JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION  September 1996

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION September 1996

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Textual Representation Group

From:

"Murray McGillivray" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 6 Sep 96 17:07:24 MDT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (166 lines)

The following message is being widely posted.  Please forgive me if
you receive multiple copies; please copy to listservs and newsgroups I 
may have ignored but that you know would be interested.

Below you will find the Draft Terms of Reference of a new Working 
Group formed this spring.  Most of the tasks listed were discussed as 
desiderata at the physical sessions of the Electric Scriptorium conference
in Calgary (November 1995), and the initial members of the working 
group were attendees at that conference.  We have since been joined by 
prominent textual scholars and members of the international text-encoding 
community.

The draft terms of reference are being posted to several different scholarly 
lists for comment.  We would appreciate it if you would post your comments
to [log in to unmask] (normal listserv subscription procedures 
apply: send a single-line message, 
SUBSCRIBE SCRIPTORIUM <Your Name>  to 
[log in to unmask]   before attempting to post to the list).  
We are especially interested to hear from people who think that our plan 
(or some part of it) is badly thought-out or just a bad idea.
We also would welcome new members and  offers of assistance.

Murray McGillivray

University of Calgary

______________________________________________________

 
DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE
WORKING GROUP ON ELECTRONIC REPRESENTATION OF 
HANDWRITTEN AND PRINTED MATERIALS

Preamble:  The Working Group on Electronic
Representation of Handwritten and Printed Materials has been
formed to devise standards and guidelines to be used by
scholars who wish to prepare electronic editions, textbases,
image-bases, or other electronic objects which have as a
purpose the exact representation of a physical print or
manuscript of whatever form, period, language, or script. 
Significant work has been done towards this goal by the Text
Encoding Initiative in its guidelines published in 1994
(hereafter "P3").  There remain, however, several areas
which the Text Encoding Initiative did not have the time or
resources to explore fully.  Chief among these is the area
of exact bibliographic description, with respect to which P3
explicitly solicits further work, but there are other areas
where P3 is either merely suggestive or where it gives too
many possible answers, so that scholars may, fairly
arbitrarily, make completely different decisions about
essentially similar problems, with resulting incompatibility
between what ought to be compatible projects.  

The primary focus of the new Working Group is the exact
electronic representation of physical books (and other
printed or handwritten materials), a focus both narrower
than and different from the main goal of P3.  It is
therefore not so much a continuation of the TEI effort as it
is a new initiative, which will, however, aim for
compatibility with the TEI recommendations wherever
possible.    

Draft Statement of Goals:   The Working Group sees a need
for standards both for text-file representations and for
graphics-file representations of printed and handwritten
materials, since it is clear that scholars can make use in
different ways of electronic transcriptions or encodings of
physical prints and manuscripts and of electronic images of
those prints and manuscripts.     

Some goals are certain to emerge in the course of the work. 
However, there are a certain number of goals that the
Working Group adopts explicitly from the beginning:  

For text-files:  

1.  To devise standard encodings for the most common of
those marks used by European and American scribes and
printers that are not contained in modern standard character
sets (such as brevigraphs, ligatures, and variant letter
forms) in the form of SGML-type entity sets.  These entity
sets would supplement the work of the Text Encoding
Initiative and serve as a resource for scholars using P3 for
transcription of manuscript or print materials.  

2.  To recommend procedures for scholars whose encoding
needs are not met by the entity sets mentioned in 1).  

3.  To devise standard ways, likely using SGML-type tags, of
encoding structural and other features of physical books and
documents that do not fall under a strict definition of
"text," such as: page layout; font, script or hand;
condition of the carrier or ink; relationship of leaves,
quires, signatures, etc. to one another; interlineal or
marginal annotation; damage, whether affecting the text or
not; and so on.  Many of these features are treated
suggestively in P3, but not considered as fully as the
working group intends to do.  

4.  To develop appropriate definitions describing the
possible relationships between the tags in the proposed
tag-sets. The new encoding procedures should be as
compatible as possible with the work of TEI:  a DTD fragment
should be developed that will make documents encoded using
the new tags TEI-conformant, and further DTD fragments or
other encoding strategems should be developed that will make
it possible for encoders to combine tags from the existing
TEI sets with tags from the proposed set(s) within the same
document without loss of structural information.  

5.  To develop a standard procedure for referencing a
graphics file from a text file when the graphics file
contains an image of the page that is transcribed in the
text file.  

For graphics files:  

1.  To develop for graphics files containing images of
printed or handwritten pages a standard text header that
would specify such things as: bibliographic information,
page of book, copy number, library where kept, size, and so
on of original the image is of; by whom and how the image
was created (camera or other device, lighting used, method
of digitizing, etc.); what transformations it has undergone
since digitized and who was responsible (resizing,
compression, dithering, adjustments of colour, etc.); the
format of the image (e.g. GIF, TIFF); copyright information
for the image where relevant.  

2.  To recommend standard ways of indicating within a
graphic image itself the size and colour of the original it
is a picture of.  

3.  To recommend standard ways of referring to precise
locations or areas within a graphic image of a printed or
handwritten text.  

4.  To develop a standard procedure for referencing a text
file from a graphics file when the graphics file contains an
image of the page that is transcribed in the text file.  

5.  To investigate and if possible recommend on ways of
annotating images by attaching text files or other graphics
files  to them.  

6.  To recommend standard methods for mutually referencing
several graphics files when those graphics files are images
of successive pages of a single book or manuscript, and for
indicating the relationships between: images of pages that
succeed one another; the images of the two sides of a leaf;
images of pages related by membership in a gathering or
signature; and so on.  

7.  To investigate ways of assuring the integrity of images
contained in graphics files, so that users can be reasonably
certain that they are working with images that have not been
altered without their knowledge. 







%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager