JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  2000

PHD-DESIGN 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Design Knowledge

From:

Klaus Krippendorff <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Klaus Krippendorff <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 02 Oct 2000 19:51:51 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (141 lines)

rosan,

i don't think you need to apologize for asking a question that goes out of 
hand -- in your opinion.  it is the nature of good questions that their 
answers are unexpected and lead to new questions.

i would say you are very right in talking about what designers need to know 
to be able to do what they do.  i prefer the verb knowing to knowledge as 
the latter has the connotation of abstract certainty whereas the former has 
to do with a knowing that is embodied in practice -- which is not to say 
that we couldn't talk of it.  but you are correct that this knowing is 
different from the knowledge that science provides.

your observation that knowing a process that changes reality is also 
changing in the process of altering that reality (i.e. designing) is very 
profound too and should not be dismissed too lightly.

i have to go somewhere and need to apologize for ending abruptly here but i 
hope that the thread will go through other conversations.

klaus

At 07:44 AM 9/29/00 -0400, Rosan Chow wrote:
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; x-mac-type="54455854"; 
>x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
>X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by 
>mailout1.mailbase.ac.uk id NAA05795
>
>Hi Tim, Håkan, Bryn, Chris, Terrence, and Dick
>
>Thank you very much for your comments and questions; without them my 
>growth will
>be slow. Having said that, I feel that there are some misunderstandings 
>about what
>I wrote due to my inadequacy in articulating my thoughts, I am sure.
>
>I read about what I wrote a few times to see how it could have caused these
>misunderstandings. I realize that I need to make it clear that when I wrote
>"another way of obtaining knowledge", I didn't mean it exclusively but rather
>alternatively.
>
>I don't think the 'what if ' question is unique to design and I don't 
>think I have
>said that either. When I said 'what if' is the favorite question for 
>designers, I
>didn't mean that is the only question that can only be asked by designers.
>
>I apologize for the sloppy reference that I made to Bruce Archer's idea of 
>design
>with the big D as a generic and domain independent way of knowing. (see Design
>Studies 1979 Vol 1 (1): 17-20) By citing him, I thought I covered the ground
>without needing to go further to explain that this way of knowing exists in
>scientific inquiry, management, arts, etc, etc. My fault. But as I said, I 
>was not
>sure the 'no name' knowledge is this either.
>
>When I wrote that "I have this strange notion that this 'no name' 
>knowledge is not
>to be known but to be designed. I know that it sounds crazy for 
>'know'ledge is to
>be known, but ... has it to be?", I was not advocating that design can't be
>understood by other ways of knowing, I was just thinking if there is an
>alternative way to seeing knowledge.
>
>The what, how and why of design can be known and take the form of 
>philosophy of
>design, history of design, sociology of design, pyschology of design, design
>studies, design science, design technology, there is no doubt that they 
>all can
>add to our understanding of design. But what about Design of Design?
>
>A little context may help to further explain myself (or may not): I have an
>interest in social problems and I always want to find out what I as a 
>designer can
>make a contribution to reduce some of these problems. I have a particular 
>one now
>that I am dealing with which is about condom use promotion among adolescents.
>
>Since I was involved in this problem, I have been constantly asking myself 
>how I
>can make sure my inquiry into the problem is distinct from how social 
>scientists
>are investigating it and how design research can complement social scientific
>research to reduce a social problem. And how in the end, I can make an 
>original
>contribution to knowledge.
>
>So I have been searching for deficiencies in the social research done in this
>area, from philosophical underpinnings, research methods, to actual 
>intervention
>and evaluation. I have been critical, as needed for research; but I think this
>style got carried over and muddled the tone of my last posting and made it 
>come
>across as being full of design or myself.
>
>In the process of analyzing my research problem, I had this diagram 
>depicting two
>parallel channels of inquiry to address the problem of condom use, one is the
>scientific one and the other is the design way. And of course, I have not
>conceptualized fully what this design way is or can be. The pairs are
>Sciences-Design,
>Scientific research-Design research, and Scientific knowledge - Design 
>knowledge.
>I was trying to identify how design knowledge can be distinctive from 
>scientific
>knowledge and I realized by making that distinction, I was already 
>limiting myself
>to what this knowledge may be.
>
>I was staring at the diagram when a bunch of questions came to my mind:
>
>1 What exactly is design knowledge?
>2 If the nature of design is change, then how can design knowledge be grasped?
>3 Does design knowledge exist in design-in-action?
>4 Does design knowledge have a form? Can it?
>5 Can we really know design if design is in the space of 'can be'?
>6 How can we define the nature of design knowledge if 'it' doesn't exist yet?
>7 By defining what design knowledge is, do we limit what it can be?
>8 What kind of design knowledge will we have if we follow the traditional 
>path of
>research?
>
>I have exhausted myself and I am not sure if I am making better sense, 
>maybe it is
>nonsense after all. But they are real and sincere thoughts, your time and 
>patience
>are greatly appreciated.
>
>Best Regards
>Rosan
>
>
>
>
>
>



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager