On 9/21/11 11:22 AM, "Josh Howlett" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>Well, you can make a guess at service names to URI by taking the service
>>as a scheme. And generating service://host as a URI. That happens to
>>get a fairly high hit rate for generating valid URIs. It's not perfect
>>obviously: you get host://hostname instead of ssh://hostname for
>>example.
>
>Sam, are you suggesting that you believe a URI is already being exposed to
>the SP?
No, he's just saying it's not a stretch to come up with them.
They don't actually have to be "valid" URIs, just syntactically reasonable
and predictable (or configurable). The code just wants to be able to split
it apart into scheme, host, port, and path because that's how the mapping
process works.
-- Scott
|