JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


March 2017


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

(early snap) Happen Stance (10 messages)
ALSO DEAD (2 messages)
Conversation with Pain (4 messages)
i.m. (3 messages)
Laugh insurance (7 messages)
pat snap 775 roughly give or take a hundred !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3 messages)
pat snap 777? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (6 messages)
pat snap 778? _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- (3 messages)
pat snap scam 776 _+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+ (8 messages)
patsnap 779? ............................................................................................................................................. (8 messages)
Playing fields (11 messages)
poem Night Club (3 messages)
snap (10 messages)
snap (or at least what Andrew requested) (5 messages)
snaps r whatever tomorrow (1 message)
Watching Test cricket on an app (15 messages)
Water (3 messages)
WPD (5 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

(early snap) Happen Stance

(early snap) Happen Stance

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:23:38 -0700

26 lines

Re: (early snap) Happen Stance

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:28:54 -0600

54 lines

Re: (early snap) Happen Stance

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:30:07 -0700

60 lines

Re: (early snap) Happen Stance

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:33:01 +0100

32 lines

Re: (early snap) Happen Stance

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:35:45 -0700

39 lines

Re: (early snap) Happen Stance

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:44:03 +1100

55 lines

Re: (early snap) Happen Stance

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:45:36 -0700

60 lines

Re: (early snap) Happen Stance

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:31:40 +0000

70 lines

Re: (early snap) Happen Stance

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:47:53 +0000

79 lines

Re: (early snap) Happen Stance

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:19:05 -0700

84 lines

New Thread

ALSO DEAD

ALSO DEAD

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:05:01 +0000

10 lines

Re: ALSO DEAD

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2017 09:31:47 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

Conversation with Pain

Conversation with Pain

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2017 03:35:55 +0000

64 lines

Re: Conversation with Pain

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:52:14 +0000

70 lines

Re: Conversation with Pain

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:18:38 -0600

92 lines

Re: Conversation with Pain

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:53:38 +1100

107 lines

New Thread

i.m.

i.m.

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:08:28 +0000

17 lines

Re: i.m.

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:06:20 -0700

46 lines

Re: i.m.

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:56:31 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

Laugh insurance

Laugh insurance

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:27:36 +0000

19 lines

Re: Laugh insurance

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:35:24 -0700

25 lines

Re: Laugh insurance

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 06:36:49 +0000

33 lines

Re: Laugh insurance

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:51:41 +0100

31 lines

Re: Laugh insurance

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:54:25 +1100

49 lines

Re: Laugh insurance

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:00:40 +0000

59 lines

Re: Laugh insurance

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:50:32 -0600

87 lines

New Thread

pat snap 775 roughly give or take a hundred !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

pat snap 775 roughly give or take a hundred !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:16:44 +0000

36 lines

Re: pat snap 775 roughly give or take a hundred !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:05:01 -0700

68 lines

Re: pat snap 775 roughly give or take a hundred !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:23:59 +0000

73 lines

New Thread

pat snap 777? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

pat snap 777? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:57:29 +0000

84 lines

Re: pat snap 777? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:09:31 +0000

97 lines

Re: pat snap 777? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:19:52 -0600

113 lines

Re: pat snap 777? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:56:30 +1100

128 lines

Re: pat snap 777? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2017 11:57:32 +0000

105 lines

Re: pat snap 777? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2017 11:36:23 +1100

124 lines

New Thread

pat snap 778? _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*-

pat snap 778? _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*-

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:09:50 +0000

44 lines

Re: pat snap 778? _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*-

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:03:18 +0000

53 lines

Re: pat snap 778? _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*- _-*!*-

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:01:15 -0600

76 lines

New Thread

pat snap scam 776 _+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+

pat snap scam 776 _+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:44:07 +0000

56 lines

Re: pat snap scam 776 _+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:00:14 +0000

65 lines

Re: pat snap scam 776 _+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:19:48 +0000

70 lines

Re: pat snap scam 776 _+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:07:59 -0700

94 lines

Re: pat snap scam 776 _+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:28:50 +0000

98 lines

Re: pat snap scam 776 _+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:57:09 -0700

100 lines

Re: pat snap scam 776 _+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:58:47 +0000

104 lines

Re: pat snap scam 776 _+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+_+-=**=+

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:20:24 -0700

118 lines

New Thread

patsnap 779? .............................................................................................................................................

patsnap 779? .............................................................................................................................................

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:47:39 +0100

56 lines

Re: patsnap 779? .............................................................................................................................................

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 06:55:39 +0000

66 lines

Re: patsnap 779? .............................................................................................................................................

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:20:38 +0100

72 lines

Re: patsnap 779? .............................................................................................................................................

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:53:37 -0600

79 lines

Re: patsnap 779? .............................................................................................................................................

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:52:14 +0100

82 lines

Re: patsnap 779? .............................................................................................................................................

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:38:15 -0700

85 lines

Re: patsnap 779? .............................................................................................................................................

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:45:34 +0100

91 lines

Re: patsnap 779? .............................................................................................................................................

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:18:05 -0700

102 lines

New Thread

Playing fields

Playing fields

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 01:19:00 +0000

17 lines

Re: Playing fields

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:49:44 +0000

29 lines

Re: Playing fields

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:59:01 +0000

38 lines

Re: Playing fields

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:26:57 +0000

56 lines

Re: Playing fields

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:10:21 -0700

89 lines

Re: Playing fields

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:31:10 +1100

110 lines

Re: Playing fields

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2017 02:43:42 +0000

124 lines

Re: Playing fields

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:36:45 +1100

149 lines

Re: Playing fields

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2017 22:18:40 +0000

165 lines

Re: Playing fields

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:29:46 +0000

172 lines

Re: Playing fields

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2017 22:21:16 +1100

228 lines

New Thread

poem Night Club

poem Night Club

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:04:17 +1100

49 lines

Re: poem Night Club

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2017 05:15:39 +0000

59 lines

Re: poem Night Club

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:59:22 -0600

85 lines

New Thread

snap

snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:01:06 -0600

46 lines

Re: snap

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:36:59 -0700

55 lines

Re: snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:49:27 +0100

50 lines

Re: snap

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2017 21:00:08 +0000

60 lines

Re: snap

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:08:32 +1100

67 lines

Re: snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:59:11 -0600

93 lines

Re: snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:36:00 +0100

96 lines

Re: snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:01:11 +0100

72 lines

Re: snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:54:22 -0600

102 lines

Re: snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:56:48 +0100

109 lines

New Thread

snap (or at least what Andrew requested)

snap (or at least what Andrew requested)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:18:45 -0600

50 lines

Re: snap (or at least what Andrew requested)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2017 19:04:03 +0000

57 lines

Re: snap (or at least what Andrew requested)

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:36:36 +0000

70 lines

Re: snap (or at least what Andrew requested)

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:23:26 -0700

77 lines

Re: snap (or at least what Andrew requested)

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:49:57 +1100

97 lines

New Thread

snaps r whatever tomorrow

snaps r whatever tomorrow

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:21:05 +0000

13 lines

New Thread

Watching Test cricket on an app

Watching Test cricket on an app

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:32:48 +0000

41 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2017 18:33:07 +1100

58 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:01:02 +0000

47 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:06:08 +0000

58 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:17:14 +0000

62 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:20:28 +0000

67 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:18:42 -0600

96 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:05:02 +0000

108 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:37:05 +0000

50 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:19:29 +0000

61 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:16:54 +0000

74 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:53:21 +0000

97 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2017 11:45:08 +0000

117 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:17:04 -0600

150 lines

Re: Watching Test cricket on an app

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:25:14 +0000

170 lines

New Thread

Water

Re: Water

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:03:41 +0000

49 lines

Re: Water

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:02:16 -0700

70 lines

Re: Water

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2017 23:03:12 +0000

111 lines

New Thread

WPD

WPD

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:33:51 +0000

14 lines

Re: WPD

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:18:19 -0600

41 lines

Re: WPD

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:12:20 +0000

43 lines

Re: WPD

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:17:34 +0000

53 lines

Re: WPD

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:23:57 +0000

55 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager