JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  December 2008

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING December 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Bio

From:

tina gonsalves <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

tina gonsalves <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:50:29 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (93 lines)

Thanks for inviting me to be part of this months discussion.

Since 2003, I have been looking at how we can use the ‘emotions’ of  
the body to drive moving image and experiences that both provokes,  
exposes, and empathizes with the audience. It took a few years to  
gather the research team which I felt was needed to in order to become  
further empirically informed to monitor, assess, and provoke the  
emotional body in more ‘intelligent’ and ‘meaningful’ ways.  Since  
2005 I have been resident at the Wellcome Department of Neuroimaging  
at Queensquare, UCL currently working with social neuroscientist Chris  
Frith whose work deals around the neural basis of social interaction.  
For a year I have been visiting artist at the Affective Computing  
Group at the MIT Media Lab, mostly working with Ros Picard and Rana El  
Kaliouby whose research looks at designing technologies and models to  
assess and communicate affective-cognitive states.  I am visiting  
artist at Brighton and Sussex Medical School, mostly working with  
chair of psychiatry and long term neuroscientific collaborator Hugo  
Critchley whose work sits around the brain/body mechanisms of emotions  
with a focus on the autonomic integration with emotion, as well as  
neuroimaging and psychosomatic medicine.  I also work with the Human  
Computer Interaction Center at UCL, particularly Nadia Berthouze – who  
specialises in emotion/HCI. This provides a really fertile ground to  
explore my work around the emotional/empathic body. Currently my works  
looks to the research and limitations in neuroscience and affective  
computing to drive new types of art experiences.

When I say assessing the body in ‘intelligent’ ways, I wanted to work  
with neuroscientists to assess the data emitted by the body, to  
understand how it relates to a feeling state of the participant, and  
match this information to drive more meaningful moving images (not an  
easy task - in the past i had taken a more intuitive approach). In  
some cases, this means testing the image and physiological responses  
to the images in the lab. Also, often the interaction design of these  
bio-sensing works means that the viewer had to be constrained, dressed  
in obtrusive technology to monitor the body which effects the emotions  
of the body (applying the sensors often causes the body to become more  
anxious). Most emotion recognition systems and sensors have been  
developed by academia and industry, tending to be used in labs, and  
therefore not aesthetic, bulky and not naturalistic in their  
interactivity. They are also problematic to work with in public  
exhibitions (breakdown after a few days of constant use…).  
Alternately, the consumer devices are often not robust enough to  
monitor the subtleness of the physiological responses (but over the  
last year are getting better). Body movement, the enormous variability  
of physiological data sets across multiple participants, and  
restraining the natural interaction of the audience create  
difficulties! By working with affective computing scientists, human  
computer interaction specialists and neuroscientists, the aim is to  
research and develop more naturalistic, robust and transparent  
monitoring techniques. We are looking at existing technology, adapting  
it, building a more transparent interface between participant and  
artwork. (http://www.tinagonsalves.com/interactive.html).

  Also, by ‘meaningful’  - artists often use ambiguous generative  
abstract moving images or sound to respond to the data of the body. I  
know pulsating circles or shifting colours to represent emotion may  
generate a sense of meaning due to its ambiguity, but I was more  
interested in working with scientists to produce more figurative and  
emotionally narrative based video works that could engage, reflect and  
provoke the feelings of the viewer. Most visual emotion research  
databases used in emotion neuroscientific studies, such as The  
Karolinska, The Ekman and the International Affective Picture System  
(IAPS) have been created in labs, informed mostly by scientists, not  
artists. From an artistic viewpoint, they are mostly visually  
underwhelming and often clichéd. We have built a range potent visual  
stimuli databases to provoke emotional responses which have been used  
in a range of experiments.

  With the scientists, we are hoping that creating ‘labs’ outside of  
labs, with stronger visual stimuli, in more naturalistic environments  
will create more robust and potent data to understand emotions. Most  
of our empirical understandings and mappings of emotions, come from  
with in labs, which I wonder, if what we view to be ‘neutral’, is not  
a ‘baseline’ of anxiousness? The lab is a difficult environment to  
relax in. For our team, a great work is one that becomes a range of  
experiments in the lab while also becoming an art experience. When  
working in the lab, we need to work in coding the scanners can  
understand (limitations), and work in time formats that suit the lab/ 
scanning technology. The exhibition output has its own difficulties -  
the work is often built in a progression of prototypes to fully  
understand the concept that umbrellas the complex balance between  
sensing methods, audience experience, architectural space, sound and  
image. Most curators are a little apprehensive of using exhibitions as  
more of a lab to create ‘testing opportunities’ to gather audience  
evaluation, space to test the technology, and artist reflection.

  Anyway, sorry about the length of this…will stop.



tina gonsalves
http://www.tinagonsalves.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager