JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


September 2017


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"ModPo" begins again on September 9 — free, non-credit, open to all (1 message)
A hart into Actaeon (3 messages)
A Tip (4 messages)
Another! (2 messages)
Ashbery (2 messages)
Course in Oxford (6 messages)
CREAM RISES TO THE TOP: NOT! (Part I) Heaney acolyte slammed (2 messages)
David Kennedy (1 message)
for (1 message)
Fwd: Re: Sad news (1 message)
hiring at Penn (1 message)
hiring in contemporary poetry/poetics at Penn (1 message)
Hurray! The Fall issue of BlazeVOX 17 is now online (1 message)
In answer to your question, Tim ... (1 message)
jack Spicer (1 message)
Jarvis epigram (5 messages)
John Challis: new Poetry Salzburg pamphlet The Black Cab / launch reading / Halifax (1 message)
Larkin, Heaney, listpeak (92 messages)
Letters in Canada - University of Toronto Quarterly Summer 2017 now available on Project MUSE (1 message)
Letters in Canada - University of Toronto Quarterly Summer 2017 now available online (1 message)
New if p then q title - Under The Cliff Like by Tim Allen (4 messages)
New Issue: Studia Hibernica Volume 43 (1 message)
new PoemTalk episode: on Anne Tardos's "Uxudo" (1 message)
New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions (21 messages)
Now launched and on the streets: (1 message)
NPD UK (9 messages)
Only a hart (1 message)
Paterson (7 messages)
patience, limit of (5 messages)
Peter Barlow's Cigarette #24 ~ poetry reading (2 messages)
Philip Larkin any comments? (60 messages)
poetic diction, nature poetry, etc (8 messages)
Post your (2 messages)
Prospectus by Simon Taylor (new title from if p then q) (1 message)
query (2 messages)
Rascal: Issue 1 (8 messages)
Sad news (8 messages)
terminology (15 messages)
The bible (1 message)
The new ebook from Argotist Ebooks is “The Posit Trilogy” by Adam Fieled (1 message)
The vine (3 messages)
up to the minute mainstream (16 messages)
Upon me (4 messages)
What do you make of the following note (of mine)? (2 messages)
What's difficult about that ? (28 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"ModPo" begins again on September 9 — free, non-credit, open to all

"ModPo" begins again on September 9 — free, non-credit, open to all

Filreis, Al <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:17:20 +0000

4707 lines

New Thread

A hart into Actaeon

A hart into Actaeon

Jeff Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:24:06 +0000

56 lines

Re: A hart into Actaeon

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Sep 2017 17:40:56 +0100

68 lines

Re: A hart into Actaeon

Jeremy F Green <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Sep 2017 16:54:30 +0000

104 lines

New Thread

A Tip

Re: A Tip

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 12:21:44 +0100

260 lines

Re: A Tip

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 12:26:11 +0100

279 lines

Re: A Tip

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 12:33:27 +0100

297 lines

Re: A Tip

patrick mcmanus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 21:12:41 +0100

159 lines

New Thread

Another!

Another!

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:03:29 +0100

2059 lines

Re: Another!

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:11:44 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Ashbery

Ashbery

hardPressed poetry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:32:05 +0100

36 lines

Re: Ashbery

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:23:34 +0100

114 lines

New Thread

Course in Oxford

Course in Oxford

GILES GOODLAND <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 19:45:54 +0000

133 lines

Re: Course in Oxford

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 21:32:20 +0100

146 lines

Re: Course in Oxford

GILES GOODLAND <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:28:41 +0000

194 lines

Re: Course in Oxford

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:35:13 +0100

234 lines

Re: Course in Oxford

GILES GOODLAND <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Sep 2017 20:55:11 +0000

304 lines

Re: Course in Oxford

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:56:43 +0100

343 lines

New Thread

CREAM RISES TO THE TOP: NOT! (Part I) Heaney acolyte slammed

CREAM RISES TO THE TOP: NOT! (Part I) Heaney acolyte slammed

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:52:42 +0100

34 lines

Re: CREAM RISES TO THE TOP: NOT! (Part I) Heaney acolyte slammed

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:36:04 +0100

100 lines

New Thread

David Kennedy

David Kennedy

david wheatley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Sep 2017 21:23:18 +0000

971 lines

New Thread

for

for

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:07:32 +0100

112 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: Sad news

Fwd: Re: Sad news

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Sep 2017 07:59:14 -0400

87 lines

New Thread

hiring at Penn

hiring at Penn

Filreis, Al <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 13:19:09 +0000

122 lines

New Thread

hiring in contemporary poetry/poetics at Penn

hiring in contemporary poetry/poetics at Penn

Filreis, Al <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 13:23:46 +0000

142 lines

New Thread

Hurray! The Fall issue of BlazeVOX 17 is now online

Hurray! The Fall issue of BlazeVOX 17 is now online

BlazeVOX [books] <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Sep 2017 14:09:57 +0000

2621 lines

New Thread

In answer to your question, Tim ...

In answer to your question, Tim ...

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Sep 2017 20:06:28 -0700

145 lines

New Thread

jack Spicer

jack Spicer

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 14:12:00 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Jarvis epigram

Jarvis epigram

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:43:36 +0100

46 lines

Re: Jarvis epigram

Jacob McGuinn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:46:44 +0000

90 lines

Re: Jarvis epigram

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:49:49 -0400

78 lines

Re: Jarvis epigram

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:56:54 +0100

123 lines

Re: Jarvis epigram

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:05:48 +0100

142 lines

New Thread

John Challis: new Poetry Salzburg pamphlet The Black Cab / launch reading / Halifax

John Challis: new Poetry Salzburg pamphlet The Black Cab / launch reading / Halifax

Wolfgang Görtschacher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:38:30 +0200

64 lines

New Thread

Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 09:13:31 +0100

60 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:04:53 +0100

540 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:41:55 +0100

216 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 13:14:30 +0100

452 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 13:24:01 +0100

135 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 14:31:45 +0100

101 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 15:07:01 +0100

120 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:23:29 +0100

279 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:58:50 +0100

53 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 17:04:41 +0100

63 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 17:14:51 +0100

108 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 17:40:33 +0100

114 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 18:06:42 +0100

151 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 18:30:11 +0100

207 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:43:34 +0100

55 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:48:24 +0100

62 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:57:51 +0100

62 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jeremy F Green <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:27:27 +0000

31 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:43:05 +0100

76 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:08:55 +0100

603 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Hampson, R <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 11:48:57 +0000

297 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:02:10 +0100

69 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:06:42 +0100

53 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:16:04 +0100

433 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:28:37 +0100

80 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:39:39 +0100

135 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jeremy F Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:52:21 +0000

102 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:22:48 +0100

84 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:33:00 +0100

175 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:35:49 +0100

99 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jeremy F Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:58:34 +0000

100 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:07:44 +0100

172 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:12:55 +0100

106 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 19:34:49 +0100

75 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:24:30 +0100

123 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:47:10 +0100

64 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2017 12:49:37 +0100

49 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:50:18 +0100

104 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:34:37 +0100

158 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:18:38 +0100

171 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Sep 2017 22:35:25 +0100

174 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:55:16 +0100

158 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:29:39 +0100

196 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Sep 2017 21:12:52 +0100

101 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:24:06 +0100

302 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tony Frazer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Sep 2017 14:20:40 +0100

192 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Sep 2017 17:02:16 +0100

408 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tony Frazer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Sep 2017 18:04:41 +0100

533 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Sep 2017 18:19:59 +0100

470 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Sep 2017 18:33:57 +0100

631 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Sep 2017 16:03:48 -0400

405 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 10:58:28 +0100

49 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 11:21:35 +0100

173 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 11:26:38 +0100

86 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 11:30:37 +0100

69 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 11:36:04 +0100

142 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:31:30 +0100

116 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 14:33:58 +0100

62 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 14:41:59 +0100

136 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 14:57:35 +0100

383 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:08:11 +0100

130 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:08:36 +0100

157 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:09:35 +0100

131 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 16:13:03 +0100

182 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 16:20:09 +0100

193 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 17:02:16 +0100

295 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 17:53:27 +0100

170 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 12:55:54 -0400

185 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:00:12 -0400

104 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 18:06:53 +0100

311 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 18:09:09 +0100

210 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:32:24 -0400

119 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 18:45:35 +0100

250 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 18:58:32 +0100

320 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 19:13:15 +0100

340 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

GILES GOODLAND <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Sep 2017 19:19:20 +0000

321 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:19:07 +0100

67 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:26:14 +0100

66 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 11:22:29 +0100

186 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 11:41:47 +0100

236 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:14:22 +0100

81 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:22:15 +0100

340 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:29:23 +0100

87 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:33:12 +0100

151 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:45:11 +0100

176 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:01:39 +0100

212 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:51:14 +0100

121 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tony Frazer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 17:36:31 +0100

48 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 17:49:22 +0100

66 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 17:53:21 +0100

59 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Jeremy F Green <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:47:17 +0000

16 lines

Re: Larkin, Heaney, listpeak

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 15:40:43 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Letters in Canada - University of Toronto Quarterly Summer 2017 now available on Project MUSE

Letters in Canada - University of Toronto Quarterly Summer 2017 now available on Project MUSE

UTP Journals <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:42:14 -0400

508 lines

New Thread

Letters in Canada - University of Toronto Quarterly Summer 2017 now available online

Letters in Canada - University of Toronto Quarterly Summer 2017 now available online

UTP Journals <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:40:53 -0400

543 lines

New Thread

New if p then q title - Under The Cliff Like by Tim Allen

New if p then q title - Under The Cliff Like by Tim Allen

James Davies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:30:01 +0100

101 lines

Re: New if p then q title - Under The Cliff Like by Tim Allen

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:51:10 +0100

133 lines

Re: New if p then q title - Under The Cliff Like by Tim Allen

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:15:17 +0100

145 lines

Re: New if p then q title - Under The Cliff Like by Tim Allen

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:53:01 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

New Issue: Studia Hibernica Volume 43

New Issue: Studia Hibernica Volume 43

Ainsworth, Megan [mains] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Sep 2017 08:51:31 +0000

359 lines

New Thread

new PoemTalk episode: on Anne Tardos's "Uxudo"

new PoemTalk episode: on Anne Tardos's "Uxudo"

Filreis, Al <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:30:21 +0000

19521 lines

New Thread

New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2017 00:02:50 +0100

98 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2017 01:17:27 +0100

145 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2017 16:46:24 +0100

52 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 12:39:27 +0100

80 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 12:52:24 +0100

235 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 13:10:15 +0100

254 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 13:13:39 +0100

310 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 13:37:02 +0100

462 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 13:54:26 +0100

103 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 14:13:08 +0100

72 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 18:38:04 +0100

93 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Sep 2017 09:49:30 +0100

113 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Sep 2017 15:33:14 +0100

130 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Sep 2017 18:05:32 +0100

155 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Sep 2017 18:09:30 +0100

248 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Sep 2017 18:25:00 +0100

82 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Sep 2017 20:51:30 +0100

97 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Sep 2017 21:40:06 +0100

118 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Sep 2017 09:50:55 +0100

112 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Sep 2017 10:46:36 +0100

141 lines

Re: New to this list, just wanted to ask two questions

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Sep 2017 11:34:55 +0100

106 lines

New Thread

Now launched and on the streets:

Now launched and on the streets:

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:07:51 +0100

654 lines

New Thread

NPD UK

NPD UK

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:17:05 +0100

37 lines

Re: NPD UK

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Sep 2017 21:39:57 +0100

73 lines

Re: NPD UK

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:39:49 +0100

107 lines

Re: NPD UK

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Sep 2017 19:01:06 +0100

119 lines

Re: NPD UK

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Sep 2017 17:33:00 +0100

177 lines

Re: NPD UK

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Sep 2017 17:34:57 +0100

190 lines

Re: NPD UK

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Sep 2017 17:43:16 +0100

262 lines

Re: NPD UK

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Sep 2017 17:46:19 +0100

269 lines

Re: NPD UK

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Sep 2017 17:51:29 +0100

288 lines

New Thread

Only a hart

Only a hart

Jeff Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 18:34:21 +0000

60 lines

New Thread

Paterson

Paterson

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:13:35 +0100

43 lines

Re: Paterson

Joey Frances <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:33:53 +0000

143 lines

Re: Paterson

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:54:29 +0100

114 lines

Re: Paterson

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 15:32:38 +0100

271 lines

Re: Paterson

Joey Frances <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:59:45 +0000

306 lines

Re: Paterson

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:13:23 +0100

169 lines

Re: Paterson

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:37:28 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

patience, limit of

patience, limit of

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 16:41:06 +0100

32 lines

Re: patience, limit of

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 17:29:43 +0100

90 lines

Re: patience, limit of

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:19:31 +0100

107 lines

Re: patience, limit of

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:57:18 +0100

69 lines

Re: patience, limit of

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Sep 2017 16:17:44 +0100

90 lines

New Thread

Peter Barlow's Cigarette #24 ~ poetry reading

Peter Barlow's Cigarette #24 ~ poetry reading

Joey Frances <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Sep 2017 15:02:00 +0000

269 lines

Re: Peter Barlow's Cigarette #24 ~ poetry reading

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Sep 2017 17:02:14 +0100

102 lines

New Thread

Philip Larkin any comments?

Philip Larkin any comments?

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:17:38 +0100

37 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:45:11 +0100

88 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Sep 2017 18:09:06 +0100

115 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Sep 2017 18:56:47 +0100

123 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Sep 2017 18:57:46 +0100

136 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Sep 2017 18:59:19 +0100

152 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Sep 2017 19:36:46 +0100

173 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Sep 2017 12:52:26 +0100

107 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:38:46 +0100

152 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:40:57 +0100

57 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:54:24 +0100

71 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 05:49:11 +0100

105 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:21:06 +0100

124 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:33:31 +0100

157 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:00:16 +0100

140 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:56:00 +0100

305 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:23:39 +0100

187 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:28:11 +0100

214 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:46:18 +0100

56 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:04:45 +0100

81 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:16:56 +0100

104 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:32:42 +0100

196 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:01:41 +0100

59 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:03:22 +0100

208 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:05:07 +0100

229 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:04:28 +0100

330 lines

Philip Larkin any comments?

Ralph Wessman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 06:31:22 +1000

56 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:05:03 +0100

72 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:33:07 +0100

424 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:19:36 +0100

128 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:48:14 +0100

156 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:52:42 +0100

179 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jeremy F Green <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:16:57 +0000

218 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Paul Green <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:21:10 +0000

256 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Hampson, R <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:23:21 +0000

390 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:57:12 +0100

367 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:06:25 +0100

316 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jeremy F Green <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:23:19 +0000

295 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:34:25 +0100

450 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 19:01:42 +0100

427 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 20:20:47 +0100

526 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Sep 2017 20:23:31 +0100

555 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Sep 2017 10:51:48 +0100

76 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:40:29 +0100

102 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:42:07 +0100

82 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jeremy F Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:25:16 +0000

142 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Sep 2017 16:35:09 +0100

201 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Sep 2017 17:13:48 +0100

88 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Sep 2017 17:16:57 +0100

48 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Sep 2017 19:23:58 +0100

170 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Sep 2017 19:33:45 +0100

127 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Sep 2017 18:42:36 +0100

140 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Sep 2017 20:47:23 +0100

171 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Sep 2017 20:52:41 +0100

193 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Sep 2017 20:58:19 +0100

210 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:29:36 +0100

264 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:46:30 +0100

280 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:57:45 +0100

299 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2017 17:11:03 +0100

361 lines

Re: Philip Larkin any comments?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:47:41 +0100

378 lines

New Thread

poetic diction, nature poetry, etc

poetic diction, nature poetry, etc

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:36:22 +0100

39 lines

Re: poetic diction, nature poetry, etc

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Sep 2017 12:16:18 +0100

67 lines

Re: poetic diction, nature poetry, etc

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Sep 2017 12:36:07 +0100

76 lines

Re: poetic diction, nature poetry, etc

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Sep 2017 16:19:46 +0100

18 lines

Re: poetic diction, nature poetry, etc

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Sep 2017 18:38:33 +0100

113 lines

Re: poetic diction, nature poetry, etc

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:01:45 +0100

17 lines

Re: poetic diction, nature poetry, etc

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Sep 2017 23:10:14 +0100

93 lines

Re: poetic diction, nature poetry, etc

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Sep 2017 23:12:11 +0100

112 lines

New Thread

Post your

Post your

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Sep 2017 22:40:28 +0100

23 lines

Re: Post your

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Sep 2017 02:16:38 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Prospectus by Simon Taylor (new title from if p then q)

Prospectus by Simon Taylor (new title from if p then q)

if p then q <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:53:00 +0000

853 lines

New Thread

query

query

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Sep 2017 16:41:21 +0100

17 lines

Re: query

Wanda O'Connor <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 07:57:36 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

Rascal: Issue 1

Rascal: Issue 1

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 08:02:41 -0400

2111 lines

Re: Rascal: Issue 1

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:19:15 +0100

2206 lines

Re: Rascal: Issue 1

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:23:24 -0400

2197 lines

Re: Rascal: Issue 1

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2017 22:22:27 +0100

2123 lines

Re: Rascal: Issue 1

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:34:10 -0400

2142 lines

Re: Rascal: Issue 1

GILES GOODLAND <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Sep 2017 13:40:30 +0000

2181 lines

Re: Rascal: Issue 1

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:52:22 +0100

2328 lines

Re: Rascal: Issue 1

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:07:38 -0400

2188 lines

New Thread

Sad news

Sad news

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Sep 2017 14:59:22 -0600

290 lines

Re: Sad news

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:07:15 -0400

327 lines

Re: Sad news

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Sep 2017 09:26:58 +0100

55 lines

Re: Sad news

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Sep 2017 10:58:29 +0100

321 lines

Re: Sad news

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:04:44 -0400

392 lines

Re: Sad news

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:38:37 +0100

46 lines

Re: Sad news

GILES GOODLAND <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:12:03 +0000

73 lines

Re: Sad news

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 13:43:40 +0100

14 lines

New Thread

terminology

Re: terminology

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2017 04:52:39 +0100

812 lines

Re: terminology

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2017 05:28:34 +0100

833 lines

Re: terminology

Filreis, Al <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:20:59 +0000

5511 lines

Re: terminology

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2017 16:59:41 +0100

70 lines

Re: terminology

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2017 18:18:56 +0100

94 lines

Re: terminology

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2017 20:23:07 +0100

5886 lines

Re: terminology

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:29:48 +0100

78 lines

Re: terminology

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:32:01 +0100

96 lines

Re: terminology

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:43:06 +0100

110 lines

Re: terminology

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:44:28 +0100

116 lines

Re: terminology

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:51:41 +0100

29 lines

Re: terminology

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:58:18 +0100

52 lines

Re: terminology

Filreis, Al <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 12:36:31 +0000

1029 lines

Re: terminology

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:26:38 +0100

52 lines

Re: terminology

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Sep 2017 18:04:58 +0100

1447 lines

New Thread

The bible

The bible

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Sep 2017 14:32:47 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

The new ebook from Argotist Ebooks is “The Posit Trilogy” by Adam Fieled

The new ebook from Argotist Ebooks is “The Posit Trilogy” by Adam Fieled

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 13:27:52 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

The vine

The vine

Jeff Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:02:30 +0000

55 lines

Re: The vine

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:05:33 +0100

68 lines

Re: The vine

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Sep 2017 01:06:45 +0100

85 lines

New Thread

up to the minute mainstream

up to the minute mainstream

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:48:36 +0100

29 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:38:59 +0100

66 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:12:26 +0100

107 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:49:11 +0100

55 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:54:37 +0100

63 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:59:05 +0100

84 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:09:27 +0100

33 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:26:22 +0100

28 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:36:01 +0100

89 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:31:27 -0700

122 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 07:12:45 +0100

148 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

GILES GOODLAND <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 06:30:32 +0000

200 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:34:50 -0700

370 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:45:06 +0100

46 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:51:44 +0100

70 lines

Re: up to the minute mainstream

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:59:14 +0100

70 lines

New Thread

Upon me

Upon me

Jeff Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2017 16:21:32 +0000

48 lines

Re: Upon me

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2017 19:34:52 +0100

60 lines

Re: Upon me

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:25:51 +0100

58 lines

Re: Upon me

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:27:47 +0100

60 lines

New Thread

What do you make of the following note (of mine)?

What do you make of the following note (of mine)?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:01:11 +0100

25 lines

Re: What do you make of the following note (of mine)?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Sep 2017 18:31:51 +0100

380 lines

New Thread

What's difficult about that ?

What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:23:44 +0100

102 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Sep 2017 11:42:56 +0100

122 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Sep 2017 12:58:34 +0100

145 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 01:27:48 +0100

167 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:44:42 +0100

184 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

GILES GOODLAND <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 08:48:40 +0000

224 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 10:02:53 +0100

275 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:07:27 +0100

725 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:20:38 +0100

82 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:20:54 +0100

609 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:25:01 +0100

48 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:31:02 +0100

57 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:35:58 +0100

73 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 12:23:52 +0100

96 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 13:41:14 +0100

189 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Sep 2017 13:46:54 +0100

206 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:36:29 +0100

256 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:43:54 +0100

251 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:48:26 +0100

274 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 12:00:34 +0100

296 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 12:48:56 +0100

338 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 14:32:51 +0100

90 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:56:46 +0100

59 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 16:05:51 +0100

57 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 16:08:00 +0100

47 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 16:14:53 +0100

81 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Sep 2017 19:51:42 +0100

94 lines

Re: What's difficult about that ?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:48:39 +0100

111 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager