Dear All,
I offer a few facts to clarify this matter, which is of some concern to
myself as incumbent of the Wigan post for many years until July 1999.
Until 1990 Wigan Record Office was staffed by two professional posts,
the Archivist (SO grade) and Assistant Archivist (Scale 5). The Office
was then combined with the existing Museums and Local History Library
sections to form a new Heritage Service (see current advert), the
Archivist becoming Heritage Service Manager. Following the opening in
1992 of the History Shop in Wigan (a combined local studies/genealogy
library/museum/art gallery) and consequent reallocation of staff and
resources, the Record Office in Leigh was staffed by the Assistant
Archivist with some clerical support. Opening hours were reduced and
the Assistant Archivist [myself] worked one day per week at the History
Shop.
Upon my departure in 1999 the post was degraded to Scales 3-5 in order,
I suppose, to bring it into line with the curatorial posts (four of the
seven Heritage Officers were Museums staff); I do not know what scale
my successor was appointed on, but at any rate my interpretation of the
current advert (my successor having recently departed), is that
unqualified candidates may be considered at Scale 3. Presumably the
Society assumed or was assured that qualified candidates would be
appointed on at least Scale 4, though I suspect this is by no means the
case. My recollection is that museums curators undertake their
professional qualification whilst in post, thereby moving up to Scales
4 and 5.
Bearing in mind that Wigan is one of the oldest and most respected of
the ten Metropolitan archives services in Greater Manchester, holds
collections of national importance and is one of only two diocesan
repositories in the former County, it is from a purist's point of view
regrettable that the professional standing of this post has been
compromised and that the Society has accepted the current advert. On
the other hand I think the Society should be offering help and
constructive advice to Wigan (and other authorities where similar
circumstances have arisen - Salford springs to mind) so that its
archives policy can move forward.
Nicholas Webb
Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays Group does
not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views
or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the Barclays Group.
|