JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


December 2017


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Be aware, predatory journals (1 message)
COURSE: Introduction to Conversation Analysis to Study Healthcare Encounters (Bristol) (1 message)
Critical Appraisal Workshop - New 2018 date released (1 message)
Deadline for Abstracts December 20: International Health Conference 2018 (1 message)
Diabetes Remission (1 message)
Disclosures in Nutrition Research (1 message)
EBM, clinical trials, dengue vaccine, Philippines (1 message)
EBP online course for Medical Librarians (1 message)
EBSurgery: ORBITA and more (1 message)
Enjoying statistics. Seeing Theory (3 messages)
Healthcare Value (1 message)
In the CDC, USA: the term "evidence-based" is forbidden (2 messages)
Looking for a Survey about EBM training during residency en Español (1 message)
Machismo in the scientific meetings (1 message)
Mandatory HCWs influenza vaccine. EBM? (3 messages)
Merry Xmas (1 message)
new hypertension guidelines, controversy (36 messages)
Preventing Overdiagnosis 2018 - Call for Abstracts (1 message)
R: Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others (1 message)
recommendations about SR software (1 message)
reproducibility (5 messages)
Ten essential papers for the practice of evidence-based medicine (3 messages)
The 37th Fisher Memorial lecture: Is there a more fundamental theorem of natural selection? (1 message)
US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others (16 messages)
Words were taboo at other agencies, including those within the Dept of Health and Human Services (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Be aware, predatory journals

Be aware, predatory journals

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:16:32 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

COURSE: Introduction to Conversation Analysis to Study Healthcare Encounters (Bristol)

COURSE: Introduction to Conversation Analysis to Study Healthcare Encounters (Bristol)

Short Course Mailbox <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:35:20 +0000

204 lines

New Thread

Critical Appraisal Workshop - New 2018 date released

Critical Appraisal Workshop - New 2018 date released

Watkeys Jacqui (RBK) Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:54:26 +0000

360 lines

New Thread

Deadline for Abstracts December 20: International Health Conference 2018

Deadline for Abstracts December 20: International Health Conference 2018

Theofili Kampianaki <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2017 07:42:56 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

Diabetes Remission

Diabetes Remission

Anoop Balachandran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:28:09 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

Disclosures in Nutrition Research

Disclosures in Nutrition Research

Anoop Balachandran <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Dec 2017 23:39:53 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

EBM, clinical trials, dengue vaccine, Philippines

EBM, clinical trials, dengue vaccine, Philippines

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:57:41 +0100

73 lines

New Thread

EBP online course for Medical Librarians

EBP online course for Medical Librarians

Schardt, Connie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:07:06 +0000

143 lines

New Thread

EBSurgery: ORBITA and more

EBSurgery: ORBITA and more

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Dec 2017 09:50:00 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

Enjoying statistics. Seeing Theory

Enjoying statistics. Seeing Theory

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2017 09:58:13 +0100

34 lines

Re: Enjoying statistics. Seeing Theory

Anoop B <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:18:00 -0500

49 lines

Re: Enjoying statistics. Seeing Theory

Bill Cayley, Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:32:34 +0000

131 lines

New Thread

Healthcare Value

Healthcare Value

University of Oxford CPD Centre <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:42:53 +0000

1187 lines

New Thread

In the CDC, USA: the term "evidence-based" is forbidden

In the CDC, USA: the term "evidence-based" is forbidden

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Dec 2017 09:27:12 +0100

61 lines

Re: In the CDC, USA: the term "evidence-based" is forbidden

Norman Vetter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Dec 2017 08:37:30 +0000

86 lines

New Thread

Looking for a Survey about EBM training during residency en Español

Looking for a Survey about EBM training during residency en Español

Shadia Constantine <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Dec 2017 18:01:32 +0900

79 lines

New Thread

Machismo in the scientific meetings

Machismo in the scientific meetings

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:05:19 +0100

240 lines

New Thread

Mandatory HCWs influenza vaccine. EBM?

Re: Mandatory HCWs influenza vaccine. EBM?

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Dec 2017 21:54:46 +0100

275 lines

Re: Mandatory HCWs influenza vaccine. EBM?

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Dec 2017 19:52:32 +0100

178 lines

Re: Mandatory HCWs influenza vaccine. EBM?

Wouter Havinga <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Dec 2017 20:15:48 +0000

85 lines

New Thread

Merry Xmas

Merry Xmas

Magdy M. Gado <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Dec 2017 16:41:07 +0000

131 lines

New Thread

new hypertension guidelines, controversy

new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:22:38 +0100

199 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Anoop B <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 08:53:35 -0500

230 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 22:44:58 +0100

921 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Rod Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:27:49 +0000

1073 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Anoop B <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:50:55 -0500

1272 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Bill Cayley, Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:54:30 +0000

1113 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:31:19 +0100

1398 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

McCormack, James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:27:49 +0000

1431 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Rod Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 03:52:18 +0000

1671 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

McCormack, James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 05:19:55 +0000

2120 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Owen Dempsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 07:40:39 +0000

2469 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

McCormack, James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:17:12 +0000

2239 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Dr Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:41:35 +0000

617 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:57:44 +0100

1432 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Mohammed T. Ansari <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 07:37:17 -0500

1489 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Owen Dempsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:48:02 +0000

1846 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

McCormack, James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:22:56 +0000

1136 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Pennington, Andy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:44:10 +0000

1198 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:34:18 +0100

1699 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

McCormack, James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:14:19 +0000

1478 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:26:03 +0100

1866 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Rod Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Dec 2017 07:10:37 +0000

1691 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

McCormack, James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Dec 2017 07:32:16 +0000

2062 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Dec 2017 10:17:48 +0100

2390 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Rod Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Dec 2017 22:39:58 +0000

2165 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Richard Hockey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:35:02 +0000

2262 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Huw Llewelyn [hul2] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2017 01:32:12 +0000

2306 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:04:11 +0100

2998 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Owen Dempsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:35:42 +0000

3368 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Bill Cayley, Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2017 16:14:32 +0000

3200 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

McCormack, James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2017 16:23:59 +0000

2815 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:37:00 +0100

3725 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Rod Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:56:52 +0000

3360 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Owen Dempsey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:06:47 +0000

3859 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Michael Power <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Dec 2017 20:44:08 +0000

3733 lines

Re: new hypertension guidelines, controversy

Rod Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Dec 2017 00:16:21 +0000

3508 lines

New Thread

Preventing Overdiagnosis 2018 - Call for Abstracts

Preventing Overdiagnosis 2018 - Call for Abstracts

Ruth Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:09:03 +0000

518 lines

New Thread

R: Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

R: Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

jefferson.tom <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 13:53:33 +0100

194 lines

New Thread

recommendations about SR software

recommendations about SR software

Valerie King <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Dec 2017 14:27:41 +0000

191 lines

New Thread

reproducibility

reproducibility

Federico Barbani <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2017 16:31:56 +0100

31 lines

Re: reproducibility

Anoop B <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2017 16:06:03 -0500

81 lines

Re: reproducibility

Pennington, Andy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2017 22:33:04 +0000

85 lines

Re: reproducibility

healingjia Price <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2017 23:31:03 +0000

176 lines

Re: reproducibility

Vasiliy Vlassov <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Dec 2017 10:28:07 +0300

311 lines

New Thread

Ten essential papers for the practice of evidence-based medicine

Re: Ten essential papers for the practice of evidence-based medicine

David Nunan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2017 21:11:03 +0000

237 lines

Re: Ten essential papers for the practice of evidence-based medicine

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:00:13 +0100

271 lines

Re: Ten essential papers for the practice of evidence-based medicine

Anoop B <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:08:32 -0500

292 lines

New Thread

The 37th Fisher Memorial lecture: Is there a more fundamental theorem of natural selection?

The 37th Fisher Memorial lecture: Is there a more fundamental theorem of natural selection?

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Dec 2017 13:17:42 +0000

216 lines

New Thread

US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Poses, Roy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:40:52 -0500

51 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

healingjia Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Dec 2017 20:50:09 +0000

130 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Birnbaum, David <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 00:00:17 +0000

262 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Neil Pakenham-Walsh <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 08:59:01 +0000

44 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Vasiliy Vlassov <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 12:13:03 +0300

70 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Brian Alper MD <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 11:50:36 +0000

84 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Bill Cayley, Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 15:01:24 +0000

327 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Poses, Roy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 11:39:09 -0500

335 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Denise Saretta Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 19:41:37 +0000

372 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Helen Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 15:58:57 -0500

400 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 22:27:24 +0100

433 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Bill Cayley, Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:34:51 +0000

489 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

healingjia Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:51:13 +0000

530 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Birnbaum, David <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:51:52 +0000

125 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Myles, Nickolas [PH] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:38:05 -0800

361 lines

Re: US CDC bans using the word "evidence-based" among others

Bill Cayley, Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:54:01 +0000

370 lines

New Thread

Words were taboo at other agencies, including those within the Dept of Health and Human Services

Words were taboo at other agencies, including those within the Dept of Health and Human Services

Poses, Roy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Dec 2017 21:56:19 -0500

66 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager