JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


October 2016


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

£4 million museum celebrating Seamus Heaney has opened (1 message)
“Bob Dylan's Nobel Prize win shows that literature can burst beyond the boundaries of books” (4 messages)
<No subject> (2 messages)
a bit much (180 messages)
a bit much (a request) (7 messages)
A few thoughts on lyric (5 messages)
a question List racism (17 messages)
Actaeon amidst hounds (1 message)
Amos Weisz Worksongs Launch (1 message)
Anne Waldman to Dispatches (1 message)
Appeal to moderators (1 message)
Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war (116 messages)
BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 14 Oct 2016 to 15 Oct 2016 (#2016-204) (3 messages)
BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 20 Oct 2016 (#2016-212) (1 message)
BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 29 Oct 2016 to 30 Oct 2016 (#2016-226) (5 messages)
broadcast (4 messages)
Call for Submissions - University of Toronto Quarterly (1 message)
Cat, pigeons (20 messages)
CIA and art (1 message)
Contemporary Innovative Poetry Research Seminar (1 message)
Correct post: Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad (1 message)
Cuisines of China (1 message)
Denise Riley review (2 messages)
Discoverable Keywords of the New Modernist Studies (1 message)
Dispatches last evenings on earth (1 message)
Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute (1 message)
Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute. (14 messages)
Dont' stop reading (1 message)
Dylan (80 messages)
Dylan may be another Faul (4 messages)
Dylan the egotist (15 messages)
Fwd: a bit much (1 message)
Fwd: New book from Ken Edwards (1 message)
Is song really more shallow than poetry? (5 messages)
Isochronic (3 messages)
Isochronic Pedantry (6 messages)
KFS SUBSCRIBER SERVICE (1 message)
Last post (1 message)
Letters in Canada - University of Toronto Quarterly 85 3 now available on Project MUSE (1 message)
Marlowe-speare (31 messages)
Max Richards obit (1 message)
new letters a (1 message)
Noon: journal of the short poem -- new issue and call for submissions (2 messages)
Nuttall (2 messages)
on Dylan and Plagiarism of Dispatches (1 message)
PoemTalk #105 on Michael Magee (1 message)
PoemTalk #105 on Michael Magee's "Morning Constitutional" (1 message)
Poetic Artifice (1 message)
Poetry and Stupidity (1 message)
Poetry Salzburg Review 29 (1 message)
Polite Reminder (2 messages)
question for Peter Riley (2 messages)
Russian help request (1 message)
Russian query follow-up (1 message)
Samething (1 message)
Shearsman Reading (1 message)
signing off (1 message)
Snowden, Eno, Levy, Alcalay (1 message)
Some Canadian* Poets (8 messages)
something I've noticed, fwiw (1 message)
Stupid Brexit (1 message)
Subject: £4 million museum celebrating Seamus Heaney has opened (1 message)
TENT 1: this coming Friday (1 message)
The "problem" of gender (25 messages)
The "problem" of prosody (47 messages)
The new ebook from Argotist Ebooks is “Signs That Do Not Signal” by Jeffrey Side (1 message)
The Unfinished Dream (1 message)
The use(s) of criticism (5 messages)
today at Dispatches (1 message)
Tone, Tune and Mandarin Chinese (1 message)
U. of Penn English Dept. Ad (13 messages)
U.S. ACADEMIC VANGUARD POETRY (1 message)
Was I overly rude to Geraldine? (1 message)
whatever (3 messages)
Why Shakespeare Matters debate (102 messages)
World War III (26 messages)
WS/ Bohemia/ Adriatic (21 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

£4 million museum celebrating Seamus Heaney has opened

Re: £4 million museum celebrating Seamus Heaney has opened

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2016 09:52:55 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

“Bob Dylan's Nobel Prize win shows that literature can burst beyond the boundaries of books”

“Bob Dylan's Nobel Prize win shows that literature can burst beyond the boundaries of books”

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:33:32 +0100

24 lines

Re: “Bob Dylan's Nobel Prize win shows that literature can burst beyond the boundaries of books”

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:55:21 +0100

55 lines

Re: “Bob Dylan's Nobel Prize win shows that literature can burst beyond the boundaries of books”

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:05:56 +0100

55 lines

Re: “Bob Dylan's Nobel Prize win shows that literature can burst beyond the boundaries of books”

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:40:25 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2016 16:14:01 -0400

23 lines

<No subject>

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2016 11:20:01 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

a bit much

a bit much

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 23:13:35 +0100

22 lines

Re: a bit much

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:16:17 -0400

30 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 00:46:44 +0100

43 lines

Re: a bit much

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 01:34:22 +0100

139 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:35:03 +0100

171 lines

Re: a bit much

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 04:36:07 +0100

229 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:56:19 +0100

29 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:25:51 +0100

37 lines

Re: a bit much

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:17:48 +0100

125 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:18:18 +0100

24 lines

Re: a bit much

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:57:12 +0100

197 lines

Re: a bit much

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:04:03 -0500

225 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:36:38 +0100

49 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:15:31 +0100

33 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:20:54 +0100

27 lines

Re: a bit much

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:30:44 -0400

32 lines

Re: a bit much

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:38:48 -0400

32 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:48:47 +0100

68 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:51:08 +0100

25 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:53:29 +0100

27 lines

Re: a bit much

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:23:16 -0400

239 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:05:18 +0100

28 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:29:48 +0100

102 lines

Re: a bit much

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 21:11:32 +0100

210 lines

Re: a bit much

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 21:19:57 +0100

251 lines

Re: a bit much

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:28:13 -0400

87 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:16:05 +0100

488 lines

Re: a bit much

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 21:43:51 -0400

303 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 03:04:16 +0100

246 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 03:14:15 +0100

601 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 06:34:15 +0100

636 lines

Re: a bit much

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:01:09 +0200

557 lines

Re: a bit much

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:02:50 +0200

506 lines

Re: a bit much

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:33:23 +0100

47 lines

Re: a bit much

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:16:22 +0100

115 lines

Re: a bit much

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:41:00 +0100

146 lines

Re: a bit much

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:02:13 +0100

58 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:24:27 +0100

588 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:30:57 +0100

603 lines

Re: a bit much

Wolfgang Görtschacher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:45:15 +0200

34 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:52:20 +0100

28 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:58:09 +0100

26 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:09:23 +0100

38 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:13:20 +0100

30 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:18:50 +0100

31 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:21:35 +0100

29 lines

Re: a bit much

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:22:32 +0100

178 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:25:38 +0100

67 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:32:24 +0100

32 lines

Re: a bit much

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:33:40 +0100

58 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:39:23 +0100

41 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:48:22 +0100

37 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:53:49 +0100

25 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:35:03 +0100

141 lines

Re: a bit much

Paul Green <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:38:37 +0000

277 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:45:33 +0100

39 lines

Re: a bit much

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:55:19 +0100

101 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:07:35 +0100

59 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:11:30 +0100

201 lines

Re: a bit much

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:37:06 +0100

39 lines

Re: a bit much

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:38:57 -0400

21 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:40:14 +0100

127 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:42:06 +0100

76 lines

Re: a bit much

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:50:48 +0100

86 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:59:20 +0100

30 lines

Re: a bit much

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:01:13 +0100

53 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:02:53 +0100

26 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:06:07 +0100

22 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:08:18 +0100

89 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:47:52 +0100

134 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:49:07 +0100

43 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:58:26 +0100

120 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:00:30 +0100

53 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:55:31 +0100

398 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:36:04 +0100

56 lines

Re: a bit much

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:18:09 +0100

497 lines

Re: a bit much

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:24:57 -0400

528 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:11:11 +0100

50 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:42:25 +0100

106 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:18:29 +0100

130 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:06:05 +0100

30 lines

Re: a bit much

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:13:24 +0100

108 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:27:42 +0100

40 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:36:49 +0100

61 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:53:20 +0100

200 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:02:41 +0100

106 lines

Re: a bit much

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:05:31 -0500

237 lines

Re: a bit much

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:22:51 +0100

45 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:32:11 +0100

248 lines

Re: a bit much

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:39:23 -0500

283 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:44:22 +0100

321 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:05:22 +0100

99 lines

Re: a bit much

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:40:49 -0500

115 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:15:15 +0100

37 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:57:11 +0100

48 lines

Re: a bit much

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:13:03 -0400

132 lines

Re: a bit much

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:00:02 +0100

74 lines

Re: a bit much

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:36:42 +0100

103 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:45:20 +0100

149 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:15:52 +0100

27 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:18:37 +0100

35 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:26:16 +0100

37 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:41:18 +0100

34 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:42:34 +0100

152 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:45:25 +0100

24 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:52:39 +0100

33 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:58:11 +0100

42 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:03:12 +0100

34 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:15:36 +0100

35 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:47:36 +0100

68 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:05:59 +0100

65 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:42:46 +0100

93 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:56:49 +0100

104 lines

Re: a bit much

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:20:51 +0100

268 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:21:09 +0100

72 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:29:30 +0100

86 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:42:54 +0100

121 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:59:47 +0100

110 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:07:18 +0100

49 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:21:06 +0100

56 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:38:35 +0100

69 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:43:11 +0100

70 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:44:01 +0100

179 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:57:39 +0100

36 lines

Re: a bit much

David Latane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:01:15 +0000

187 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:08:36 +0100

29 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:15:17 +0100

82 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:19:52 +0100

246 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:33:57 +0100

225 lines

Re: a bit much

David Latane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:43:31 +0000

99 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:46:57 +0100

207 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:07:02 +0100

20 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:08:07 +0100

23 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:18:54 +0100

37 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:21:31 +0100

100 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:23:24 +0100

43 lines

Re: a bit much

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:39:36 +0100

62 lines

Re: a bit much

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:42:56 +0100

60 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:46:20 +0100

25 lines

a bit much

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:38:16 +0100

119 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:42:45 +0100

27 lines

Re: a bit much

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:44:00 +0100

59 lines

Re: a bit much

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:28:02 +0100

90 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:50:54 +0100

29 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:54:47 +0100

30 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:52:42 +0100

52 lines

Re: a bit much

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:23:23 +0100

33 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:08:18 +0100

38 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:20:22 +0100

52 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:25:14 +0100

59 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:07:58 +0100

34 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:11:03 +0100

23 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:12:53 +0100

30 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:18:51 +0100

24 lines

Re: a bit much

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:22:30 -0500

67 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:23:14 +0100

37 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:35:07 +0100

45 lines

Re: a bit much

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:44:12 -0500

112 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:55:45 +0100

70 lines

Re: a bit much

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:53:01 -0500

158 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:31:35 +0100

338 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:54:07 +0100

132 lines

Re: a bit much

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 23:31:17 +0100

206 lines

Re: a bit much

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:44:06 -0500

206 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 04:21:02 +0100

239 lines

Re: a bit much

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:46:04 +0100

40 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:13:12 +0100

34 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:30:26 +0100

406 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:07:51 +0100

321 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:44:23 +0100

123 lines

Re: a bit much

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:53:14 +0100

167 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:01:44 +0100

553 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:30:26 +0100

159 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:17:03 +0100

162 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:55:14 +0100

182 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:04:08 +0100

48 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:15:21 +0100

61 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:51:26 +0100

63 lines

Re: a bit much

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:13:39 +0100

71 lines

Re: a bit much

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:48:43 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

a bit much (a request)

Re: a bit much (a request)

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:20:04 -0500

88 lines

Re: a bit much (a request)

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:40:20 +0100

30 lines

Re: a bit much (a request)

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:41:15 +0100

138 lines

Re: a bit much (a request)

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:45:49 +0100

42 lines

Re: a bit much (a request)

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:32:27 -0500

139 lines

Re: a bit much (a request)

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 01:09:51 +0100

160 lines

Re: a bit much (a request)

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:23:22 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

A few thoughts on lyric

A few thoughts on lyric

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 09:24:38 -0700

92 lines

Re: A few thoughts on lyric

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 10:40:11 -0700

162 lines

Re: A few thoughts on lyric

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 19:19:44 +0100

23 lines

Re: A few thoughts on lyric

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:31:00 -0700

123 lines

Re: A few thoughts on lyric

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 19:49:17 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

a question List racism

a question List racism

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:37:30 -0500

195 lines

Re: a question List racism

Tony Frazer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:44:57 +0100

117 lines

Re: a question List racism

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 01:18:30 +0100

213 lines

Re: a question List racism

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:23:23 -0500

198 lines

Re: a question List racism

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 01:39:07 +0100

119 lines

Re: a question List racism

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:58:58 -0500

145 lines

Re: a question List racism

Jeremy F Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 01:04:16 +0000

198 lines

Re: a question List racism

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 02:18:54 +0100

192 lines

Re: a question List racism

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 02:30:28 +0100

210 lines

Re: a question List racism

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:09:14 -0400

79 lines

Re: a question List racism

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 04:07:29 +0100

170 lines

Re: a question List racism

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 04:22:43 +0100

183 lines

Re: a question List racism

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 23:45:24 -0400

194 lines

Re: a question List racism

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 07:29:58 +0100

238 lines

Re: a question List racism

Tony Frazer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:33:59 +0100

240 lines

Re: a question List racism

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:01:08 +0100

16 lines

Re: a question List racism

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:34:47 -0500

266 lines

New Thread

Actaeon amidst hounds

Actaeon amidst hounds

Jeff Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:17:27 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Amos Weisz Worksongs Launch

Amos Weisz Worksongs Launch

Peter Philpott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:38:06 +0100

8457 lines

New Thread

Anne Waldman to Dispatches

Anne Waldman to Dispatches

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:13:56 -0500

120 lines

New Thread

Appeal to moderators

Appeal to moderators

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:50:02 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:06:42 -0500

173 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:33:45 +0100

75 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:58:29 -0700

175 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:23:54 -0500

207 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 19:21:15 +0100

248 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:38:43 -0500

243 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:59:05 -0700

337 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:06:52 -0500

350 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:15:53 +0100

252 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:31:07 +0100

471 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:35:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:40:21 -0700

532 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:00:40 +0100

537 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:08:40 -0500

487 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 22:16:25 +0100

156 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:18:28 -0400

95 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:23:02 -0500

199 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:30:45 -0400

108 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:32:32 -0500

235 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 22:37:38 +0100

139 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:52:55 -0400

90 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:00:49 +0100

93 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:18:19 +0100

43 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:50:14 +0100

95 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:22:53 -0500

155 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:53:02 -0500

114 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:54:39 -0500

120 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:07:04 -0400

67 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:20:49 -0400

63 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:28:40 -0400

175 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:31:39 -0400

91 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:37:02 +0200

284 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:50:29 -0500

302 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:51:37 -0400

176 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:04:41 +0100

297 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:09:46 +0100

328 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:14:06 -0400

195 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:52:39 +0100

400 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:04:24 -0400

237 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 19:24:12 +0100

157 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 23:26:06 +0200

382 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 23:00:47 +0100

418 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:04:40 -0500

370 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:12:48 -0400

207 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Hampson, R <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 22:31:53 +0000

213 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:34:09 -0400

153 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:35:58 -0500

438 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:38:05 -0500

264 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:42:49 -0500

273 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Hampson, R <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 22:45:15 +0000

470 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:18:51 +0100

72 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 07:40:16 +0100

103 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:17:00 +0100

34 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Hampson, R <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:24:09 +0000

56 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:29:42 +0100

71 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:06:31 +0100

24 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:17:13 +0100

26 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:19:47 +0100

41 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Latane <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:22:32 +0000

90 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:18:45 +0100

116 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:22:44 +0100

39 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:28:25 +0100

30 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:34:30 +0100

28 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:12:57 +0100

65 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:22:02 +0100

72 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:50:48 +0100

28 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:15:33 +0100

72 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Hampson, R <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:31:00 +0000

30 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Hampson, R <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:32:14 +0000

127 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 00:07:38 +0100

65 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 01:37:07 +0100

148 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 11:07:59 +0100

118 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:47:57 +0100

27 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:54:57 +0100

30 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:58:45 +0100

39 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:02:27 +0100

32 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:10:56 +0100

30 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:30:12 +0100

55 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:38:23 +0100

157 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:49:35 +0100

65 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:54:24 +0100

123 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:58:20 +0100

44 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:11:28 +0100

61 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:26:58 +0100

28 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:32:01 +0100

126 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Latane <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:47:16 +0000

54 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:06:17 +0100

26 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:34:43 +0100

80 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:47:47 +0100

114 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:04:46 +0100

75 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:14:19 +0100

34 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:18:56 +0100

26 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:20:22 +0100

65 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:23:39 +0100

71 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:24:04 +0100

32 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:27:26 +0100

156 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:44:42 +0100

54 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:47:06 +0100

48 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:49:09 +0100

34 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:52:32 +0100

26 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 17:08:54 +0100

52 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 17:15:59 +0100

99 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 17:49:07 +0100

63 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:18:10 +0100

97 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:57:04 +0100

65 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:19:44 +0100

98 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:41:51 -0400

112 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:51:20 +0100

90 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Latane <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:48:24 +0000

173 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:38:24 +0100

42 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:19:32 +0100

50 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:11:49 +0100

20 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Hampson, R <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:02:18 +0000

32 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:28:42 +0100

34 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:07:44 +0100

85 lines

Re: Britain vs. U.S. Poetry war

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:17:23 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 14 Oct 2016 to 15 Oct 2016 (#2016-204)

Re: BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 14 Oct 2016 to 15 Oct 2016 (#2016-204)

Rupert Hildyard <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 19:37:20 +0000

1015 lines

Re: BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 14 Oct 2016 to 15 Oct 2016 (#2016-204)

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:08:51 +0100

39 lines

Re: BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 14 Oct 2016 to 15 Oct 2016 (#2016-204)

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:32:37 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 20 Oct 2016 (#2016-212)

Re: BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 20 Oct 2016 (#2016-212)

Drew Milne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 01:35:26 +0100

974 lines

New Thread

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 29 Oct 2016 to 30 Oct 2016 (#2016-226)

Re: BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 29 Oct 2016 to 30 Oct 2016 (#2016-226)

Connie Voisine <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:14:50 -0600

2835 lines

Re: BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 29 Oct 2016 to 30 Oct 2016 (#2016-226)

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 01:14:43 +0000

2610 lines

Re: BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 29 Oct 2016 to 30 Oct 2016 (#2016-226)

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:53:09 -0500

2398 lines

Re: BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 29 Oct 2016 to 30 Oct 2016 (#2016-226)

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 03:53:40 +0000

89 lines

Re: BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Digest - 29 Oct 2016 to 30 Oct 2016 (#2016-226)

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:00:10 -0400

105 lines

New Thread

broadcast

broadcast

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2016 20:13:41 +0100

14 lines

Re: broadcast

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2016 16:15:05 -0400

21 lines

Re: broadcast

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2016 13:54:35 +0200

42 lines

Re: broadcast

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2016 14:06:28 +0200

2473 lines

New Thread

Call for Submissions - University of Toronto Quarterly

Call for Submissions - University of Toronto Quarterly

UTP Journals <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:08:17 -0400

859 lines

New Thread

Cat, pigeons

Cat, pigeons

Aidan Semmens <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:35:16 +0000

117 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 20:43:35 +0100

17 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 23:34:10 +0100

30 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:36:49 +0100

31 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:19:51 +0100

20 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:27:56 +0100

53 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:10:08 +0100

35 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:54:22 +0100

52 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:11:27 +0100

35 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:37:58 +0100

60 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:57:31 +0100

21 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:20:20 +0100

46 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:24:07 +0100

26 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:26:28 +0100

91 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:50:47 -0400

171 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:00:54 +0100

254 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:41:41 -0400

268 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:17:29 +0100

59 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:26:00 +0100

98 lines

Re: Cat, pigeons

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:27:03 -0500

99 lines

New Thread

CIA and art

CIA and art

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:31:43 +0100

91 lines

New Thread

Contemporary Innovative Poetry Research Seminar

Contemporary Innovative Poetry Research Seminar

Hampson, R <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:54:04 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

Correct post: Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

Correct post: Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2016 21:25:00 -0500

154 lines

New Thread

Cuisines of China

Cuisines of China

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:38:00 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

Denise Riley review

Denise Riley review

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:07:13 +0100

30 lines

Re: Denise Riley review

GOODBY JOHN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2016 05:44:59 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Discoverable Keywords of the New Modernist Studies

Discoverable Keywords of the New Modernist Studies

UTP Journals <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:25:21 -0400

430 lines

New Thread

Dispatches last evenings on earth

Dispatches last evenings on earth

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:23:59 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:55:29 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:03:21 +0100

254 lines

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:28:14 +0100

16 lines

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:59:21 -0700

120 lines

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:42:03 +0100

153 lines

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:06:27 -0700

264 lines

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:28:11 -0400

144 lines

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:00:30 +0100

204 lines

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:42:08 +0100

262 lines

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:13:38 -0400

139 lines

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:01:25 -0700

463 lines

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:33:40 +0100

92 lines

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:02:08 -0700

190 lines

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:34:09 +0100

435 lines

Re: Donne's Taxonomy and Wyatt's Lute.

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:21:21 +0100

194 lines

New Thread

Dont' stop reading

Dont' stop reading

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 11:32:45 +0100

84 lines

New Thread

Dylan

Dylan

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 05:54:32 -0500

47 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:04:38 +0100

36 lines

Re: Dylan

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:46:28 +0100

43 lines

Re: Dylan

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:49:57 +0100

69 lines

Re: Dylan

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:12:19 -0400

75 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:56:00 +0100

169 lines

Re: Dylan

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:03:12 +0100

23 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:07:23 +0100

117 lines

Re: Dylan

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:19:01 +0100

144 lines

Re: Dylan

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:31:02 +0100

188 lines

Re: Dylan

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:36:52 -0400

120 lines

Re: Dylan

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:41:43 +0100

207 lines

Re: Dylan

Rupert Mallin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:01:24 +0100

228 lines

Re: Dylan

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:15:59 +0100

164 lines

Re: Dylan

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:36:03 +0100

200 lines

Re: Dylan

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:02:48 +0100

18 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:07:09 +0100

48 lines

Re: Dylan

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:08:08 +0100

32 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:42:37 +0100

115 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:46:40 +0100

51 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:52:33 +0100

57 lines

Re: Dylan

Maighread Medbh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 20:05:44 +0100

138 lines

Re: Dylan

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:09:33 -0400

214 lines

Re: Dylan

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:57:01 -0400

193 lines

Re: Dylan

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 22:05:38 +0100

343 lines

Re: Dylan

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:36:59 -0400

297 lines

Re: Dylan

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 22:48:42 +0100

73 lines

Re: Dylan

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:18:49 -0400

79 lines

Re: Dylan

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 08:49:15 +0100

131 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 09:58:34 +0100

177 lines

Re: Dylan

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:02:56 +0100

285 lines

Re: Dylan

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:31:25 +0100

33 lines

Re: Dylan

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 13:10:09 +0100

31 lines

Re: Dylan

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:13:04 -0400

126 lines

Re: Dylan

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:55:54 +0100

169 lines

Re: Dylan

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:43:14 -0400

91 lines

Re: Dylan

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 20:39:17 +0100

103 lines

Re: Dylan

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:27:33 -0400

154 lines

Re: Dylan

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:06:47 +0100

78 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:37:10 +0100

173 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 15:04:11 +0100

125 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 15:10:57 +0100

72 lines

Re: Dylan

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 11:46:56 -0400

236 lines

Re: Dylan

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 17:19:20 +0100

87 lines

Re: Dylan

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 19:51:17 +0100

23 lines

Re: Dylan

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 15:34:44 -0400

201 lines

Re: Dylan

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 20:48:25 +0100

73 lines

Re: Dylan

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 17:00:15 -0400

105 lines

Re: Dylan

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 17:42:32 -0500

220 lines

Re: Dylan

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 23:46:38 +0100

73 lines

Re: Dylan

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 23:54:25 +0100

69 lines

Re: Dylan

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:03:49 -0500

91 lines

Re: Dylan

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 19:21:18 -0400

83 lines

Re: Dylan

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:28:16 +0100

150 lines

Re: Dylan

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:43:24 -0500

165 lines

Re: Dylan

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:58:30 +0100

44 lines

Re: Dylan

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 19:08:08 -0500

74 lines

Re: Dylan

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 01:29:53 +0100

102 lines

Re: Dylan

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 07:33:46 +0100

186 lines

Re: Dylan

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:04:00 +0100

231 lines

Re: Dylan

Jeremy Hardingham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:53:46 +0100

125 lines

Re: Dylan

Jeremy Hardingham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:00:49 +0100

141 lines

Re: Dylan

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:32:56 +0100

48 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:36:16 +0100

50 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:39:49 +0100

48 lines

Re: Dylan

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:10:54 +0100

79 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:22:52 +0100

92 lines

Re: Dylan

David Dowker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:02:08 -0400

607 lines

Re: Dylan

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:12:43 -0500

571 lines

Re: Dylan

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:19:42 +0100

26 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:10:17 +0100

66 lines

Re: Dylan

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:21:20 +0100

81 lines

Re: Dylan

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:23:52 -0500

83 lines

Re: Dylan

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:47:38 -0500

220 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:51:45 +0100

48 lines

Re: Dylan

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:49:11 +0100

75 lines

Re: Dylan

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:31:01 +0100

370 lines

Re: Dylan

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:51:23 -0500

299 lines

Re: Dylan

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:45:25 +0100

97 lines

Re: Dylan

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:07:29 -0400

104 lines

New Thread

Dylan may be another Faul

Re: Dylan may be another Faul

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:28:30 -0400

163 lines

Re: Dylan may be another Faul

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:31:00 +0100

42 lines

Re: Dylan may be another Faul

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:37:02 +0100

46 lines

Re: Dylan may be another Faul

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:04:35 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Dylan the egotist

Dylan the egotist

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:31:50 -0500

103 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:43:16 -0400

131 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:52:20 +0100

35 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:54:53 -0400

40 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:53:14 +0100

110 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:06:01 +0100

179 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:05:07 -0400

282 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:30:29 +0100

91 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:40:47 +0100

85 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:51:46 -0400

183 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:54:16 -0400

123 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:42:00 +0100

75 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:51:01 +0100

51 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:25:38 +0100

17 lines

Re: Dylan the egotist

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:00:08 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

Fwd: a bit much

Fwd: a bit much

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:09:44 -0400

441 lines

New Thread

Fwd: New book from Ken Edwards

Fwd: New book from Ken Edwards

Paul Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:22:49 +0000

627 lines

New Thread

Is song really more shallow than poetry?

Is song really more shallow than poetry?

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:12:11 +0100

64 lines

Re: Is song really more shallow than poetry?

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:38:20 +0100

254 lines

Re: Is song really more shallow than poetry?

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:38:46 +0100

82 lines

Re: Is song really more shallow than poetry?

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:52:42 +0100

49 lines

Re: Is song really more shallow than poetry?

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:50:09 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Isochronic

Isochronic

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:02:47 +0100

283 lines

Re: Isochronic

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:25:31 +0100

431 lines

Re: Isochronic

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:39:00 -0400

265 lines

New Thread

Isochronic Pedantry

Re: Isochronic Pedantry

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:18:48 -0500

255 lines

Re: Isochronic Pedantry

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:36:38 +0100

339 lines

Re: Isochronic Pedantry

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:44:06 +0100

454 lines

Re: Isochronic Pedantry

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:03:03 -0500

310 lines

Re: Isochronic Pedantry

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 21:23:23 +0100

396 lines

Re: Isochronic Pedantry

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 21:34:32 +0100

423 lines

New Thread

KFS SUBSCRIBER SERVICE

Re: KFS SUBSCRIBER SERVICE

GOODBY JOHN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2016 06:32:36 +0100

238 lines

New Thread

Last post

Last post

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:50:52 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

Letters in Canada - University of Toronto Quarterly 85 3 now available on Project MUSE

Letters in Canada - University of Toronto Quarterly 85 3 now available on Project MUSE

UTP Journals <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2016 11:37:24 -0400

2415 lines

New Thread

Marlowe-speare

Marlowe-speare

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:36:26 +0200

450 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:33:06 -0500

484 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:04:32 +0100

132 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:17:05 +0100

567 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:18:10 +0100

163 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:27:50 -0500

158 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:39:28 -0500

600 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:50:49 +0100

650 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:55:33 -0400

253 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:03:06 +0100

240 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:05:59 +0100

37 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:25:07 -0500

522 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:29:10 +0100

33 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:29:48 -0400

21 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:56:29 +0100

11 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:03:19 +0100

38 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:33:38 +0100

81 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:25:50 +0100

126 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:56:47 -0400

69 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Tony Frazer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:05:56 +0100

200 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Tony Frazer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:13:38 +0100

227 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:53:39 +0100

250 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:45:06 -0400

129 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:48:45 -0400

112 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:57:59 -0400

111 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:08:29 -0500

243 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:48:46 +0100

271 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 06:29:43 +0100

288 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:53:53 +0100

15 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:21:36 +0100

99 lines

Re: Marlowe-speare

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:34:21 -0500

563 lines

New Thread

Max Richards obit

Max Richards obit

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 2 Oct 2016 20:45:02 -0400

39 lines

New Thread

new letters a

new letters a

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:13:41 -0500

99 lines

New Thread

Noon: journal of the short poem -- new issue and call for submissions

Noon: journal of the short poem -- new issue and call for submissions

Philip Rowland <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2016 22:12:22 +0900

84 lines

Re: Noon: journal of the short poem -- new issue and call for submissions

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2016 08:21:34 -0500

105 lines

New Thread

Nuttall

Nuttall

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:05:08 +0100

16 lines

Re: Nuttall

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:29:16 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

on Dylan and Plagiarism of Dispatches

on Dylan and Plagiarism of Dispatches

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:43:29 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

PoemTalk #105 on Michael Magee

PoemTalk #105 on Michael Magee

Filreis, Al <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:24:07 +0000

76 lines

New Thread

PoemTalk #105 on Michael Magee's "Morning Constitutional"

PoemTalk #105 on Michael Magee's "Morning Constitutional"

Filreis, Al <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:22:32 +0000

76 lines

New Thread

Poetic Artifice

Re: Poetic Artifice

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2016 12:22:17 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Poetry and Stupidity

Poetry and Stupidity

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 07:15:00 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

Poetry Salzburg Review 29

Poetry Salzburg Review 29

Wolfgang Görtschacher <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:26:07 +0200

705 lines

New Thread

Polite Reminder

Polite Reminder

lucy caddel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:43:15 +0000

65 lines

Re: Polite Reminder

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:34:31 +0100

95 lines

New Thread

question for Peter Riley

question for Peter Riley

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:39:15 -0500

272 lines

Re: question for Peter Riley

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:41:30 -0500

264 lines

New Thread

Russian help request

Russian help request

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:19:53 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

Russian query follow-up

Russian query follow-up

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:14:00 -0500

145 lines

New Thread

Samething

Samething

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:33:51 +0100

112 lines

New Thread

Shearsman Reading

Shearsman Reading

Tony Frazer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:44:53 +0000

196 lines

New Thread

signing off

signing off

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:20:44 -0500

423 lines

New Thread

Snowden, Eno, Levy, Alcalay

Snowden, Eno, Levy, Alcalay

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:28:42 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

Some Canadian* Poets

Some Canadian* Poets

David Dowker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:11:25 -0400

1564 lines

Re: Some Canadian* Poets

Paul Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:31:16 +0000

1675 lines

Re: Some Canadian* Poets

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:51:50 -0500

1337 lines

Re: Some Canadian* Poets

Drew Milne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:20:20 +0100

2822 lines

Re: Some Canadian* Poets

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:10:57 -0500

1609 lines

Re: Some Canadian* Poets

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:15:44 +0100

1179 lines

Re: Some Canadian* Poets

John Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:54:16 +0100

136 lines

Re: Some Canadian* Poets

mIEKAL aND <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:44:43 -0500

230 lines

New Thread

something I've noticed, fwiw

something I've noticed, fwiw

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:43:00 -0500

517 lines

New Thread

Stupid Brexit

Re: Stupid Brexit

Hampson, R <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:28:53 +0000

248 lines

New Thread

Subject: £4 million museum celebrating Seamus Heaney has opened

Re: Subject: £4 million museum celebrating Seamus Heaney has opened

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 1 Oct 2016 08:32:15 -0400

107 lines

New Thread

TENT 1: this coming Friday

TENT 1: this coming Friday

Edmund Hardy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 21:32:16 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

The "problem" of gender

Re: The "problem" of gender

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 21:31:01 -0500

89 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:31:38 -0700

166 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

John L Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:55:03 +0000

19 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:09:12 +0000

40 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:49:06 +0000

49 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Tony Frazer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:50:39 +0000

57 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:03:40 -0500

175 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:35:39 -0400

46 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:45:28 +0000

43 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:35:22 -0500

111 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 11:47:26 -0400

50 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:51:22 +0000

46 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:51:38 +0000

163 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:52:08 -0500

143 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:58:56 +0000

46 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:28:31 -0000

64 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:42:56 +0000

32 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:45:13 +0000

87 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:46:47 +0000

51 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 11:44:17 -0700

212 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:30:28 +0000

84 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:56:00 -0400

164 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 22:15:29 +0000

75 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:41:10 -0400

102 lines

Re: The "problem" of gender

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 23:40:19 +0000

66 lines

New Thread

The "problem" of prosody

The "problem" of prosody

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:59:51 +0100

59 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:00:27 +0100

208 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:06:54 +0100

15 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:04:53 +0100

46 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:59:12 +0100

85 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:11:20 +0100

61 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:38:35 +0100

64 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:56:26 +0100

308 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:56:39 +0100

90 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:42:52 +0100

127 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:57:19 +0100

89 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:11:47 +0100

97 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:16:46 +0100

119 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:18:56 +0100

74 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:34:41 +0100

110 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:37:58 +0100

59 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:38:35 +0100

54 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:41:40 +0100

63 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:49:52 +0100

61 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:52:12 +0100

12 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 16:10:41 +0100

182 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 16:11:23 +0100

12 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 16:50:17 +0100

216 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 16:54:39 +0100

230 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 16:59:54 +0100

231 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 17:07:52 +0100

65 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Tony Frazer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 18:09:59 +0100

17 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:12:17 +0100

307 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:56:06 +0100

84 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 23:56:05 +0100

225 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:21:38 +0000

119 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:21:19 +0000

95 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 09:20:30 -0400

113 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 13:42:22 +0000

67 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 16:01:56 +0000

191 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 17:17:50 +0000

102 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:26:45 -0500

222 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 17:49:14 +0000

67 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 13:00:47 -0500

90 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:08:00 +0000

32 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 13:17:05 -0500

94 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:32:53 +0000

22 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:52:10 -0000

374 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:13:23 -0000

500 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:14:13 +0000

69 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:46:11 +0000

484 lines

Re: The "problem" of prosody

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:21:05 +0000

92 lines

New Thread

The new ebook from Argotist Ebooks is “Signs That Do Not Signal” by Jeffrey Side

The new ebook from Argotist Ebooks is “Signs That Do Not Signal” by Jeffrey Side

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2016 19:45:37 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

The Unfinished Dream

The Unfinished Dream

Joseph Lindsay Walton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:45:06 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

The use(s) of criticism

The use(s) of criticism

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:37:07 +0100

27 lines

Re: The use(s) of criticism

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:53:59 -0400

77 lines

Re: The use(s) of criticism

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:01:19 +0100

276 lines

Re: The use(s) of criticism

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 11:36:38 -0400

366 lines

Re: The use(s) of criticism

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:14:52 -0000

482 lines

New Thread

today at Dispatches

today at Dispatches

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:28:52 -0500

154 lines

New Thread

Tone, Tune and Mandarin Chinese

Tone, Tune and Mandarin Chinese

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:55:10 +0100

131 lines

New Thread

U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2016 08:58:05 -0500

52 lines

Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

Maighread Medbh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2016 15:45:14 +0100

77 lines

Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:22:19 +0100

33 lines

Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

Van Den Beukel, Karlien <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:21:48 +0000

78 lines

Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2016 22:54:18 -0500

181 lines

Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:25:38 +0100

191 lines

Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:43:34 +0100

216 lines

Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2016 07:50:53 -0500

221 lines

Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2016 13:02:18 +0100

23 lines

Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

Maighread Medbh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2016 21:47:23 +0100

49 lines

Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2016 21:21:44 -0500

151 lines

Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2016 09:47:32 +0100

181 lines

Re: U. of Penn English Dept. Ad

David Latane <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Oct 2016 15:13:04 +0000

71 lines

New Thread

U.S. ACADEMIC VANGUARD POETRY

U.S. ACADEMIC VANGUARD POETRY

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2016 10:05:03 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Was I overly rude to Geraldine?

Was I overly rude to Geraldine?

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:51:28 +0100

121 lines

New Thread

whatever

whatever

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:59:24 +0200

36 lines

Re: whatever

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:05:35 +0100

34 lines

Re: whatever

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:06:39 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:32:31 -0500

415 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:43:44 -0400

217 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:34:55 -0500

444 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:41:10 +0100

447 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:59:16 -0500

473 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:05:55 -0400

222 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:07:19 -0400

236 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:11:29 +0100

738 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:11:34 -0500

485 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:14:27 -0500

499 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:15:25 -0500

580 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:16:48 -0400

244 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:20:07 -0500

519 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:42:14 +0100

475 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:55:25 +0100

476 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:09:21 -0400

254 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 22:11:15 +0100

467 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:27:40 -0500

453 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:31:39 -0500

451 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:45:17 -0400

199 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 23:01:02 +0100

522 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:19:06 -0500

513 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:22:57 -0500

498 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:04:19 +0100

554 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:12:22 +0100

172 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:24:07 +0100

41 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:32:17 +0100

123 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:42:30 -0500

71 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:58:36 +0100

140 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:44:10 +0100

202 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:10:48 +0100

282 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:27:13 +0100

18 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:26:05 +0100

55 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:02:37 -0400

67 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:06:29 -0400

28 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:33:46 +0100

109 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:38:16 +0100

47 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:40:42 +0100

53 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:48:40 +0100

106 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:50:29 -0400

63 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:55:58 +0100

58 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:04:21 +0100

44 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Ricky Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:01:15 -0400

67 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:11:18 +0100

34 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:14:45 +0100

81 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:37:03 +0100

17 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Hampson, R <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:03:19 +0000

634 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:05:30 +0100

120 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:13:07 +0100

55 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:17:19 +0100

130 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:02:25 +0100

79 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Hampson, R <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:07:49 +0000

115 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:41:25 -0500

163 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:39:55 +0100

182 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:45:34 +0100

120 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:29:54 -0400

55 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:32:08 -0400

32 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:35:42 -0400

57 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:40:56 -0500

122 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:44:33 -0400

95 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:47:19 +0100

245 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:51:32 -0400

131 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:54:13 +0100

163 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:55:03 +0100

189 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:59:18 -0500

304 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:02:13 -0400

84 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:03:33 -0400

140 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:06:25 -0400

140 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:07:15 -0500

325 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 22:12:18 +0100

99 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 22:22:52 +0100

345 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:24:41 -0500

339 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 22:37:52 +0100

398 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:47:16 -0500

373 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:54:00 -0400

151 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:04:21 -0500

406 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:12:09 -0400

167 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:37:28 +0100

24 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:40:31 +0100

25 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:42:51 -0400

30 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:04:40 +0100

25 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:57:25 -0400

39 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:25:51 +0100

168 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:30:51 -0400

82 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:36:32 +0100

27 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:41:19 +0100

222 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:41:57 +0100

29 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:52:49 -0400

29 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:54:01 -0400

93 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:55:16 -0400

32 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:12:10 +0100

77 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 11:21:46 +0100

52 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:30:19 +0100

27 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:34:12 +0100

27 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:39:19 +0100

47 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 09:49:25 -0400

57 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:59:56 +0100

51 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 10:35:16 -0400

60 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 00:05:22 +0200

54 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:27:37 +0100

25 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

Sean Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 10:55:05 -0400

117 lines

Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:08:14 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

World War III

World War III

Kent Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:22:53 -0500

142 lines

Re: World War III

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:34:23 +0100

51 lines

Re: World War III

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:42:12 +0100

75 lines

Re: World War III

Paul Green <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:01:41 +0000

497 lines

Re: World War III

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:13:47 -0400

84 lines

Re: World War III

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:48:26 +0200

69 lines

Re: World War III

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:24:27 -0400

77 lines

Re: World War III

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:31:38 +0100

266 lines

Re: World War III

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:41:42 -0400

116 lines

Re: World War III

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:08:02 +0200

2569 lines

Re: World War III

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:12:58 +0100

403 lines

Re: World War III

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:29:48 -0400

173 lines

Re: World War III

Paul Green <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:05:02 +0000

510 lines

Re: World War III

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:08:08 -0700

525 lines

Re: World War III

Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:13:46 -0700

607 lines

Re: World War III

Paul Green <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:26:59 +0000

648 lines

Re: World War III

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:38:39 -0400