|
|
|
Size
|
University of Stirling Realist Writers' Retreat 9th and 10th Sept 2016
|
Jean Hannah |
Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:19:58 +0000 |
158 lines |
Re: CARES 2016 Conference - 5 weeks left!
|
Jagosh, Justin |
Tue, 30 Aug 2016 01:18:40 +0000 |
211 lines |
Re: CARES 2016 Conference - 5 weeks left!
|
Emma Williams |
Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:13:04 +1000 |
119 lines |
CARES 2016 Conference - 5 weeks left!
|
Jagosh, Justin |
Tue, 30 Aug 2016 01:00:19 +0000 |
19537 lines |
Re: Systematic reviews and realism
|
Kershaw-Solomon, Hazel |
Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:03:11 +0000 |
139 lines |
Systematic reviews and realism
|
Federico Carini |
Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:48:06 -0300 |
49 lines |
Re: designing interview questions
|
Naoimh McMahon |
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 07:57:35 +0000 |
446 lines |
Re: designing interview questions
|
Hazel Meredith |
Wed, 24 Aug 2016 01:13:04 +0000 |
187 lines |
Re: designing interview questions
|
Gill Westhorp |
Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:03:02 +0930 |
185 lines |
designing interview questions
|
Hazel Meredith |
Tue, 23 Aug 2016 22:42:30 +0000 |
70 lines |
CALL FOR PAPERS: Research Synthesis Methods special issue: Innovation in Information Retrieval Methods for Evidence Synthesis
|
Suzy Paisley |
Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:45:00 +0100 |
462 lines |
RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations on EQUATOR network
|
Geoff Wong |
Fri, 19 Aug 2016 15:14:31 +0100 |
29 lines |
Process for unsubscribing to the RAMESES JISCMail list
|
Geoff Wong |
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:21:52 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Stakeholders in RR
|
Janet L Harris |
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:18:56 +0100 |
215 lines |
Re: could I also be removed from the list, thanks
|
Geoff Wong |
Mon, 15 Aug 2016 22:40:33 +0100 |
106 lines |
Re: could I also be removed from the list, thanks
|
Jason Lowther (Institute of Local Government Studies) |
Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:05:35 +0000 |
43 lines |
Stakeholders in RR
|
Waldron, Tami |
Mon, 15 Aug 2016 19:36:39 +0000 |
170 lines |
Re: mail list
|
Laycock, Gloria |
Sun, 14 Aug 2016 08:24:55 +0000 |
121 lines |
Re: Q Methodology and Realist Evaluation
|
Kev Harris |
Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:51:06 +0000 |
455 lines |
Re: Q Methodology and Realist Evaluation
|
Gill Westhorp |
Tue, 9 Aug 2016 03:09:50 +0930 |
400 lines |
Re: Q Methodology and Realist Evaluation
|
Pearson, Mark |
Mon, 8 Aug 2016 16:02:06 +0000 |
303 lines |
Q Methodology and Realist Evaluation
|
Newman-Allen, Helen Allen |
Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:36:22 +0000 |
121 lines |
|
Sims, Laura |
Mon, 8 Aug 2016 10:48:52 +0000 |
99 lines |
FW: realist innovation? or realist disintegration?
|
Gemma Pearce |
Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:43:44 +0000 |
506 lines |
Re: Realist criteria for funding allocation
|
Sue Keller-Olaman |
Sun, 7 Aug 2016 17:00:42 +0000 |
78 lines |
Re: Realist criteria for funding allocation
|
Gill Westhorp |
Sun, 7 Aug 2016 16:32:14 +0930 |
73 lines |
Re: Realist criteria for funding allocation
|
Kim Grey |
Sun, 7 Aug 2016 07:17:28 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: realist innovation? or realist disintegration?
|
Shane Pointing |
Sun, 7 Aug 2016 09:31:22 +1000 |
342 lines |
Re: realist innovation? or realist disintegration?
|
Trish Greenhalgh |
Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:06:26 +0000 |
31 lines |
realist innovation? or realist disintegration?
|
Jagosh, Justin |
Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:04:09 +0000 |
3405 lines |
Re: Realist criteria for funding allocation
|
Andrew Booth |
Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:02:47 +0100 |
160 lines |
Realist criteria for funding allocation
|
Kim Grey |
Fri, 5 Aug 2016 09:37:19 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Meta-evaluation or Critical instance case study
|
Coleman Amy (Analysis) |
Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:21:31 +0000 |
238 lines |
Re: Meta-evaluation or Critical instance case study
|
Gill Westhorp |
Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:43:50 +0930 |
270 lines |
Meta-evaluation or Critical instance case study
|
Melanie King |
Thu, 4 Aug 2016 10:42:48 +0000 |
115 lines |
University of Oxford New MSc in EBHC Systematic Reviews
|
University of Oxford CPD Centre |
Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:08:11 +0100 |
584 lines |