JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BRITARCH Archives


BRITARCH Archives

BRITARCH Archives


BRITARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BRITARCH Home

BRITARCH Home

BRITARCH  July 1998

BRITARCH July 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Fw: A depressing state of affairs

From:

"James G. Gibb" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 30 Jul 1998 21:53:20 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (77 lines)

Fellow Britarchers:
If what Paul Spoerry says is true, allowing for even a little hyperbole,
British contract archaeology is in deep trouble. Private sector
archaeology is a business, and businesses often opt for smaller profit
margins for the opportunity to work on high profile projects. If you run
year after year without a profit, you aren't a business. And you
certainly aren't going to land and optimally exploit high profile
projects.

Competition is part of business in a capitalist society. Theoretically,
those firms that can produce the best products at the lowest prices
survive. But competition isn't just a matter of trying to underbid other
firms. It's about building client lists and developing local
constituencies. In archaeology, it's about working the 'rubber chicken'
circuit (giving dinner talks to local organizations), publishing in
local newspapers, publishing in historical and archaeological society
journals, and taking active, leadership roles in those societies. It's
about showing clients innovative ways to use archaeology to promote
their projects. And--and this is where the underqualified fall by the
roadside--it's about showing clients, review agencies, and the public
how even the smallest of projects can yield interesting insights into
the past.

Business is far more than waiting for the next brief or request for
proposal to come down the pike, hoping you can outbid other firms.
Seizing opportunities is important, but I think it more important that
we create our own opportunities. My undergraduate mentor told me that
cultural resources management, or contract archaeology, was going to be
a flash in the pan and that I should focus on creating my own niche, my
own market if you will. Well, his prognostication was way off base.
Contract archaeology has become big business in the USA, a far cry from
what it was in the 1970s. But his advice? Given the time and
inclination, I could put an accurate, precise value on it, and I have
done rather well by it. (No Mike, there will be no royalties.) Demanding
increased government control and subsidizing may help a little in the
short run, but as American automobile manufacturers learned in the
1980s, you can't make cars with steering wheels on the left and expect
to sell them to customers who want them on the right.

One other thing in what already as been an all too long posting.
Business people, whether as a personality trait or as a facade, are
positive, can-do kinds of folks. Long faces and grumbling over low pay
scales will do little to establish a rapport with them. I think it is
very important when dealing with clients that I make clear that I am an
ethical professional (a redundant phrase) and I am a businessman who
expects to make his worth. I also make it clear that I am there to help
them comply with the law. Balancing professional and business ethics and
priorities can be tough. But hundreds of thousands of soils scientists,
geologists, physicists, physicians, etc., do it every day of the week.

Jim Gibb
Annapolis, Maryland  USA

[log in to unmask] wrote:
> 
>      Just a quick response to James G Gibb's interesting view on this
>      subject (depressing state, developer-funding, public arch etc).  The
>      concept of reducing a quote and thus reducing 'profit margins' because
>      the work looks interesting is one that, although i sympathise with,
>      lies in the realm of fantasy in my experience.  I have spent virtually
>      the whole 1990s as a manager of arch projects in England, the majorty
>      developer-funded and competitively tendered.  In all that time any
>      'margin' that might have existed was used for precisely the sort of
>      worthwhile public archaeological work that other contrbutions here
>      have indicated support for.  In more recet years, as competition bites
>      deeper, i find tere are NO MARGINS and certainly nothing that could
>      ever be described as a PROFIT.  In fact all our competitively tendered
>      work is so pared down as to be close to inadequate in my view.
>      Certainly the quality of archaeology I knew in the 1980s (and i know
>      it was not all good so no comments re: selective memory please!) was
>      far higher than that regularly seen now.
> 
>      Paul Spoerry


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager