|
|
|
Size
|
"Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Thomas Baker |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:01:24 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Antoine Isaac |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 15:24:24 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Eric Prud'hommeaux |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 09:56:40 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Thomas Baker |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:55:42 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Bernard Vatant |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 23:43:35 +0100 |
206 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Holger Knublauch |
Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:05:15 +1000 |
48 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Holger Knublauch |
Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:31:00 +1000 |
36 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Karen Coyle |
Sun, 25 Jan 2015 07:19:21 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Thomas Baker |
Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:39:15 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Karen Coyle |
Sun, 25 Jan 2015 08:09:12 -0800 |
73 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Young,Jeff (OR) |
Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:22:04 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Holger Knublauch |
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:32:23 +1000 |
88 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Simon J D Cox |
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:53:34 +0000 |
279 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Holger Knublauch |
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:22:35 +1000 |
194 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Thomas Baker |
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:45:02 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Thomas Baker |
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:50:22 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Bernard Vatant |
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:12:04 +0100 |
168 lines |
Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?
|
Bill Nichols |
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:56:34 -0500 |
180 lines |
AW: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C
|
Bosch, Thomas |
Tue, 6 Jan 2015 14:59:54 +0000 |
184 lines |
Re: AW: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C
|
Eric Prud'hommeaux |
Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:57:47 -0500 |
188 lines |
Re: AW: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C
|
Karen Coyle |
Tue, 6 Jan 2015 08:43:16 -0800 |
35 lines |
Re: AW: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C
|
Eric Prud'hommeaux |
Sat, 10 Jan 2015 14:01:05 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: AW: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C
|
Karen Coyle |
Sat, 10 Jan 2015 12:09:16 -0800 |
119 lines |
AW: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Bosch, Thomas |
Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:32:05 +0000 |
78 lines |
AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C
|
Bosch, Thomas |
Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:50:12 +0000 |
138 lines |
Re: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C
|
Karen Coyle |
Tue, 6 Jan 2015 06:30:59 -0800 |
155 lines |
CFP: Classification and Authority Control: Expanding Resource Discovery - Lisbon, 29-30 October 2015
|
Aida Slavic |
Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:05:56 +0000 |
72 lines |
ISKO UK afternoon meeting The Great Debate: "This House believes that the traditional thesaurus has no place in modern information retrieval" 2pm 19th Feb in London
|
Bob Bater |
Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:50:23 +0000 |
162 lines |
LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment
|
Adrian Pohl |
Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:24:08 +0100 |
108 lines |
Re: LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment
|
Stuart Sutton |
Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:58:59 -0800 |
351 lines |
Re: LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment
|
Karen Coyle |
Sat, 10 Jan 2015 00:25:43 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment
|
Phil Barker |
Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:30:25 +0000 |
91 lines |
Re: LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment
|
Karen Coyle |
Sat, 10 Jan 2015 09:06:43 -0800 |
94 lines |
Re: LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment
|
Adrian Pohl |
Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:31:17 +0100 |
266 lines |
LRMI comment
|
Karen Coyle |
Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:21:46 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: LRMI comment
|
Stuart Sutton |
Wed, 7 Jan 2015 12:09:19 -0800 |
91 lines |
Re: LRMI comment
|
Mr DC |
Thu, 8 Jan 2015 11:34:04 +1300 |
156 lines |
Re: LRMI comment
|
Liddy Nevile |
Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:57:20 +1100 |
97 lines |
LRMI draft
|
Karen Coyle |
Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:06:34 -0800 |
22 lines |
Re: LRMI draft
|
Karen Coyle |
Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:07:42 -0800 |
35 lines |
Re: LRMI draft
|
Stuart Sutton |
Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:11:13 -0800 |
66 lines |
Re: LRMI draft
|
Stuart Sutton |
Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:14:29 -0800 |
96 lines |
[RDF AP] Call scheduled Jan 13
|
Karen Coyle |
Sun, 11 Jan 2015 04:50:55 -0800 |
26 lines |
[RDF AP] Call Tuesday Jan 20
|
Antoine Isaac |
Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:24:29 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] Call Tuesday Jan 20
|
Svensson, Lars |
Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:08:48 +0000 |
50 lines |
[RDF AP] Call Tuesday Jan 6
|
Antoine Isaac |
Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:58:16 +0100 |
22 lines |
[RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Karen Coyle |
Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:08:13 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Thomas Baker |
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:31:57 +0100 |
89 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Karen Coyle |
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:12:38 -0800 |
141 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Thomas Baker |
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:51:31 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Bernard Vatant |
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:08:45 +0100 |
189 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Karen Coyle |
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:58:09 -0800 |
44 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Karen Coyle |
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:04:38 -0800 |
75 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Young,Jeff (OR) |
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:19:24 +0000 |
97 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Karen Coyle |
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:44:02 -0800 |
111 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Young,Jeff (OR) |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:35:21 +0000 |
133 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Holger Knublauch |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:40:37 +1000 |
121 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Young,Jeff (OR) |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:56:57 +0000 |
146 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Holger Knublauch |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:09:09 +1000 |
134 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Young,Jeff (OR) |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 02:24:11 +0000 |
176 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Karen Coyle |
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:57:13 -0800 |
182 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Holger Knublauch |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:39:09 +1000 |
26 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Young,Jeff (OR) |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 03:48:04 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Holger Knublauch |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:53:46 +1000 |
40 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Young,Jeff (OR) |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 03:59:08 +0000 |
218 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Thomas Baker |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:05:21 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Thomas Baker |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 15:07:04 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Antoine Isaac |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 15:16:25 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Svensson, Lars |
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:24:46 +0000 |
75 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Bernard Vatant |
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:16:32 +0100 |
233 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Bernard Vatant |
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:02:57 +0100 |
252 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Holger Knublauch |
Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:20:25 +1000 |
454 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Bernard Vatant |
Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:39:14 +0100 |
690 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Holger Knublauch |
Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:29:30 +1000 |
548 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Bernard Vatant |
Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:31:57 +0100 |
654 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Holger Knublauch |
Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:49:14 +1000 |
910 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Bernard Vatant |
Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:56:39 +0100 |
1006 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal
|
Holger Knublauch |
Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:32:56 +1000 |
207 lines |
[RDF AP] Keeping track of recently created requirements
|
Antoine Isaac |
Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:54:09 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] Keeping track of recently created requirements
|
Karen Coyle |
Tue, 6 Jan 2015 09:15:54 -0800 |
48 lines |
[RDF AP] requirements and case-study collection still ongoing?
|
Bosch, Thomas |
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:40:46 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] requirements and case-study collection still ongoing?
|
Karen Coyle |
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:41:52 -0800 |
53 lines |
Re: [RDF AP] requirements and case-study collection still ongoing?
|
Jan Polowinski |
Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:37:13 +0100 |
90 lines |
[RDF AP] Requirements on list memberships
|
Antoine Isaac |
Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:52:16 +0100 |
33 lines |
[RDF AP] Sorry, more work to do
|
Karen Coyle |
Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:56:52 -0800 |
27 lines |
[RDF AP] Summary of today's meetiing
|
Karen Coyle |
Tue, 6 Jan 2015 08:36:22 -0800 |
69 lines |
[RDF AP] Update on W3C
|
Karen Coyle |
Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:17:15 -0800 |
53 lines |