> There is a proposal that we use envelopes 'sponsored' by a bank with whom we
> have an affinity partnership arrangement. This involves the envelopes having
> their logo printed on them. Do you agree that this is direct marketing? The
> fact that no invitation to buy goods or services is involved is not relevant
> as far as I could see.
Hi Gail,
The exasperation is not with you it is because there will always be reasons
why you should not do something. There are never reasons why you should do
something. Get my drift?
Oh for Pete's shake just use the envelopes if it keeps your bosses happy :-)
If some silly moron wants to complain use a pigeon and its droppings next
time you want to send them mail.
I mean quality writting paper has the logo of the firm patterned on the paper.
I guess that is banned too. Ordinary envelopes sometimes carry the brand of
the company that makes them. Banned too.
Ban me too. I carry an advert at the footer of my message ('cause I am a
geek) and when people joined the list did not get an option to tick not to
receive the footer of my message.
We should also ban ...
Between you and me and noone else listening just do it. Most franking
machines place adverts. I mean a stamp with the Queen's head might constitute
advertising (promotes a brand and a way of life).
:-)
Positive response or what?
Charles
==============================================
Charles Christacopoulos, Secretary's Office, University of Dundee,
Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Tel: +44+(0)1382-344891. Fax: +44+(0)1382-201604.
http://somis.ais.dundee.ac.uk/
Scottish Search Maestro http://somis2.ais.dundee.ac.uk/
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|