JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CEPHAD Archives


CEPHAD Archives

CEPHAD Archives


CEPHAD@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CEPHAD Home

CEPHAD Home

CEPHAD  November 2017

CEPHAD November 2017

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

CfP - The Poster - Issue 5.1- Lies, Damn Lies and Alternative Truth

From:

Simon Downs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Simon Downs <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:15:16 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (54 lines)

Dear CEPHAD Members
This is the Second Call for Papers
Issue 5.1- Lies, Damn Lies and Alternative Truth

Introduction.
The Poster, the journal of rhetoric in the public sphere,  is making a call for: 
• Papers, Artist / Designer Monographs
• Image and Photo Essays
• Reviews
• Opinion Pieces: from a variety of subject areas and interdisciplinary perspectives 
With the aim of developing new understandings of the on the subject of the mechanisms and operation of: 
Alternative Truth, Outright Lies, Spin and Propaganda in the Age of Putin and Trump; told through visual rhetorics.  

Context
Civil society finds itself living in the the (Trump) Tower of Babel. We inhabit an increasingly divided society, divided through a lack of a common worldview, with communication technologies promotinh the daily creation of alternative canons of truth with the ease of a child's kaleidoscope making patterns. 
This facile and joyful fecundity in social myth making brings deep problems for traditional political communication, because as Habermas notes: 
'Every act of reaching mutual understanding is confirmed by a rationale consensus; otherwise it is not a "real" act of reaching understanding, as we say. Competent speakers know that any de facto consensus attained can be illusory; but their basis for the concept of an illusory (or simply forced) consensus is the concept of a rationale consensus. They know that an illusory consensus must be replaced with an actual one if communication is to lead to mutual understanding. As soon as we start communicating, we implicitly declare our desire to reach an understanding with one another about something. If consensus―even about a difference of opinion―can no longer be reasonably expected, communication breaks down.' 
(p. 450 (Truth and Seeing from Preliminary studies in the theory if communication action (2001) from Theorising Communication. 2007))
In this world of floating values the hope for political consensus of the Habermas model seems to be receding into the Net.
What does this mean for communicators, designers, artists, theorists and propagandists when our rhetorical barbs lose their edge through simple miscomprehension? When disbelief in the shootings at Sandy Hook is replaced by a belief in the Bowling Green Massacre, how will political communication happen? 

Call
Areas of interest for studies of visual political communication include (but are not limited to):
Is a social disconnect with the normative narratives that mass communication depends on rendering propaganda speechless?
Is the rise of the Digital Public Sphere killing consensus politics, or saving us from a weight of overbearing myths?
Does the disruption of large scale mono-cultures by online communities mark an end for 20th century models of mass propaganda? 
Are the subalterns taking control?
What happens to informed democratic systems when the rulers and the ruled fundamentally inhabit different worlds, shaped by different idea.
Universal Translators: Are there communications methods that can speak across the divides? 
Can we Mass Customise political communication to speak the same truth, in different tongues, to all audiences at once?
The relationship between culture and technology has shaped political communication since the time of the Sacra Congregatio de Propaganda Fide, and now emergent communications tools have widened the grasp and increased the reach of a political message. The rise of the Net has given individuals and small groups the same grasp and reach as the largest power-block: and the possibilities for technically mediated political communication keeps growing.
More than timely, it has become imperative, for researchers to examine the complex interplay between the means and methods of political communication and the possibility of a normative consensus in the political world.

Details
Multimodality is a key element to understanding the use of images in combination with other forms of mediated communication. We therefore encourage scholars from both social and political science, as well as cultural studies, arts, and communication studies, to submit proposals for work for publication. The journal is looking for: 
Full papers of 7000-9000 words plus illustrations on the issue’s theme (for double blind peer review). Rich illustration of the text is welcomed. Theoretical papers as well as methodological discussion are welcome, but preferably in combination with empirical analysis of imagery. Case studies, comparisons across culture, or historical studies are invited.
Artist / Designer Monographs. Extended scholarly pieces addressing the issue’s theme (for double blind peer review). 10000 – 25000 words plus extensive illustrations.
Image and Photo Essays composed of illustrations, photographs, diagrams or schematics that use visual languages to communicate their point of view on this edition’s themes. Textual support may be added, if it is felt necessary.
Reviews of relevant books, exhibitions and political gatherings (the editors would be more than happy to publish a good review of the U.S. Republican or Democratic party conferences, a Congressional investigation, or a demonstration).

Timeline
Initial Abstracts/Statements of Intent (250 words) due Friday 15th of December 2017. Selected contributors will be informed in the following week. 
Full manuscripts due Monday 19th of February 2018.


Simon Downs
Lecturer in Graphic Communication
School of Arts, English and Drama
Loughborough University

Lead Editor of The Poster
Editor of Tracey
Director of the Drawing Research Network
Rep’ for the University and Colleges Union 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
September 2015
February 2015
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
June 2012
May 2012
March 2012
February 2012
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
May 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
August 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
April 2005
January 2005
October 2004
July 2004
May 2004
April 2004
December 2003
November 2003
September 2003
May 2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager