Or conversely, irrespective of the ‘tensions between modes (conceptual, popular, avant) things (i.e. poetry) will still happen and develop’.
I can’t really believe that these abstract entities are in the least bit necessary for generating poems.
> On 2 May 2018, at 02:01, Luke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I mean 'the future of poetry' doesn't have to be a thing, as long as there are still tensions between modes (conceptual, popular, avant) things will still happen and develop, etc.. It's the soggy undifferentiated mess that would disappoint.