JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ECONOMETRIC-RESEARCH Archives


ECONOMETRIC-RESEARCH Archives

ECONOMETRIC-RESEARCH Archives


ECONOMETRIC-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ECONOMETRIC-RESEARCH Home

ECONOMETRIC-RESEARCH Home

ECONOMETRIC-RESEARCH  2000

ECONOMETRIC-RESEARCH 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

HT, AM and BMS instrumental variables for panel data with static , regressors (fwd)

From:

R Martinez-Espineira <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

R Martinez-Espineira <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:34:17 +0100 (BST)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (100 lines)


Dear all:

I would like to ask for help on the following.
>
> When one uses panel data and needs to resort to Fixed Effects
Estimation (FEE)
> the problem arises that some of the regressors might not vary in time
and,
> therefore, they are "wiped out" by the transformations involved
> in the FEE (as these consist of finding the "within group" variation
of the
> regressors).

A solution proposed by Hausman and Taylor (1981), HT, suggest
substituting in a OLS
model the problematic variables with instrumental variables that are
assumed not to
be correlated with the fixed effects. The HT estimator requires that the
number of
exogenous time-varying variables to be greater than the number of
variables X1,
that are both endogenous (and are therefore correlated with the fixed
effects,
which invalidates OLS analysis) and static (so they are swept away when
more
conventional methods are used to isolate them from the fixed effects).

This problem happens often when we analyse labour supply data and we
find that the characteristics
of people (race, schooling, gender) do not change for each individual,
but whose effects are
interesting to estimate.

Amemiya and MaCurdy (1986) (AM), and Breusch, Mizon and Schmidt (1989)
(BMS)
suggest the use of additional instruments that are valid under
increasingly
restrictive exogeneity conditions. These additional instruments add
explanatory
power if there is a variation in time of the correlation between the X1
= exogenous
and time-varying regressors  and Z2 = static and endogenous regressors.

My understanding is that there would be no gain if the set Z2 is empty.
Is there?
Should I expect the estimates to be very similar but different... should
I expect
the t-ratios to decrease ...as I go from HT to AM and BMS? or should the
three
estimations yield exactly the same result if Z2 is empty so that it
cannot play any
role?

I would appreciate any comments on this.

Rober

The references mentioned are:

Hausman, J. and W.E. Taylor (1981) “Panel Data and Unobservable
Individual
Effects.” Econometrica. Vol. 49, No. 6, p. 1377-1398

Amemiya, T. and T.E. MaCurdy (1986) “Instrumental-Variable Estimation of
an
Error-Components Model”. Econometrica. Vol. 54, No 4, p. 869-880

Breusch, T.S., G.E. Mizon and P. Schmidt (1989) ”Efficient Estimation
Using Panel
Data.” Econometrica 57, No. 3, p. 695-700




--
======================================================================
Roberto Martinez-Espineira
Environment Department
University of York
Heslington
York  YO1 5DD

Tel:    +44 (0)1904 434067
E-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Webpage:   http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~rme103/webpage1_htm.html
======================================================================

Quote of the day:

"Let us so live that when we come to die even the undertaker
 will be sorry"
 --Mark Twain





%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager