JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


January 2016


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Design and Culture Issue 7.3

Maggie Taft

Sun, 31 Jan 2016 10:06:36 -0600

116 lines

New JRP Special Issue "Experiential Knowledge, Expertise, and Connoisseurship” published

nithikul nimkulrat

Sun, 31 Jan 2016 16:01:56 +0200

96 lines

Conference: Sustainable Energy for All by Design - Cape Town - 28-30.9.2016

Carlo Vezzoli

Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:42:50 +0000

57 lines

3 x PhD studentships at University of Dundee

Nick Taylor (Staff)

Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:37:33 +0000

43 lines

SAPIENS anthropology web site

Ken Friedman

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 19:06:08 +0100

63 lines

Re: Anybody knows if the EAD'11 proceedings have been/will be published?

Soren Petersen

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 08:52:08 -0800

102 lines

Re: Simon's glory

Ken Friedman

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 17:42:49 +0100

92 lines

Re: Simon's glory

Eduardo corte-real

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 15:52:52 +0000

87 lines

Call of papers

Cleomar Rocha

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:18:18 -0200

6710 lines

Re: [SPAM] Re: Simon's glory

Terence Love

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 21:14:58 +0800

167 lines

Re: Simon's glory

Ken Friedman

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:59:25 +0100

121 lines

Anybody knows if the EAD'11 proceedings have been/will be published?

Saad-Sulonen Joanna

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:24:55 +0000

37 lines

Re: Roberto Verganti on "The Innovative Power of Criticism"

Lassi A Liikkanen

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 08:28:52 +0200

57 lines

Re: Simon's glory

Diaz-Kommonen Lily

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 05:28:23 +0000

213 lines

Re: Simon's glory

Terence Love

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:57:27 +0800

544 lines

Re: Simon's glory

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 04:34:33 +0000

355 lines

Re: Simon's glory

Terence Love

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:03:03 +0800

427 lines

Re: Simon's glory

Eduardo corte-real

Wed, 27 Jan 2016 23:30:48 +0000

396 lines

Re: Academia -- and the new Premium Academia that will monetise the service

Ken Friedman

Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:06:32 +0100

83 lines

Re: Academia -- and the new Premium Academia that will monetise the service

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:33:14 -0500

41 lines

Re: Simon's glory

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:15:25 +0000

173 lines

Re: Simon's glory

Ken Friedman

Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:11:14 +0100

79 lines

Re: Simon's glory

Eduardo corte-real

Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:25:56 +0000

170 lines

Re: Academia -- and the new Premium Academia that will monetise the service

Kommonen Kari-Hans

Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:06:23 +0000

82 lines

Re: Simon's glory

Eduardo corte-real

Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:21:45 +0000

257 lines

Academia -- and the new Premium Academia that will monetise the service

Ken Friedman

Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:07:12 +0100

114 lines

Re: Simon's glory

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:38:26 +0000

111 lines

Simon's glory

Eduardo corte-real

Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:00:53 +0000

87 lines

Re: Open Syllabus Project

Charlie Cox

Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:21:34 -0500

172 lines

Re: Open Syllabus Project

Darren Southee

Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:27:04 +0000

100 lines

Open Syllabus Project

Ken Friedman

Tue, 26 Jan 2016 13:01:47 +0100

79 lines

Fwd: PhD research fellowship in CEA LIST (Paris, France)- Software tools for building design support

K. Zreik - University Paris8

Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:38:23 +0100

94 lines

FW: An invitation from Tim

Timothy Emlyn Jones

Tue, 26 Jan 2016 00:15:00 -0000

769 lines

define design in poetry

Paul Mike Zender

Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:06:16 +0000

49 lines

Call of papers - Appel à contribution - Llamada de trabajo - SIIMI 2016

Cleomar Rocha

Sun, 24 Jan 2016 07:57:38 -0200

16388 lines

Re: Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

Terence Love

Sun, 24 Jan 2016 09:16:14 +0800

150 lines

Re: Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

Luke Feast

Sat, 23 Jan 2016 18:44:44 +0000

73 lines

Re: Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

Ken Friedman

Sat, 23 Jan 2016 18:16:51 +0100

65 lines

Re: Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

CHARLES BURNETTE

Sat, 23 Jan 2016 11:51:29 -0500

521 lines

Re: Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

CHARLES BURNETTE

Sat, 23 Jan 2016 11:01:39 -0500

456 lines

Re: Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

Terence Love

Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:24:00 +0800

79 lines

Re: Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

Yoád David Luxembourg

Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:50:47 +0100

49 lines

Re: Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

Terence Love

Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:39:21 +0800

218 lines

Re: Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

Ken Friedman

Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:24:18 +0100

122 lines

Re: Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

Ken Friedman

Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:00:59 +0100

80 lines

Re: Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

Terence Love

Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:44:45 +0800

199 lines

Re: Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

Terence Love

Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:21:47 +0800

441 lines

Student Design Competition: MAB 2016

Luke Hespanhol

Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:28:31 +1100

87 lines

call for paper, sciences du design #4

Remy Bourganel Admin

Thu, 21 Jan 2016 21:17:31 +0100

151 lines

call for paper, science du design #4

Remy Bourganel Admin

Thu, 21 Jan 2016 21:13:40 +0100

151 lines

CFP: CHI2016 Workshop – Sharing Methods for Involving People with Impairments in the Design Process

Rita Maldonado Branco

Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:11:14 +0000

65 lines

Re: Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

CHARLES BURNETTE

Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:32:11 -0500

327 lines

CfP Visual Literacy & HCI - DEADLINE EXTENSION

Kyle Overton

Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:20:28 +0000

205 lines

Definitions: testing structure rather than meaning

Terence Love

Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:24:39 +0800

225 lines

Re: Philosophy in Context

CHARLES BURNETTE

Tue, 19 Jan 2016 09:29:49 -0500

329 lines

Re: Philosophy in Context

Eduardo corte-real

Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:21:08 +0000

116 lines

Re: Philosophy in Context

Keith Russell

Mon, 18 Jan 2016 22:29:15 +0000

69 lines

Philosophy in Context

Ken Friedman

Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:52:52 +0100

295 lines

RSD5 Symposium Toronto, Oct 13-15: Systemic Design for Social Complexity

Peter Jones | Redesign

Mon, 18 Jan 2016 12:44:00 -0500

97 lines

Cultural Heritage Information Design

K. Zreik - University Paris8

Mon, 18 Jan 2016 18:08:18 +0100

91 lines

2016 PhD Summer School on Integrated Product Development (Malta & Magdeburg)

Jonathan C. Borg

Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:20:06 +0100

56 lines

6th International Conference on Research into Design (ICoRD '17)

Ken Friedman

Sat, 16 Jan 2016 23:52:44 +0100

141 lines

Re: Definitions

Ken Friedman

Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:02:51 +0100

105 lines

Re: Definitions

Terence Love

Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:07:21 +0800

61 lines

+++ Exhibition Call for Works - INFORMATION EVERYTHING: New work in information design and visualization

Gillian Russell

Fri, 15 Jan 2016 21:26:24 +0000

53 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Filippo Salustri

Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:06:55 -0500

49 lines

Assistant Chair and a Full-Time Faculty at Pratt Institute

gaia scagnetti

Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:39:48 -0500

281 lines

Re: Definitions

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:32:16 +0000

139 lines

Senior professorships available

David Durling

Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:01:41 +0000

60 lines

Beware a company called Manuscript Proofreading Services

Ken Friedman

Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:57:50 +0100

167 lines

Re: Definitions

Terence Love

Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:36:52 +0800

191 lines

Re: NYT article

Harold Nelson

Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:55:10 -0700

195 lines

PhD Studentship in Service Design at School of the Arts, Loughborough University

Kathy Lo

Thu, 14 Jan 2016 22:19:06 +0000

66 lines

Full-time Tenure-track Design Teaching Positions at OCAD University, Toronto

Patricio Davila

Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:15:54 -0500

69 lines

Call for works: Information Everything: New works in information design and visualization

Gillian Russell

Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:00:01 -0800

8355 lines

Re: Definitions

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:04:03 +0000

115 lines

Re: Definitions

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:35:48 +0000

114 lines

Re: Definitions

Terence Love

Thu, 14 Jan 2016 22:36:41 +0800

147 lines

Re: Definitions

Ken Friedman

Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:58:33 +0100

92 lines

Re: Definitions

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:58:41 +0000

157 lines

DeL 2016: Anxiety and Security - call for papers

Cynthia Lawson

Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:00:00 +0000

125 lines

Re: Definitions

Ken Friedman

Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:49:37 +0100

91 lines

Re: Definitions

Terence Love

Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:08:12 +0800

321 lines

Re: Definitions and Etymology of the Word "Design"

Yoád David Luxembourg

Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:20:04 +0100

181 lines

Definitions and Etymology of the Word "Design"

Adam Girard

Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:51:18 +0000

156 lines

Disaster Ethics, Disaster Mobilities & IT ELSI @ ISCRAM 2016 Short paper deadline 29th January

Buscher, Monika

Wed, 13 Jan 2016 07:31:28 +0000

128 lines

Postdoc positions at UTS

Dorst, C.H.

Wed, 13 Jan 2016 02:41:08 +0000

33 lines

Re: NYT article

Terence Love

Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:30:25 +0800

169 lines

NYT article

Harold Nelson

Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:52:30 -0700

52 lines

Call of papers | SIIMI 2016 | UFG | Brazil

Cleomar Rocha

Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:12:32 -0200

67 lines

Book launch Designing Business and Management

Prof. Juergen Faust

Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:31:45 +0000

37 lines

Re: Definitions and Etymology of the Word "Design"

CHUA Soo Meng Jude (GPL, PLS)

Tue, 12 Jan 2016 03:13:59 +0000

97 lines

Re: The subconscious, aesthetics, and Graduate design education

Charles Burnette

Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:48:28 -0500

171 lines

Recent post problem

CHARLES BURNETTE

Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:09:37 -0500

37 lines

Re: Subconsciousness, Aesthetics, and An Interdisciplinary Graduate Program

Marcella Eaton

Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:51:22 +0000

203 lines

Re: Subconsciousness, Aesthetics, and An Interdisciplinary Graduate Program

Paola Pierri

Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:33:36 +0000

182 lines

French conference on 3D printing / Appel à communication – Colloque impression 3D

Guillaume Blum

Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:45:13 +0000

62 lines

Subconsciousness, Aesthetics, and An Interdisciplinary Graduate Program

Charles Burnette

Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:00:27 -0500

168 lines

ONE WEEK LEFT FOR THE CITY STREET2 ABSTRACT SUBMISSION

Christine Mady

Mon, 11 Jan 2016 05:24:48 +0000

25 lines

Designing gas events

Keith Russell

Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:43:29 +0000

46 lines

farting and design

Keith Russell

Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:28:30 +0000

50 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Gunnar Swanson

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:55:29 -0500

60 lines

Re: Definitions and Etymology of the Word "Design"

Eduardo corte-real

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:12:19 +0000

210 lines

[REMINDER] Call for Papers - Special Issue "Exploring Participatory Design as a strategy to act within the city" - SDRJ

Chiara Del Gaudio

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:09:27 -0200

231 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Charles Burnette

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:33:16 -0500

64 lines

Re: Definitions and Etymology of the Word "Design"

Ken Friedman

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:03:53 +0100

132 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Ken Friedman

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:29:18 +0100

55 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Terence Love

Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:46 +0800

115 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Charles Burnette

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:57:41 -0500

61 lines

Re: Definitions and Etymology of the Word "Design"

derek hales

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:46:24 +0000

1618 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Ken Friedman

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:25:54 +0100

55 lines

Re: Definitions and Etymology of the Word "Design"

Eduardo corte-real

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:06:57 +0000

1508 lines

Re: Definitions and Etymology of the Word "Design"

derek hales

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:38:19 +0000

1262 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Terence Love

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 22:11:41 +0800

370 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Ken Friedman

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:58:25 +0100

273 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Terence Love

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:46:10 +0800

97 lines

Definitions and Etymology of the Word "Design"

Ken Friedman

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 06:06:36 +0100

942 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Ken Friedman

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 05:51:42 +0100

189 lines

Re: Roberto Verganti on "The Innovative Power of Criticism"

Terence Love

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:36:39 +0800

99 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Paul Mike Zender

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 01:08:48 +0000

46 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Eduardo corte-real

Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:57:50 +0000

192 lines

Re: Roberto Verganti on "The Innovative Power of Criticism"

Nicholas Torretta

Sat, 9 Jan 2016 21:30:56 +0100

126 lines

Remarks on beauty

Jerry Diethelm

Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:12:34 -0800

69 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Ken Friedman

Sat, 9 Jan 2016 18:09:11 +0100

94 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Terence Love

Sun, 10 Jan 2016 00:11:19 +0800

246 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Ken Friedman

Sat, 9 Jan 2016 16:18:46 +0100

179 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Terence Love

Sat, 9 Jan 2016 21:37:38 +0800

230 lines

Re: Roberto Verganti on "The Innovative Power of Criticism"

ben jonson

Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:33:53 +0000

77 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Ken Friedman

Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:03:13 +0100

127 lines

Re: [SPAM] Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:58:22 +0000

239 lines

Re: Do simply beautiful artefacts ALWAYS instantiate good design?

Charles Burnette

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:40:50 -0500

52 lines

Re: Assistant/Associate Professor Position in Industrial Design at Iowa State University

Colleen Seifert

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:28:01 -0500

70 lines

Assistant/Associate Professor Position in Industrial Design at Iowa State University

Yilmaz, Seda [IND D]

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 20:13:38 +0000

57 lines

Re: Roberto Verganti on "The Innovative Power of Criticism"

Charles Burnette

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:06:46 -0500

50 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Ken Friedman

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 19:34:19 +0100

135 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

João Ferreira

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:55:42 +0000

41 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Eduardo corte-real

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:22:23 +0000

444 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Terence Love

Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:15:34 +0800

429 lines

Re: [SPAM] Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Eduardo corte-real

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:40:49 +0000

348 lines

conference invitation

Ursula Tischner

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:20:52 +0100

2975 lines

Re: Do simply beautiful artefacts ALWAYS instantiate good design?

Paul Mike Zender

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:10:22 +0000

129 lines

Journal for Artistic Research (JAR) issue 9 out now

Michael Schwab

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 13:03:32 +0000

81 lines

Re: Roberto Verganti on "The Innovative Power of Criticism"

Darren Southee

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 08:52:01 +0000

91 lines

Re: Do simply beautiful artefacts ALWAYS instantiate good design?

CHUA Soo Meng Jude (GPL, PLS)

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 06:09:02 +0000

84 lines

Roberto Verganti on "The Innovative Power of Criticism"

Ken Friedman

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:11:33 +0100

65 lines

[Open Faculty Position] Information and Interaction Design, Yonsei University, Korea

Soojin Jun

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:00:19 +0900

179 lines

Re: [SPAM] Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Terence Love

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 08:46:18 +0800

284 lines

Re: Do simply beautiful artefacts ALWAYS instantiate good design?

Eduardo corte-real

Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:13:32 +0000

91 lines

Re: Do simply beautiful artefacts ALWAYS instantiate good design?

Gunnar Swanson

Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:06:52 -0500

75 lines

Re: Do simply beautiful artefacts ALWAYS instantiate good design?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 8 Jan 2016 06:23:16 +1100

126 lines

Re: Do simply beautiful artefacts ALWAYS instantiate good design?

Bardzell, Jeffrey S

Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:00:27 +0000

43 lines

Do simply beautiful artefacts ALWAYS instantiate good design?

Ken Friedman

Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:38:01 +0100

61 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Eduardo corte-real

Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:03:59 +0000

203 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Barbara Trippeer

Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:24:24 -0600

221 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Ken Friedman

Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:55:18 +0100

132 lines

Re: Evidence-Based Practice

Gjoko Muratovski

Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:21:07 +0000

120 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

David Sless

Thu, 7 Jan 2016 13:32:25 +1100

90 lines

Re: Evidence-Based Practice

Barbara Trippeer

Wed, 6 Jan 2016 19:57:03 -0600

78 lines

Re: Big plywood construction toy system

Matthew Hunter

Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:24:26 -0500

6648 lines

[Open Faculty Position] Assistant Professor in Industrial Product Design or Interaction Design at Koç University

Oğuz Turan BURUK

Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:03:26 +0000

92 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Teena Clerke

Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:48:46 +1100

77 lines

EPIC 2016 call for participation

Fernando Galdino

Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:39:23 +0100

93 lines

Re: Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Eduardo corte-real

Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:32:19 +0000

191 lines

Big plywood construction toy system

Nicolai Steinø

Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:58:54 +0000

51 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Francois Nsenga

Wed, 6 Jan 2016 00:31:58 -0500

57 lines

Reminder: CFP for Social Justice, Design, and HCI Workshop (CHI '16)

Mariam Asad

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 22:59:05 -0500

83 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:56:12 +1100

54 lines

Re: Evidence-Based Practice

Gjoko Muratovski

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 22:47:23 +0000

30 lines

Design Disruptors

Gjoko Muratovski

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:42:36 +0000

32 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Filippo Salustri

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:20:04 -0500

35 lines

Re: Evidence-Based Practice

Francois Nsenga

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:51:18 -0500

70 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Filippo Salustri

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:29:42 -0500

54 lines

Re: Practitioners versus Academic Scholars

Ahmed Ansari

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:57:57 +0000

48 lines

Re: Practitioners versus Academic Scholars

Filippo Salustri

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:13:25 -0500

138 lines

Evidence & Beauty - Was: Bass evidence

Filippo Salustri

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:04:02 -0500

120 lines

Re: Practitioners versus Academic Scholars

cameron tonkinwise

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:55:51 -0500

29 lines

Practitioners versus Academic Scholars

Don Norman

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:42:30 -0800

94 lines

Re: Evidence-Based Practice

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:22:15 +0000

65 lines

Re: Evidence-Based Practice

Terence Love

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 23:08:06 +0800

169 lines

Special Issue of "Design Issues": Mortality in Design

Drinkall, Pennie

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:07:03 +0000

3332 lines

25 pounds of design thinking

Eduardo corte-real

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:57:57 +0000

30 lines

Re: Evidence-Based Practice

Birger Sevaldson

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:00:21 +0000

74 lines

Re: Survey on Design for Development!

pramod khadilkar

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:04:54 +0530

99 lines

Re: Evidence-Based Practice

Ken Friedman

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:21:22 +0100

337 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

João Ferreira

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:48:51 +0000

125 lines

Re: Evidence-Based Practice

Keith Russell

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 07:22:24 +0000

42 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Gjoko Muratovski

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 07:04:26 +0000

43 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Gjoko Muratovski

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:47:05 +0000

31 lines

Re: Evidence-Based Practice

Diaz-Kommonen Lily

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:42:02 +0000

305 lines

Re: Evidence-Based Practice

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 05:28:54 +0000

282 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 04:28:59 +0000

162 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Arjun Dhillon

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 23:13:29 -0500

44 lines

Evidence-Based Practice

Ken Friedman

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 05:04:16 +0100

283 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Arjun Dhillon

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 22:45:28 -0500

72 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Paul Mike Zender

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 03:40:15 +0000

66 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Gjoko Muratovski

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 03:38:55 +0000

42 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Keith Russell

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 03:24:26 +0000

40 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Arjun Dhillon

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 22:08:41 -0500

63 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Barbara Trippeer

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:13:30 -0600

87 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Gjoko Muratovski

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 01:00:24 +0000

24 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Gjoko Muratovski

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:39:31 +0000

96 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Terence Love

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 08:26:30 +0800

112 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Terence Love

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 08:13:55 +0800

93 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 23:29:35 +0000

50 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Filippo Salustri

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:14:36 -0500

36 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Filippo Salustri

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:10:35 -0500

45 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Filippo Salustri

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:07:22 -0500

41 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:53:16 +1100

127 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 22:11:44 +0000

130 lines

Re: Bass evidence; was: evidence Based

Eduardo corte-real

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 21:58:33 +0000

59 lines

Open faculty position: Experience Design - Northeastern University, Boston

Kristian Kloeckl

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 21:47:57 +0000

113 lines

Re: Bass evidence; was: evidence Based

Don Norman

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:28:57 -0800

352 lines

Re: The D-Day invasion of Normandy was an evidence based activity

Terence Love

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 01:24:05 +0800

114 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Filippo Salustri

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:23:11 -0500

54 lines

Re: Apologies to Portugal

Terence Love

Tue, 5 Jan 2016 01:09:13 +0800

124 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Bardzell, Jeffrey S

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:59:53 +0000

48 lines

Funded Design PhD Positions -Design Factors, University of Limerick, Ireland

Adam.DeEyto

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:38:45 +0000

50 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Birger Sevaldson

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:36:06 +0000

87 lines

Re: Bass evidence; was: evidence Based

Filippo Salustri

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:33:19 -0500

39 lines

Re: The D-Day invasion of Normandy was an evidence based activity

Birger Sevaldson

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:27:38 +0000

70 lines

Re: Bass evidence; was: evidence Based

Eduardo corte-real

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:24:29 +0000

98 lines

Re: Apologies to Portugal

Fernando Mendes

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:06:05 +0000

76 lines

Bass evidence; was: evidence Based

Gunnar Swanson

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:03:32 -0500

72 lines

Apologies to Portugal

Ken Friedman

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:54:21 +0100

44 lines

Re: What is *not* evidence?

Filippo Salustri

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:54:09 -0500

77 lines

The Evaluation of Evidence

Charles Burnette

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:43:05 -0500

48 lines

What is *not* evidence?

Bardzell, Jeffrey S

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:43:00 +0000

50 lines

Re: The D-Day invasion of Normandy was an evidence based activity

Ken Friedman

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:30:44 +0100

64 lines

Re: The D-Day invasion of Normandy was an evidence based activity

Birger Sevaldson

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:04:03 +0000

181 lines

The D-Day invasion of Normandy was an evidence based activity

Ken Friedman

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:39:43 +0100

155 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Eduardo corte-real

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:37:31 +0000

110 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Terence Love

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:30:14 +0800

74 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Gunnar Swanson

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 20:49:41 -0500

84 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Teena Clerke

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:43:01 +1100

75 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 20:40:45 -0500

55 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Teena Clerke

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:16:47 +1100

33 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 19:29:21 -0500

47 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Gjoko Muratovski

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 00:01:16 +0000

28 lines

Re: design questions and evidence

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 18:58:58 -0500

41 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 18:58:00 -0500

109 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Teena Clerke

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:47:41 +1100

66 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Teena Clerke

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:43:07 +1100

60 lines

Re: design questions and evidence

Gjoko Muratovski

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 23:40:41 +0000

21 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Gjoko Muratovski

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 23:38:22 +0000

33 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Keith Russell

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 23:34:59 +0000

71 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 18:07:58 -0500

71 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Gjoko Muratovski

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 23:02:54 +0000

34 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Teena Clerke

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 09:53:13 +1100

47 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 17:38:13 -0500

52 lines

design questions and evidence

Keith Russell

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 22:22:57 +0000

25 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Teena Clerke

Mon, 4 Jan 2016 09:14:39 +1100

59 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Peter Jones | Redesign

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 16:20:34 -0500

220 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

cameron tonkinwise

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 14:11:40 -0500

40 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Gjoko Muratovski

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 18:49:28 +0000

114 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:34:09 -0500

58 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Dinesh Korjan

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 17:57:18 +0000

35 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Gordon Rowland

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 16:27:59 +0000

74 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Birger Sevaldson

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 12:37:56 +0000

167 lines

Re: Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Diaz-Kommonen Lily

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 12:33:24 +0000

135 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again (reply to Don)

Birger Sevaldson

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 12:06:35 +0000

49 lines

Questions in design (reply to Gjoko, was: evidence Based Design once again)

Birger Sevaldson

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:03:05 +0000

101 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Francois Nsenga

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 03:10:00 -0500

97 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

cameron tonkinwise

Sat, 2 Jan 2016 19:31:36 -0500

52 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Teena Clerke

Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:23:39 +1100

53 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Don Norman

Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:01:47 -0800

65 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

cameron tonkinwise

Sat, 2 Jan 2016 17:39:24 -0500

53 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Filippo Salustri

Sat, 2 Jan 2016 17:02:38 -0500

87 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Gjoko Muratovski

Sat, 2 Jan 2016 21:59:52 +0000

74 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Don Norman

Sat, 2 Jan 2016 13:39:32 -0800

157 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Gunnar Swanson

Sat, 2 Jan 2016 13:38:15 -0500

99 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

cameron tonkinwise

Sat, 2 Jan 2016 13:34:53 -0500

80 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Birger Sevaldson

Sat, 2 Jan 2016 18:17:52 +0000

295 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Tiiu Poldma

Sat, 2 Jan 2016 11:50:08 -0500

172 lines

Re: evidence Based Design once again

Don Norman

Sat, 2 Jan 2016 08:32:26 -0800

288 lines

evidence Based Design once again

Birger Sevaldson

Sat, 2 Jan 2016 11:17:18 +0000

133 lines

December CFPs to DesignCalls blog

Filippo Salustri

Fri, 1 Jan 2016 21:06:11 -0500

173 lines

Re: Research for Designers

Gjoko Muratovski

Sat, 2 Jan 2016 00:05:06 +0000

114 lines

Evidence-based design

David Durling

Fri, 1 Jan 2016 14:13:36 +0000

49 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager