Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

## SPM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK

#### View:

 Message: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] By Topic: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] By Author: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] Font: Proportional Font
 LISTSERV Archives SPM Home SPM May 2010

#### Options

Subject:

DCM Input specification

From:

Date:

Wed, 12 May 2010 16:20:59 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

 text/plain (31 lines)
 ```Hi,  I have three questions pertaining to DCM in SPM8. (1) When specifying the inputs for a DCM analysis, what is the appropriate way to specify inputs that vary over different levels? Should the first level design matrix contain parametric modulators for certain factors? If so, are both the non-modulated stick functions from (Sess.U.u(33:end,1)) and the parametric modulators be included (Sess.U.u(33:end,2)) or would it be just the parametric modulators? I'm leaning toward the latter but I'm not sure if the non-modulated stick functions are needed for part of the DCM analysis. (2) Consider a situation where an event varies along more than 1 dimension. Let's call the event A and the dimensions 1 and 2. I could then create a design matrix with all events A and two parametric modulators for A1 and A2. (This would make three columns A A1 and A2) Would it then be correct to do something like specify the inputs A1 into one region and then the inputs A2 into another region even though the events occur at the same time. The hypothesis to be tested would be that dimension 1 is processed by one region and dimension 2 is processed by another. Is this the appropriate way to set something like this up? (3) Why are the first 32 time bins dropped from the time series as can be seen in the code of spm_dcm_specify:        U.u = [U.u Sess.U(i).u(33:end,j)]; Thanks in advance for your help. Ryan Haynes ```