JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


October 2014


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Can Care,data be made compatible with patient confidentiality?" CLICSIG report now available online (1 message)
BBC news item (5 messages)
Can/should NHS England over-rule NICE purely on cost due to numbers of patients needing new drug? (1 message)
Care.data at EMIS NUG Conference (1 message)
Care.data CCGs have been announced (1 message)
Copy and other rights some digital: Fwd: Our Rights are under Attack (1 message)
CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing" (8 messages)
CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing":can you help Sarah Woolaston? (3 messages)
Data to Insight: An Introduction to Data Analysis (1 message)
Dr Who??? (7 messages)
Ebola (18 messages)
HANDI Health Apps - last few stands remaining (1 message)
hat are the Lifestyle Risks for dementia? (6 messages)
How are you incorporating the Named GP into your practice system? (2 messages)
Online privacy: Big Brother plans from ICANN (1 message)
Performer List Reviews - Locum GPs (2 messages)
Prescriptions and privacy (11 messages)
PRIMIS on GP data quality at PHCSG conference 2013 (4 messages)
re TTIP: does the AHC *really* want to make all medical qualification trans-national? (1 message)
Revalidation!! (30 messages)
Virtual Wards no improvement outcome:study in JAMA (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Can Care,data be made compatible with patient confidentiality?" CLICSIG report now available online

"Can Care,data be made compatible with patient confidentiality?" CLICSIG report now available online

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:41:37 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

BBC news item

BBC news item

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Oct 2014 19:53:06 +0100

22 lines

Re: BBC news item

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2014 04:23:35 -0400

27 lines

Re: BBC news item

mark westwood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:01:13 +0100

135 lines

Re: BBC news item

Lesley Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:03:33 +0200

55 lines

Re: BBC news item

Piers Longhorn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:06:23 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

Can/should NHS England over-rule NICE purely on cost due to numbers of patients needing new drug?

Can/should NHS England over-rule NICE purely on cost due to numbers of patients needing new drug?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Oct 2014 14:21:08 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Care.data at EMIS NUG Conference

Care.data at EMIS NUG Conference

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Oct 2014 18:07:27 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Care.data CCGs have been announced

Care.data CCGs have been announced

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:36:31 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Copy and other rights some digital: Fwd: Our Rights are under Attack

Copy and other rights some digital: Fwd: Our Rights are under Attack

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:26:25 +0100

203 lines

New Thread

CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing"

CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing"

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:40:39 +0100

27 lines

Re: CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing"

Roz Foad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:26:04 +0100

69 lines

Re: CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing"

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:34:23 +0100

83 lines

Re: CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing"

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:42:18 +0100

79 lines

Re: CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing"

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:19:41 +0100

104 lines

Re: CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing"

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:05:49 +0100

32 lines

Re: CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing"

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:29:12 +0100

121 lines

Re: CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing"

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:53:22 +0100

295 lines

New Thread

CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing":can you help Sarah Woolaston?

Re: CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing":can you help Sarah Woolaston?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:51:50 +0100

127 lines

Re: CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing":can you help Sarah Woolaston?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:08:35 +0100

178 lines

Re: CQC inspectors accessing GP patient records:what about "Fair Processing":can you help Sarah Woolaston?

Marcus Baw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:58:54 +0100

400 lines

New Thread

Data to Insight: An Introduction to Data Analysis

Data to Insight: An Introduction to Data Analysis

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Oct 2014 11:46:07 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Dr Who???

Dr Who???

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:41:00 +0100

27 lines

Re: Dr Who???

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:20:07 +0100

21 lines

Re: Dr Who???

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:23:15 +0100

38 lines

Re: Dr Who???

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:52:40 +0100

60 lines

Re: Dr Who???

Julia Hippisley-Cox <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:06:02 +0100

29 lines

Re: Dr Who???

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:28:25 +0100

105 lines

Re: Dr Who???

kupton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:47:46 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Ebola

Re: Ebola

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Oct 2014 02:23:58 +0100

61 lines

Re: Ebola

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Oct 2014 21:02:29 +0100

53 lines

Re: Ebola

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:21:38 +0100

72 lines

Re: Ebola

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:23:29 +0100

157 lines

Re: Ebola

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:37:17 +0100

38 lines

Re: Ebola

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:53:24 +0100

49 lines

Re: Ebola

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Oct 2014 01:29:44 +0100

79 lines

Re: Ebola

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Oct 2014 08:06:51 +0100

88 lines

Re: Ebola

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Oct 2014 09:14:02 +0100

85 lines

Re: Ebola

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Oct 2014 12:08:52 +0100

44 lines

Re: Ebola

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Oct 2014 12:10:11 +0100

25 lines

Re: Ebola

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:25:39 +0100

37 lines

Re: Ebola

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Oct 2014 05:08:36 +0100

46 lines

Re: Ebola

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Oct 2014 22:05:48 -0700

129 lines

Re: Ebola

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Oct 2014 12:01:22 +0100

31 lines

Re: Ebola

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Oct 2014 08:23:27 -0400

67 lines

Re: Ebola

Markwick Christopher (NHS MEDWAY CCG) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:12:19 +0100

244 lines

Re: Ebola

Markwick Christopher (NHS MEDWAY CCG) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:49:09 +0100

5530 lines

New Thread

HANDI Health Apps - last few stands remaining

HANDI Health Apps - last few stands remaining

Jill Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:02:29 +0100

311 lines

New Thread

hat are the Lifestyle Risks for dementia?

hat are the Lifestyle Risks for dementia?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:56:34 -0000

24 lines

Re: hat are the Lifestyle Risks for dementia?

quail <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:58:25 -0600

43 lines

Re: hat are the Lifestyle Risks for dementia?

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:10:23 -0000

40 lines

Re: hat are the Lifestyle Risks for dementia?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:02:27 -0000

78 lines

Re: hat are the Lifestyle Risks for dementia?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:32:29 +0000

78 lines

Re: hat are the Lifestyle Risks for dementia?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:33:50 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

How are you incorporating the Named GP into your practice system?

How are you incorporating the Named GP into your practice system?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:33:56 -0000

55 lines

Re: How are you incorporating the Named GP into your practice system?

Marcus Baw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:31:21 +0000

157 lines

New Thread

Online privacy: Big Brother plans from ICANN

Online privacy: Big Brother plans from ICANN

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Oct 2014 20:52:35 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

Performer List Reviews - Locum GPs

Performer List Reviews - Locum GPs

Marcus Baw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:30:33 +0100

79 lines

Re: Performer List Reviews - Locum GPs

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:49:14 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Prescriptions and privacy

Prescriptions and privacy

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:54:33 -0700

65 lines

Re: Prescriptions and privacy

Marcus Baw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:27:42 +0100

32 lines

Re: Prescriptions and privacy

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:02:55 +0100

46 lines

Re: Prescriptions and privacy

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:30:50 +0100

366 lines

Re: Prescriptions and privacy

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2014 03:53:47 -0400

43 lines

Re: Prescriptions and privacy

Marcus Baw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:23:04 +0100

208 lines

Re: Prescriptions and privacy

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:53:18 +0100

240 lines

Re: Prescriptions and privacy

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:54:06 +0100

508 lines

Re: Prescriptions and privacy

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:34 +0100

22 lines

Re: Prescriptions and privacy

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:47:08 -0400

71 lines

Re: Prescriptions and privacy

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:59:19 +0100

198 lines

New Thread

PRIMIS on GP data quality at PHCSG conference 2013

PRIMIS on GP data quality at PHCSG conference 2013

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Oct 2014 20:11:49 +0100

20 lines

Re: PRIMIS on GP data quality at PHCSG conference 2013

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:23:34 -0700

65 lines

Re: PRIMIS on GP data quality at PHCSG conference 2013

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Oct 2014 20:27:08 +0100

58 lines

Re: PRIMIS on GP data quality at PHCSG conference 2013

Dai Evans (PRIMIS) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:36:14 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

re TTIP: does the AHC *really* want to make all medical qualification trans-national?

re TTIP: does the AHC *really* want to make all medical qualification trans-national?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:11:28 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Revalidation!!

Revalidation!!

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:08:18 +0100

54 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Marcus Baw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2014 18:05:55 +0100

157 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Karen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2014 18:25:08 +0100

30 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2014 18:44:21 +0100

117 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2014 18:57:16 +0100

64 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Andrew Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:07:18 +0100

116 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2014 20:50:40 +0100

37 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Dinesh Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2014 21:14:53 +0100

199 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Ian Trimble <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:08:35 +0100

279 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:05:57 +0100

34 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

kupton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:01:32 +0100

46 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:22:24 +0100

70 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Dinesh Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2014 19:17:05 +0100

182 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:04:38 +0100

177 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:29:00 +0100

21 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:04:08 +0100

34 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:05:25 +0100

157 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:06:10 +0100

52 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Stephen Crawshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:13:33 +1100

82 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Ian Trimble <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:24:42 +0100

128 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Stephen Crawshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:33:23 +1100

142 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2014 22:02:30 +0100

155 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:38:05 -0700

183 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:48:32 -0700

213 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:46:33 +0100

144 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2014 05:13:35 -0400

86 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:42:46 +0100

350 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:47:38 +0100

395 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Marcus Baw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:11:02 +0100

73 lines

Re: Revalidation!!

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:00:17 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Virtual Wards no improvement outcome:study in JAMA

Virtual Wards no improvement outcome:study in JAMA

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:30:46 +0100

29 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager