The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature states the following:
"Article 51a:-Optional Use.-The name of the author does not form part
of the name of a taxon and its citation is optional, although
customary and often advisable."
In my opinion, for zooarchaeological purposes it is not necessary to
use the authority name in most cases. In some cases where there is a
question of identification and the possibility of new forms being
described, then it is definitely advisable. If the systematics of a
form is in a state of uncertainty, then you might cite an author or
authors whom you are using as authorities for your use of
nomenclature and let the reader sort things out from there, if it is
not critical to your argument.
Richard Meadow
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|