JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


June 2020


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Introduction to test evaluation with BLCMs. An example on COVID-19 diagnostics

Polychronis Kostoulas

Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:17:09 +0000

153 lines

Statistical Modelling using SPSS (2-days course) - Imperial College London

Krupa Shukla

Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:27:28 +0100

85 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:08:32 +0000

617 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

Rod Jackson

Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:45:21 +0000

577 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

Jeremy Howick

Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:38:25 +0000

575 lines

Fwd: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 - why comparing reported test results by country are meaningless

Rod Jackson

Sun, 28 Jun 2020 06:17:13 +0000

1829 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

Rod Jackson

Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:22:00 +0000

1800 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

Jeremy Howick

Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:26:46 +0000

584 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe

Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:40:24 +0000

504 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:25:58 +0000

562 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

Emily Gmail

Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:23:10 -0400

665 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

Jeremy Howick

Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:04:52 +0000

457 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:30:20 +0000

439 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

Jeremy Howick

Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:19:58 +0000

280 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

Alfredo Serrano Moraza

Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:15:49 +0200

624 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe

Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:59:33 +0000

133 lines

Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

Dan Mayer

Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:29:10 -0400

141 lines

Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries

David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe

Sat, 27 Jun 2020 13:30:30 +0000

69 lines

Call for papers: Evidence & Policy special issue -The many faces of disability in evidence for policy and practice

Thea Cook

Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:08:03 +0100

300 lines

NVivo Virtual Conference Qualitative Research in a Changing World

Silvana di Gregorio

Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:04:45 +0000

64 lines

Imperial College London - Data Management and Statistical Analysis using SPSS

Krupa Shukla

Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:14:38 +0100

101 lines

Invitation to attend Prof. Blanca Rodriguez talk "Augmenting drug development and cardiology with computer science"

ACM-W UK

Thu, 18 Jun 2020 15:51:59 +0100

130 lines

Re: WHO halts trial of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients

Jeremy Howick

Thu, 18 Jun 2020 07:55:18 +0000

152 lines

WHO halts trial of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients

Manitoba Hunter

Wed, 17 Jun 2020 21:53:45 +0000

93 lines

From BBC world service: Coronavirus: first life-saving drug

David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe

Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:23:24 +0000

47 lines

Webinar on the evaluation of COVID-19 diagnostics with BLCMs

Polychronis Kostoulas

Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:51:03 +0000

318 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Michael Bennett

Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:49:19 +0000

1519 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe

Sun, 14 Jun 2020 13:00:12 +0000

1445 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Sun, 14 Jun 2020 11:08:22 +0000

1266 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Wouter Havinga

Sun, 14 Jun 2020 10:32:30 +0100

1809 lines

Is transparency dangerous to science?

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Sat, 13 Jun 2020 18:46:00 +0000

193 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Rakesh Biswas

Sat, 13 Jun 2020 21:33:47 +0530

1691 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Mohammed T. Ansari

Sat, 13 Jun 2020 11:42:12 -0400

1656 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Rakesh Biswas

Sat, 13 Jun 2020 21:02:53 +0530

1619 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Anoop B

Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:16:55 -0400

1580 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Rakesh Biswas

Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:32:43 +0530

1529 lines

Fwd: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Donald E. Stanley

Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:09:16 +0000

424 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 23:34:26 +0000

963 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 23:34:23 +0000

963 lines

Fwd: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Donald E. Stanley

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 23:07:06 +0000

894 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Anoop B

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 18:06:07 -0400

1459 lines

Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity

Myles, Nickolas [PH]

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 17:07:55 +0000

631 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Rakesh Biswas

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 21:36:14 +0530

2304 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:31:25 +0000

1526 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:07:08 +0000

1425 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Ashley Kennedy

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 14:57:50 +0000

1788 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Jeremy Howick

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 14:54:23 +0000

1187 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Donald E. Stanley

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 14:50:50 +0000

416 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Ashley Kennedy

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 14:33:08 +0000

1040 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Mohammed T. Ansari

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:01:00 -0400

1463 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:39:46 +0000

903 lines

Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity

joseph ana

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:37:48 +0000

659 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Ashley Kennedy

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 03:26:52 +0000

821 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Mohammed T. Ansari

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 21:52:22 -0400

1100 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Thu, 11 Jun 2020 01:07:59 +0000

701 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Anoop B

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:54:18 -0400

735 lines

Surgisphere: mass audit of papers linked to firm behind hydroxychloroquine Lancet study scandal

Richard Hockey

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:06:40 +0000

27 lines

Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity

Dan Mayer

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:00:00 -0400

500 lines

Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity

Christie A

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:37:37 -0600

474 lines

Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity

Rod Jackson

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:58:28 +0000

279 lines

Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity

Alfredo Serrano

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:23:55 +0200

582 lines

Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity

Kelleher, Kevin

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:53:09 +0000

382 lines

Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity

EGW BWC

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:48:45 +0100

226 lines

Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:37:35 +0000

259 lines

Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity

David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:01:38 +0000

122 lines

Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity

EGW BWC

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:58:25 +0100

151 lines

Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity

David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:37:19 +0000

89 lines

THIS Institute fellowship opportunity

Hannah Flack

Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:47:24 +0000

204 lines

WHO on asymptomatic coronavirus spread.

David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe

Tue, 9 Jun 2020 23:46:16 +0000

58 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

joseph ana

Tue, 9 Jun 2020 23:40:57 +0100

921 lines

Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Wouter Havinga

Tue, 9 Jun 2020 21:13:41 +0100

926 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper....Lockdowns are a powerful tool

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:42:06 +0000

3462 lines

Call for Papers - NVivo Virtual Conference

Silvana di Gregorio

Tue, 9 Jun 2020 09:05:35 +0000

66 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

David Nunan

Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:57:56 +0000

3065 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

joseph ana

Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:47:55 +0100

4086 lines

Computer Programs for Semi-Automation of Evidence

Farhad Shokraneh

Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:45:13 +0100

102 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Mon, 8 Jun 2020 12:51:23 +0000

492 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Anoop B

Mon, 8 Jun 2020 00:04:14 -0400

596 lines

Bradford-Hill’s thoughts on ‘some things to consider’ when assessing causality: that’s the approach GRADE should have taken as well

Rod Jackson

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 22:20:01 +0000

263 lines

Re: Lancet

Rod Jackson

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 21:02:38 +0000

556 lines

Re: Lancet

David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 20:44:36 +0000

581 lines

Lancet

Jeremy Howick

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 20:36:11 +0000

527 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Rod Jackson

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 19:26:43 +0000

311 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 19:06:47 +0000

660 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Wouter Havinga

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 19:47:14 +0100

632 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 13:35:18 +0000

391 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Anoop B

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 08:36:20 -0400

294 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 12:33:28 +0000

378 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Mohammed T. Ansari

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 06:37:30 -0400

302 lines

Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Michael Power

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 10:19:09 +0100

228 lines

Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.

Rod Jackson

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 00:28:01 +0000

80 lines

Re: Has Sweden made a fatal mistake?

David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe

Sun, 7 Jun 2020 00:00:48 +0000

538 lines

Re: Has Sweden made a fatal mistake?

Rod Jackson

Sat, 6 Jun 2020 22:50:40 +0000

467 lines

Has Sweden made a fatal mistake?

Rod Jackson

Sat, 6 Jun 2020 21:24:06 +0000

146 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

David Nunan

Sat, 6 Jun 2020 21:06:37 +0000

3092 lines

Re: ROBIS 2 tool

Aamer Imdad

Sat, 6 Jun 2020 16:52:42 -0400

201 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Rod Jackson

Sat, 6 Jun 2020 20:49:45 +0000

3068 lines

Re: ROBIS 2 tool

K Hopayian

Sat, 6 Jun 2020 19:44:15 +0100

185 lines

Re: ROBIS 2 tool

Manitoba Hunter

Sat, 6 Jun 2020 18:43:24 +0000

172 lines

Re: ROBIS 2 tool

Aamer Imdad

Sat, 6 Jun 2020 14:29:22 -0400

126 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Jim Walker

Sat, 6 Jun 2020 13:28:12 -0400

3942 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Sat, 6 Jun 2020 14:02:54 +0000

3035 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Ashok Handa

Sat, 6 Jun 2020 12:22:06 +0000

4249 lines

ROBIS 2 tool

K Hopayian

Sat, 6 Jun 2020 13:15:22 +0100

123 lines

The use of evidence to inform response efforts during infectious epidemics-looking for participants

Vindrola, Cecilia

Sat, 6 Jun 2020 10:06:11 +0000

235 lines

Re: Covid 19: Altmetric top 20 articles by category

Lelia Carvalho

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 21:41:22 -0300

170 lines

Hydroxychloroquine does not cure Covid-19, say drug trial chiefs

Richard Hockey

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 23:47:23 +0000

24 lines

Retracted studies may have damaged public trust in science, top researchers fear

Richard Hockey

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 23:42:31 +0000

27 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Rod Jackson

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 21:54:30 +0000

2862 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Dr Amy Price

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:49:40 -0400

2832 lines

Results from the RECOVERY Trial

Anoop Balachandran

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 16:58:05 +0100

29 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Reynolds,Penelope Susan

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:44:59 +0000

2802 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Anoop B

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:33:18 -0400

4245 lines

Covid 19: Altmetric top 20 articles by category

Ernesto Barrera

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:09:45 +0200

113 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

David Nunan

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:08:46 +0000

2851 lines

Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper

David Nunan

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:06:39 +0000

485 lines

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper

William Grant

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:04:40 -0400

551 lines

Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper

Jeremy Howick

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:47:29 +0000

379 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Anoop B

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:47:29 -0400

4119 lines

Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper

Philipp Dahm

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 09:33:02 -0500

470 lines

Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper

Suhail Doi

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:22:31 +0300

124 lines

Re: (External Email) Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper

Benson, Teresa

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:19:10 +0000

232 lines

Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper

Suhail Doi

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:14:27 +0300

153 lines

Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper

Andreas Lundh

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 16:11:15 +0200

370 lines

Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper

Amy Price

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:56:18 +0000

111 lines

Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper

Philipp Dahm

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:52:28 -0500

164 lines

Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper

Suhail Doi

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 16:44:29 +0300

42 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Benjamin Djulbegovic MD

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:27:23 +0000

2748 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Mariam Hassan

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:32:06 +0000

3287 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Mariam Hassan

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:29:19 +0000

2556 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Narges Khanjani

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 12:56:46 +0430

4582 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Richard Hockey

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:25:59 +0000

2516 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Federico Barbani USL

Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:17:30 +0200

3769 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Anoop B

Thu, 4 Jun 2020 19:54:22 -0400

3700 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Richard Hockey

Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:43:31 +0000

3874 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Bewley, Susan

Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:09:33 +0000

3145 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Michael Power

Thu, 4 Jun 2020 22:24:36 +0100

5183 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Carlos A. Cuello Garcia

Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:19:37 -0400

4908 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Jeremy Howick

Thu, 4 Jun 2020 21:12:47 +0000

3616 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Kelleher, Kevin

Thu, 4 Jun 2020 21:04:29 +0000

4040 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Anoop B

Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:04:29 -0400

4517 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Michael Power

Thu, 4 Jun 2020 22:03:58 +0100

5134 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Jeremy Howick

Thu, 4 Jun 2020 20:39:56 +0000

3944 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Michael Power

Thu, 4 Jun 2020 21:39:19 +0100

5454 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Michael Power

Thu, 4 Jun 2020 20:55:42 +0100

5386 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Anoop B

Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:40:51 -0400

4953 lines

Governments and WHO changed Covid-19 policy based on suspect data from tiny US company | World news | The Guardian

Richard Hockey

Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:51:34 +0000

79 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Richard Hockey

Wed, 3 Jun 2020 02:18:40 +0000

3716 lines

STATA Short Courses from Imperial College London

Krupa Shukla

Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:28:05 +0100

97 lines

Call for Papers: COVID-19 interactions with our Environment, “UCL Open: Environment”

Margie Coughlin

Mon, 1 Jun 2020 14:30:09 +0100

64 lines

Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper

Richard Hockey

Mon, 1 Jun 2020 00:33:05 +0000

3490 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager