JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  2000

PHD-DESIGN 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: If I don't read the books do I deserve a PhD in Design?

From:

"VanDerLem, Paul" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

VanDerLem, Paul

Date:

Fri, 8 Sep 2000 14:30:58 +0100 (BST)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (132 lines)

Dear Paul

	Your email stirred me in as far that I want to 
reassure you. Your reading should be specific to the 
problem identified if you want to do a research PhD. That 
includes subject matter specific data and research 
methodologies. If however you want to do a professional 
doctorate then indeed a more universal list of set text 
will be crucial.

The contrast between the two types of doctorates is not 
always recognized in different countries which use 
different traditions to define doctoral standards. Basically 
professional doctorates were invented in the 13the century, 
based on scholarly tradition and civic needs. The research 
doctorates date from the 19th century and were invented in 
the north German and Swiss university tradition. Your own 
supervisors may be able to explain these polarities 
of position further.

Just help you to identify my position in the argument on 
PhD work: I am a graphic designer but have been a Dean of 
Faculty of Art, Media and Design for a decade. I did my PhD 
fifteen years ago. I am a full research professor at UWE in 
Bristol and hold also several visiting professorships in 
Asian Universities. My research group is a leading 
recipient in funded research grants for the creative 
professions in the UK, and I have completed several 
successful research degrees supervisions. I wish you the 
best with your work.

Paul van der Lem


On Fri, 08 Sep 2000 01:02:05 -0700 "Paul M. Gutherson" 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> The discussion on a ‘canon’ or core texts for design PhD students is an 
> interesting one. As a current PhD student I thought I would throw my 
> hat into the ring.  I have to say that I am, depending on my mood, in 
> turn uneasy about the idea or extremely excited by the idea.  After the 
> original message from Dick I sat waiting with tremendous anticipation 
> for people’s suggestions but I was also filled with trepidation - what 
> if I haven’t read these texts (or even worse never heard of them) does 
> this make my research less valuable? will I not be accepted into the 
> community? am I some kind of fraud  - an interloper into the world of 
> design?
> 
> As you may gather I like the idea that there could be a small set of 
> texts that provide a starting point from which students can set out on 
> their journey but I am at the same time disturbed by the possibility 
> that this would lead to a narrow conception of design, of suitable 
> areas for research, of acceptable methods for research, and of 
> acceptable ‘types’ of people who are allowed to conduct this research.
> 
> Please let me explain further.  I am currently in the process of 
> preparing a paper for a conference on interdisciplinary research.  My 
> basic argument is that as design (as a practice) is interdisciplinary 
> design research ( or the ‘discipline’ - ‘the study of’ as Terry 
> helpfully defines it - of design) is also interdisciplinary.
> 
> I am using brief case studies from 4 PhD students in the design area to 
> support this idea.  In terms of the subject matter that these students 
> have had to develop an expertise in only one student identified 
> specific areas of design specialism, two mentioned design in a generic 
> sense and the other did not mention design at all.  I do not want to 
> make too much of this, as I said the case studies were not particularly 
> ‘in depth’, however it started me thinking.
> 
> I began to consider a number of things.  I have an understanding of 
> design as being a core human activity that impinges on most aspects of 
> human life.  If this is so then ‘design’ can be studied from the 
> perspective of these aspects of human life, not just from the 
> perspective of design.  In other words I see design research as context 
> specific.  It is perfectly legitimate to investigate design as an 
> educator, an ergonomist, an economist, a sociologist or whatever.
> 
> What I am saying is this. Is it really necessary for a PhD student (as 
> opposed to an undergraduate) to read certain texts on design - sure 
> they need to have some appreciation of what design is and where it has 
> come from but would you have allowed them to start a PhD if you thought 
> they did not already have some understanding in this area? - AND - if 
> they do not read those books do they still deserve a PhD in Design? 
> Surely in a PhD it is the 'philosophy' that is tested not the 'design'. 
> 
> The real moments of discovery will come from what the student brings 
> from outside of design - that is their understandings of other subject 
> areas (and life) that they apply to the study of design.  I look at 
> myself and my background, I think about a number of contributors to 
> this discussion and I wonder is it their understanding of design that 
> informs their critiques and analyses of design or is it their knowledge 
> and understanding, their critical application of things ‘outside’ of 
> design?
> 
> I guess if I try and sum all this up what I am really saying is - I 
> believe in pluralism and diversity, inclusivity, serendipitous 
> discovery and cross fertilisation.  So by all means come up with a list 
> of texts ( a handful or an intricate web) but beware the idea that 
> alongside a list comes an expectation that they should all be read by 
> every PhD student (besides that would mean that all the supervisors 
> would have to go and read them too!).
> 
> Cheers, Paul 
> 
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> P.M. Gutherson
> [log in to unmask]
> Tel: 01782 294669
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>                                                      __
>   Advanced Research Institute              /  \     |    |   )
>   School of Art & Design                  ____ \     __ /
>   Staffordshire University               /      \   |    \   |
>   Stoke on Trent, ST4 2XN, UK          _/       _\ _|    _\ _|
> 
>   tel +44(0)1782 294602 fax +44(0)1782 294873 [log in to unmask]
> 
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> 

----------------------------------------
VanDerLem, Paul
Email: [log in to unmask]
"University of the West of England"



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager