JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ARCHIVES-NRA Archives


ARCHIVES-NRA Archives

ARCHIVES-NRA Archives


ARCHIVES-NRA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARCHIVES-NRA Home

ARCHIVES-NRA Home

ARCHIVES-NRA  2000

ARCHIVES-NRA 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

RE: A Business Archives SIG for the Society of Archivists?

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:05:47 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (153 lines)

As an SRG Committee member I can best answer this one. The SRG's membership
is currently in the region of 550, which is around a third of the Society.
Its membership consists of archivists from a variety of sectors. The largest
body represented are university archivists, the audience which the SRG was
originally set up to serve, and for which is still has an emphasis. As far
as I can tell, business archivists in the SRG number around 75.  I do not
know how many others would be in the RMG.
The SRG's particular focus these days is on archivists working, often alone,
in small, poorly resourced repositories. Obviously, this does not account
for all its membership, and I have been wondering of late whether someone
from my environment is best suited to represent SRG members (there are,
incidentally, no archivists from the academic sector currently on the SRG
Committee, whereas until recently there were at least 3 business archivists,
including the Secretary and one of the two Chairs). Also, whether the SRG is
the best vehicle to represent me within the Society as a business archivist,
given the size and scope of its membership.
None of this is meant to be a criticism of the SRG. As a committee member
for the past few years I am hardly in a position to criticise. Susan Snell
and David Prior whilst co-Chairs have done a terrific job to promote the SRG
community and its wider concerns, most significantly perhaps in securing a
British Library grant to undertake a mapping exercise of specialist
repositories which would otherwise have been completely overlooked in the
similar surveys of national and local authority archives. Members surveys
that we have undertaken suggest that the SRG is widely appreciated, and the
fact that it is still growing confirms this. Quite simply, the SRG has come
to be seen as the natural home of archivists who do not work in the public
sector (this is again reflected in our feedback).
Recognising its increasing size, and concerned to better represent members
outside the south east, the SRG has recently set up a network of regional
representatives to feed back issues into the Committee. It has been
suggested that, rather than having a regional organisation, the SRG instead
should have one based around the sectors in which its members work. In this
scenario, there could be a Business Records Sub-Group of the SRG, and others
for universities, historic houses etc. I have been asked to raise this at
the SRG AGM, but I have to say that a distinct Business Records Group seems
to be the preferred option of most people I have spoken with.  It would be
interesting to learn of others' views on this.
I have rambled somewhat, but in short I do not believe that the SRG would
unduly suffer by the setting up of a Business Archives Group (BRG),
particularly if some archivists from the universities put themselves forward
to serve on the committee (gentle hint). In any case, there is nothing to
prevent people from belonging to both groups, which would be my personal
intention if the BRG gets off the ground.
As to the geographical spread of members, London is inevitably a focus for
many people because of ease of access, even if they do not actually work
there. However, I would suggest that commercial pressures mean that there is
more likelihood of business archivists working outside London than those in
the public sector.

David Hay
Group Archivist
British Telecommunications plc
* 020 7492 8799
*  020 7242 1973
* [log in to unmask]
http://www.bt.com/archives/




> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Helen Osborn [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent:	Wednesday, February 09, 2000 3:13 PM
> To:	[log in to unmask]
> Subject:	RE: A Business Archives SIG for the Society of Archivists?
> 
> I think in general this is a good idea and I like the idea of uniting all
> of
> us who work with business archives in both public and private sectors.
> 
> How denuded would the SRG be if all the business archivists left to join a
> new group?  Would the new group have a majority of members in London to
> the
> detriment of those further away? (I am thinking of travel to meetings,
> etc.)
> 
> Helen Osborn
> Archivist & Records Manager
> Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C.
> The Ram Brewery, Wandsworth, London SW18 4JD
> e:mail - [log in to unmask]
> Tel: +44 20 8875 7000 Fax: +44 20 8875 7100
> Reg. No. 32763 England
> Web site (including map): http://www.youngs.co.uk/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Jeannette Strickland
> [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent:	Wednesday, February 09, 2000 11:33 AM
> > To:	[log in to unmask]
> > Subject:	A Business Archives SIG for the Society of Archivists?
> > 
> > Dear Colleagues,
> > 
> > As business archivists we feel that we constitute a distinct and growing
> > community within the Society of Archivists whose views are currently
> > under-represented.  Until now, archivists such as ourselves may have
> > attempted to find a voice within the Society through either the SRG or
> > RMG, both of which do sterling work within their specialised areas. 
> > Neither, however, was originally set up to encompass business archives
> > and, as a result, our influence has been unfocused and muted.
> > 
> > We further believe that there are sufficient issues specific to any
> > professionals who care for business archives, including those in the
> > public sector, such that there is a need for a Specialist Interest Group
> > within the Society.  In this way we can have an input into matters that
> > directly affect us and ensure that the problems and needs of our sector
> > are fully understood.  This message, therefore, is a means of sounding
> out
> > likeminded colleagues.
> > 
> > This proposal is not intended as a criticism of the Business Archives
> > Council or the Business Archives Council of Scotland.  These bodies do a
> > splendid job for business archives in general and their owners, users
> and
> > practitioners as a group.  However, they do not provide a suitable forum
> > in which business archivists can meet to discuss their problems and
> > concerns, and neither should they.  Such a forum should surely be within
> > our professional association, not an external body.
> > 
> > The proposed group should be seen as complimenting the work of the BACs
> > and other specialist interest groups in the Society, whilst providing a
> > vital plank in the development of the Society of Archivists and the
> > profession in general.  It would provide a forum for all professionals
> who
> > have business archives in their care, and thus unite archivists from
> local
> > and central government, museums and universities, with core business
> > archivists.
> > 
> > Please publish expressions of interest or contributions on list, or send
> > to one of the following:
> > 
> > Jessie Campbell, Barclays Group Archives (e-mail
> > <[log in to unmask]>)
> > Helen Ford, BG Group (e-mail <[log in to unmask]>)
> > David Hay, BT Archives (e-mail <[log in to unmask]>)
> > Nigel Hardman, Alliance & Leicester Group Archives (Fax: 0151-966 2831)
> > Jeannette Strickland, Unilever Archives (e-mail
> > <[log in to unmask]>)
> > 
> > 
> > ***OUR APOLOGIES FOR ANY CROSS-POSTING***
> >  << File: ATT00082.ATT >> 


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager