JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


February 2015


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Alzheimer's Society information sharing guide (1 message)
Anticipatory regulation? (1 message)
Cambridge conference on Google Spain (2 messages)
Data protection for Charities (2 messages)
Data Protection in Brunei (1 message)
Data Protection Qualification (1 message)
Data Protection Qualifications (2 messages)
Data Protection Regulation likely to provide a lower level protection than Directive 95/46/EC (1 message)
Friday viewing: if your APP was a shop assistant... (1 message)
FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves (13 messages)
FW: Hawktalk: Is this the solution for maintaining privacy in the Cloud? (2 messages)
FW: privacy impact assessment templates (4 messages)
GCHQ surevillance unlawful (1 message)
Hawktalk: Materials that help you to laugh, learn and chill (1 message)
How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error? (4 messages)
I like that phone APP..... (1 message)
ICO audits, context, and regional data protection security workshops (2 messages)
ICO given powers to audit the NHS (23 messages)
ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public] (9 messages)
If personal data is not property, who owns it and how do you have a right to it? (2 messages)
Job Opportunity (1 message)
Job Opportunity in London (1 message)
Nominations open: IRMS Fellowships and 2015 IRMS Profession Awards (1 message)
Police Photos (2 messages)
Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves (4 messages)
Preparing for new DPA law? (3 messages)
Press Gazette investigations vexatious (4 messages)
privacy impact assessment templates (1 message)
Proposed EU DP Regulation (1 message)
really a Friday aftenoon topic but still... (2 messages)
s35 Access to Restricted Information (5 messages)
s35 DPA (3 messages)
s55 "obtaining" (23 messages)
Sharing Information with social landlords re Universal Credit (1 message)
The future of data protection soon to go the way of lawyers? (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Alzheimer's Society information sharing guide

Alzheimer's Society information sharing guide

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:00:23 +0000

305 lines

New Thread

Anticipatory regulation?

Anticipatory regulation?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:03:03 +0000

84 lines

New Thread

Cambridge conference on Google Spain

Cambridge conference on Google Spain

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:07:51 +0000

316 lines

Re: Cambridge conference on Google Spain

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:20:42 +0000

379 lines

New Thread

Data protection for Charities

Data protection for Charities

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:02:51 +0000

98 lines

Re: Data protection for Charities

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:41:11 -0000

383 lines

New Thread

Data Protection in Brunei

Data Protection in Brunei

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:34:42 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Qualification

Data Protection Qualification

Stu Ashton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:26:44 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Qualifications

Data Protection Qualifications

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:44:10 +0000

162 lines

Re: Data Protection Qualifications

Lisa Souza - PDP <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:57:33 -0000

103 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Regulation likely to provide a lower level protection than Directive 95/46/EC

Data Protection Regulation likely to provide a lower level protection than Directive 95/46/EC

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:24:28 -0000

293 lines

New Thread

Friday viewing: if your APP was a shop assistant...

Friday viewing: if your APP was a shop assistant...

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:36:48 -0000

187 lines

New Thread

FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2015 09:23:17 +0000

134 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2015 10:50:37 +0000

150 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2015 11:09:41 +0000

63 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2015 12:40:09 +0000

104 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2015 13:45:56 +0000

138 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2015 14:25:23 +0000

317 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2015 15:14:56 +0000

37 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2015 15:18:24 +0000

42 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2015 15:28:46 +0000

171 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2015 15:51:53 +0000

269 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2015 16:01:43 +0000

37 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2015 16:07:39 +0000

405 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:47:12 +0000

68 lines

New Thread

FW: Hawktalk: Is this the solution for maintaining privacy in the Cloud?

FW: Hawktalk: Is this the solution for maintaining privacy in the Cloud?

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:31:45 -0000

214 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: Is this the solution for maintaining privacy in the Cloud?

Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 12:47:42 +0000

274 lines

New Thread

FW: privacy impact assessment templates

FW: privacy impact assessment templates

GRAHAM Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:20:13 +0000

65 lines

Re: FW: privacy impact assessment templates

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:27:39 -0000

95 lines

Re: FW: privacy impact assessment templates

Emmanuelle Goldson-Croix <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:34:17 +0000

133 lines

FW: privacy impact assessment templates

Roshier, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:48:02 +0000

184 lines

New Thread

GCHQ surevillance unlawful

GCHQ surevillance unlawful

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:04:20 -0000

252 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Materials that help you to laugh, learn and chill

Hawktalk: Materials that help you to laugh, learn and chill

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:00:59 -0000

166 lines

New Thread

How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error?

How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:57:37 +0000

51 lines

Re: How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:47:14 +0000

48 lines

Re: How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:52:23 +0000

30 lines

Re: How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:12:14 +0000

89 lines

New Thread

I like that phone APP.....

I like that phone APP.....

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:12:01 -0000

218 lines

New Thread

ICO audits, context, and regional data protection security workshops

ICO audits, context, and regional data protection security workshops

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:36:08 +0000

317 lines

Re: ICO audits, context, and regional data protection security workshops

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:13:35 +0000

598 lines

New Thread

ICO given powers to audit the NHS

ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:44:40 -0000

372 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:52:47 +0000

471 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:59:42 +0000

569 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:11:35 -0000

920 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Gudge, Teresa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:20:50 +0000

389 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:32:01 +0000

743 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:09:26 +0000

558 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:26:19 +0000

678 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:10:44 +0000

178 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:11:48 +0000

384 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:13:59 +0000

720 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Gemma Galdon Clavell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:05:03 +0100

838 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:17:24 +0000

360 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Gemma Galdon Clavell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:16:58 +0100

429 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:20:54 +0000

920 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:27:02 +0000

466 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:31:04 +0000

536 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:47:37 +0000

185 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:56:49 +0000

242 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Paul Cardin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:49:53 -0000

742 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2015 20:25:57 -0000

320 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2015 20:34:45 -0000

851 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2015 20:39:44 -0000

504 lines

New Thread

ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:52:07 +0000

535 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2015 18:18:20 +0000

722 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2015 12:39:38 +0000

199 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]

Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:00:32 +0000

320 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:01:53 +0000

238 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]

Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:09:53 +0000

131 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:40:36 +0000

427 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]

Donald Henderson - CHX <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:50:49 +0000

688 lines

Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:23:53 +0000

385 lines

New Thread

If personal data is not property, who owns it and how do you have a right to it?

If personal data is not property, who owns it and how do you have a right to it?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:00:27 +0000

298 lines

Re: If personal data is not property, who owns it and how do you have a right to it?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:28:08 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Job Opportunity

Job Opportunity

Karen Mc Cullagh (LAW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2015 23:11:48 +0000

128 lines

New Thread

Job Opportunity in London

Job Opportunity in London

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:53:25 +0000

127 lines

New Thread

Nominations open: IRMS Fellowships and 2015 IRMS Profession Awards

Nominations open: IRMS Fellowships and 2015 IRMS Profession Awards

IRMS Chair <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:17:48 +0000

410 lines

New Thread

Police Photos

Police Photos

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:05:30 +0000

93 lines

Re: Police Photos

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:20:51 -0000

463 lines

New Thread

Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:18:38 -0000

51 lines

Re: Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:41:14 +0000

101 lines

Re: Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2015 11:51:08 +0000

45 lines

Re: Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:13:08 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

Preparing for new DPA law?

Re: Preparing for new DPA law?

Catherine Lantsbery <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:46:04 +0000

48 lines

Re: Preparing for new DPA law?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:18:59 +0000

117 lines

Re: Preparing for new DPA law?

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:07:30 -0000

80 lines

New Thread

Press Gazette investigations vexatious

Press Gazette investigations vexatious

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:49:02 +0000

81 lines

Re: Press Gazette investigations vexatious

Peter Dinsdale <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:56:27 +0000

402 lines

Re: Press Gazette investigations vexatious

Owen Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:00:17 +0000

29 lines

Re: Press Gazette investigations vexatious

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:03:55 +0000

488 lines

New Thread

privacy impact assessment templates

Re: privacy impact assessment templates

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2015 09:03:54 +0000

120 lines

New Thread

Proposed EU DP Regulation

Proposed EU DP Regulation

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:55:05 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

really a Friday aftenoon topic but still...

really a Friday aftenoon topic but still...

Lynsey Newton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:42:21 +0000

195 lines

Re: really a Friday aftenoon topic but still...

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:48:39 +0000

493 lines

New Thread

s35 Access to Restricted Information

s35 Access to Restricted Information

Heness Nigel (CENTRAL AND NORTH WEST LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:23:52 +0000

82 lines

Re: s35 Access to Restricted Information

Catherine Hanley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:24:23 +0000

193 lines

Re: s35 Access to Restricted Information

Peter Dinsdale <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:39:01 +0000

203 lines

Re: s35 Access to Restricted Information

Catherine Hanley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:49:43 +0000

332 lines

Re: s35 Access to Restricted Information

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:13:51 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

s35 DPA

s35 DPA

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:32:51 +0000

36 lines

Re: s35 DPA

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:09:57 +0000

85 lines

Re: s35 DPA

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:58:54 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

s55 "obtaining"

s55 "obtaining"

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:58:55 +0000

362 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:15:35 +0000

598 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:22:08 +0000

33 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:23:20 +0000

790 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:24:58 +0000

41 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:30:19 +0000

447 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:29:58 +0000

35 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:32:26 +0000

65 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:35:02 +0000

650 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:43:47 +0000

93 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:44:22 +0000

547 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:44:29 +0000

35 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:50:47 +0000

40 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:52:28 +0000

513 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:54:51 +0000

65 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:55:24 +0000

704 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:55:29 +0000

454 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:58:45 +0000

99 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:00:11 +0000

114 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Catherine Lantsbery <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:16:33 +0000

55 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:16:49 +0000

124 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:10:29 -0000

480 lines

Re: s55 "obtaining"

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:20:24 +0000

483 lines

New Thread

Sharing Information with social landlords re Universal Credit

Sharing Information with social landlords re Universal Credit

Kate Glanville <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:32:11 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

The future of data protection soon to go the way of lawyers?

The future of data protection soon to go the way of lawyers?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:16:24 +0000

191 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager