JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  December 2008

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING December 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Bio

From:

Kristina Höök <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Kristina Höök <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:41:46 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (105 lines)

Hi everyone,

I am also really looking forward to this discussion - and in  
particular, I am keen to discuss the value implications and the  
dualistic perspectives (separating mind and  body) that many of the  
bio-sensor, health- or sports-monitoring systems enforce. In my view,  
many of them make us see our own bodies as objects or machines that  
can be trimmed, controlled, kept in balance - separate from ourselves,  
our dreams, our experiences of being in the world, in our bodies. I  
think this connects to Hannah's idea of relating to something else  
than the "objective".

In my own work, we have been trying to use bio-sensors to connect  
scraps and bits of our everyday bodily experiences to various social  
events in the world and our own accounts of what has been going on. We  
have tried to create a systems that do not tell the user what they  
have experienced but instead provide materials to reflect on.

An example from my group is the Affective Diary system: http://www.sics.se/interaction/projects/ad/
Another example is the Affective Health system: http://affectivehealth.blogspot.com/

In short, both systems logs users' movements (accelererometers) and  
arousal (GSR). Affective Health also logs pulse. These data are then  
representated back to users in evocative shapes, forms and animations  
that do not *tell* users what they are experiencing, but are open- 
ended "surfaces" that they can inscribe meaning into in various ways.
A lot of people really like our systems, but there are also those  
(mainly academics who have not used the system) that object to them,  
feeling that it is sad that we should have to have technology to  
communicate with ourselves. They fear it is a kind of prosthesis and  
that it distances ourselves even more from our corporeal experiences.

My question is therefore: is it possible to use bio-sensors and create  
for embodied interactions that relate to our whole selves - subject/ 
object, body/mind, rational/irrational - and what would that mean? And  
am I right in claiming that a lot of existing systems convey a  
conceptualisation of the world that makes us think of the our own  
bodies as objects rather than our lived embodied experiences?

Anyway, this was a very brief introduction of what I find fascinating  
in this field. Before writing tons more, I look forward to seeing more  
of what others have been thinking of relating to this field.



Yours,



Kristina Höök

(currently a visiting researcher at Microsoft Research, normaly  
working in the Mobile Life centre at Stockholm University)



On 3 dec 2008, at 19.07, Hannah Drayson wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the prompt Adinda, I'm really looking forward to seeing  
> what this discussion will bear.
>
> I'll begin by giving a little background and some concerns-
>
> My experiences with biosignals began about 2 years ago, when I  
> joined Transtechnology Research as a Doctoral Researcher.
> Beginning in 2007 I attended an eNTERFACE workshop hosted by  
> Bogazici University, Istanbul where I worked as part of a group  
> investigating and experimenting with biosignals, sharing knowledge,  
> and finally performing with the systems/works we had produced.  
> Miguel - also a participant on this discussion was there also.
> About a year ago my department acquired a Nexus-10 clinical  
> biofeedback unit which I have been using for signal acquisition for  
> real-time sonification and visualization experiments and  
> performance. If anyone has any questions about the technical aspects  
> of all this I'll happily expand - perhaps off-list.
>
> However, my major research interest is more generally focused on  
> philosophical and theoretical questions regarding technology and  
> medicine. My thesis, currently under construction, begins by  
> attempting to disentangle technological devices from scientific  
> notions to ask how creative uses of technologies might be able to  
> provide something other than 'objective' accounts.
>
> The current situation regarding the availability of these  
> technologies is very interesting in terms of creative practice  
> because of the current interest in these devices, and the increasing  
> availability of cheaper products for signal acquisition, analysis  
> and visualization. One issue for me - although not possibly a  
> particularly original one - is related more generally to the  
> artistic "re-purposing" of technologies (although this happens just  
> as much in the sciences) and the question of how these technologies  
> might be expanded upon and modified or reinvented by artists.
>
> Best
> Hannah

Kristina Höök
[log in to unmask]

Professor at Stockholm University
Lab manager at SICS
Leads Mobile Life center: www.mobile-life.org

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager