This is just a reminder of the scientific meeting on Multiple Imputation held on Tuesday 4th December. Registration is required - the event is free to RSS Fellows with a £25 registration fee for non-Fellows. Further details can be found below and on the event page on statslife:
The RSS Medical Section is hosting a scientific meeting on Multiple Imputation on Tuesday 4th December in London. It will be held at 15 Hatfields, Chadwick Court, London, SE1 8DJ from 3pm - 6pm. Please note the venue is not at the RSS.
It has been exactly 40 years since the seminal paper introducing multiple imputation to handle the problem of missing data was published. Since then, this approach has led the way in developing principled statistical methodology to address this problem. In this session we aim to bring together state of the art developments in multiple imputation research in the area of medical statistics. In particular, we will also look at the use of Multiple Imputation beyond RCTs. The session speakers comprise some of the world leaders and experts in the field.
The programme of the scientific meeting is as follows (titles and abstracts of the talks can be found at the end):
Meeting title: Multiple imputation 40 years on, where are we now?
Organiser and chair: Robin Mitra (Lancaster University)
15:00 - 15:40 Ian White (University College London)
15:40 - 16:20 Tra Pham (University College London)
16:20 - 16:50 Break for refreshments
16:50 - 17:30 James Carpenter (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL) and Suzie Cro (Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London)
17:30 - 18:00 Panel discussion
Registration is required - the event is free to RSS Fellows with a £25 registration fee for non-Fellows. For more details and to register please see the event page on statslife:
The session will be preceded by the AGM of the Medical Section at 14:50 (at the same venue) all are welcome to attend.
Title and abstracts:
Ian White (University College London)
Title: Multiple imputation: the universal panacea, and its limitations
Abstract: Ian will review some of the developments in theory and software that led to multiple imputation being seen by some people as a universal solution to missing data problems. He will then explain why it isn’t, discussing alternatives to multiple imputation, difficulties of imputing multilevel data, and avoiding the untestable missing at random assumption.
Tra Pham (University College London)
Title: Population-calibrated multiple imputation for a binary/categorical covariate in categorical regression models
Abstract: Multiple imputation (MI) has become popular for analyses with missing data in medical research. The standard implementation of MI is based on the assumption of data being missing at random (MAR). However, for missing data generated by missing not at random (MNAR) mechanisms, MI performed assuming MAR might not be satisfactory. For an incomplete variable in a given data set, its corresponding population marginal distribution might also be available in an external data source. We show how this information can be utilised in the imputation model to calibrate inference to the population by incorporating an appropriately calculated offset termed the "calibrated-δ adjustment". We describe the derivation of this offset from the population distribution of the incomplete variable and show how, in applications, it can be used to closely (and often exactly) match the post-imputation distribution to the population level. Through analytic and simulation studies of a binary/categorical covariate in categorical regression models, we show that our proposed calibrated-δ adjustment MI method can give the same inference as standard MI when data are MAR, and can produce more accurate inference under two general MNAR mechanisms. The method is used to impute missing ethnicity data in a type 2 diabetes prevalence case study using UK primary care electronic health records. Calibrated-δ adjustment MI represents a pragmatic approach for utilising available population-level information in a sensitivity analysis to explore potential departures from the MAR assumption.
James Carpenter (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL) and Suzie Cro (Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London)
Title: Sensitivity analysis for missing trial outcomes: what can it do for you?
Abstract: Missing outcome data are almost inevitable in clinical trials, for example due to inter-current events such as treatment withdrawal, treatment switching or loss to follow-up. In such settings, the analysis can only proceed on the basis of an untestable assumption about the missing outcome data. In applications, it is therefore important to understand the robustness of conclusions to a range of plausible assumptions about the distribution of the missing outcomes.
In this talk, we outline two approaches for this: (a) reference based imputation, where missing outcomes are imputed by reference to other patient groups , and (b) eliciting expert opinion on the distribution of missing values and incorporating this in to the analysis . For each approach, we discuss the assumptions made about the missing data, implementation using multiple imputation, and give an illustrative application. We conclude with a discussion of the pros and cons of each approach, and how they may be used to address some of the challenges raised by the ICH-E9 addendum on estimands.
 Cro, S., Carpenter, J. R. and Kenward, M. G. (2018) Information-anchored sensitivity analysis: theory and application. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A. https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/rssa.12423
 Mason, A. J., Gomes M., Grieve, M. Ulug, P., Powell, J. T. and Carpenter J. R. (2017). Development of a practical approach to expert elicitation for trials with missing health outcomes: application to the IMPROVE trial. Clinical Trials, 14, 357-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774517711442
You may leave the list at any time by sending the command
to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank.