|
|
|
Size
|
Hawktalk: Google lost its two recent Court cases for the same reason the one-stop shop does not work
|
Chris Pounder |
Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:15:35 +0100 |
251 lines |
Re: Public interest tests
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:27:47 +0000 |
411 lines |
Re: Public interest tests
|
Michelle Peel |
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:08:04 +0000 |
874 lines |
Re: Public interest tests
|
Michelle Peel |
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:52:19 +0000 |
543 lines |
Re: Public interest tests
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:51:13 +0100 |
503 lines |
Public interest tests
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:48:23 +0100 |
91 lines |
Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
Owen Thomas |
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:18:14 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: Obscurity
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:19:41 +0000 |
539 lines |
Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:44:27 +0000 |
156 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:29:59 +0100 |
129 lines |
Forced disclosure of all spent and minor convictions breaches human rights
|
Jackie Milne |
Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:03:33 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: Listening to live customer service calls
|
Jackie Milne |
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:42:42 +0100 |
55 lines |
verdict in phone hacking
|
Chris Pounder |
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:25:37 +0100 |
226 lines |
Re: Irish DPA
|
Kevin Broadfoot |
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:09:02 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Obscurity
|
Roland Perry |
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:05:37 +0100 |
56 lines |
PECR threshold on shaky ground
|
Jackie Milne |
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:01:08 +0100 |
49 lines |
Irish DPA
|
Paul Ticher |
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:51:13 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Amy Jaines |
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:11:02 +0000 |
100 lines |
Re: Obscurity
|
Paul C |
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:01:34 +0100 |
724 lines |
Re: Obscurity
|
Chris Pounder |
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:24:38 +0100 |
379 lines |
Re: Obscurity
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:44:17 +0100 |
498 lines |
Obscurity
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:39:38 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems
|
Owen Thomas |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 18:13:59 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Owen Thomas |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:45:37 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems
|
Paul Ticher |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:30:48 +0100 |
951 lines |
Re: Exclusively personal email held on corporate systems
|
Bell, Neil |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:35:33 +0100 |
586 lines |
Re: Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems
|
Claire E Miller |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:21:21 +0000 |
663 lines |
Re: Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems
|
Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:02:11 +0100 |
328 lines |
Re: Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems
|
Bell, Neil |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:46:21 +0100 |
209 lines |
Re: Exclusively personal email held on corporate systems
|
Gudge Teresa (AVON AND WILTSHIRE MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST) |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:40:11 +0100 |
184 lines |
Re: Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems
|
Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:39:31 +0100 |
979 lines |
Re: Exclusively personal email held on corporate systems
|
Marchini, Renzo |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 06:37:17 -0400 |
170 lines |
Re: Exclusively personal email held on corporate systems
|
Paul Ticher |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:31:29 +0100 |
116 lines |
Re: Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems
|
Donald Henderson - CHX |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:21:31 +0100 |
506 lines |
Re: Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED]
|
Johnson, Carol (Cent Serv) |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 10:13:15 +0000 |
680 lines |
Re: Exclusively personal email held on corporate systems
|
Marchini, Renzo |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 05:08:39 -0400 |
681 lines |
Re: Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems
|
James Walkom |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 10:03:41 +0100 |
923 lines |
Re: Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems
|
Bell, Neil |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:26:05 +0100 |
941 lines |
Re: Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems
|
Paul Ticher |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:04:18 +0100 |
821 lines |
Re: Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems
|
Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:50:30 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Hawktalk: Why the European Parliament view of data subject "consent" should be supported.
|
Chris Spray |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:36:58 +0100 |
498 lines |
Re: Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems
|
Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 22:31:04 +0100 |
522 lines |
Exclusivly personal email held on corporate systems
|
Bell, Neil |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:09:37 +0100 |
215 lines |
Re: Hawktalk: Why the European Parliament view of data subject "consent" should be supported.
|
Andrew Cormack |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:12:24 +0000 |
133 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Marchini, Renzo |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:40:04 -0400 |
707 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Cotterill, Steve |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:38:01 +0100 |
925 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Amy Jaines |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:24:51 +0000 |
434 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Priestley Sarah |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:22:09 +0100 |
503 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Peter Dinsdale |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:21:50 +0000 |
599 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Dooley, Gary |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:18:21 +0000 |
644 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Marchini, Renzo |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:14:07 -0400 |
516 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Lemon, Stephen |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:06:52 +0100 |
803 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Marchini, Renzo |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:03:43 -0400 |
561 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Paul Ticher |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:40:29 +0100 |
429 lines |
Re: Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
James Walkom |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:36:31 +0100 |
621 lines |
Data Controller or Data Processor??
|
Amy Jaines |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:28:17 +0000 |
162 lines |
S35 Data Protection Act requests
|
Clare Furlong |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:14:47 +0000 |
186 lines |
New University of Cambridge "Law in Focus" YouTube Video on Google Spain
|
David Erdos |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:24:18 +0100 |
307 lines |
FW: Hawktalk: Why the European Parliament view of data subject "consent" should be supported.
|
Chris Pounder |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:40:19 +0100 |
258 lines |
Re: New ICO Guidance - Cost of redaction
|
Jackie Milne |
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:44:12 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
Owen Thomas |
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:08:54 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
Owen Thomas |
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:05:53 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: Is a work email address personal data ? confused
|
Gudge Teresa (AVON AND WILTSHIRE MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST) |
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 07:59:24 +0100 |
660 lines |
Re: Is a work email address personal data ? confused
|
Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:48:46 +0100 |
823 lines |
Is a work email address personal data ? confused
|
Chris Spray |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:36:17 +0100 |
488 lines |
Re: Is a work email address personal data ? confused
|
Blyth, Victoria |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:32:37 +0100 |
94 lines |
Re: Is a work email address personal data ? confused
|
Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:30:37 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: Is a work email address personal data ? confused
|
Katherine Gundersen |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:23:57 +0100 |
245 lines |
Re: Is a work email address personal data ? confused
|
Owen Thomas |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:03:00 +0100 |
42 lines |
Is a work email address personal data ? confused
|
Gudge Teresa (AVON AND WILTSHIRE MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST) |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:42:16 +0100 |
335 lines |
Re: Caldicott Guardians in Social Care Organisations
|
Blyth, Victoria |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:25:15 +0100 |
584 lines |
Caldicott Guardians in Social Care Organisations
|
Catherine Hanley |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:43:32 +0100 |
191 lines |
icm2re: June 2014 - You said that! About being a rutilant innovator and persistent learner
|
Brunella Longo |
Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:42:09 +0100 |
105 lines |
Paul Nemitz lecture in London on the EU
|
Chris Pounder |
Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:16:02 +0100 |
381 lines |
Two Friday questions -- thanks
|
Mark van Harmelen |
Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:12:14 +0100 |
582 lines |
Re: Two Friday questions
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 14:27:47 +0100 |
460 lines |
Two Friday questions
|
Mark van Harmelen |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 13:53:35 +0100 |
236 lines |
Temporary Information Governance Manager 12 Month Contract
|
Andrew Ledgard |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 13:47:32 +0100 |
99 lines |
Re: Student Images - Social Media
|
Tracey Watkinson |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 08:22:42 +0000 |
336 lines |
Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:10:15 +0000 |
139 lines |
Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
Paul C |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:19:21 +0100 |
98 lines |
Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:18:17 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
Andrew Cormack |
Mon, 9 Jun 2014 20:20:44 +0000 |
172 lines |
Re: Student Images - Social Media
|
Jackie Milne |
Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:02:06 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
David Erdos |
Mon, 9 Jun 2014 14:36:00 +0100 |
704 lines |
Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
Chris Pounder |
Mon, 9 Jun 2014 13:19:10 +0100 |
974 lines |
Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement [Two questions]
|
David Erdos |
Mon, 9 Jun 2014 12:03:10 +0100 |
921 lines |
Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement [Two questions]
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Mon, 9 Jun 2014 10:51:08 +0000 |
472 lines |
Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
David Erdos |
Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:22:49 +0100 |
948 lines |
Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
Chris Pounder |
Mon, 9 Jun 2014 10:46:26 +0100 |
552 lines |
Re: EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
Marchini, Renzo |
Mon, 9 Jun 2014 04:51:30 -0400 |
354 lines |
EU has fact sheet on Google Judgement
|
Chris Pounder |
Sun, 8 Jun 2014 20:32:43 +0100 |
220 lines |
Student Images - Social Media
|
Tracey Watkinson |
Fri, 6 Jun 2014 09:32:17 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Incident in car park
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 15:40:23 +0100 |
581 lines |
Re: Listening to live customer service calls
|
Blyth, Victoria |
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 15:15:49 +0100 |
140 lines |
Re: New ICO Guidance - Cost of redaction
|
Simon Howarth |
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 14:38:15 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Incident in car park
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:31:20 +0100 |
793 lines |
Re: Incident in car park
|
Jane Holden |
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:10:40 +0000 |
456 lines |
Re: Incident in car park
|
James Walkom |
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:10:21 +0100 |
548 lines |
Re: Incident in car park
|
Gudge Teresa (AVON AND WILTSHIRE MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST) |
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:01:59 +0100 |
904 lines |
Incident in car park
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:55:29 +0100 |
88 lines |
Council Databreach
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 09:48:51 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: Listening to live customer service calls
|
Andrew Cormack |
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 08:22:00 +0000 |
79 lines |
Re: Government to change Computer Misuse Act
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:55:41 +0100 |
969 lines |
Re: New ICO Guidance - Cost of redaction
|
Peter Dinsdale |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 15:26:16 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: New ICO Guidance - Cost of redaction
|
Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:22:17 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: Government to change Computer Misuse Act
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:17:51 +0100 |
878 lines |
Re: New ICO Guidance - Cost of redaction
|
Peter Dinsdale |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 15:07:39 +0000 |
71 lines |
Re: New ICO Guidance - Cost of redaction
|
Jane Holden |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 15:05:27 +0000 |
74 lines |
Re: New ICO Guidance - Cost of redaction
|
Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 15:59:25 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: New ICO Guidance - Cost of redaction
|
Jane Holden |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:27:39 +0000 |
91 lines |
Re: New ICO Guidance - Cost of redaction
|
Peter Dinsdale |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:26:50 +0000 |
67 lines |
Re: Government to change Computer Misuse Act
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 15:22:38 +0100 |
852 lines |
Re: New ICO Guidance - Cost of redaction
|
Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 15:03:31 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: New ICO Guidance - Cost of redaction
|
Peter Dinsdale |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:58:15 +0000 |
74 lines |
New ICO Guidance - Cost of redaction
|
Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:48:45 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: Government to change Computer Misuse Act
|
Chris Pounder |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:20:48 +0100 |
614 lines |
Government to change Computer Misuse Act
|
Chris Pounder |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:18:26 +0100 |
238 lines |
Listening to live customer service calls
|
Katharine Stevenson |
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:41:08 +0100 |
46 lines |
3T - Turning The Tide: Testing a new taxonomy - Call for sponsors and volunteers
|
Brunella Longo |
Tue, 3 Jun 2014 11:33:33 +0100 |
72 lines |
Re: How to get your details from Google
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:05:04 +0000 |
259 lines |
Re: How to get your details from Google
|
Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap |
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:00:25 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: How to get your details from Googke
|
Simon Howarth |
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:44:18 +0100 |
168 lines |
Re: How to get your details from Google
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:04:03 +0000 |
137 lines |
Re: How to get your details from Googke
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:13:59 +0100 |
181 lines |
Re: How to get your details from Googke
|
David Erdos |
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 14:20:08 +0100 |
184 lines |
Re: How to get your details from Googke
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 14:14:49 +0100 |
123 lines |
Re: How to get your details from Googke
|
Simon Howarth |
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:48:02 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: If Google remembers whom it has forgotten, has it complied with the ECJ Judgment?
|
Roland Perry |
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 09:55:24 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: If Google remembers whom it has forgotten, has it complied with the ECJ Judgment?
|
Paul C |
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 21:04:52 +0100 |
336 lines |
FW: Hawktalk: If Google remembers whom it has forgotten, has it complied with the ECJ Judgment?
|
Chris Pounder |
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 14:21:54 +0100 |
182 lines |