JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives


CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives


CAPITAL-AND-CLASS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Home

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Home

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS  2000

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re:AUT: Capital is wrong

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 9 Mar 2000 18:08:14 -0500 (EST)

Content-Type:

Text/Plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

Text/Plain (44 lines)

I'm sorry if this post get to you twice  -  I am new here and don't know the technique. But I tried to say:

>>> George Pennefather <[log in to unmask]> 09-03-00 19:37:57:
>To say that the "wealth of those societies presents itself as an immense accumulation of
>commodities" is not true. Much of the wealth is in the form of industrial capital which is
>not capital in the form of the commodity. This mistaken premise renders the validity of
>making the commodity a starting point questionable on that basis.

Hello

This statement from George ignores a series of points and demonstrates ignorance of the actual history and inner logic of Karl Marx's project concerning 'the critique of political economy':

1. In the first place is was not Marx, but the 'classics' of bourgois political economy who realized the commodity- and money-production to be the foundation of capitalism. All their (Smith, Ricardo etc.) efforts was aimed at understanding the comodity-based production as determining factor for all other phenomenons and 'problems' of capitalist wealth. This was actually the 'progressive honesty' of classical political economy.

2. In that period of up-comming and 'progressive' capitalism the phrase was in fact self-evident for everybody. The proces of initial and violent accumulation of capital seperated the proletariat as non-owners of everything execpt their potentials as wage-labourers, i.e. of wage-labour as single commodity confronted with all other necessary items of life as commodities accumulated by others. This is in fact still the basic of capitalism and experienced hardly by the wast majority of the world population.

3. In that period of capitalism the appearences of crisis took the 'plastic' form of simple overproduction of commodities not finding any buyers on the market  -  excactly "an immense accumulation of commodities". On the sufface of things capitalism coming into crisis openly revealed its basic problem on the simple field of the market, i.e. problems with the immediate realisation of overproduced commodities on an unregulated market.

4. Marx himself saw the historical change of capitalism through different phases and the following/constituent (from viewpoint) changes in the apperance of 'wealth'. Capital developed its forms of ownership, organisation and operation historically from small personal ownership over large industrial or commercial firmovnershops towards capital-ownership through loan-capital, banks and even bigger financial constructions. M. folloved these developments of capitalism and foresaw even state-capitalism as the ultimate tendency of the processes of competition, concentration and centralisation of capital.  -  These phenomenons was to M. not contradictions to the original start of analysis from the commodity-form of 'wealth', but on the contrary only explicable on this line of systematic 'exposition' (Darstellung) of the inner logic of capitalism.

5. In later development of capitalism the tendencies observed and basicly explained by Marx have of course went much futher and changed the apperances of things a lot. "Finance-capitalism", "monopoly-capitalism", "state-capitalism", "mixed economy" etc. have together with a series of technological 'revolutions' in the spheres of material production and distribution changed the world radically. But from the 'marxist' point of view the basic analysis and critique of 'political economy' holds all the way: commodity is the basic form of 'wealth', money is the visual and powefull form of the commodity and capital is  -  in whatever its fantastic appearence  -  the absolutely unpersonal and selfvaluating monsterform of commodity.

6. The basic focus of Marx's analysis on commodlty, money and capital (in its basic and single form  (Das Kapital im allgemeinen) is not only 'scientifically' and historically consistent, but is also the revolutionary perspective: in explaining the roots of capitalism in commodity-production it is at the same time pointed out clearly (against all sorts of utopian and/or reformist socialists and anarchists), that the basic task of overthrowing capitalism is the abolition of commodity-production at its root  -  i.e. the seperation and alienation of abstract social labour from concrete usefull labour or wage-labour.

I will stop it here, but conclude in another direction:

George's remark reveals complete unfamiliaty with the historical tradition of 'marxism'. I could suggest a long list of readings, but ...

Instead I wil suggest George to read "Das Kapital" some more and use some time to actually understand the methodology and inner logic of the complete analysis.

With greetings.
JH

Kurasje - Council Communist Archive
http://kurasje.tripod.com
[log in to unmask]


---------------------------------------------------
Get free personalized email at http://www.iname.com


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager