JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


1998


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"casting" pointers (2 messages)
$ versus non-advancing (1 message)
(Addendum) Re: Performance Again (1 message)
(x3j3.1998-194) Re: personal notes from trollhatten (1 message)
(x3j3.1998-253) 98-198 (2 messages)
(x3j3.1998-291) stream i/o (1 message)
(x3j3.1998-302) Re: Defining BYTE and BIT (1 message)
(x3j3.1998-305) Re: Defining BYTE and BIT vs RECL= (fwd) (3 messages)
4-tensor as a matrix (1 message)
<No subject> (6 messages)
A dissertation that Fortran-9x vendors ought to read (1 message)
A little advice, please (10 messages)
A more regular syntax (27 messages)
A more regular syntax (sic) (1 message)
A paper on HPF... (1 message)
A paper on HPF... (fwd) (1 message)
A particular use of procedure names as arguments (2 messages)
A rare behaivor of pointers (24 messages)
A type data deferred-shape array (3 messages)
About format (4 messages)
about Random_Number (3 messages)
Access Privileges (was READONLY) (2 messages)
Access Privileges (was READONLY) (fwd) (1 message)
Access protection granularity (was: MODULE and naming strategies) (1 message)
Advice required for fortran90 (5 messages)
AINT and ANINT (1 message)
ALLOCATABLE cannot be LOCAL (1 message)
Allocated-array problem (2 messages)
Allocation/reallocation (2 messages)
Alternatives to ASSIGN? (7 messages)
an old question, no doubt... (2 messages)
Announcing DIGITAL Visual Fortran V6 (1 message)
Another rare situation with pointers (1 message)
Appologies (was Re: Resolving generic procedures.) (1 message)
Argument name overloading - expert help needed (5 messages)
Ariane 5 (3 messages)
ARMA Models (1 message)
array compatibility (5 messages)
array of pointers (2 messages)
Array valued functions (8 messages)
Array(s) passing when using mixed F90 and F77- performance issues (2 messages)
arrays and strings question (8 messages)
Arrays of arrays ... (1 message)
associated Legendre functions (2 messages)
automatic arrays (1 message)
automaticc arrays (1 message)
availability of a members list (1 message)
Avoiding unnecessary recompilation (4 messages)
Binary stream I/O in Fortran 2000 (1 message)
Binary stream I/O( was: Start the Wish List) (1 message)
Bit constants initialization (1 message)
bit size for REAL (2 messages)
BNF grammar file for Fortran 90? (7 messages)
Book on efficient implementation with f90? (9 messages)
Book on efficient implementation with f90? (fwd) (1 message)
Bounds of array and stride? (5 messages)
buffer size (1 message)
Bug or feature (1 message)
Bug or feature? (6 messages)
Byte swapping during I/O on PC's? (3 messages)
Byte switching (was re: Transfer) (1 message)
C Interface (2 messages)
C++ & Fortran 90 (2 messages)
calling F90 from C (2 messages)
Centralized memory management? (2 messages)
CF90 SETPOS extension on SGI? (1 message)
Co-array Fortran (2 messages)
Co-Array Fortran for parallel programming (1 message)
Co-Array Fortran? (3 messages)
Coding standards (4 messages)
Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference (6 messages)
command line arguments? (6 messages)
Comments on C++ (1 message)
comp-fortran-90 list owner on holiday (1 message)
Comparison of C and Ada costs (2 messages)
Compilation of modules (7 messages)
Compilation of modules (fwd) (2 messages)
compiler (3 messages)
Compiler Internal Error (2 messages)
complex matrix inversion routine anyone? (6 messages)
Complex numbers matrix (1 message)
Confused about intent of INTENT (6 messages)
Constructor to derived types ? (4 messages)
cpp variables (3 messages)
cull of list members (1 message)
Deallocation of ADT with pointer component? (2 messages)
Deallocation of ADT with pointer component? (fwd) (1 message)
Debuggers and f90 (2 messages)
debuggers(recomendations) (3 messages)
debuggers(recomendations) (fwd) (4 messages)
Debugging suggestions under Digital f90 (unix) needed (4 messages)
derived type I/O, where statements (3 messages)
derived type name scope (4 messages)
derived type problem (5 messages)
Determine buffer sizes (1 message)
Diff. between F77 and F90 (3 messages)
Difference between DIgital and Absoft compiler (2 messages)
Digital F90 warning, what's wrong? (1 message)
DIGITAL Visual Fortran Technology Guarantee program (1 message)
dot_product (2 messages)
double precision discussion (incl. NaN and Inf) (3 messages)
dprod (26 messages)
dprod (fwd) (2 messages)
dprod - dec vax (nag), dec alpha (dec), sun ultra (nagace and sun) intel pc (dec and salford) (2 messages)
DPROD Experience (1 message)
dprod: Summary of Results (4 messages)
Dummy procedures and elemental (1 message)
easy fotran io question (2 messages)
ELEMENTAL and PURE (2 messages)
entities (1 message)
EQUIVALENCE question (5 messages)
EQV vs == (8 messages)
Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (4 messages)
Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd) (8 messages)
executing shell commands within Fortran (5 messages)
Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays? (14 messages)
Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays? (fwd) (1 message)
Extensions of DPROD (26 messages)
Extensions of DPROD (fwd) (1 message)
F and encapsulation vs. the Fortran90/95 standard ... (3 messages)
F2000 Standard (4 messages)
F90 & Purify (3 messages)
F90 and Purify (6 messages)
F90 coding standard (10 messages)
F90 compilers for Linux (15 messages)
f90 for linux (1 message)
f90 for linux? (5 messages)
F90 for SGI R10000? (7 messages)
F90 Graphical Capabilities (5 messages)
f90 mode?(Emacs) (4 messages)
F90 Standard clarification needed (2 messages)
f90 to f77 style converter ? (1 message)
fft (4 messages)
fft response (1 message)
FFTs Cont (1 message)
Final call: HUG'98 -- 2nd HPF User Group meeting (1 message)
Finding KIND Values with Fortran 90 (1 message)
Formal and Actual Parameters in Fortran 90 (3 messages)
Formally undefined behavior? (1 message)
Format again,etc (4 messages)
Fortran 90 / 95 for FreeBSD (2 messages)
Fortran 90/95 Information (August) (1 message)
Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (April) (1 message)
Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (May) (1 message)
Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (October) (1 message)
Fortran 95/HPF: ALLOCATE for INTENT(OUT) dummy arguments? (1 message)
Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*) (9 messages)
Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*) (fwd) (2 messages)
Fortran and VI for Win95 (1 message)
Fortran backspace (3 messages)
fortran beautifier (1 message)
Fortran compilers for Linux (3 messages)
fortran futures (1 message)
fortran futures 98 (1 message)
Fortran input parsing (1 message)
Fortran or Ada? (9 messages)
Fortran or Ada? (fwd) (2 messages)
Fortran90 and Emacs 19.34 under WinNT (4 messages)
Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha (6 messages)
Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak (14 messages)
Free book for lecturers (1 message)
Free PSR f90 for Linux? (5 messages)
free VAST-f90 for Linux: libvast90 has undefined references (2 messages)
Function pointers? (4 messages)
FW: fortran story (1 message)
g77 (1 message)
generalisation of DPROD (1 message)
Generic design (actual procedures) (3 messages)
Generic disambiguation using procedures (6 messages)
Generic interface (10 messages)
generic interfaces (6 messages)
generic interfaces -- A summary (4 messages)
generic with dummy procedure (5 messages)
Generics (was Re: operator( == ) and its negation) (1 message)
Help (1 message)
HELP ME! I don't known any things ! (2 messages)
Help! please (2 messages)
helping to promote fortran 90 (18 messages)
High Hopes? (Start the Wish List) (5 messages)
History (1 message)
How can I do it on f90? (2 messages)
How to build libraries? (4 messages)
How to do it with Salford (4 messages)
HPF vs. arrays of pointers (8 messages)
HUG'98 Program and Call for Participation (1 message)
HUG'98: 2nd HPF User Group conference (1 message)
i couldn't resist. :-) it is friday..... (1 message)
i need help (1 message)
I think this is OK... (2 messages)
initial values and SAVE (37 messages)
initialization of arrays vs. "data" statements (6 messages)
input and output of variable sized arrays (4 messages)
Integer to String (20 messages)
Integer to String, now in F95 (3 messages)
Interesting Statistics (2 messages)
INTERFACE block scoping (1 message)
interface blocks (8 messages)
interface blocks (fwd) (1 message)
INTERFACE blocks for dummy procedures, derived TYPEs and SCOPE (4 messages)
INTERFACE blocks for dummy procedures, derived TYPEs and SCOPE (fwd) (6 messages)
Interface Operator (2 messages)
Interface Operator & only (2 messages)
Interoperability with C (2 messages)
inverse (2 messages)
Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay? (21 messages)
Is there a mem limit for DVF + Win95 + Pentium motherboards (3 messages)
Is there an f90-subset compatible way of doing BLOCK (1 message)
Is there an f90-subset compatible way of doing BLOCK DATA? (what's portable)? (1 message)
ISO_VARYING_STRING and memory leaks (9 messages)
[log in to unmask] (2 messages)
Kind type parameter value for actual and dummy arguments (2 messages)
KindFinder (2 messages)
LINUX (1 message)
list changes (1 message)
list information (1 message)
list requests (1 message)
Macintosh/PPC LInux F95 (2 messages)
Macro (was Re: Suggestions for Fortran 2000) (1 message)
Mailbase Error Report (1 message)
makefile (3 messages)
Makefile question (2 messages)
makemake.pl und NAG-F90-LIB (1 message)
making F90 code Elf90/F compatible (2 messages)
Matrix Operations (3 messages)
Matrix-game (3 messages)
Max size of array (4 messages)
Maximum Likelihood Method (1 message)
Memory control/garbage collection (2 messages)
memory error (2 messages)
memory leak (10 messages)
migration (2 messages)
migration to f90 (1 message)
MinVal, floops.... (1 message)
MOD and MODULO functions (2 messages)
MODULE and naming strategies (23 messages)
modules and makefiles (7 messages)
Modules ideas out there? (4 messages)
MODULO (1 message)
more ideas (2 messages)
MPI Module (1 message)
Multiplication accuracy (was: dprod) (1 message)
multiply defined (2 messages)
NAG dbx90 can't find private variables (1 message)
NAG f90 on RH Linux 5.0 (3 messages)
NAG graphic (3 messages)
NAG GRAPHICS for circles (2 messages)
NAMELIST input (2 messages)
Namelist Problem (1 message)
Namelists - a question of style (2 messages)
Names in OOP (1 message)
Names in OOP (was Re: Polymorphic variables (97-183r2, 97-196r2)) (2 messages)
need pointer[s[ to f90 implementions of multigrid (4 messages)
need your advice (2 messages)
New ideas (was Re: A more regular syntax and subset) (9 messages)
Non-advancing I/O (2 messages)
Non-advancing output versus $ format (20 messages)
Non-advancing outupt versus $ format (1 message)
NUMERICAL RECIPES and Digital Fortran90 (2 messages)
Object Oriented Programming (3 messages)
Object-oriented programming in Fortran 2000 (1 message)
Off the record answers (5 messages)
off-topic question triggered by new ideas (2 messages)
OOP in Fortran 2000 (1 message)
Oops; was, Re: C++ & Fortran 90 (2 messages)
Open statement and permission to write (4 messages)
Open VMS Debug and PRIVATE variables (2 messages)
OpenGL for Fortran 90 (1 message)
operator( == ) and its negation (13 messages)
operator( == ) and its negation (fwd) (11 messages)
OPTIONAL function name (1 message)
OPTIONAL with function name (1 message)
Out of topic - Laguerre (2 messages)
Out of topic -- Laguerre (1 message)
Parsing Fortran 95 (1 message)
Patches for Digital f90 compiler (2 messages)
performances, again..... (17 messages)
performances, again..... (fwd) (7 messages)
Pointer behaviour (13 messages)
POINTER Intent (1 message)
pointers undefined and otherwise (8 messages)
pointers undefined and otherwise (fwd) (4 messages)
Pointers, allocatables and static arrays and performance (2 messages)
Polymorphic variables (97-183r2, 97-196r2) (3 messages)
popup menus (1 message)
popup menus (fwd) (1 message)
Popup menus in F90 (for Mac)? (3 messages)
Popup menus in F90 (for Mac)? some history, too. (1 message)
Popup menus in F90? (5 messages)
Popup menus in F90? (fwd) (1 message)
Portability to Sun Ultra from Sun Sparc 20 (3 messages)
positionning (4 messages)
possible changes to the list (2 messages)
Privacy within modules (1 message)
Problem using same argument twice in calling subroutine (8 messages)
Problem with mailing list (NASA server) (1 message)
problem with optional arguments (12 messages)
Problems with F90 automatic arrays (1 message)
Problems with F90 automatic arrays; was, Re: F90 coding standard (4 messages)
Problems with F90 automatic arrays; was, Re: F90 coding standard (fwd) (4 messages)
Problems with Suns (4 messages)
Processing telemetry data in Fortran 90 (4 messages)
Profiling (11 messages)
Program efficiency & PARAMETERs (4 messages)
Public instance of private derived type? (2 messages)
Q; Why is complex/real division slow (1 message)
query about arguments (2 messages)
questin, makefile (17 messages)
questin, makefile (with corrections) (5 messages)
questin, makefile --- IMPORTANT CORRECTION (1 message)
Question about library and modules (4 messages)
Question on F2000: typ change under inheritance (was Re: more ideas) (4 messages)
Question on INTERFACE OPERATOR (3 messages)
Random Access (1 message)
re takeup of F90 (1 message)
Re: A more regular syntax (1 message)
RE: double precision discussion (incl. NaN and Inf) (4 messages)
Re: F90 coding standard (3 messages)
RE: helping to promote fortran 90 (1 message)
Re: New ideas (was Re: A more regular syntax and subset) (1 message)
Re: performances, again..... (3 messages)
Re: performances, again..... (fwd) (1 message)
Re:Some suggestion for F2000 (2 messages)
READONLY (3 messages)
READONLY (was Wishlist) (6 messages)
READONLY (was Wishlist) (fwd) (4 messages)
readonly/private/public stuff, was Re: Start the Wish List (1 message)
real kinds with xlf (2 messages)
Recursion through the back door (7 messages)
regular expression parser (1 message)
regularise syntax (1 message)
Request (5 messages)
request for help (2 messages)
Reserved words and parsing (3 messages)
Resolving generic procedures (1 message)
Resolving generic procedures (was: OpenGL for Fortran 90) (10 messages)
Resolving generic procedures. (6 messages)
Response to my Fortran talk (1 message)
Running a DVF program in Client/Server mode? (5 messages)
Running time (3 messages)
Same argument passed twice (7 messages)
Same argument passed twice to subroutine (1 message)
Scope of Implicit typing (4 messages)
Seasons Greetings and a program that may be of some interest (1 message)
SELECT-CASE, computed GOTO, and efficiency (1 message)
selected real kinds (4 messages)
share memory (1 message)
SierraPacific f90 (2 messages)
Sixteen compilers! (2 messages)
Some suggestion for F2000 (6 messages)
Some suggestions for F2000 (10 messages)
Sparse matrices (3 messages)
speed of Digital Visual Fortran on Alpha and Intel (2 messages)
Standard subset? (3 messages)
Standardised subset (18 messages)
Standardized Subset (1 message)
Start the Wish List (10 messages)
Start the Wish List (fwd) (3 messages)
Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT) (24 messages)
Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT) (fwd) (1 message)
Stiff ODE solvers in ELF90 or F90 (1 message)
Stream I/O (was Start the Wish List) (4 messages)
Suggestion for Fortran 2000 (3 messages)
Suggestion: (1/2) subobjects of optional dummy args (7 messages)
Suggestions: (2/2) impure elemental procedures (3 messages)
SUMMARY: F90 coding standards (1 message)
Summary: initial values and SAVE (3 messages)
sun f90 (16 messages)
Sun Workshop 4.2 Fortran and #error (5 messages)
Syntax to read derived-type data with a NAMELIST (2 messages)
take up of f90 (6 messages)
telling the compiler about equivalence (2 messages)
temporary objects (2 messages)
test (1 message)
test, please ignore (1 message)
thankyou (problem solved) (1 message)
Thee volatile attribut proposal (1 message)
Toeplitz (1 message)
tools to generate interface blocks (9 messages)
Transfer (9 messages)
true dynamic arrays in f90? (2 messages)
Unit stride (6 messages)
Unit stride (again) (2 messages)
unresolved (6 messages)
unresolved and makefile(F77+F90) (1 message)
unresoved (2 messages)
unsubscribe (5 messages)
Unsubsribe (1 message)
USE stmts, .mod Files and Slowww Compilations (3 messages)
useful url (1 message)
Using F90 routines in support of a F77 library (11 messages)
Using foresys (incorrect type of argument) ? (5 messages)
Using KIND correctly (13 messages)
Using KIND correctly (fwd) (1 message)
Variable Precision Arithmetic (1 message)
Varying-length strings (1 message)
Varying-length strings (was Re: Integer to String) (2 messages)
VAST/f90, free f90 compiler for linux (1 message)
vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL (13 messages)
very funny... (1 message)
Visual DEC Fortran 90 for WinNT (2 messages)
Visual Fortran Bug?? (1 message)
Weird binary I/O problem with Sun compiler (3 messages)
What am I doing wrong? (3 messages)
What it is wrong in this example? (4 messages)
where structure (9 messages)
Which compiler can work with DUAL CPU? (3 messages)
Why not second time? (4 messages)
Why? case(non-constant) (2 messages)
Why? case(non-constant) (fwd) (1 message)
Your evaluation of F90 compilers, please (6 messages)
Your evaluation of F90 compilers, please (fwd) (1 message)
zero-length strings (1 message)
[Fwd: Re: F90 compiler] (1 message)
[Fwd: Rejected [non-member submission] upgrading] (1 message)
[Fwd: Visual DEC Fortran 90 for WinNT] (1 message)
[LF] initialization expressions (6 messages)
[makefileII upgrading] (1 message)
[[log in to unmask]: Compiler comparisons] (1 message)
[No] Warning of lack of support of common extensions (8 messages)
[OFF TOPIC] Why not put the comp-forrtan-90 address in "Reply to:" (10 messages)
[Q] Pointer association with dummy arguments (2 messages)
[Q] proper syntax for Cray pointers (1 message)
`-r8' switch equivalent for f90 (5 messages)
LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives
COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

 Log In

Log In

 Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re:

David R. Leal Valmana <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Nov 1998 15:27:44 +0000

118 lines
New Thread

"casting" pointers

"casting" pointers

Jason Abate <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 98 10:34:18 -0600

32 lines

Re: "casting" pointers

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 11 Feb 98 18:07:23 +0100

34 lines
New Thread

$ versus non-advancing

$ versus non-advancing

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Nov 1998 13:21:39 PST

35 lines
New Thread

(Addendum) Re: Performance Again

(Addendum) Re: Performance Again

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 1998 07:45:43 -0500

36 lines
New Thread

(x3j3.1998-194) Re: personal notes from trollhatten

Re: (x3j3.1998-194) Re: personal notes from trollhatten

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 1998 10:29:48 PDT

32 lines
New Thread

(x3j3.1998-253) 98-198

Re: (x3j3.1998-253) 98-198

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 1998 13:30:54 +0100 (BST)

101 lines

Re: (x3j3.1998-253) 98-198

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 8 Sep 1998 01:00:14 EDT

22 lines
New Thread

(x3j3.1998-291) stream i/o

Re: (x3j3.1998-291) stream i/o

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 11:54:10 PDT

83 lines
New Thread

(x3j3.1998-302) Re: Defining BYTE and BIT

Re: (x3j3.1998-302) Re: Defining BYTE and BIT

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 1998 10:04:20 PDT

47 lines
New Thread

(x3j3.1998-305) Re: Defining BYTE and BIT vs RECL= (fwd)

(x3j3.1998-305) Re: Defining BYTE and BIT vs RECL= (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 1998 10:12:54 PDT

45 lines

RE: (x3j3.1998-305) Re: Defining BYTE and BIT vs RECL= (fwd)

Steven Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 1998 13:29:52 -0400

32 lines

Re: (x3j3.1998-305) Re: Defining BYTE and BIT vs RECL= (fwd)

Miles Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 1998 18:41:57 +0100

38 lines
New Thread

4-tensor as a matrix

4-tensor as a matrix

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 22 Apr 1998 22:29:25 +1200 (NZST)

46 lines
New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Darrin York <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 1998 04:08:21 GMT

82 lines

<No subject>

Octavio Rodriguez Villar <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 1998 21:55:13 -0500 (PDT)

12 lines

<No subject>

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 06 Aug 1998 18:55:29 +0200

10 lines

<No subject>

Nuno Pinhão <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 1998 15:30:04 +0100

77 lines

<No subject>

Jeff Knaggs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Oct 1998 13:35:33 -0400

23 lines

<No subject>

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 13 Nov 1998 15:37:44 +0200

43 lines
New Thread

A dissertation that Fortran-9x vendors ought to read

A dissertation that Fortran-9x vendors ought to read

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 1998 12:20:07 PST

48 lines
New Thread

A little advice, please

A little advice, please

Loren P. Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 1998 21:12:27 -0700

64 lines

Re: A little advice, please

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 18 Oct 1998 09:22:29 EDT

20 lines

Re: A little advice, please

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:05:43 -0400

89 lines

Re: A little advice, please

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:21:54 -0400

31 lines

Re: A little advice, please

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:22:46 -0600

92 lines

Re: A little advice, please

Friedrich R. Hertweck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Nov 1998 09:09:20 +0100 (MET)

216 lines

RE: A little advice, please

Loren P. Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Nov 1998 10:57:13 -0800

47 lines

RE: A little advice, please

Loren P. Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Nov 1998 11:55:51 -0800

95 lines

RE: A little advice, please

Friedrich R. Hertweck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Nov 1998 07:38:54 +0100 (MET)

46 lines

Re: A little advice, please

Werner Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Nov 1998 21:00:04 -0000

29 lines
New Thread

A more regular syntax

A more regular syntax

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 1998 10:34:12 +0000 (GMT)

174 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 1998 16:48:12 +0000 (GMT)

85 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 1998 10:44:30 -0700 (MST)

31 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Adriaan Joubert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 1998 18:01:44 GMT

71 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 1998 13:56:45 +0000 (GMT)

143 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 1998 15:40:07 +0000 (GMT)

77 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 1998 08:23:44 -0800 (PST)

78 lines

A more regular syntax

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 1998 10:12:52 PST

76 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 1998 14:04:16 -0700 (MST)

27 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 1998 14:11:12 -0700 (MST)

26 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 1998 10:42:47 +0000 (GMT)

105 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Swietanowski Artur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 1998 13:59:52 +0100

98 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 1998 14:09:03 +0000 (GMT)

56 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 1998 08:06:15 -0700 (MST)

22 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Wclodius <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 1998 23:57:30 EST

43 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 1998 12:09:45 +0000 (GMT)

127 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 1998 09:16:27 -0800 (PST)

122 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 1998 18:44:30 +0000 (GMT)

142 lines

A more regular syntax

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 1998 12:49:14 PST

75 lines

A more regular syntax

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 1998 13:50:38 -0800 (PST)

73 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 1998 16:29:03 -0700 (MST)

44 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 1998 19:12:19 PST

58 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Fred Marton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 1998 17:37:39 +0800

61 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Fred Marton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 1998 18:03:19 +0800

49 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Wclodius <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 1998 13:09:12 EST

85 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 1998 09:25:02 -0800 (PST)

57 lines

Re: A more regular syntax

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 1998 18:47:47 +0100 (BST)

61 lines
New Thread

A more regular syntax (sic)

Re: A more regular syntax (sic)

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 1998 09:05:56 +0000 (GMT)

37 lines
New Thread

A paper on HPF...

A paper on HPF...

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 1998 11:16:43 PST

18 lines
New Thread

A paper on HPF... (fwd)

A paper on HPF... (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 1998 13:46:54 PST

23 lines
New Thread

A particular use of procedure names as arguments

A particular use of procedure names as arguments

David Leal Valmana <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jul 1998 15:25:20 -0400

52 lines

Re: A particular use of procedure names as arguments

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jul 1998 10:36:20 +0100 (BST)

76 lines
New Thread

A rare behaivor of pointers

A rare behaivor of pointers

David R. Leal Valmana <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 18:48:11 +0100

325 lines

A rare behaivor of pointers

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 14:17:50 -0400

32 lines

RE: A rare behaivor of pointers

Olaf Michelsson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 09:25:45 +0200 (METDST)

92 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 10:09:14 +0100 (BST)

41 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 10:30:15 -0400

51 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:25:32 +0100 (BST)

42 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:46:07 +0200 (CEST)

28 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:54:30 -0400

72 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:57:10 -0400

30 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:26:31 +0000 (BST)

52 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:56:34 +0100 (BST)

34 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 10:16:08 -0700 (PDT)

50 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Robert Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 18:17:26 +0100 (BST)

36 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 13:22:16 -0400

36 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 13:00:49 -0500

50 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:46:11 -0400

79 lines

RE: A rare behaivor of pointers

Loren P. Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 18:43:37 -0700

84 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 1998 14:38:25 +0200 (CEST)

48 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 1998 11:02:46 -0400

64 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 1998 17:31:23 +0200 (CEST)

41 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 25 Sep 1998 01:22:10 EDT

26 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 1998 08:15:47 -0700 (PDT)

51 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

Mike Lijewski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 1998 08:23:47 -0700

69 lines

Re: A rare behaivor of pointers

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 26 Sep 1998 01:48:09 EDT

30 lines
New Thread

A type data deferred-shape array

A type data deferred-shape array

David Leal Valmana <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jul 1998 22:53:17 -0400

72 lines

Re: A type data deferred-shape array

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:46:30 +0100 (BST)

99 lines

Re: A type data deferred-shape array

Jean-Yves Tillier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:11:14 -0500

26 lines
New Thread

About format

About format

David R. Leal Valmana <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 1998 12:47:22 +0100

74 lines

Re: About format

Roger Glover <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 1998 23:11:06 -0500

90 lines

Re: About format

Steve Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 1998 10:07:04 -0400

41 lines

Re: About format

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 1998 10:28:36 -0400 (EDT)

37 lines
New Thread

about Random_Number

about Random_Number

David R. Leal Valmana <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Nov 1998 18:52:48 +0000

78 lines

RE: about Random_Number

Steven Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:57:40 -0500

38 lines

Re: about Random_Number

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Nov 1998 15:14:50 -0500

49 lines
New Thread

Access Privileges (was READONLY)

Re: Access Privileges (was READONLY)

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 1998 19:22:55 +0100 (BST)

84 lines

Re: Access Privileges (was READONLY)

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:05:11 +0200 (CEST)

31 lines
New Thread

Access Privileges (was READONLY) (fwd)

Re: Access Privileges (was READONLY) (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 02 Sep 1998 11:37:42 PDT

45 lines
New Thread

Access protection granularity (was: MODULE and naming strategies)

Access protection granularity (was: MODULE and naming strategies)

Swietanowski Artur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 03 Feb 1998 14:36:05 +0100

176 lines
New Thread

Advice required for fortran90

Advice required for fortran90

Assefaw Hadish Gebremedhin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 1998 17:25:04 +0200 (MET DST)

47 lines

Re: Advice required for fortran90

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 1998 10:54:05 -0600 (MDT)

51 lines

Re: Advice required for fortran90

Lars Mossberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 1998 09:34:28 +0200

112 lines

Re: Advice required for fortran90

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 20 Oct 98 10:08:25 +0200

47 lines

Re: Advice required for fortran90

Tony Harker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 1998 09:26:37 +0100 (BST)

42 lines
New Thread

AINT and ANINT

AINT and ANINT

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 1998 15:50:17 PST

24 lines
New Thread

ALLOCATABLE cannot be LOCAL

ALLOCATABLE cannot be LOCAL

Mr. Sanjay P. Joshi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 1998 18:40:37 +0530 (IST)

25 lines
New Thread

Allocated-array problem

Allocated-array problem

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jul 1998 15:13:26 +0100

32 lines

Re: Allocated-array problem

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jul 1998 15:48:18 +0100

44 lines
New Thread

Allocation/reallocation

Allocation/reallocation

Alan.Miller @ vic.cmis.CSIRO.AU = Alan Miller, Honorary Research Fellow (Retired) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 02 Jun 1998 11:15:56 +1000

53 lines

Re: Allocation/reallocation

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 02 Jun 1998 11:37:57 +0200

147 lines
New Thread

Alternatives to ASSIGN?

Alternatives to ASSIGN?

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 1998 17:25:39 +0000

55 lines

Re: Alternatives to ASSIGN?

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 1998 15:52:23 +0000

39 lines

Re: Alternatives to ASSIGN?

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 1998 10:21:06 -0600

78 lines

Re: Alternatives to ASSIGN?

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 1998 16:17:56 GMT

35 lines

Re: Alternatives to ASSIGN?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 1998 08:42:23 -0800 (PST)

49 lines

Re: Alternatives to ASSIGN?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 1998 21:27:19 -0500

25 lines

Re: Alternatives to ASSIGN?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 1998 07:33:09 -0800 (PST)

36 lines
New Thread

an old question, no doubt...

an old question, no doubt...

Comer Duncan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 1998 13:40:14 -0400

67 lines

RE: an old question, no doubt...

Loren P. Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 1998 11:26:59 -0700

108 lines
New Thread

Announcing DIGITAL Visual Fortran V6

Announcing DIGITAL Visual Fortran V6

Steve Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 1998 16:53:42 -0400

102 lines
New Thread

Another rare situation with pointers

Another rare situation with pointers

David R. Leal Valmana <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 1998 12:24:39 +0100

168 lines
New Thread

Appologies (was Re: Resolving generic procedures.)

Appologies (was Re: Resolving generic procedures.)

Wclodius <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 08:14:29 EDT

16 lines
New Thread

Argument name overloading - expert help needed

Argument name overloading - expert help needed

Swietanowski Artur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jul 1998 20:49:18 +0200

98 lines

Re: Argument name overloading - expert help needed

Kurt W. Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jul 1998 14:37:12 -0500

115 lines

Re: Argument name overloading - expert help needed

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jul 1998 21:49:31 GMT

43 lines

Re: Argument name overloading - expert help needed

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jul 1998 13:55:27 +0100 (BST)

76 lines

Re: Argument name overloading - expert help needed

Swietanowski Artur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jul 1998 16:54:17 +0200

35 lines
New Thread

Ariane 5

Ariane 5

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 Sep 1998 00:25:07 EDT

73 lines

Re: Ariane 5

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 98 15:30:55 PDT

130 lines

Re: Ariane 5

David J Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 1998 10:09:30 +0100 (BST)

29 lines
New Thread

ARMA Models

ARMA Models

Nesmith_T <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 1998 07:49:21 -0400

72 lines
New Thread

array compatibility

array compatibility

Jaehoon Seol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Nov 1998 10:20:32 -0600 (CST)

34 lines

Re: array compatibility

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Nov 1998 16:35:55 +0000 (GMT)

57 lines

array compatibility

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 6 Nov 1998 11:40:32 -0500

45 lines

array compatibility

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Nov 1998 08:54:09 -0800 (PST)

103 lines

RE: array compatibility

Loren P. Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Nov 1998 10:39:12 -0800

50 lines
New Thread

array of pointers

array of pointers

Marcelo Grafulha Vanti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Dec 1998 11:44:31 -0200

46 lines

Re: array of pointers

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Dec 1998 15:11:58 +0100

57 lines
New Thread

Array valued functions

Array valued functions

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 21 Apr 1998 10:55:04 -0600 (MDT)

60 lines

Re: Array valued functions

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 1998 18:21:39 +0100 (BST)

24 lines

Re: Array valued functions

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 21 Apr 1998 14:06:20 -0400 (EDT)

82 lines

Re: Array valued functions

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 1998 20:39:41 -0400

99 lines

Re: Array valued functions

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:32:24 +0100 (BST)

87 lines

Re: Array valued functions

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 1998 11:13:54 -0400

63 lines

Re: Array valued functions

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 1998 17:19:18 -0400

71 lines

Re: Array valued functions

Steve Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 1998 09:17:46 -0400

73 lines
New Thread

Array(s) passing when using mixed F90 and F77- performance issues

Array(s) passing when using mixed F90 and F77- performance issues

Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 1998 09:56:11 +0200

78 lines

Re: Array(s) passing when using mixed F90 and F77- performance issues

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Sep 1998 14:25:06 +0000 (BST)

116 lines
New Thread

arrays and strings question

arrays and strings question

Kevin Maguire <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 1998 16:06:28 +0000 (GMT)

149 lines

Re: arrays and strings question

Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 1998 18:09:10 +0200

63 lines

Re: arrays and strings question

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 1998 10:07:27 -0800 (PST)

53 lines

Re: arrays and strings question

Steve Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 1998 13:21:54 -0500

29 lines

Re: arrays and strings question

Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 1998 08:46:37 +0200

49 lines

Re: arrays and strings question

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 1998 09:36:54 GMT

21 lines

arrays and strings question

Otto Stolz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 1998 12:57:05 +0100

76 lines

Re: arrays and strings question

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 1998 08:52:05 -0500

28 lines
New Thread

Arrays of arrays ...

Arrays of arrays ...

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 1998 16:59:08 +0200

63 lines
New Thread

associated Legendre functions

associated Legendre functions

Ingve Simonsen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Nov 1998 18:05:38 +0100 (CET)

40 lines

Re: associated Legendre functions

Jacques Duilio Brancher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Nov 1998 07:57:59 -0200 (BDB)

225 lines
New Thread

automatic arrays

Re: automatic arrays

Adriaan Joubert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 1998 15:51:35 GMT

37 lines
New Thread

automaticc arrays

automaticc arrays

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 1998 16:32:20 +0100

34 lines
New Thread

availability of a members list

availability of a members list

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 1998 11:13:01 BST

28 lines
New Thread

Avoiding unnecessary recompilation

Avoiding unnecessary recompilation

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jul 1998 16:29:58 +0100

97 lines

Re: Avoiding unnecessary recompilation

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jul 1998 11:48:22 -0400

51 lines

Re: Avoiding unnecessary recompilation

stringfellow.n.d <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 08 Jul 1998 18:07:18 +0100

26 lines

Re: Avoiding unnecessary recompilation

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 18:15:55 +0200

133 lines
New Thread

Binary stream I/O in Fortran 2000

Binary stream I/O in Fortran 2000

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 1998 20:13:50 -0400

35 lines
New Thread

Binary stream I/O( was: Start the Wish List)

Binary stream I/O( was: Start the Wish List)

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 1998 20:13:24 -0400

54 lines
New Thread

Bit constants initialization

Bit constants initialization

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Nov 1998 15:50:49 -0600

35 lines
New Thread

bit size for REAL

bit size for REAL

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 26 Mar 1998 13:14:44 -0500

15 lines

Re: bit size for REAL

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 26 Mar 1998 14:10:48 -0500 (EST)

42 lines
New Thread

BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?

BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?

Magne Rudshaug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 1998 09:37:07 +0200

27 lines

Re: BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?

Adrian Slowik <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 1998 10:32:08 +0200

51 lines

Re: BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 1998 11:46:11 +0100 (BST)

53 lines

Re: BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 1998 09:03:59 -0600 (MDT)

18 lines

Re: BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 1998 16:10:12 +0100 (BST)

34 lines

Re: BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 1998 23:43:32 -0600

33 lines

Re: BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 23:20:59 EDT

68 lines
New Thread

Book on efficient implementation with f90?

Book on efficient implementation with f90?

Magne Rudshaug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jun 1998 09:37:29 +0200

28 lines

Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jun 1998 09:46:24 +0100 (BST)

74 lines

Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 25 Jun 1998 08:54:03 EDT

25 lines

Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jun 1998 11:47:33 -0400

39 lines

Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jun 1998 17:58:24 PDT

24 lines

Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Jun 1998 23:53:14 +0100

47 lines

Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?

David Mosley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Jun 1998 12:11:51 +0100

57 lines

Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 30 Jun 1998 20:14:01 +1200 (NZST)

29 lines

RE: Book on efficient implementation with f90?

Loren P. Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jul 1998 14:58:14 -0700

76 lines
New Thread

Book on efficient implementation with f90? (fwd)

Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90? (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Jun 1998 17:31:56 PDT

32 lines
New Thread

Bounds of array and stride?

Bounds of array and stride?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 06 Mar 1998 10:01:06 PST

26 lines

Re: Bounds of array and stride?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 6 Mar 1998 13:22:26 -0500

19 lines

Re: Bounds of array and stride?

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 1998 15:35:53 GMT

31 lines

Re: Bounds of array and stride?

Richard Weaver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 1998 09:36:45 -0600 (CST)

23 lines

Re: Bounds of array and stride?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 1998 07:57:02 -0800 (PST)

35 lines
New Thread

buffer size

buffer size

Eildert Groeneveld <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 1998 09:20:28 +0100

45 lines
New Thread

Bug or feature

Re: Bug or feature

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 09 Dec 1998 17:54:35 PST

44 lines
New Thread

Bug or feature?

Bug or feature?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 09 Dec 1998 15:41:31 PST

48 lines

Re: Bug or feature?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 09 Dec 1998 17:16:14 PST

29 lines

Bug or feature?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Dec 1998 17:39:09 -0800 (PST)

38 lines

Re: Bug or feature?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Dec 1998 17:59:36 -0800 (PST)

49 lines

Re: Bug or feature?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Dec 1998 09:06:16 +0100

78 lines

Re: Bug or feature?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Dec 1998 09:54:24 +0100

75 lines
New Thread

Byte swapping during I/O on PC's?

Byte swapping during I/O on PC's?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Nov 1998 17:43:49 PST

20 lines

Re: Byte swapping during I/O on PC's?

Ralph and Wendy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Nov 1998 21:33:53 -0800

44 lines

Re: Byte swapping during I/O on PC's?

Greynolds, Al <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 1998 05:37:07 -0700

57 lines
New Thread

Byte switching (was re: Transfer)

Byte switching (was re: Transfer)

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Nov 1998 09:34:22 +0000 (GMT)

49 lines
New Thread

C Interface

C Interface

Jack Hatfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 1998 09:30:56 -0700

31 lines

Re: C Interface

Mark Stevens <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 1998 17:55:30 +0000

20 lines
New Thread

C++ & Fortran 90

C++ & Fortran 90

Jaehoon Seol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jun 1998 12:51:56 -0500 (CDT)

24 lines

Re: C++ & Fortran 90

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jun 1998 14:47:58 -0400

44 lines
New Thread

calling F90 from C

calling F90 from C

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 29 Jan 1998 15:23:55 -0500

42 lines

calling F90 from C

Adriaan Joubert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 1998 08:41:41 GMT

78 lines
New Thread

Centralized memory management?

Centralized memory management?

Magne Rudshaug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 1998 14:52:08 +0200

29 lines

Centralized memory management?

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 1998 09:24:37 -0400

26 lines
New Thread

CF90 SETPOS extension on SGI?

CF90 SETPOS extension on SGI?

Jeffrey D. Pursel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Nov 1998 12:57:35 -0500

31 lines
New Thread

Co-array Fortran

Co-array Fortran

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 1998 17:29:10 +0100 (BST)

47 lines

Re: Co-array Fortran

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 1998 13:56:42 -0400

34 lines
New Thread

Co-Array Fortran for parallel programming

Co-Array Fortran for parallel programming

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 1998 19:19:08 +0100 (BST)

50 lines
New Thread

Co-Array Fortran?

Co-Array Fortran?

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 1998 10:23:40 -0500

29 lines

Re: Co-Array Fortran?

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 1998 17:01:47 +0100 (BST)

43 lines

Re: Co-Array Fortran?

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 1998 09:08:06 -0500

21 lines
New Thread

Coding standards

Coding standards

Vittorio G. Caffa <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jun 1998 09:41:44 +1

23 lines

Re: Coding standards

Waveren, Matthijs van <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jun 1998 10:05:40 +0100

36 lines

Re: Coding standards

Bob Runyan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jun 1998 08:12:18 -0700

40 lines

Re: Coding standards

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 30 Jun 1998 19:22:26 EDT

20 lines
New Thread

Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference

Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference

Jennifer O'Connor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jul 1998 16:51:22 -0400

41 lines

Re: Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference

Richard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jul 1998 14:09:16 -0700 (PDT)

79 lines

Re: Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jul 1998 21:57:26 GMT

62 lines

Re: Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference

Alberto Fasso' <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jul 1998 14:23:04 -0700 (PDT)

47 lines

Re: Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Jul 98 21:05:36 PDT

45 lines

Re: Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Jul 1998 21:59:51 -0400

46 lines
New Thread

command line arguments?

command line arguments?

Jack Saba <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 1998 12:58:09 -0400 (EDT)

20 lines

Re: command line arguments?

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 1998 12:36:10 -0500

47 lines

command line arguments?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 1998 12:55:32 -0700 (PDT)

42 lines

Re: command line arguments?

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 1998 08:20:04 +0200 (METDST)

35 lines

Re: command line arguments?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 1998 08:56:52 +0200

50 lines

Re: command line arguments?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 1998 08:50:37 -0400

23 lines
New Thread

Comments on C++

Comments on C++

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 08 Jul 1998 10:50:03 PDT

32 lines
New Thread

comp-fortran-90 list owner on holiday

comp-fortran-90 list owner on holiday

Ian D Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Jul 1998 13:43:13 +0100 ()

27 lines
New Thread

Comparison of C and Ada costs

Comparison of C and Ada costs

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 07 Jan 1998 11:37:31 PST

59 lines

Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs

Roger Glover <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 07 Jan 1998 17:22:46 -0600

106 lines
New Thread

Compilation of modules

Compilation of modules

jean-jacques wasbauer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 1998 16:16:34 +0200

72 lines

Re: Compilation of modules

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 1998 15:47:49 +0100

48 lines

Compilation of modules

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 1998 16:45:17 +0200

55 lines

Re: Compilation of modules

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 15 May 1998 10:52:09 -0400 (EDT)

140 lines

Re: Compilation of modules

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 1998 11:58:12 -0400

49 lines

Re: Compilation of modules

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 1998 10:38:46 +0100

28 lines

Re: Compilation of modules

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 1998 09:49:36 -0400 (EDT)

332 lines
New Thread

Compilation of modules (fwd)

Re: Compilation of modules (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 1998 10:09:36 PDT

61 lines

Re: Compilation of modules (fwd)

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 1998 14:37:39 -0400

53 lines
New Thread

compiler

compiler

Huang Chun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 08 Apr 1998 15:34:06 +0800

18 lines

Re: compiler

Dirk Thorsten Vogel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 08 Apr 1998 10:49:05 +0200

57 lines

Re: compiler

Mark Stevens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 1998 15:57:23 +0000

23 lines
New Thread

Compiler Internal Error

Compiler Internal Error

Ower Villegas Gonzalez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 1998 15:09:20 +0100

84 lines

Re: Compiler Internal Error

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 06 Feb 1998 10:32:16 -0500

32 lines
New Thread

complex matrix inversion routine anyone?

complex matrix inversion routine anyone?

Peter Bismuti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 1998 12:31:21 -0500 (EST)

23 lines

Re: complex matrix inversion routine anyone?

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 1998 15:53:28 +0930

68 lines

Re: complex matrix inversion routine anyone?

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 1998 08:14:03 GMT

27 lines

Re: complex matrix inversion routine anyone?

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 1998 09:35:24 +0930

61 lines

Re: complex matrix inversion routine anyone?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 1998 16:35:46 -0800 (PST)

77 lines

Re: complex matrix inversion routine anyone?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 1998 11:14:51 +0100

51 lines
New Thread

Complex numbers matrix

Complex numbers matrix

Levy, Yoram <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 08:14:38 +0100

32 lines
New Thread

Confused about intent of INTENT

Confused about intent of INTENT

Hari Sundararaghavan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 1998 11:34:53 -1000 (HST)

246 lines

Re: Confused about intent of INTENT

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 1998 18:02:03 -0400

43 lines

Re: Confused about intent of INTENT

Hari Sundararaghavan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 1998 14:56:40 -1000 (HST)

98 lines

Re: Confused about intent of INTENT

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 1998 11:43:36 +0000 (BST)

169 lines

Re: Confused about intent of INTENT

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 1998 15:46:34 -0400

31 lines

Re: Confused about intent of INTENT

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 1998 06:22:09 GMT

32 lines
New Thread

Constructor to derived types ?

Constructor to derived types ?

Jean Claude Berges <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 98 18:13:52 +0200

72 lines

Constructor to derived types ?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 1998 09:28:00 -0700 (PDT)

28 lines

Re: Constructor to derived types ?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 1998 17:26:58 +0000 (BST)

29 lines

Re: Constructor to derived types ?

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 1998 10:23:04 +0100 (British Summer Time)

99 lines
New Thread

cpp variables

cpp variables

David B. Serafini <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Oct 1998 16:55:59 -0600 (CST)

21 lines

Re: cpp variables

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 29 Oct 1998 23:47:38 EST

35 lines

Re: cpp variables

David B. Serafini <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Oct 1998 23:32:23 -0600 (CST)

45 lines
New Thread

cull of list members

cull of list members

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 17:11:49 +0100 ()

23 lines
New Thread

Deallocation of ADT with pointer component?

Deallocation of ADT with pointer component?

Magne Rudshaug <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 1998 08:16:47 +0200

50 lines

Re: Deallocation of ADT with pointer component?

John Reid (guest-pch w44/98) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 1998 19:28:22 +0200

54 lines
New Thread

Deallocation of ADT with pointer component? (fwd)

Re: Deallocation of ADT with pointer component? (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 1998 11:16:02 PDT

56 lines
New Thread

Debuggers and f90

Debuggers and f90

Eildert Groeneveld <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jun 1998 15:24:36 +0200 (MEST)

35 lines

Re: Debuggers and f90

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:29:16 -0400

38 lines
New Thread

debuggers(recomendations)

debuggers(recomendations)

David R. Leal Valmana <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 02 Sep 1998 12:48:22 +0100

33 lines

RE: debuggers(recomendations)

Peter Jewell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 1998 09:05:32 +0100

40 lines

Re: debuggers(recomendations)

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 03 Sep 98 13:24:20 PDT

36 lines
New Thread

debuggers(recomendations) (fwd)

RE: debuggers(recomendations) (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 03 Sep 1998 11:26:08 PDT

59 lines

Re: debuggers(recomendations) (fwd)

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:06:09 -0400

48 lines

Re: debuggers(recomendations) (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 03 Sep 1998 13:52:08 PDT

30 lines

Re: debuggers(recomendations) (fwd)

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 1998 17:07:29 -0400

70 lines
New Thread

Debugging suggestions under Digital f90 (unix) needed

Debugging suggestions under Digital f90 (unix) needed

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 09 Dec 1998 12:10:15 -0700

65 lines

RE: Debugging suggestions under Digital f90 (unix) needed

Steven Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Dec 1998 14:23:05 -0500

33 lines

Re: Debugging suggestions under Digital f90 (unix) needed

Steven Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Dec 1998 15:59:50 -0500

65 lines

Re: Debugging suggestions under Digital f90 (unix) needed

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 09 Dec 1998 16:55:07 -0700

33 lines
New Thread

derived type I/O, where statements

derived type I/O, where statements

Mike Bauer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:00:29 -0500

49 lines

Re: derived type I/O, where statements

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:20:38 -0400 (EDT)

69 lines

derived type I/O, where statements

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:35:30 -0400

86 lines
New Thread

derived type name scope

derived type name scope

Laurent Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 1998 11:23:11 +0100

51 lines

Re: derived type name scope

Kevin Maguire <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 1998 11:12:49 +0000 (GMT)

96 lines

Re: derived type name scope

Frederic PASCAL <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 1998 12:26:00 +0100 (MET)

23 lines

Re: derived type name scope

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 1998 11:35:12 +0000 (GMT)

78 lines
New Thread

derived type problem

derived type problem

Hassan Mehrabani-Yeganeh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 1998 09:03:02 -0500 (EST)

58 lines

Re: derived type problem

Richard Shapiro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 1998 10:14:32 -0500

65 lines

Re: derived type problem

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 1998 10:15:43 -0500 (EST)

70 lines

Re: derived type problem

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 1998 16:14:39 +0000 (GMT)

104 lines

Re: derived type problem

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 1998 09:06:37 -0700 (MST)

117 lines
New Thread

Determine buffer sizes

Determine buffer sizes

Eildert Groeneveld <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 1998 09:11:57 +0100

43 lines
New Thread

Diff. between F77 and F90

Diff. between F77 and F90

Pravin Chavan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 1998 10:12:22 +0530

17 lines

Diff. between F77 and F90

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 1998 03:37:39 -0400

18 lines

RE: Diff. between F77 and F90

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 06 May 1998 16:17:35 MET_DST

52 lines
New Thread

Difference between DIgital and Absoft compiler

Difference between DIgital and Absoft compiler

Luigi Mazza <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 1998 10:29:06 +0100

23 lines

Re: Difference between Digital and Absoft compiler

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 15 Jan 1998 10:22:14 GMT

92 lines
New Thread

Digital F90 warning, what's wrong?

Digital F90 warning, what's wrong?

Kevin Maguire <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 1998 15:12:22 +0100 (BST)

45 lines
New Thread

DIGITAL Visual Fortran Technology Guarantee program

DIGITAL Visual Fortran Technology Guarantee program

Steve Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 1998 16:55:36 -0400

41 lines
New Thread

dot_product

dot_product

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jun 1998 11:58:47 +0200

38 lines

Dot_Product

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Nov 1998 15:28:26 PST

33 lines
New Thread

double precision discussion (incl. NaN and Inf)

RE: double precision discussion (incl. NaN and Inf)

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jul 1998 18:28:35 +0100 (BST)

35 lines

Re: double precision discussion (incl. NaN and Inf)

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:22:24 +0100

22 lines

Re: double precision discussion (incl. NaN and Inf)

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jul 1998 12:14:07 -0400

71 lines
New Thread

dprod

dprod

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 1998 18:19:31 +0000 (GMT)

29 lines

Re: dprod

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 1998 18:22:13 +0100 (BST)

102 lines

Re: dprod

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 1998 14:13:06 -0400

64 lines

Re: dprod

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 23 Jun 1998 22:00:42 EDT

26 lines

Re: dprod

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 23 Jun 1998 22:21:04 EDT

33 lines

RE: dprod

Peter Jewell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 09:45:00 +0100

118 lines

Re: dprod

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:03:13 +0200

44 lines

Re: dprod

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:14:34 +0100 (BST)

87 lines

Re: dprod

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 24 Jun 98 12:50:40 +0200

93 lines

Re: dprod

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 13:51:35 +0200

93 lines

Re: dprod

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 14:45:41 +0100 (BST)

118 lines

Re: dprod

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 15:17:44 GMT

25 lines

Re: dprod

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:10:20 -0400

53 lines

Re: dprod

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 24 Jun 98 18:10:10 +0200

63 lines

Re: dprod

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 17:43:38 +0200 (MET DST)

176 lines

Re: dprod

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 23:52:38 EDT

32 lines

Re: DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jun 98 00:08:28 PDT

27 lines

Re: dprod

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jun 98 00:18:21 PDT

27 lines

Re: DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Jun 98 19:20:13 PDT

78 lines

Re: DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Jun 98 19:20:13 PDT

98 lines

Re: DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Jun 98 20:15:43 PDT

134 lines

Re: DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Jun 98 19:20:13 PDT

98 lines

Re: DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Jun 98 19:20:13 PDT

98 lines

Re: DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Jun 98 19:20:13 PDT

98 lines

Re: DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Jun 98 19:20:13 PDT

98 lines

Re: dprod

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Jun 98 00:42:05 PDT

38 lines
New Thread

dprod (fwd)

Re: dprod (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 10:49:32 PDT

64 lines

Re: dprod (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:40:46 PDT

41 lines
New Thread

dprod - dec vax (nag), dec alpha (dec), sun ultra (nagace and sun) intel pc (dec and salford)

dprod - dec vax (nag), dec alpha (dec), sun ultra (nagace and sun) intel pc (dec and salford)

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 14:31:13 +0000 (GMT)

39 lines

Re: dprod - dec vax (nag), dec alpha (dec), sun ultra (nagace and sun) intel pc (dec and salford)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jun 98 00:08:28 PDT

97 lines
New Thread

DPROD Experience

DPROD Experience

Paul J. Nikolai or Carolyn J. Nikolai <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 14:41:03 -0400

66 lines
New Thread

dprod: Summary of Results

Re: dprod: Summary of Results

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 18:02:18 +0100 (BST)

37 lines

Re: dprod: Summary of Results

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 1998 20:03:16 +0200

40 lines

Re: dprod: Summary of Results

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 25 Jun 98 09:00:50 +0200

36 lines

Re: dprod: Summary of Results

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 25 Jun 1998 13:08:14 +0200

32 lines
New Thread

Dummy procedures and elemental

Dummy procedures and elemental

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 1998 18:28:59 +0200

29 lines
New Thread

easy fotran io question

easy fotran io question

Assefaw Hadish Gebremedhin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 1998 14:02:17 +0200 (MET DST)

24 lines

Re: easy fotran io question

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 1998 15:00:33 +0200

36 lines
New Thread

ELEMENTAL and PURE

ELEMENTAL and PURE

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 1998 10:03:59 +0100 (BST)

114 lines

Re: ELEMENTAL and PURE

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 98 19:09:28 PDT

47 lines
New Thread

entities

entities

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 1998 15:13:37 -0700 (MST)

20 lines
New Thread

EQUIVALENCE question

EQUIVALENCE question

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 1998 17:27:49 +0000

55 lines

EQUIVALENCE question

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 1998 09:55:27 -0800 (PST)

62 lines

Re: EQUIVALENCE question

Richard Shapiro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 1998 13:07:49 -0500

44 lines

Re: EQUIVALENCE question

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 1998 18:22:19 +0000 (GMT)

93 lines

Re: EQUIVALENCE question

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 1998 15:14:57 +0000

41 lines
New Thread

EQV vs ==

EQV vs ==

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 1998 11:33:22 +0100 (BST)

49 lines

Re: EQV vs ==

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 1998 12:02:56 +0100 (BST)

45 lines

Re: EQV vs ==

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Sep 1998 12:28:58 GMT

61 lines

Re: EQV vs ==

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Sep 1998 23:22:31 EDT

42 lines

Re: EQV vs ==

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 1998 11:45:37 +0100 (BST)

75 lines

Re: EQV vs ==

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 1998 13:50:47 -0600

54 lines

Re: EQV vs ==

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:24:25 EDT

59 lines

Re: EQV vs ==

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 1998 11:00:35 +0100 (BST)

59 lines
New Thread

Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs

Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs

Roger Glover <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Jan 1998 13:13:54 -0600

78 lines

Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 1998 09:46:41 +0100 (MET)

30 lines

RE: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs

Peter Jewell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 1998 10:07:14 -0000

60 lines

Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs

Roger Glover <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 09 Jan 1998 10:40:35 -0600

34 lines
New Thread

Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)

Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Jan 1998 11:43:02 PST

40 lines

Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)

Alberto Fasso' <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Jan 1998 12:30:46 -0800 (PST)

48 lines

Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)

Roger Glover <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Jan 1998 17:55:49 -0600

146 lines

Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 09 Jan 1998 10:24:35 -0600

33 lines

Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)

David B. Serafini <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 1998 11:28:01 -0600 (CST)

39 lines

Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)

David B. Serafini <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 1998 11:39:51 -0600 (CST)

43 lines

Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 09 Jan 1998 12:15:04 -0600

41 lines

Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 1998 13:23:00 +0000 (GMT)

95 lines
New Thread

executing shell commands within Fortran

executing shell commands within Fortran

Peter Bismuti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 1998 13:31:49 -0500 (EST)

29 lines

Re: executing shell commands within Fortran

Harvey Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 1998 08:47:21 GMT

23 lines

Re: executing shell commands within Fortran

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 1998 09:45:28 +0100

43 lines

Re: executing shell commands within Fortran

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 13 Jan 1998 13:05:13 +0100

51 lines

Re: executing shell commands within Fortran

John Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 1998 10:08:08 -0500

39 lines
New Thread

Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 00:59:26 -0400

22 lines

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 10:53:00 +0100 (BST)

29 lines

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 07:41:54 -0400

30 lines

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

Carol Munroe - SMCC High Performance Computing <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 09:52:00 -0400 (EDT)

50 lines

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 10:02:11 -0400

37 lines

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 May 1998 10:20:52 -0400 (EDT)

46 lines

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 10:28:13 -0400

41 lines

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 98 00:29:14 PDT

54 lines

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 May 1998 10:54:17 -0400 (EDT)

59 lines

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 98 01:25:17 PDT

53 lines

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 11:36:38 -0400

59 lines

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

N8TM <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 22:10:43 EDT

28 lines

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 98 23:41:33 PDT

62 lines

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 1998 09:59:51 -0400

43 lines
New Thread

Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays? (fwd)

Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays? (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 1998 9:29:58 PDT

35 lines
New Thread

Extensions of DPROD

Extensions of DPROD

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jun 1998 09:11:08 +0200

45 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 19 Jun 1998 08:59:55 EDT

41 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jun 1998 21:18:17 -0500

47 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 19 Jun 98 16:51:07 +0200

36 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jun 1998 10:56:40 -0400

30 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jun 1998 16:16:59 +0100 (BST)

28 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 19 Jun 98 17:30:38 +0200

28 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jun 1998 12:01:28 -0400

41 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jun 1998 12:06:49 -0500

41 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Jun 98 13:19:08 PDT

52 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 20 Jun 1998 01:36:35 EDT

27 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jun 1998 09:19:52 +0200

52 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 98 00:05:01 PDT

63 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Jun 1998 09:49:09 -0500

50 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jun 1998 11:41:48 -0400

93 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jun 1998 18:05:18 +0200

71 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 23 Jun 1998 00:17:36 EDT

24 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 98 22:00:53 PDT

91 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 98 22:06:28 PDT

106 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 1998 15:32:51 +0200

89 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 1998 15:37:42 +0200

39 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 98 23:06:39 PDT

47 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 98 23:44:32 PDT

103 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 1998 10:20:00 -0400

33 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 1998 10:18:26 -0400

31 lines

Re: Extensions of DPROD

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 1998 17:26:12 +0200

88 lines
New Thread

Extensions of DPROD (fwd)

Re: Extensions of DPROD (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jun 1998 11:35:33 PDT

26 lines
New Thread

F and encapsulation vs. the Fortran90/95 standard ...

F and encapsulation vs. the Fortran90/95 standard ...

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:07:47 +0200 (CEST)

55 lines

Re: F and encapsulation vs. the Fortran90/95 standard ...

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:00:02 +0000 (BST)

42 lines

Re: F and encapsulation vs. the Fortran90/95 standard ...

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 03 Sep 1998 14:11:38 -0500

59 lines
New Thread

F2000 Standard

F2000 Standard

SHYAN LAM <[log in to unmask]>

28 Oct 98 10:15:53 CST

34 lines

F2000 Standard

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 1998 08:37:57 -0800 (PST)

50 lines

Re: F2000 Standard

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 1998 13:49:58 -0700

60 lines

Re: F2000 Standard

SHYAN LAM <[log in to unmask]>

29 Oct 98 09:05:16 CST

45 lines
New Thread

F90 & Purify

F90 & Purify

Olivier Ricois <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 12:01:15 +0200

91 lines

Re: F90 & Purify

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:07:08 +0000 (BST)

28 lines

Re: F90 & Purify

Bill Moffitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:42:19 -0700

48 lines
New Thread

F90 and Purify

Re: F90 and Purify

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 10:00:16 -0400

57 lines

Re: F90 and Purify

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:29:43 +0000 (BST)

49 lines

Re: F90 and Purify

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 11:44:39 -0400

73 lines

Re: F90 and Purify

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 17:00:40 +0100

28 lines

Re: F90 and Purify

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 12:47:21 -0400

85 lines

Re: F90 and Purify

David B. Serafini <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:31:32 -0500 (CDT)

87 lines
New Thread

F90 coding standard

F90 coding standard

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jul 1998 23:21:26 +0100

38 lines

F90 coding standard

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jul 1998 03:24:54 -0400

28 lines

Re: F90 coding standard

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jul 1998 10:09:13 +0100

22 lines

Re: F90 coding standard

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jul 1998 16:12:42 -0400 (EDT)

38 lines

Re: F90 coding standard

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:18:46 +0100

52 lines

Re: F90 coding standard

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 17 Jul 1998 09:00:51 EDT

28 lines

Re: F90 coding standard

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jul 1998 15:54:41 +0100

26 lines

Re: F90 coding standard

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jul 1998 11:53:35 -0400 (EDT)

66 lines

Re: F90 coding standard

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jul 1998 10:47:57 +0100

32 lines

Re: F90 coding standard

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jul 1998 11:02:31 +0100

33 lines
New Thread

F90 compilers for Linux

F90 compilers for Linux

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 08:51:19 +0000

18 lines

Re: F90 compilers for Linux

[log in to unmask]

18 Mar 1998 10:02:08 +0100

20 lines

Re: F90 compilers for Linux

Harry Bingham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 12:06:00 +0000

41 lines

Re: F90 compilers for Linux

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 08:02:32 -0500

26 lines

Re: F90 compilers for Linux

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 13:03:43 GMT

33 lines

Re: F90 compilers for Linux

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 14:42:00 +0100

48 lines

Re: F90 compilers for Linux

Neil N. Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 09:19:46 -0500

31 lines

Re: F90 compilers for Linux

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 14:33:06 GMT

64 lines

Re: F90 compilers for Linux

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 14:43:54 GMT

28 lines

Re: F90 compilers for Linux

Douglas Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 10:10:49 -0500 (EST)

43 lines

Re: F90 compilers for Linux

Eildert Groeneveld <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 16:17:41 +0100

36 lines

Re: F90 compilers for Linux

[log in to unmask]

18 Mar 1998 16:43:48 +0100

89 lines

Re: F90 compilers for Linux

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 08:25:59 -0800 (PST)

81 lines

Re: F90 compilers for Linux

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 17:51:26 +0100

30 lines

F90 compilers for Linux

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 17:54:06 +0100

52 lines
New Thread

f90 for linux

f90 for linux

Dr. E.L.Heck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Nov 1998 13:14:48 +0000 (GMT)

29 lines
New Thread

f90 for linux?

f90 for linux?

Dr. E.L.Heck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Nov 1998 11:21:52 +0000 (GMT)

28 lines

Re: f90 for linux?

Alvaro Colina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Nov 1998 14:21:27 +0100

38 lines

Re: f90 for linux?

Juergen vonHagen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Nov 1998 08:28:47 -0500

27 lines

Re: f90 for linux?

David Brian Serafini <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Nov 1998 07:50:25 -0600 (CST)

12 lines

Re: f90 for linux?

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Nov 1998 07:22:01 -0700 (MST)

21 lines
New Thread

F90 for SGI R10000?

F90 for SGI R10000?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 1998 14:41:16 PDT

20 lines

Re: F90 for SGI R10000?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 22 May 1998 21:37:31 -0400 (EDT)

48 lines

Re: F90 for SGI R10000?

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 1998 21:47:30 -0400 (EDT)

24 lines

Re: F90 for SGI R10000?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 1998 22:30:00 -0400

47 lines

Re: F90 for SGI R10000?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 1998 22:35:43 -0400

22 lines

Re: F90 for SGI R10000?

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 1998 08:31:23 -0400 (EDT)

19 lines

Re: F90 for SGI R10000?

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 1998 08:33:20 -0400 (EDT)

18 lines
New Thread

F90 Graphical Capabilities

F90 Graphical Capabilities

Dave Wooff <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 1998 16:59:03 GMT+0

23 lines

Re: F90 Graphical Capabilities

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:12:25 -0400

28 lines

Re: F90 Graphical Capabilities

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 1998 18:09:43 GMT

46 lines

Re: F90 Graphical Capabilities

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 21 Sep 1998 20:17:05 EDT

19 lines

Re: F90 Graphical Capabilities

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 98 11:27:26 PDT

29 lines
New Thread

f90 mode?(Emacs)

f90 mode?(Emacs)

David R. Leal Valmana <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 05 May 1998 15:58:59 +0100

43 lines

Re: f90 mode?(Emacs)

John Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 1998 10:44:27 -0400 (EDT)

36 lines

RE: f90 mode?(Emacs)

Olaf Michelsson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 05 May 1998 17:48:07 +0200 (METDST)

79 lines

Re: f90 mode?(Emacs)

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 1998 09:06:41 -0700 (PDT)

69 lines
New Thread

F90 Standard clarification needed

F90 Standard clarification needed

Bertrand Meltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 1998 14:38:19 +0200 (MET DST)

61 lines

Re: F90 Standard clarification needed

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 1998 14:35:06 +0000 (BST)

39 lines
New Thread

f90 to f77 style converter ?

f90 to f77 style converter ?

Jeffrey Augenbaum <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 1998 14:34:51 -0400

24 lines
New Thread

fft

fft

Nesmith_T <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 1998 16:59:16 -0400

107 lines

Re: fft

Ralph and Wendy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 1998 21:47:46 -0700

69 lines

Re: FFT

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 98 14:52:28 PDT

73 lines

Re: fft

Otto Stolz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 1998 10:06:03 -0600

60 lines
New Thread

fft response

fft response

Nesmith_T <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 1998 08:34:22 -0400

63 lines
New Thread

FFTs Cont

FFTs Cont

Nesmith_T <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 1998 11:01:48 -0400

77 lines
New Thread

Final call: HUG'98 -- 2nd HPF User Group meeting

Final call: HUG'98 -- 2nd HPF User Group meeting

John Merlin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 1998 15:45:59 +0100 (MET)

141 lines
New Thread

Finding KIND Values with Fortran 90

Finding KIND Values with Fortran 90

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 1998 10:04:13 +0100 (BST)

176 lines
New Thread

Formal and Actual Parameters in Fortran 90

Formal and Actual Parameters in Fortran 90

Dirk Thorsten Vogel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 03 Apr 1998 08:26:13 +0200

71 lines

Re: Formal and Actual Parameters in Fortran 90

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 1998 09:30:25 +0100 (BST)

78 lines

Re: Formal and Actual Parameters in Fortran 90

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 3 Apr 1998 09:35:15 GMT

42 lines
New Thread

Formally undefined behavior?

Formally undefined behavior?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 1998 11:20:04 PDT

19 lines
New Thread

Format again,etc

Format again,etc

David R. Leal Valmana <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 1998 11:43:40 +0100

73 lines

Re: Format again,etc

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 1998 11:26:13 +0100 (BST)

38 lines

Re: Format again,etc

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 30 Apr 1998 11:56:26 GMT

78 lines

RE: Format again,etc

Loren P. Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 1998 08:58:36 -0700

96 lines
New Thread

Fortran 90 / 95 for FreeBSD

Fortran 90 / 95 for FreeBSD

Fabio Luiz Laurenti Garbujo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Oct 1998 19:50:17 -0300 (EST)

19 lines

Re: Fortran 90 / 95 for FreeBSD

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Oct 1998 16:42:44 +0000 (BST)

25 lines
New Thread

Fortran 90/95 Information (August)

Fortran 90/95 Information (August)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Aug 1998 04:11:01 -0400

746 lines
New Thread

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (April)

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (April)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 1998 03:45:32 -0400

731 lines
New Thread

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (May)

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (May)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 1998 05:04:46 -0400

728 lines
New Thread

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (October)

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (October)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 1998 01:30:49 -0400

551 lines
New Thread

Fortran 95/HPF: ALLOCATE for INTENT(OUT) dummy arguments?

Fortran 95/HPF: ALLOCATE for INTENT(OUT) dummy arguments?

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 1998 16:15:21 +0100

60 lines
New Thread

Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)

Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 1998 14:32:20 +0100

37 lines

Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)

John Blair-Fish <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 1998 14:10:34 +0000 (GMT)

65 lines

Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 1998 14:18:49 GMT

57 lines

Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:35:08 -0500 (EST)

19 lines

Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:14:13 GMT

32 lines

Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 1998 16:15:34 +0100

78 lines

Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 1998 17:48:00 +0100

102 lines

Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)

Chuck Koelbel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 1998 16:35:21 -0600

98 lines

Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 1998 16:33:19 +0100

52 lines
New Thread

Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*) (fwd)

Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*) (fwd)

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 1998 14:50:07 +0000 (GMT)

40 lines

Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*) (fwd)

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 1998 10:37:43 -0500 (EST)

23 lines
New Thread

Fortran and VI for Win95

Fortran and VI for Win95

Paulo Avilez Valente <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jul 1998 17:24:43 +0100

83 lines
New Thread

Fortran backspace

Fortran backspace

Harold P. Hjalmarson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:39:58 -0600

66 lines

Re: Fortran backspace

forth.s.a <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:58:11 +0100

84 lines

Re: Fortran backspace

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 06:35:18 -0400

47 lines
New Thread

fortran beautifier

fortran beautifier

Sirish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 1998 09:29:02 +0530

19 lines
New Thread

Fortran compilers for Linux

Fortran compilers for Linux

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 16:09:33 GMT

27 lines

Re: Fortran compilers for Linux

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 11:42:18 -0500 (EST)

18 lines

Re: Fortran compilers for Linux

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 20 Mar 1998 10:51:07 GMT

38 lines
New Thread

fortran futures

fortran futures

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 1998 15:52:28 BST

26 lines
New Thread

fortran futures 98

fortran futures 98

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 1998 15:19:14 BST

724 lines
New Thread

Fortran input parsing

Re: Fortran input parsing

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:38:44 +0100

41 lines
New Thread

Fortran or Ada?

Fortran or Ada?

Siamak Kaveh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:35:47 -0400

73 lines

Re: Fortran or Ada?

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 1998 18:34:51 GMT

35 lines

Re: Fortran or Ada?

David J Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 10:05:55 +0100 (BST)

90 lines

Re: Fortran or Ada?

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 10:30:59 +0100 (BST)

35 lines

Re: Fortran or Ada?

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:20:55 +0100 (BST)

147 lines

Re: Fortran or Ada?

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 98 12:00:39 PDT

45 lines

Re: Fortran or Ada?

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 98 12:21:20 PDT

185 lines

Re: Fortran or Ada?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:23:09 EDT

88 lines

Re: Fortran or Ada?

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 98 15:02:34 PDT

224 lines
New Thread

Fortran or Ada? (fwd)

Re: Fortran or Ada? (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 13:51:12 PDT

22 lines

Re: Fortran or Ada? (fwd)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 14:02:21 PDT

46 lines
New Thread

Fortran90 and Emacs 19.34 under WinNT

Fortran90 and Emacs 19.34 under WinNT

Dirk Thorsten Vogel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jul 1998 08:14:40 +0200

49 lines

Re: Fortran90 and Emacs 19.34 under WinNT

Jean-Yves Tillier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jul 1998 09:26:54 -0500

24 lines

Re: Fortran90 and Emacs 19.34 under WinNT

Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jul 1998 16:41:50 +0200

23 lines

Re: Fortran90 and Emacs 19.34 under WinNT

Jesper Harder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jul 1998 16:51:18 +0200

40 lines
New Thread

Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha

Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha

Antti Kuronen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 1998 11:37:40 +0300 (EET DST)

28 lines

Re: Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 98 23:50:13 PDT

34 lines

Re: Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 1998 16:55:12 +0000 (BST)

24 lines

Re: Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha

Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:10:11 +0200

29 lines

Re: Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 98 10:42:45 PDT

48 lines

Re: Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha

Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 1998 08:50:03 +0200

42 lines
New Thread

Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 1998 13:49:50 -0400

113 lines

Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 1998 17:11:49 -0400 (EDT)

125 lines

Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 1998 18:11:18 -0400

59 lines

Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 09:59:43 +0200

90 lines

Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 09:24:04 -0400 (EDT)

51 lines

Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 10:46:12 -0400

75 lines

Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Mike Lijewski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 08:43:51 -0700

57 lines

Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 13:30:54 -0400 (EDT)

41 lines

Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 1998 10:14:03 +0200

157 lines

Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 1998 14:33:12 +0200

45 lines

Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jun 1998 16:41:32 -0400 (EDT)

211 lines

Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 02 Jun 1998 12:13:32 +0200

138 lines

Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jun 1998 11:14:37 -0400 (EDT)

45 lines

Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 08 Jun 1998 12:36:21 +0200

55 lines
New Thread

Free book for lecturers

Free book for lecturers

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 23 Mar 1998 14:09:50 +0000

39 lines
New Thread

Free PSR f90 for Linux?

Free PSR f90 for Linux?

Jose Marin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 1998 12:18:02 +0100 (BST)

55 lines

Re: Free PSR f90 for Linux?

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 1998 07:56:49 -0400

39 lines

Re: Free PSR f90 for Linux?

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 1998 08:07:32 -0400

27 lines

Free PSR f90 for Linux?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 1998 06:18:30 -0700 (PDT)

36 lines

Re: Free PSR f90 for Linux?

N8TM <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 1998 21:38:30 EDT

21 lines
New Thread

free VAST-f90 for Linux: libvast90 has undefined references

free VAST-f90 for Linux: libvast90 has undefined references

Jose Marin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 1998 15:42:24 +0100 (BST)

68 lines

Re: free VAST-f90 for Linux: libvast90 has undefined references

Jose Marin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 1998 16:43:17 +0100 (BST)

74 lines
New Thread

Function pointers?

Function pointers?

Adriaan Joubert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 1998 11:21:15 GMT

52 lines

Re: Function pointers?

[log in to unmask]

11 Mar 1998 14:27:46 +0100

24 lines

Function pointers?

Adriaan Joubert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 1998 13:47:17 GMT

78 lines

Re: Function pointers?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 1998 9:53:07 PST

32 lines
New Thread

FW: fortran story

FW: fortran story

Loren P. Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 1998 09:11:54 -0700

77 lines
New Thread

g77

g77

Jimmy E. Touma <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jun 1998 00:43:58 -0500

65 lines
New Thread

generalisation of DPROD

generalisation of DPROD

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jun 1998 09:55:24 +0200

42 lines
New Thread

Generic design (actual procedures)

Generic design (actual procedures)

Helmers, Jens Bloch <[log in to unmask]>

03 Oct 1998 12:07:29 +0200

69 lines

Re: Generic design (actual procedures)

Erik Schnetter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Oct 1998 13:59:24 +0200 (MEST)

63 lines

Re: Generic design (actual procedures)

Helmers, Jens Bloch <[log in to unmask]>

06 Oct 1998 21:19:12 +0200

65 lines
New Thread

Generic disambiguation using procedures

Generic disambiguation using procedures

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 13:34:54 PDT

73 lines

Re: Generic disambiguation using procedures

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 18:29:17 -0400

87 lines

Re: Generic disambiguation using procedures

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 16:02:05 -0700 (PDT)

41 lines

Re: Generic disambiguation using procedures

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 15:41:47 PDT

34 lines

Re: Generic disambiguation using procedures

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 19:58:03 -0400

60 lines

Re: Generic disambiguation using procedures

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 1998 19:20:45 -0700 (PDT)

85 lines
New Thread

Generic interface

Generic interface

Christian de Polignac <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 16:08:56 +0200

137 lines

Re: Generic interface

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 16:44:44 +0200

126 lines

Re: Generic interface

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 16:00:02 +0000 (BST)

26 lines

Re: Generic interface

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 16:20:55 +0100 (BST)

98 lines

Re: Generic interface

Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:30:25 +0200

32 lines

Re: Generic interface

John Reid (guest-pch w44/98) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 18:30:56 +0200

85 lines

Re: Generic interface

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:51:42 -0600

91 lines

Re: Generic interface

Graham Kipp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 08:46:52 +1000

56 lines

RE: Generic interface

Olaf Michelsson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 09:46:47 +0200 (METDST)

135 lines

RE: Generic interface

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:29:41 +0100 (BST)

70 lines
New Thread

generic interfaces

generic interfaces

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 1998 10:54:24 +0100 (BST)

149 lines

Re: generic interfaces

Kurt W. Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 1998 08:42:11 -0500

39 lines

Re: generic interfaces

Ron Sverdlove x2517 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 1998 12:28:11 -0400

46 lines

Re: generic interfaces

Waveren, Matthijs van <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 1998 18:20:52 +0100

43 lines

Re: generic interfaces

Len Makin, CSIRO Maths & Info Sci, Melbourne. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 1998 09:32:42 +1000

28 lines

Re: generic interfaces

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 1998 16:34:51 +0200

122 lines
New Thread

generic interfaces -- A summary

Re: generic interfaces -- A summary

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 1998 16:55:53 +0100 (BST)

54 lines

Re: generic interfaces -- A summary

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 1998 16:57:56 -0500

81 lines

Re: generic interfaces -- A summary

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 1998 11:12:40 +0100 (BST)

103 lines

Re: generic interfaces -- A summary

Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 1998 16:01:25 +0200

52 lines
New Thread

generic with dummy procedure

generic with dummy procedure

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 1998 13:34:32 -0500

60 lines

generic with dummy procedure

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 1998 11:16:58 -0800 (PST)

74 lines

Re: generic with dummy procedure

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 1998 14:55:36 -0500

31 lines

Re: generic with dummy procedure

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 13:39:57 +0100

132 lines

Re: generic with dummy procedure

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 14:14:16 +0100

57 lines
New Thread

Generics (was Re: operator( == ) and its negation)

Generics (was Re: operator( == ) and its negation)

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jul 1998 12:58:30 +0100 (BST)

140 lines
New Thread

Help

Help

Jimmy E. Touma <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 1998 18:38:52 -0500

82 lines
New Thread

HELP ME! I don't known any things !

HELP ME! I don't known any things !

Miguel Murillo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 1998 18:52:29 +0200 (CET)

408 lines

Re: HELP ME! I don't known any things !

John Reid (guest-pch w44/98) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 1998 17:07:16 +0200

57 lines
New Thread

Help! please

Help! please

Jimmy E. Touma <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 1998 15:13:36 -0500

80 lines

Re: Help! please

Steve Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 1998 20:40:43 -0400

42 lines
New Thread

helping to promote fortran 90

helping to promote fortran 90

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 1998 12:00:13 +0000 (GMT)

40 lines

Re: helping to promote fortran 90

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 1998 10:15:26 -0400

39 lines

Re: helping to promote fortran 90

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 1998 15:37:05 GMT

38 lines

RE: helping to promote fortran 90

Xinnian Li <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 1998 11:11:27 -0400

62 lines

Re: helping to promote fortran 90

Stu Anderson 425-865-3595 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 1998 09:31:48 -0700 (PDT)

30 lines

Re: helping to promote fortran 90

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 1998 09:53:32 -0700 (PDT)

33 lines

Re: helping to promote Fortran 90

Richard Weaver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 1998 14:04:42 -0500 (CDT)

21 lines

Re: helping to promote fortran 90

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 1998 22:40:54 +0100

58 lines

Re: helping to promote fortran 90

Alan.Miller @ vic.cmis.CSIRO.AU = Alan Miller, Honorary Research Fellow (Retired) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 01 May 1998 10:48:35 +1000

53 lines

Re: helping to promote fortran 90

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 04 May 1998 12:10:45 -0500

39 lines

Re: helping to promote fortran 90

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 1998 15:35:31 -0700 (PDT)

68 lines

RE: helping to promote fortran 90

Loren P. Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 1998 09:13:25 -0700

41 lines

Re: helping to promote fortran 90

Mark Stevens <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 1998 09:22:29 +0000

32 lines

Re:helping to promote fortran 90

venkat sastry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 06 May 1998 10:02:27 +0100

63 lines

Re: helping to promote fortran 90

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 1998 09:34:45 -0400

29 lines

Re: helping to promote fortran 90

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 06 May 1998 09:42:01 -0500

37 lines

Re:helping to promote fortran 90

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 1998 08:59:47 -0600 (MDT)

25 lines

Re: helping to promote fortran 90

N8TM <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 1998 00:30:05 EDT

27 lines
New Thread

High Hopes? (Start the Wish List)

Re: High Hopes? (Start the Wish List)

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 1998 12:18:00 +0100 (BST)

63 lines

Re: High Hopes? (Start the Wish List)

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 1998 09:51:20 -0600

75 lines

Re: High Hopes? (Start the Wish List)

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 1998 12:40:32 +0100 (BST)

77 lines

Re: High Hopes? (Start the Wish List)

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 1998 10:09:45 -0600

71 lines

Re: High Hopes? (Start the Wish List)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 04 Sep 1998 18:19:25 PDT

41 lines
New Thread

History

History

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 1998 10:35:17 -0700 (MST)

26 lines
New Thread

How can I do it on f90?

How can I do it on f90?

David Leal Valmana <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:46:38 -0400

85 lines

Re: How can I do it on f90?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 14 Jul 1998 10:09:19 +0200 (MET DST)

194 lines
New Thread

How to build libraries?

How to build libraries?

Joerg Strutwolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jun 1998 19:26:45 +0100

33 lines

Re: How to build libraries?

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jun 1998 15:33:18 -0400 (EDT)

26 lines

Re: How to build libraries?

Dr. Dan Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jun 1998 10:02:27 BST

55 lines

Re: How to build libraries?

Joerg Strutwolf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jun 1998 10:50:27 +0100

30 lines
New Thread

How to do it with Salford

How to do it with Salford

David R. Leal Valmana <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Oct 1998 09:58:59 +0100

38 lines

Re: How to do it with Salford

Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 1998 11:01:07 +0200

45 lines

RE: How to do it with Salford

Peter Jewell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 1998 11:27:00 +0100

86 lines

Re: How to do it with Salford

Mark Stevens <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Oct 1998 08:55:53 -0000

69 lines
New Thread

HPF vs. arrays of pointers

HPF vs. arrays of pointers

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 1998 16:01:09 +0200

61 lines

Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers

Carl Offner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 1998 11:37:43 -0400

165 lines

Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 1998 19:06:52 +0200

96 lines

Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers

Carl Offner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:55:18 -0400

161 lines

Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 1998 20:06:26 +0200

40 lines

Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers

Carl Offner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 1998 14:34:22 -0400

74 lines

Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 1998 20:31:32 GMT

24 lines

Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 1998 16:34:04 +0200

198 lines
New Thread

HUG'98 Program and Call for Participation

HUG'98 Program and Call for Participation

John Merlin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 1998 15:13:13 +0200 (MET DST)

184 lines
New Thread

HUG'98: 2nd HPF User Group conference

HUG'98: 2nd HPF User Group conference

John Merlin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 1998 16:45:15 +0100 (MET)

114 lines
New Thread

i couldn't resist. :-) it is friday.....

i couldn't resist. :-) it is friday.....

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 1998 15:26:19 BST

223 lines
New Thread

i need help

i need help

ALEX KIRA <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 1998 15:42:48 +0300

14 lines
New Thread

I think this is OK...

I think this is OK...

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 1998 10:46:51 PST

47 lines

Re: I think this is OK...

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:52:47 GMT

66 lines
New Thread

initial values and SAVE

initial values and SAVE

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:14:31 +0000 (GMT)

44 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Adriaan Joubert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:58:55 GMT

34 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 11:44:03 GMT

34 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:03:35 +0000 (GMT)

43 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

I.J.Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:20:23 GMT

45 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:30:34 +0000 (GMT)

59 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:34:51 +0000 (GMT)

39 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 13:41:10 +0100

60 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 13:46:39 +0000 (GMT)

32 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:42:42 -0500 (EST)

17 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Dr W.W. Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 14:53:36 +0000 (GMT)

58 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

I.J.Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 14:57:51 GMT

34 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 15:05:52 GMT

26 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:04:54 +0100

41 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:03:33 -0500 (EST)

27 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:11:01 -0500 (EST)

18 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:16:40 +0100

35 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 15:21:14 GMT

29 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:56:58 -0500 (EST)

52 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:03:24 -0700 (MST)

17 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:06:45 GMT

34 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:20:03 -0700 (MST)

17 lines

initial values and SAVE

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 08:22:21 -0800 (PST)

74 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

John Lindsay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 11:32:39 -0500

65 lines

Re: initial values and SAVE

Jack Scheible <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 1998 11:35:48 -0500 (EST)

23 lines