JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DC-PROVENANCE Archives


DC-PROVENANCE Archives

DC-PROVENANCE Archives


DC-PROVENANCE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DC-PROVENANCE Home

DC-PROVENANCE Home

DC-PROVENANCE  October 2011

DC-PROVENANCE October 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: W3C developments: Provenance WG data model

From:

Paul Groth <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Paul Groth <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:51:07 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (46 lines)

Hi Tom,

I was wondering in the Dublin Core view of the world whether being a 
doman model is a good thing or not?

A note on complexity, I believe the core PROV model is fairly straight 
forward but there is complexity that helps to address a number of other 
use cases. I think as a working group we can do a better job of 
presenting the PROV-DM in a simplified fashion. We're working on it but 
obviously would love the DC's input on ensuring that it is simple and 
that it interacts well with Dublin Core.

Thanks,
Paul

-- Paul Groth, co-chair W3C Provenance Working Group

Thomas Baker wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The W3C Provenance WG has published a working draft [1]:
>
>      The PROV Data Model and Abstract Syntax Notation
>      W3C Working Draft 18 October 2011
>
> Ivan Herman, in a blog post [2], characterizes this as "a core data model for
> provenance for building representations of the entities, people and processes
> involved in producing a piece of data or thing in the world".
>
> To me, the model [3] looks pretty complicated and specific -- the sort of model
> one would design for a particular application profile...  In the terms of
> Singapore Framework [4], I'm wondering if this model is fundamentally different
> from a "domain model" defining the basic entities of an application profile?
>
> Tom
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2011/10/18/first-draft-of-a-provenance-data-model-published/
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/overview.png
> [4] http://dublincore.org/documents/singapore-framework/
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the DC-PROVENANCE list, click the following link:
http://jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=DC-PROVENANCE&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2013
October 2013
August 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
November 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
June 2010


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager