On 12/05/2018 02:00, jp d wrote:
> i have to use mmCif format for my structure.
> pymol, phenix and molprobity seem ok with it.
> as i try to fix issues with coot i run into problems
> every residue seems to have the same number
> -2147483647 which confuses me and also i think confuses
> this is coot version 0.8.9
> any suggestions ?
> forgive me if there is a coot place to email this question.
There is a place to ask coot questions (a jiscmail mailing list like this one).
Without details, I imagine that there is a discrepancy between _atom_site.label_seq_id and
_atom_site.auth_seq_id - you should be using the latter for coot. mmCIF files from the wwPDB work as
expected. I wonder how your was generated.