Hi Christos,
I am working with a student with similar issues. I used a commercially available single channel BCI with him which is OK for simple activities https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZC4zx8MhaY
What we found was that apart from being a binary tool (on/off) there is quite an issue with latency which really impacts on BCI's ability to be used as an input to AAC. Technologies.
There a a few companies out there who appear rto offer solutions to locked in clients including https://assistech.eu/en/c-eye-en/ https://www.eyecontrol.co.il/product/ and https://righteye.com/
All of these products have potential but also come with a hefty price tag.
I have been in touch with these guys who produce a software platform that aggregates and visualises inputs from third party sensors. https://imotions.com/ Their technology brings together BCI, galvanic skin response heart rate eye tracking and combines it to support rsearch and development via an API. I was hoping that in all of that raw data one could identify a mode of switching that would correlate with intent in a timely manner.
That said the kit is about £10K and beyond the budget and academic rigor of a small FE college. I would be happy to collaborate in any way to drive this agenda forward as I am increasingly encountering individuals for whom our exiting arsenal of kit is not doing the trick.
Paul
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the ASSISTECH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=ASSISTECH&A=1
|