Thanks Celine, and to Alan for that helpful outline yesterday. I have left my original choice of editor in the record as well.
What I'm noticing in the non-MARC template is that we have those editor names appearing in the creator (19.2), other p,f, cb (19.3) and contributor (20.2) fields. I'm still feeling a bit unsure about how to use those. Does anyone have any comments?
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of C.J. Carty
Sent: 25 October 2012 10:04
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] Day 2 - record 6
Here is my record for title 6, looking forward to another day of discussions. I did all of today's titles using the MARC template, though I must say I think I found the RDA template easier to use.
Questions in this record for me: 1) The edition statement - did others consider "UK edition" to be an edition statement? 2) I've obviously decided to transcribe all the editors and also provide access points for them all.
3) Relationship designators - after Alan's helpful email and all of yesterday's discussions on this, I'd need to see the contents page to make a decision here between "editor" and "editor of compilation" but feel fairly happy that they're not "author". I've left my original choice of "editor" in the record.
Cambridge University Library
Cambridge CB3 9DR
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer