JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


June 2017


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

+AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- +AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015) (1 message)
+AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015) (3 messages)
A question on CMPLX function (4 messages)
A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008 (6 messages)
DTIO question (6 messages)
elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments (6 messages)
Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015) (50 messages)
LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran? (7 messages)
On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type (6 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

+AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- +AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Re: +AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- +AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 14:40:34 +0900

40 lines

New Thread

+AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Re: +AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:12:00 +0900

146 lines

Re: +AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:22:17 +0900

49 lines

Re: +AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:04:20 +1000

67 lines

New Thread

A question on CMPLX function

A question on CMPLX function

Vipul Parekh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:32:02 -0400

79 lines

Re: A question on CMPLX function

Anton Shterenlikht <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:14:07 +0100

83 lines

Re: A question on CMPLX function

Vipul Parekh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:26:16 -0400

42 lines

Re: A question on CMPLX function

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:42:00 +1000

50 lines

New Thread

A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008

Re: A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:47:36 +0900

388 lines

Re: A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008

Vipul Parekh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:56:51 -0400

76 lines

Re: A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:38:05 -0700

90 lines

Re: A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:12:35 +0900

180 lines

Re: A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:32:41 +0900

37 lines

Re: A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008

Vipul Parekh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:32:03 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

DTIO question

DTIO question

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jun 2017 11:19:23 -0600

144 lines

Re: DTIO question

Steve Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jun 2017 17:24:45 -0400

89 lines

Re: DTIO question

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jun 2017 21:47:33 +0000

110 lines

Re: DTIO question

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:38:24 +0900

486 lines

Re: DTIO question

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:30:21 -0600

397 lines

Re: DTIO question

Daniel C Chen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:21:39 -0400

200 lines

New Thread

elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments

elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments

Anton Shterenlikht <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:47 +0100

40 lines

Re: elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:57:17 +0100

56 lines

Re: elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments

Anton Shterenlikht <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jun 2017 12:13:21 +0100

41 lines

Re: elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jun 2017 12:43:57 +0100

58 lines

Re: elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments

Anton Shterenlikht <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:06:23 +0100

27 lines

Re: elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:04:13 +0000

95 lines

New Thread

Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:22:05 +1000

23 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:55:09 +0900

41 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:40:03 +1000

37 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:51:42 +1000

52 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:30:08 +0900

37 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:43:27 +1000

60 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:48:30 +0000

68 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jun 2017 13:15:41 +1000

54 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jun 2017 22:51:01 -0700

33 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jun 2017 23:25:16 +0000

60 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

John Harper <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2017 10:06:47 +1200

53 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

John Harper <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:12:22 +1200

73 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2017 10:00:16 +0900

70 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:41:30 +0200

91 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Vipul Parekh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:09:55 -0400

96 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:10:38 +0000

88 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2017 23:10:55 +0200

17 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jun 2017 00:04:12 +0000

46 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:06:40 -0500

258 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:33:37 +0200

21 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:02:32 +0200

162 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Clune, Thomas L. (GSFC-6101) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:40:12 +0000

138 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jun 2017 14:40:20 +0000

32 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

John Harper <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:46:45 +1200

75 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:07:00 +1000

85 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:08:49 +1000

24 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:21:37 +1000

52 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:23:37 +1000

29 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jun 2017 19:25:28 -0700

41 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:32:03 +1000

41 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:37:19 +1000

34 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:45:33 +1000

32 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:51:17 +1000

63 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:52:49 +1000

35 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:57:13 +1000

56 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:30:56 +1000

59 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:07:14 +0200

17 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:18:01 +1000

32 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:45:01 -0600

53 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:14:36 +0000

41 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:58:35 +0200

26 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Steve Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:15:29 -0400

61 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 21:18:22 +0200

32 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Steve Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:42:22 -0400

84 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:14:09 +0100

187 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2017 12:36:26 +0200

28 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Vipul Parekh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2017 11:14:24 -0400

42 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:31:00 -0700

39 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Steve Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2017 11:47:52 -0400

31 lines

Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:47:17 +1000

58 lines

New Thread

LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?

LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?

Vipul Parekh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2017 18:13:30 -0400

115 lines

Re: LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:34:07 +0900

147 lines

Re: LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?

Vipul Parekh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:21:04 -0400

45 lines

Re: LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:59:17 +0900

77 lines

Re: LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:56:20 +1000

130 lines

Re: LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?

Vipul Parekh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:32:21 -0400

24 lines

Re: LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:56:17 +1000

38 lines

New Thread

On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type

On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type

Vipul Parekh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jun 2017 15:50:45 -0400

119 lines

Re: On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jun 2017 20:21:31 -0500

312 lines

Re: On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type

Vipul Parekh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 00:07:11 -0400

92 lines

Re: On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:35:26 +0900

31 lines

Re: On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type

Vipul Parekh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2017 22:27:06 -0400

53 lines

Re: On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type

Anton Shterenlikht <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:02:48 +0100

20 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
April 2015
March 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager