JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives


CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives


CAPITAL-AND-CLASS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Home

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Home

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS  2000

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Marxism v's Democracy

From:

"steve.devos" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

steve.devos

Date:

Sun, 02 Apr 2000 22:10:12 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (155 lines)

See below...

David Tehr wrote:

> Here's a question for EVERYBODY.   If you do NOTHING ELSE in reply to this
> debate, at least send your estimate/answer to this one question in.   My
> estimate is that the apex of the bell shaped curve for the answers will be
> out by a standard deviation of 3 or more!!!
>
> QUESTION:  Of the Bills that go to a multi-party Senate Committee for
> review in the Australian Federal Parliament, what percentage will
> subsequently pass through both Houses of Parliament UNOPPOSED (i.e.
> everyone assents to the Bill)???
>

No idea... estimate 60% - depends on the electoral system - usually opposed
means every election.

>
> >Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 01:21:38 +1200  Noel Cheer wrote:
> >.........  Keep your poMo options open and, with Kuhn, be prepared to
> >jettison a paradigm if a better one presents itself.
>

Doesn't follow -  consider any religion...

>
> OK, bee-in-bonnet time .....   OR, "something that's been nagging me for 15
> years and I just HAVE to share with this discussion group to see what sort
> of response it gets."
>
> My passions are law and politics.
>
> [Premise #1] You can think/believe/feel what you like, but, in the end we
> are all SOCIAL animals/souls, ergo we HAVE to live TOGETHER.   Ostracism =
> death.
>

The problem however is that we are social beings who define ourselves against
something other. Hence we do not have to live together but only within our own
social group. (Ignoring here the pupose of politics)

>
> [Premise #2] To live together (reasonably) peacefully, we need:
> (i)     laws, and
> (ii)    a system of government to administer (or, where appropriate, to
> change) those laws WHICH IS ACCEPTED BY ALL THE POPULATION (i.e. to be
> "legitimate").
>

Doesn't follow - We are subjects and as such we are subjected to the laws
created by govenments.

>
> [Premise #3] There are many examples of what have been seen as perfectly
> legitimate laws in the past which would now be seen as risible at best -
> and inhumane or even evil at worst - and that this process of reviewing
> (and changing) what are legitimate laws will continue until Doomsday.
> Since this happens continually through the life-span of a citizen, it is
> accepted as a natural process of law.   HOWEVER, since "a system of
> government" does NOT change so frequently, there is far more
> emotional/historical/cultural investment in whichever system of government
> a citizen lives under, THUS a change in this will require a "change of
> paradigm" in their thinking.
>
> I put forward as examples, reforms to the Westminster Parliamentary system
> that the 19th Century British "Chartists" were fighting for, viz:
> Universal Suffrage
> Every man can stand for election to parliament
> Parliamentarians to be paid a salary
> Secret ballot
> Equal electoral boundaries
>
> All of these reforms were initially seen as ridiculous/unworkable/too
> expensive/utopian/dangerous etc,
> or-any-number-of-other-"rationalist"-put-downs.   And yet, TODAY, they are
> ALL seen as FUNDAMENTALS (or, as I like to say: "Canons of the Faith") of
> "democracy", that most revered "system of government".
>
> [Premise #4] An important part of living together is having shared cultural
> festivals/commemorations/celebrations, to recognize/solemnize/edify that
> which is important to us as a community.
>
> [Premise #5] These festivals inevitably happen on an annual basis. (In
> relation to the sacred, one cannot imagine celebrating
> Easter/Passover/Ramadan etc every 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc year.  Likewise
> secularly, one would not celebrate birthdays, anniversaries etc similarly.)
>
> [Premise #6] In a democratic system of government, our most "communally
> sacred duty" is the secular act of voting.
>
> [Conclusion] The Chartists had a "vision" or "paradigm" for how democracy
> could and should work.   There is one more reform they promulgated which,
> as yet, has never been implemented anywhere in the world, viz:  ANNUAL
> GENERAL ELECTIONS.
>
> [Discussion]
> LEGITIMACY: All incorporated bodies must, by law, have an AGM whereby
> shareholders can review the workings and administration of the corporation.
>   Why, as equal shareholders in our respective nations, do we not get the
> same opportunity?
>

The idea of treating a democractic state as a limited stock company, chortle -
I suspect that you have not worked for a long period of time in a transnational
corporation.

>
> STABILITY: Working with the Westminster system of a Government (which is
> based on having a strong and encouraged alternative Government - NOT lots
> of small parties, as with Italy) there is no danger of instability
> (Aoteoroa NZ may be a challenge here!)   Indeed, the very process of
> HOMEOSTASIS requires the "body" to react swiftly (but not violently or
> rashly) to changing circumstances in order to remain "stable".
>
> COST EFFECTIVENESS: Money = energy.   The political process so often seems
> divorced from our "real concerns", ergo people complain about how much
> elections cost.   However, the facts are that a Federal election in
> Australia (which is held at the whim of the Prime Minister) costs far less
> than $10 per voter (this INCLUDES electioneering costs).  An Annual General
> Election, with a fixed date each year, MUST cost even less.  If you believe
> that $10 per year is still too much to pay, then thee & me have VERY
> differing ideas as to the benefits of elections!

Given such short term electoral cycles I suspect that politics would be
completely trivialised and no long term structural planning would take place.

>
> EDIFICATION: If we are truly to call ourselves a "democratic nation", what
> are we doing to educate/inculcate/celebrate democratic principles,
> processes and structures to our youth, let alone ourselves?   It never
> ceases to amaze me what ignorance there is in my community about the very
> fundamental things which govern our lives.   I have seen every Prime
> Minister in Australia since 1974 referred to as being "just like Hitler";
> the percentage of people who even know WHO their local Member is (let alone
> which party they belong to) is frightfully low; a large proportion of
> people believe that things would be so much better if only "the politicians
> in Canberra would get together and stop fighting about things" - which
> gives an indication of how out-of-touch they REALLY are with what happens
> in their own governing legislature.
>
> I will answer the question I posed at the beginning in 2 weeks time.
> Please try to answer it as you BELIEVE it to be (if you KNOW the answer,
> all well and fine, but DON'T go researching it).   Politics is the art of
> the possible.   I'm wanting to check-in as to people's PERCEPTIONS before
> clouding the issue with facts.
>
> In love and peace,
> David Tehr
> Perth, Western Australia



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager