JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


January 1999


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

RE: NNT or NNH

Simon, Steve, PhD

Fri, 29 Jan 1999 16:24:36 -0600

62 lines

RE: NNT or NNH

Djulbegovic, Benjamin

Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:38:15 -0500

54 lines

CASP conference announcement (fwd)

Douglas Badenoch

Fri, 29 Jan 1999 17:03:32 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

78 lines

Request for suggestions

Montori, Victor M., M.D.

Fri, 29 Jan 1999 08:05:42 -0600

52 lines

Users' Guides

Robin Snowball

Fri, 29 Jan 1999 12:46:23 -0000

15 lines

Re: Workshop about journal club

Andre Tomlin

Fri, 29 Jan 1999 10:45:59 -0000

67 lines

Any information on EBM for Ob&G folk

padmanabhan badrinath

Fri, 29 Jan 1999 02:18:16 PST

41 lines

Re: evidence based searching

N.P. van Duijn

Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:00:43 +0100

59 lines

Re: evidence based searching

N.P. van Duijn

Fri, 29 Jan 1999 08:50:30 +0100

58 lines

Re: NNT or NNH

Jeong H. Oh, MD MPH

Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:56:54 -0500

29 lines

RE: JAMA search

Montori, Victor M., M.D.

Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:01:03 -0600

22 lines

Re: JAMA search

Richard Keatinge

Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:55:37 +0000

43 lines

Re: JAMA search

Jim Walker

Thu, 28 Jan 1999 08:39:16 -0500

28 lines

JAMA search

Andrew Thomas

Thu, 28 Jan 1999 00:30:34 -0600

685 lines

Re: Octreotide: Do you use it?

Patrick J. Sousa, MD

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 19:26:26 -1000

62 lines

Re: EBM cardiology

Jim Walker

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 22:11:03 -0500

35 lines

Octreotide: Do you use it?

Janet Martin

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:11:03 -0500

40 lines

Does CQI effectively change prescribing practice?

Janet Martin

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:54:35 -0500

61 lines

Workshop about journal club

Arturo Marti-Carvajal

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:15:27 -0400

27 lines

RE: NNT or NNH

Djulbegovic, Benjamin

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:50:49 -0500

96 lines

Re: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair

Richard Keatinge

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 20:47:39 +0000

23 lines

NNT or NNH

Dave Sackett

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:50:35 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

36 lines

RE: NNT or NNH

Djulbegovic, Benjamin

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 12:40:08 -0500

35 lines

Re: JAMA issue

Simon and Jo Fitsall

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:00:03 -0000

21 lines

MetaMaps

Ricardo Pietrobon

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 10:36:01 -0500

72 lines

Re: Indexed Journals

Peg Allen

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 09:18:42 -0600

73 lines

RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH! (fwd)

D.W. OWENS

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:15:22 GMT0BST

39 lines

critical appraisal guidelines qualitative research

Mark Newman

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 13:04:22 +0000 (GMT)

35 lines

CRitical appraisal guidelines for qualitative research

Mark Newman

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:40:44 +0000 (GMT)

48 lines

RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH! (fwd)

Dave Sackett

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:26:55 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

59 lines

Re: Where are the Users Guides?

Nino Cartabellotta

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 09:29:14 +0100

59 lines

RE: Nursing diagnostic papers

Andrew Jull

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 07:56:26 +1300

91 lines

Re: NNT or NNH

David Birnbaum

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 23:49:35 -0800

41 lines

RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair

Ronald Ingle

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 09:43:53 +0200

26 lines

Re: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair

Jon Wilcox

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 06:59:05 +1300

95 lines

Indexed Journals

Ronald Ingle

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 07:29:53 +0200

28 lines

Re: RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair

Jim Walker

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:52:39 -0500

44 lines

Re: Inconsistent presentation within a journal article -Reply -Forwarded

Daryle Gardner-Bonneau

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 19:15:05 -0500

74 lines

a bit more re: JAMA

Barbara Berger

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:35:48 -0600

36 lines

RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMAaffair

Trefor Roscoe

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:45:49 -0000

66 lines

RE: JAMA

Trefor Roscoe

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:45:48 -0000

49 lines

JAMA editorial from this week

Andrew Thomas

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:45:24 -0600

258 lines

RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair

Susan Kaiser, M.D.

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:11:44 -0500

29 lines

RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair

Charles C. Engel, Jr.

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:56:59 -0500

32 lines

RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH!

Simon, Steve, PhD

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:08:21 -0600

135 lines

Re: Where are the Users Guides?

Susan Kaiser, M.D.

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:11:49 -0500

34 lines

interesting quote found this week in JAMA.....

John Thompson

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:39:19 -0000

108 lines

Re: Nursing diagnostic papers

Peg Allen

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:45:27 -0600

62 lines

New JAMA scandal comes to light.....

John Thompson

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:35:17 -0000

145 lines

Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair

Dave Sackett

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:09:55 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

60 lines

RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH!

Ted Harding

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:08:10 -0000 (GMT)

58 lines

Critical appraisal of Qualitative research for Evidence based pr

Mark Newman

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 12:42:10 +0000 (GMT)

29 lines

Nursing diagnostic papers

Karen Jones

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:21:52 GMT0BST

35 lines

NNT or NNH

Andrew Jull

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:30:20 +1300

36 lines

Re: Inconsistent presentation within a journal article

A.J.O'rourke

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:15:27 +0000

51 lines

Re: Where are the Users Guides?

Atle Klovning

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:05:23 +0100

31 lines

RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH!

<>

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 06:50:29

69 lines

Where are the Users Guides?

<>

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 22:52:13 -0600 (CST)

22 lines

RE: NNT or NNH

Djulbegovic, Benjamin

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:50:50 -0500

126 lines

Re: NNT or NNH

Peter Ellis

Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:54:30 +1100

104 lines

RE: NNT or NNH

lesley.kay

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 23:40:31 -0000

94 lines

RE: JAMA

Charles C. Engel, Jr.

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 18:24:41 -0500

42 lines

Re: JAMA

<>

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:04:23

234 lines

RE: NNT or NNH

Djulbegovic, Benjamin

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:00:44 -0500

80 lines

Re: JAMA

Susan Kaiser, M.D.

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 13:23:30 -0500

136 lines

Evidence based practice - distance learning course

Graeme Barber

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:36:43 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

114 lines

Other straws?

Dr. Scott Richardson

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:42:02 -0600

44 lines

RE: indexed journals

Nino Cartabellotta

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:27:19 +0100

46 lines

RE: Inconsistent presentation within a journal article

Albert J. Kirshen, MD, FRCPC

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 07:13:56 -0700

76 lines

RE: indexed journals

CDF

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 10:01:07 -0400

29 lines

Re: JAMA

Dave Sackett

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:47:43 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

29 lines

Re: JAMA issue

Karen Ingvoldstad

Mon, 25 Jan 1999 15:16:56 +0800

104 lines

Re: JAMA

Andrew Thomas

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:10:02 -0600

99 lines

Re: JAMA

Andrew Thomas

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 20:44:06 -0600

214 lines

Re: JAMA

Andrew Thomas

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 20:22:06 -0600

78 lines

Re: JAMA

David & Zoe Brown

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 15:22:39 -1000

40 lines

Re: JAMA

Dave Sackett

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:59:27 +0000 (GMT)

45 lines

FW: Change in Leadership at JAMA (fwd)

Dave Sackett

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:45:25 +0000 (GMT)

376 lines

Re: JAMA

Andrew Thomas

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 12:57:54 -0600

149 lines

I recommend Medscape, http://www.medscape.com.

amit ghosh

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 12:26:50 -0500

58 lines

Re: JAMA

<>

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 15:08:37

104 lines

EBM cardiology

Amit Ghosh

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 08:25:15 -0600

44 lines

Re: JAMA issue

Dave Sackett

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:03:30 +0000 (GMT)

87 lines

Re: JAMA issue

Mark Fenton

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:34:16 +0000

28 lines

Re: JAMA issue

Toby Lipman 7, Collingwood Terrace, Jesmond, Newcastle upon Tyne. Tel 0191-2811060 (home), 0191-2869178 (surgery)

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:31:39 +0000

69 lines

Re: Inconsistent presentation within a journal article

Ian Bowns

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 12:38:07 +0000

59 lines

Re: JAMA

<>

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 11:52:56

72 lines

Re: JAMA issue

Andrew Thomas

Sun, 24 Jan 1999 02:42:16 -0600

92 lines

Re: JAMA issue

Dave Sackett

Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:02:16 +0000 (GMT)

48 lines

Re: JAMA

Andrew Thomas

Sat, 23 Jan 1999 09:52:51 -0600

338 lines

Re: JAMA

Karen Ingvoldstad

Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:33:24 +0800

112 lines

Indexed Journals

Ronald Ingle

Sat, 23 Jan 1999 10:28:18 +0200

23 lines

Inconsistent presentation within a journal article

Simon, Steve, PhD

Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:54:12 -0600

59 lines

RE: JAMA issue

Montori, Victor M., M.D.

Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:41:53 -0600

135 lines

JAMA issue

Andrew Thomas

Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:40:08 -0500

242 lines

RE: Why didn't the JAMA Editorial Board resign following the sacking of george lundberg? (fwd)

Montori, Victor M., M.D.

Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:53:12 -0600

92 lines

hould we boycott JAMA?

Amit Ghosh

Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:30:43 -0600

34 lines

RE: Why didn't the JAMA Editorial Board resign following the sacking of george lundberg?

Montori, Victor M., M.D.

Fri, 22 Jan 1999 07:23:57 -0600

106 lines

RE: Why didn't the JAMA Editorial Board resign following the sacking of george lundberg? (fwd)

Dave Sackett

Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:10:03 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

70 lines

RE: Why didn't the JAMA Editorial Board resign following the sacking of george lundberg?

Dave Sackett

Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:39:14 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

56 lines

Re: JAMA

Roy Poses

Thu, 21 Jan 99 16:08:47 EST

55 lines

RE: Sacking of JAMA's editor; the irrelevance of the subject matter, and where do we go from here?

Montori, Victor M., M.D.

Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:06:19 -0600

24 lines

Re: JAMA

Dave Sackett

Thu, 21 Jan 1999 17:04:06 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

59 lines

(Fwd) examples - evidence and nursing

Mark Newman

Thu, 21 Jan 1999 16:08:51 +0000 (GMT)

70 lines

examples - evidence and nursing

Mark Newman

Thu, 21 Jan 1999 12:13:49 +0000 (GMT)

48 lines

Re:EBM & Mental Health Nursing

Mark Fenton

Thu, 21 Jan 1999 09:58:42 +0000

61 lines

Re: World Association of Medical Editors condemns sacking

<>

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 21:04:45 EST

50 lines

JAMA

Henry Barry

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 13:26:14 -0500

63 lines

negative results response to 'Arturo Marti-Carvajal'

Doggett, David

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 13:16:12 -0500

53 lines

European MSc in Health Informatics

John Bryant

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 16:46:19 +0000

49 lines

Transference Factor

CDF

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:35:01 -0400

29 lines

if you want to keep abreast of reactions to AMA's sacking of george lundberg

Dave Sackett

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 11:49:46 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

32 lines

Evidence & Mental health nursing

Robin Snowball

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 11:00:07 -0000

33 lines

Re: Klebsiella and ankylosing spondylitis

Paul Glasziou

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 20:54:47 +1000

63 lines

RE: EBM, Mental Health Nursing and peer reviewed journals

<>

20 Jan 1999 10:13:25 +0000

480 lines

Freedom of speech

Atle Klovning

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:43:31 +0100

33 lines

Still places on 1st N+Y EBHC workshop

Toby Lipman 7, Collingwood Terrace, Jesmond, Newcastle upon Tyne. Tel 0191-2811060 (home), 0191-2869178 (surgery)

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:27:51 +0000

147 lines

Re: helping our friends at JAMA

Dave Sackett

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:26:51 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

43 lines

Can we get high powers?

<>

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 08:41:35 GMT+1200

30 lines

EBM & Mental Health Nursing

Simon and Jo Fitsall

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 00:58:31 -0000

118 lines

Re: negative results

Brian Stein

Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:27:22 +1000

48 lines

Re: EBM

Mark Fenton

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 22:06:31 +0000

28 lines

RE: Negative Results

Doggett, David

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:24:59 -0500

67 lines

Klebsiella and ankylosing spondylitis

Dr Fred Kavalier

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 18:27:18 +0000

25 lines

Re: EBM

Dave Sackett

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 18:17:22 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

66 lines

Re: Negative Results

Dave Sackett

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 18:02:21 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

49 lines

Negative Results

Arturo Marti-Carvajal

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:50:41 -0400

20 lines

Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor; the irrelevance of the subject matter, and where do we go from here?

Dave Sackett

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:47:30 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

56 lines

Negative vs. inconclusive results

Doggett, David

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 11:34:52 -0500

106 lines

Re: negative results

Ted Harding

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:40:17 -0000 (GMT)

57 lines

Re: EBM

D.A.Courtney

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 12:53:51 +0000 (GMT)

587 lines

Re: EBM + mental health nursing

Dave Lloyd

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 12:52:14 +0000 (GMT)

60 lines

Re: EBM

Peter Griffiths

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 12:12:33 +0000

50 lines

Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor; the irrelevance of the subject matter, and where do we go from here?

Terry Aspray

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 11:45:46 -0000

117 lines

Re:EBM reply

Barbara BOLTON

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 10:54:38 -0000

68 lines

World Association of Medical Editors condemns sacking

Dave Sackett

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 10:03:21 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

56 lines

Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor; the irrelevance of the subject matter, and where do we go from here?

Dave Sackett

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 09:29:02 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

57 lines

Re: negative results

N.P. van Duijn

Tue, 19 Jan 1999 09:35:46 +0100

224 lines

Re: EBM

Mark Fenton

Mon, 18 Jan 1999 23:14:01 +0000

58 lines

Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)

Nicholas R Hicks

Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:43:48 -0000

54 lines

Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)

Silvia Patrick

Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:40:44 -0800 (PST)

46 lines

Re: EBM

Simon and Jo Fitsall

Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:34:39 -0000

40 lines

Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)

David & Zoe Brown

Mon, 18 Jan 1999 11:02:36 -1000

31 lines

Risk ranking of NSAID

Karen Rosenbloom

Mon, 18 Jan 1999 18:18:45 +0000

28 lines

RE: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)

Andre Tomlin

Mon, 18 Jan 1999 14:59:58 -0000

32 lines

RE: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)

Jordi Gol

Mon, 18 Jan 1999 14:10:02 +0100

34 lines

protocol for COAD#2 ready for review

Dave Sackett

Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:06:43 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

43 lines

Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)

Dave Sackett

Mon, 18 Jan 1999 11:45:20 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

83 lines

Meeting on food safety

Michele Panunzio

Sun, 17 Jan 1999 10:27:36 +0100

48 lines

Negative Results

Arturo Marti-Carvajal

Sat, 16 Jan 1999 13:30:04 -0400

37 lines

Re: TV News and EBM

Amit Ghosh

Sat, 16 Jan 1999 10:08:38 -0600

85 lines

Evidence based teaching of EBM/EBHC

Dr. G. Mustafa Soomro

Sat, 16 Jan 1999 12:15:26 -0000

38 lines

JOB: Research fellow at the University of York, UK

Alison Eastwood

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 15:52:43 +0000

28 lines

Re: negative results

Ted Harding

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 15:22:31 -0000 (GMT)

178 lines

Re: negative results

Dave Sackett

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:38:27 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

127 lines

Health Statistics Users Group

Alison Macfarlane

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:36:03 +0000 (GMT)

109 lines

RE: negative results

N.P. van Duijn

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 15:16:43 +0100

75 lines

Re: negative results

Peter Griffiths

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:52:23 +0000

47 lines

RE: negative results

jenny keating

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 23:30:32 +1100

69 lines

Short Course: Survey Data Analysis II 27-29 January 99

Nyovani Madise

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 11:16:43 GMT

105 lines

Re: Negative Results.

Kath McPherson

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:52:12 +1300

39 lines

"Hospital Without Walls" Conference - 24 - 26 March 1999

<>

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:48:22 -0000

1147 lines

Re: Negative Results.

Dr. Paul Kamill

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:36:59 -0000

92 lines

Re: negative results

Peter Griffiths

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:05:33 +0000

55 lines

RE: TV news and EBM

S.Mola

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:37:31 +0100

43 lines

Where is Sam Wiebe? (about presenting ordinal scales)

N.P. van Duijn

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 08:38:19 +0100

26 lines

Re: TV news and EBM and brain tumors missed

N.P. van Duijn

Fri, 15 Jan 1999 08:29:07 +0100

131 lines

adjusting for statification

Sean Keenan

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:52:16 PST

47 lines

Re: TV news and EBM

Gaetano Lombardo, PT

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:57:40 -0500

68 lines

who wants articles against EBM?

Dr Trisha Greenhalgh

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:18:23 -0800

41 lines

RE: negative results

Simon, Steve, PhD

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:35:24 -0600

72 lines

Re: TV news and EBM

Susan Kaiser, M.D.

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:50:40 -0500

90 lines

TV news and EBM

Amit Ghosh

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 12:31:16 -0600

39 lines

Re: Negative Results.

Richard Morris

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:15:57 +0000

56 lines

Re: Negative Results for meta-analysis

Peter Griffiths

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:08:36 +0000

50 lines

negative results

John Stapleton

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:33:46 +0000

64 lines

Re EBH

Rowena Clayton

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:32:24 +0000

22 lines

RE: Negative Results for meta-analysis

Montori, Victor M., M.D.

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 11:29:38 -0600

70 lines

Re: Negative Results.

Peter Griffiths

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:59:41 +0000

37 lines

Re: Negative Results.

Dave Sackett

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:00:04 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

47 lines

RE: EBM

Henry Barry

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 08:37:33 -0500

62 lines

Lecturer post in Social Science and Medicine (clinical or non-clinical)

Dr Adrian Renton (Social Science and Medicine)

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 12:35:07 +0000

62 lines

Re: EBM

Dave Sackett

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 09:18:24 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

46 lines

EBM

<>

Thu, 14 Jan 1999 09:16:50 +1100

25 lines

Re: 'Seprafilm' bioreabsorbable membrane

Deborah Chase

Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:27:15 -0500 (EST)

73 lines

Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia

Katherine Schneider, MD

Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:38:58 -0500 (EST)

48 lines

epid_shift: New subscription address

Dr. Harshad Thakur

Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:09:31 +0530

45 lines

EVIDENCE BASED MANAGEMENT

<>

Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:54:47 +0000

43 lines

Re: Negative results in observational studies

Fujian Song

Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:27:24 +0000

129 lines

Re: Negative results in observational studies

Arturo Marti-Carvajal

Wed, 13 Jan 1999 06:10:36 -0400

100 lines

Negative results in observational studies

padmanabhan badrinath

Tue, 12 Jan 1999 20:25:38 PST

84 lines

anthelmintic drugs

Michele Panunzio

Tue, 12 Jan 1999 21:34:41 +0100

48 lines

Teniae

Michele Panunzio

Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:29:11 +0100

50 lines

Re: Negative Results.

Fujian Song

Tue, 12 Jan 1999 12:07:36 +0000

72 lines

Re: The WWW and patient recuitment for RCTs

Ben Toth

Tue, 12 Jan 1999 11:47:27 -0000

96 lines

Workshops in software for qualitative analysis - NUDIST and ATLAS.ti

SDG Associates

Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:01:08 -0000

45 lines

osteoporosis bulletin

Sophia Bird

Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:39:34 +0000

32 lines

Re: Negative Results.

N.P. van Duijn

Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:23:40 +0100

62 lines

Organisational culture and EBM

Dr Trisha Greenhalgh

Mon, 11 Jan 1999 12:36:02 -0800

52 lines

RE: Negative Results.

Simon, Steve, PhD

Mon, 11 Jan 1999 12:23:59 -0600

87 lines

Bibliographic software and the EBH mailbase

Richard Hancock

Mon, 11 Jan 1999 18:01:40 +0000

17 lines

Guidelines to help report studies evaluating health prom

Martin White

Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:47:26 GMT0BST

68 lines

FW: Delivery failure!

<>

Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:23:57 +0000

59 lines

Re: two questions

Paul Krueger

Mon, 11 Jan 1999 08:29:34 -0500 (EST)

42 lines

Quantitative Research-short courses

Karen Pilkington

Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:27:00 +0000

21 lines

Radical Statistics TWENTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE (fwd)

Alison Macfarlane

Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:32:09 +0000 (GMT)

189 lines

Negative Results.

Arturo Marti-Carvajal

Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:11:26 -0400

31 lines

New discussion list epi_shift

Dr. Harshad Thakur

Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:07:39 +0530

44 lines

Re: RE: Registries for cardiac services

Adrian Midgley

Sat, 9 Jan 1999 19:31:29 -0000

75 lines

RE: Registries for cardiac services

Chris Burton

Sat, 9 Jan 1999 14:47:58 -0000

93 lines

MS and Beta interferon enquiry

padmanabhan badrinath

Fri, 08 Jan 1999 20:27:32 PST

47 lines

Re: Registries for cardiac services

Adrian Midgley

Fri, 8 Jan 1999 22:04:21 -0000

32 lines

RE: The WWW and patient recuitment for RCTs

Carol Lefebvre

Fri, 8 Jan 1999 19:16:33 -0000

83 lines

The WWW and patient recuitment for RCTs

Dr. Samuel Wiebe

Fri, 8 Jan 1999 13:50:57 -0500 (EST)

58 lines

'Seprafilm' bioreabsorbable membrane

Sumeyah Sallam

Fri, 8 Jan 1999 10:13:30 -0800 (PST)

36 lines

Registries for cardiac services

<>

08 Jan 1999 14:24:37 +0000

23 lines

MS and Beta interferon enquiry

John Bryant

Fri, 08 Jan 1999 11:58:34 +0000

29 lines

antibiotic treatment short courses UTI

N.P. van Duijn

Fri, 8 Jan 1999 11:59:55 +0100

56 lines

(Fwd) TISS, MODS

Peter Dodek

Fri, 8 Jan 1999 08:56:05 +0000

44 lines

New link for best evidence

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 06 Jan 1999 15:25:08 +1100

46 lines

<>

Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:40:44 +0000

13 lines

Re: RE: RE: Bibliographic software

Adrian Midgley

Tue, 5 Jan 1999 14:54:01 -0000

24 lines

clinical relevance and presentation of differences ordinal scale

N.P. van Duijn

Tue, 5 Jan 1999 15:12:36 +0100

53 lines

Reviewers Sought for Positron Emission Tomography Report Update

Elaine C Alligood

Tue, 5 Jan 1999 07:16:52 -0500 (EST)

52 lines

RE: Teaching EBM in real time: treatment UTI

N.P. van Duijn

Tue, 5 Jan 1999 11:29:09 +0100

44 lines

Re: Negative Results.

Balvinder Kaur

Tue, 5 Jan 1999 09:54:26 GMT

58 lines

Re: Head Lice

Peg Allen

Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:21:04 -0600

53 lines

SHIMR 99 - Call for Papers

Ian Bowns

Mon, 4 Jan 1999 15:45:09 +0000

188 lines

re: Head Lice

Peter English

Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:52:04 +0000

20 lines

<>

04 Jan 1999 10:06:52 +0000

9 lines

Re: two questions

Peggy Hines

Sun, 3 Jan 1999 06:48:18 -0800 (PST)

82 lines

Head Lice

0tolerance

Sat, 02 Jan 1999 18:26:26 -0800

28 lines

Journal of Informatics in Primary Care

Sheila Teasdale.

Sat, 2 Jan 1999 22:07:07 -0000

42 lines

RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH!

Dr Johan Kock

Tue, 7 Jan 1997 09:12:59 +0200

70 lines

RE: JAMA issue

Dr Johan Kock

Sat, 4 Jan 1997 00:43:48 +0200

125 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager