Hi All,
Sorry for the short notice, but I need to cancel the KAP conference
call scheduled for tomorrow. I've developed a nasty cold and with
the end of the year rush I have little report anyway.
Can we reschedule for Jan 24? Please let me know.
Jan 17 and Jan 31 are also options.
-John
--- On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, John A. Kunze wrote:
> Please mark your calendars for our next KAP call December 20
> at the usual time.
>
> 6am California (John, Adrian)
> 8am Chicago (Charles), Texas (Bill, Jane)
> 2pm UK (Pete)
> 3pm Berlin (Tom)
> 10:30pm Adelaide (Jon)
>
> Notes from today's call have been posted to the wiki and are
> included below. Please make additions and corrections on the
> wiki or send them to me.
>
> -John
>
>
> ---- Notes from 2007.11.29 KAP Task Group Conference Call ----
>
> * Reminder of new mailing list: [log in to unmask]
>
> * Discussion of Jane's parallel writing system followup; interesting implications seen for the evolution of the Kernel spec, but with no known impact on the Kernel Application Profile
>
> * Review of KAP draft V1.0, as follows:
>
> * Adrian walked group through the document, noting that much of the structure was due to the Simple Dublin Core AP from which it had been copied
>
> * A number of terms (eg, Language and URI constraints, Literal vs non-Literal) and features (Creator Max Occurs = 2?) were not well-understood and will require some homework
>
> * Discussion of Tom's email, acknowledgement that when mapping Kernel to DC, there must be an indication of when a Kernel element refines a DC element; the use of "ark:" as a namespace in Tom's example is probably misleading
>
> * Question of whether we're working on a Kernel or an ERC application profile; answer is that both the Kernel and the ERC supply constraints; now the question is what to call it -- eg, continue using "Kernel Application Profile"?
>
> * Action items: Charles will look into how to apply an RDF Schema; Adrian will push out another draft after followup with Tom
>
> * The group's next call will be Thursday, 20 December for 60 minutes
>
> === Attending: ===
> Charles Blair, Jane Huang, Adrian Turner, John Kunze
>
>
> >
> > > ---- Notes from 2007.10.25 KAP Task Group Conference Call ----
> > >
> > > * Adrian and John to create strawman application profile (AP) using the Kernel term URIs defined in the Kernel spec
> > >
> > > * Bill suggested (again) that we need to clarify whether it is the ERC or the Kernel that is the subject of the AP; discussion resulted in an understanding that the AP must comprehend constraint and/or prescription from both; the Kernel dictates value rules for any Kernel elements that appear while the ERC dictates that "this object description will contain four specific Kernel elements at a minimum"; it is not yet clear what impact this has on the AP or on naming (eg, should we be working on an "ERC AP" instead of a "Kernel AP"?)
> > >
> > > * Adrian seeking to understand ("eliminate from our enquiry") whether the AP can be created by simply mapping Kernel to DC and then pointing to the "Simple DC AP"; [ simple Kernel profile linked now from wiki http://knowware.nada.kth.se/DCWiki/SimpleDublinCore ]
> > >
> > > * Specification status: published as Internet-Draft [after removing the confusing instance-erc story]
> > >
> > > * Action items: group to look over and comment on Jon Mason's slide, Adrian's crosswalk; Jane to comment on parallel writing system requirements; John and Adrian to produce strawman
> > >
>
|