JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives


DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives

DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives


January 2015


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Data shape" or "data pattern"? (18 messages)
AW: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C (5 messages)
AW: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal (1 message)
AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C (2 messages)
CFP: Classification and Authority Control: Expanding Resource Discovery - Lisbon, 29-30 October 2015 (1 message)
ISKO UK afternoon meeting The Great Debate: "This House believes that the traditional thesaurus has no place in modern information retrieval" 2pm 19th Feb in London (1 message)
LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment (6 messages)
LRMI comment (4 messages)
LRMI draft (4 messages)
[RDF AP] Call scheduled Jan 13 (1 message)
[RDF AP] Call Tuesday Jan 20 (2 messages)
[RDF AP] Call Tuesday Jan 6 (1 message)
[RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal (32 messages)
[RDF AP] Keeping track of recently created requirements (2 messages)
[RDF AP] requirements and case-study collection still ongoing? (3 messages)
[RDF AP] Requirements on list memberships (1 message)
[RDF AP] Sorry, more work to do (1 message)
[RDF AP] Summary of today's meetiing (1 message)
[RDF AP] Update on W3C (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DC-ARCHITECTURE Home

DC-ARCHITECTURE Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Data shape" or "data pattern"?

"Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:01:24 +0100

25 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 15:24:24 +0100

28 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Eric Prud'hommeaux <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 09:56:40 -0500

58 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:55:42 +0100

66 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Bernard Vatant <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 23:43:35 +0100

206 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Holger Knublauch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:05:15 +1000

48 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Holger Knublauch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:31:00 +1000

36 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2015 07:19:21 -0800

27 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:39:15 +0100

56 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2015 08:09:12 -0800

73 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Young,Jeff (OR) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:22:04 +0000

82 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Holger Knublauch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:32:23 +1000

88 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Simon J D Cox <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:53:34 +0000

279 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Holger Knublauch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:22:35 +1000

194 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:45:02 +0100

36 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:50:22 +0100

26 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Bernard Vatant <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:12:04 +0100

168 lines

Re: "Data shape" or "data pattern"?

Bill Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:56:34 -0500

180 lines

New Thread

AW: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C

AW: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C

Bosch, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2015 14:59:54 +0000

184 lines

Re: AW: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C

Eric Prud'hommeaux <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:57:47 -0500

188 lines

Re: AW: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2015 08:43:16 -0800

35 lines

Re: AW: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C

Eric Prud'hommeaux <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2015 14:01:05 -0500

78 lines

Re: AW: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2015 12:09:16 -0800

119 lines

New Thread

AW: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

AW: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Bosch, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:32:05 +0000

78 lines

New Thread

AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C

AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C

Bosch, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:50:12 +0000

138 lines

Re: AW: [RDF AP] Update on W3C

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2015 06:30:59 -0800

155 lines

New Thread

CFP: Classification and Authority Control: Expanding Resource Discovery - Lisbon, 29-30 October 2015

CFP: Classification and Authority Control: Expanding Resource Discovery - Lisbon, 29-30 October 2015

Aida Slavic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:05:56 +0000

72 lines

New Thread

ISKO UK afternoon meeting The Great Debate: "This House believes that the traditional thesaurus has no place in modern information retrieval" 2pm 19th Feb in London

ISKO UK afternoon meeting The Great Debate: "This House believes that the traditional thesaurus has no place in modern information retrieval" 2pm 19th Feb in London

Bob Bater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:50:23 +0000

162 lines

New Thread

LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment

LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment

Adrian Pohl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:24:08 +0100

108 lines

Re: LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment

Stuart Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:58:59 -0800

351 lines

Re: LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2015 00:25:43 -0800

29 lines

Re: LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:30:25 +0000

91 lines

Re: LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2015 09:06:43 -0800

94 lines

Re: LRMI & schema.org drifting apart? Re: LRMI comment

Adrian Pohl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:31:17 +0100

266 lines

New Thread

LRMI comment

LRMI comment

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:21:46 -0800

31 lines

Re: LRMI comment

Stuart Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2015 12:09:19 -0800

91 lines

Re: LRMI comment

Mr DC <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2015 11:34:04 +1300

156 lines

Re: LRMI comment

Liddy Nevile <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:57:20 +1100

97 lines

New Thread

LRMI draft

LRMI draft

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:06:34 -0800

22 lines

Re: LRMI draft

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:07:42 -0800

35 lines

Re: LRMI draft

Stuart Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:11:13 -0800

66 lines

Re: LRMI draft

Stuart Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:14:29 -0800

96 lines

New Thread

[RDF AP] Call scheduled Jan 13

[RDF AP] Call scheduled Jan 13

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2015 04:50:55 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

[RDF AP] Call Tuesday Jan 20

[RDF AP] Call Tuesday Jan 20

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:24:29 +0100

22 lines

Re: [RDF AP] Call Tuesday Jan 20

Svensson, Lars <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:08:48 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

[RDF AP] Call Tuesday Jan 6

[RDF AP] Call Tuesday Jan 6

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:58:16 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

[RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

[RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:08:13 -0800

27 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:31:57 +0100

89 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:12:38 -0800

141 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:51:31 +0100

46 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Bernard Vatant <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:08:45 +0100

189 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:58:09 -0800

44 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:04:38 -0800

75 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Young,Jeff (OR) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:19:24 +0000

97 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:44:02 -0800

111 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Young,Jeff (OR) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:35:21 +0000

133 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Holger Knublauch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:40:37 +1000

121 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Young,Jeff (OR) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:56:57 +0000

146 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Holger Knublauch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:09:09 +1000

134 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Young,Jeff (OR) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 02:24:11 +0000

176 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:57:13 -0800

182 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Holger Knublauch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:39:09 +1000

26 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Young,Jeff (OR) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 03:48:04 +0000

39 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Holger Knublauch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:53:46 +1000

40 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Young,Jeff (OR) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 03:59:08 +0000

218 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:05:21 +0100

33 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 15:07:04 +0100

68 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2015 15:16:25 +0100

71 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Svensson, Lars <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:24:46 +0000

75 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Bernard Vatant <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:16:32 +0100

233 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Bernard Vatant <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:02:57 +0100

252 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Holger Knublauch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:20:25 +1000

454 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Bernard Vatant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:39:14 +0100

690 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Holger Knublauch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:29:30 +1000

548 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Bernard Vatant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:31:57 +0100

654 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Holger Knublauch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:49:14 +1000

910 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Bernard Vatant <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:56:39 +0100

1006 lines

Re: [RDF AP] First draft validation language proposal

Holger Knublauch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:32:56 +1000

207 lines

New Thread

[RDF AP] Keeping track of recently created requirements

[RDF AP] Keeping track of recently created requirements

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:54:09 +0100

21 lines

Re: [RDF AP] Keeping track of recently created requirements

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2015 09:15:54 -0800

48 lines

New Thread

[RDF AP] requirements and case-study collection still ongoing?

[RDF AP] requirements and case-study collection still ongoing?

Bosch, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:40:46 +0000

52 lines

Re: [RDF AP] requirements and case-study collection still ongoing?

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:41:52 -0800

53 lines

Re: [RDF AP] requirements and case-study collection still ongoing?

Jan Polowinski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:37:13 +0100

90 lines

New Thread

[RDF AP] Requirements on list memberships

[RDF AP] Requirements on list memberships

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:52:16 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

[RDF AP] Sorry, more work to do

[RDF AP] Sorry, more work to do

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:56:52 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

[RDF AP] Summary of today's meetiing

[RDF AP] Summary of today's meetiing

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2015 08:36:22 -0800

69 lines

New Thread

[RDF AP] Update on W3C

[RDF AP] Update on W3C

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:17:15 -0800

53 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager