> > The comment in
> > http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-description says:
> > Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract,
> a table of
> > contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the
> > resource.
> > On that basis dcterms:description is *not* limited to being
> a literal.
> OK, but then surely dcterms:abstract should be a literal?
Possibly. I guess that is a question for the Usage Board. I don't
recall our discussions about dcterms:abstract, though I'm sure we had
A brief look at the UB Wiki - http://dublincore.org/usageboardwiki/ -
doesn't indicate that it is currently being thought about.
Head of Development, Eduserv Foundation
[log in to unmask]
+44 (0)1225 474319