JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


October 2013


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: Confidential references

Chris Spray

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:45:09 -0000

38 lines

Re: Access to who has accessed!

Sarah White

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:58:40 +0000

38 lines

Joint Data Controller Contracts

Catherine Hanley

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:39:35 +0000

156 lines

Re: Confidential references

Jane Holden

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:29:23 +0000

413 lines

Re: Confidential references

Phil Bradshaw

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:08:52 +0100

129 lines

Re: Access to who has accessed!

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:04:56 +0000

433 lines

Re: Access to who has accessed!

Phil Bradshaw

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:03:16 +0100

128 lines

Re: SAR redaction

Grimbaldus

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:36:22 +0000

126 lines

Re: Access to who has accessed!

Jackie Milne (JISC Legal)

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:15:30 +0000

51 lines

Re: SAR redaction

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:00:23 +0000

83 lines

SAR redaction

Emma Wainman

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:46:59 +0000

43 lines

Re: Confidential references

Jackie Milne (JISC Legal)

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:31:04 +0000

47 lines

Re: Confidential references

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:17:29 +0000

568 lines

Confidential references

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security)

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:21:08 +0000

300 lines

Access to who has accessed!

Sarah White

Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:22:43 +0000

39 lines

CCTV: and FYI Corporate report: Memorandum of understanding: Surveillance Camera Commissioner and Information Commissioner

Chris Pounder

Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:00:03 -0000

43 lines

Security of email

Marilyn Barton

Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:22:17 +0000

32 lines

New DPA Fine

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:53:34 +0000

103 lines

Re: Police access

Simon Howarth

Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:57:14 -0000

547 lines

Re: CCTV Conference

Simon Howarth

Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:57:14 -0000

74 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Brunella Longo

Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:37:28 +0000

38 lines

Re: MPN Cancelled

Grimbaldus

Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:29:13 +0100

228 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Andrew Cormack

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:38:48 +0000

89 lines

Durant

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security)

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:49:04 +0100

326 lines

Re: Convicted person's DP rights

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security)

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:29:37 +0100

515 lines

Re: Convicted person's DP rights

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:20:11 +0100

594 lines

Re: Convicted person's DP rights

Chris Pounder

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:12:08 +0100

380 lines

Re: Convicted person's DP rights

Phil Bradshaw

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:14:25 +0200

376 lines

Re: Convicted person's DP rights

Cotterill, Steve

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:58:05 +0100

515 lines

Re: Convicted person's DP rights

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:47:53 +0100

557 lines

Convicted person's DP rights

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security)

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:42:33 +0100

314 lines

Re: Final negotiations on Data Protection Reg look set to be delayed

Dr D.O. Erdos

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:28:01 +0100

107 lines

Re: Final negotiations on Data Protection Reg look set to be delayed

Chris Pounder

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:22:11 +0100

81 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Roland Perry

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:00:37 +0100

51 lines

Final negotiations on Data Protection Reg look set to be delayed

Dr D.O. Erdos

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:58:09 +0100

41 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:55:22 +0100

187 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Grimbaldus

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:44:24 +0100

129 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Andrew Cormack

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:34:30 +0000

100 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Andrew Cormack

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:29:55 +0000

101 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Roland Perry

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:10:01 +0100

63 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Roland Perry

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:12:21 +0100

41 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Andrew Cormack

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 06:45:44 +0000

87 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:38:56 +0100

132 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Grimbaldus

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:24:56 +0100

69 lines

BYOD policy

Jessica Robson

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:58:39 +0100

41 lines

Re: PIA, DP Audit and DP Regulation workshop (All November in London)

Chris Pounder

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:31:16 +0100

538 lines

New Blog post

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:27:06 +0100

40 lines

MPN Cancelled

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:20:05 +0100

140 lines

ADV: PIA, DP Audit and DP Regulation workshop (All November in London)

Chris Pounder

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:00:41 +0100

285 lines

Meeting the Data Protection Challenge - one day course 14.11.2013

cimqgen

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:44:38 +0100

240 lines

Re: DP Requests from Overseas Police

Charles Christacopoulos

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:17:22 +0100

70 lines

Re: DP Requests from Overseas Police

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:08:49 +0100

90 lines

DP Requests from Overseas Police

Bev Buckley

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:46:54 +0100

63 lines

ADV - PDP's 2014 Training Courses

Lisa Souza - PDP

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:43:44 +0100

599 lines

Re: The artist formerly known as data protection

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:37:05 +0000

264 lines

Re: 3rd Party Systems Access

Catherine Hanley

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:52:32 +0100

135 lines

BCS Exam Tomorrow

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:41:50 +0100

39 lines

Re: Police access

Chris Brogan

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:40:42 +0100

399 lines

CCTV Conference

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:36:29 +0100

44 lines

Re: Data Protection & FOI Vacancy

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:30:40 +0100

107 lines

Re: The artist formerly known as data protection

Marchini, Renzo

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 04:45:01 -0400

200 lines

Re: Police access

Simon Howarth

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:22:35 +0100

719 lines

Re: The artist formerly known as data protection

Simon Howarth

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:16:31 +0100

113 lines

Re: Police access

Mike Burgess

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:13:22 +0000

314 lines

Re: Police access

Grimbaldus

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:18:40 +0100

178 lines

Data Protection & FOI Vacancy

Fatima Zohra

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:21:09 +0100

73 lines

Fwd: 3rd Party Systems Access

Trish-louise Bailey

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:10:57 +0100

311 lines

Police access

Mike Burgess

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:28:37 +0000

137 lines

3rd Party Systems Access

Catherine Hanley

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:50:51 +0100

164 lines

Re: The artist formerly known as data protection

Owen Thomas

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:15:52 +0100

46 lines

Adv - 2014 Courses

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:41:09 +0100

39 lines

The artist formerly known as data protection

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:45:16 +0000

71 lines

EU DP Regulation passes first hurdle - a good thing?

stephen Lemon

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:05:31 +0100

27 lines

Re: MoJ Fine - Irony Alert

Paul C

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:53:24 +0100

99 lines

Re: MoJ Fine - Irony Alert

Paul C

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:52:14 +0100

93 lines

Re: MoJ Fine - Irony Alert

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:47:34 +0100

50 lines

Re: MoJ Fine - Irony Alert

Simon Howarth

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:32:22 +0100

73 lines

MoJ Fine - Irony Alert

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:57:57 +0100

40 lines

Our latest update e mail

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:51:30 +0100

238 lines

Re: IG re-named IS

Jones Sandre (NOTTINGHAM CITYCARE PARTNERSHIP)

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:41:50 +0100

92 lines

Re: IG re-named IS

Sarah White

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:33:35 +0100

31 lines

Re: IG re-named IS

Gudge Teresa (AVON AND WILTSHIRE MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST)

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:26:16 +0100

81 lines

Re: IG re-named IS

Grimbaldus

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:44:36 +0100

63 lines

Re: Are a baby's scan pictures personal data?

Phil Bradshaw

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:26:45 +0200

158 lines

IG re-named IS

Sarah White

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:25:04 +0100

35 lines

Re: Are a baby's scan pictures personal data?

GM Polato

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:13:17 +0100

84 lines

Re: Are a baby's scan pictures personal data?

Baines, Jonathan

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:01:24 +0100

159 lines

Re: Are a baby's scan pictures personal data?

Simon Howarth

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:35:39 +0100

89 lines

Are a baby's scan pictures personal data?

stephen Lemon

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:08:03 +0100

48 lines

Hawktalk: EU Parliament proposes 100 million euro fines for non-compliance with Data Protection Regulation

Chris Pounder

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 01:43:04 +0100

193 lines

Re: Fire Service Question. (who owns the home?)

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:34:08 +0000

113 lines

Re: Fire Service Question.

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:19:52 +0100

135 lines

Quiz to go with "Data Day Hygiene" ICO Vid?

Michelle Peel

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:17:09 +0100

43 lines

Re: Fire Service Question.

Simon Howarth

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:05:41 +0100

103 lines

Re: Fire Service Question.

Jones Sandre (NOTTINGHAM CITYCARE PARTNERSHIP)

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:01:54 +0100

127 lines

Digital Lasting power of attorney

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:37:09 +0000

53 lines

Re: Fire Service Question.

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:21:24 +0100

120 lines

Re: Fire Service Question.

James Walkom

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:16:07 +0100

65 lines

Re: Fire Service Question.

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:57:24 +0000

79 lines

Re: Memorandum of understanding between ICO and MOJ on national security

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:50:55 +0000

540 lines

Fire Service Question.

Richard Birmingham

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:48:16 +0100

37 lines

Re: Memorandum of understanding between ICO and MOJ on national security

Gleeson, Mark

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:03:34 +0100

449 lines

Memorandum of understanding between ICO and MOJ on national security

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:33:13 +0000

180 lines

Breakthrogh on DP Bill

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security)

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 08:39:49 +0100

259 lines

Landlord Schedules - Housing Benefit

Jane Holden

Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:38:18 +0000

62 lines

Watching You Watching Them

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:48:36 +0100

40 lines

GCHQ and privacy

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:39:10 +0100

39 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Craig Moore

Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:46:04 +0000

204 lines

Re: Another Data Controller Question - Joint DC

Paul Ticher

Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:32:38 +0100

162 lines

Another Data Controller Question - Joint DC

Catherine Hanley

Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:38:17 +0100

181 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Simon Howarth

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:50:35 +0100

49 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

<>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:16:49 +0100

92 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Grimbaldus

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:47:36 +0100

81 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Grimbaldus

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:42:28 +0100

173 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Grimbaldus

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:05:14 +0100

79 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:20:12 +0100

309 lines

Hawktalk: Select Committee criticises ICO's approach to enforcement of Millepede offences

Chris Pounder

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:59:54 +0100

363 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Paul C

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:31:24 +0100

305 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:13:34 +0100

267 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:05:21 +0100

147 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:59:27 +0000

225 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:22:07 +0100

100 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

<>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:21:40 +0100

56 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Brian Morgan

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:13:24 +0100

43 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

<>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:59:28 +0100

180 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Paul C

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:42:01 +0100

108 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:33:41 +0100

148 lines

Re: Access to Health Records training

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:23:03 +0100

86 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

JiscMail Helpline

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:23:01 +0100

68 lines

Re: Thanks

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:52:53 +0100

201 lines

Re: Thanks

Paul Ticher

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:37:57 +0100

88 lines

Re: Thanks

Simon Howarth

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:20:55 +0100

87 lines

Re: Thanks

<>

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:01:51 +0100

76 lines

Thanks

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:55:28 +0100

45 lines

Re: Data Processing where Data Controllers are "In Common"

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:39:51 +0000

115 lines

Re: Data Processing where Data Controllers are "In Common"

Simon Howarth

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:45:38 +0100

93 lines

Re: Staff access to personal data in case management systems

Andrew Cormack

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:54:03 +0000

171 lines

Access to Health Records training

Jessica Robson

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:44:03 +0100

45 lines

Re: Staff access to personal data in case management systems

Paul C

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:36:03 +0100

804 lines

Re: Staff access to personal data in case management systems

Gudge Teresa (AVON AND WILTSHIRE MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST)

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:28:59 +0100

762 lines

Re: Staff access to personal data in case management systems

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:19:45 +0100

782 lines

Staff access to personal data in case management systems

Catherine Hanley

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:13:19 +0100

179 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Chris Spray

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 22:52:30 +0100

397 lines

Re: Data Processing where Data Controllers are "In Common"

Jackie Milne (JISC Legal)

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:39:30 +0100

53 lines

Data Processing where Data Controllers are "In Common"

Michelle Peel

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:27:19 +0100

55 lines

Message from Moderators

Paul Simpkins

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:00:57 +0100

163 lines

Re: A footnote on PRISM {a long response please ignore if not interested}

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:06:59 +0000

167 lines

Information Governance role - maternity cover fixed term 12 months

Andy Morrall

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:01:24 +0100

103 lines

Hi !

Paul C

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:27:34 +0100

590 lines

Informed - a new place for information professionals

Clark, Ian ([log in to unmask])

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:54:19 +0000

160 lines

Re: Retention of records

Heather Jack

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:52:41 +0100

103 lines

Re: Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:38:14 +0100

349 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Baines, Jonathan

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:27:57 +0100

291 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Paul Ticher

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:01:37 +0100

235 lines

Re: Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Gleeson, Mark

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:32:48 +0100

257 lines

Re: Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:12:24 +0100

368 lines

Re: Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Jones Sandre (NOTTINGHAM CITYCARE PARTNERSHIP)

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:08:12 +0100

146 lines

Re: Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:04:53 +0100

185 lines

Re: Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Simon Howarth

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:57:42 +0100

101 lines

Retention of records

Christopher Munro

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:55:17 +0100

41 lines

Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:34:57 +0100

37 lines

Re: s61 and data breaches have they ever been connected?

Grimbaldus

Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:25:13 +0100

132 lines

Re: s61 and data breaches have they ever been connected?

Grimbaldus

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:55:39 +0100

106 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Grimbaldus

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:42:07 +0100

188 lines

s61 and data breaches have they ever been connected?

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 18:16:14 +0100

67 lines

A footnote on PRISM

Grimbaldus

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:52:08 +0100

38 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:13:13 +0100

157 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

<>

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:12:11 +0100

145 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Chris Pounder

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:05:47 +0100

70 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:51:22 +0100

113 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Lynn Wyeth

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:47:15 +0100

40 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

<>

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:31:07 +0100

113 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:26:38 +0100

171 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Chris Pounder

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:25:59 +0100

972 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

<>

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:18:42 +0100

110 lines

Re: Staff surveys and employer responsibility as a Data controller query

Jackie Milne (JISC Legal)

Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:25:42 +0100

54 lines

Re: Has there been a MPN for joint data controllers?

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:59:26 +0100

120 lines

Has there been a MPN for joint data controllers?

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:51:42 +0000

59 lines

Re: Staff surveys and employer responsibility as a Data controller query

Simon Macauley

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:22:57 +0000

96 lines

Re: Staff surveys and employer responsibility as a Data controller query

Jackie Milne (JISC Legal)

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:09:38 +0100

53 lines

blog post - use of social media in investigations

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:56:05 +0100

36 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Roland Perry

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:30:53 +0100

38 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Roland Perry

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:28:12 +0100

51 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Roland Perry

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:25:09 +0100

44 lines

Information sharing - Are you really sure you've got two ideas?

Brunella Longo

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:59:16 +0100

54 lines

Staff surveys and employer responsibility as a Data controller query

Simon Macauley

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:50:26 +0000

64 lines

Re: Safe Harbour and the DPO's ABC

Chris Pounder

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:18:51 +0100

525 lines

ADV: Update your DP knowledge at our UPDATE conference (Oct 28)

Chris Pounder

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:13:45 +0100

269 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Andrew Cormack

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:45:38 +0000

166 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Paul Ticher

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:37:22 +0100

108 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:34:34 +0100

130 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Jethro R Binks

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:21:16 +0100

81 lines

Dead Peoples' Digital Records

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:57:39 +0100

39 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Cotterill, Steve

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:53:41 +0100

96 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Roland Perry

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:41:48 +0100

52 lines

Safe Harbour

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security)

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:27:02 +0100

290 lines

A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Grimbaldus

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 05:09:58 +0100

43 lines

Re: Whose data is it (anyway)?

Grimbaldus

Tue, 8 Oct 2013 20:10:07 +0100

56 lines

ICO prosecutes payday loan company

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:43:46 +0100

36 lines

Student surveys and data protection issues

Barlow, Jackie

Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:42:54 +0000

650 lines

PIA Code

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:47:59 +0100

432 lines

Data Breaches

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:00:11 +0100

39 lines

smartphone security

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:05:28 +0100

38 lines

Re: Who's responsible for investigating breach

Owen Thomas

Mon, 7 Oct 2013 12:24:31 +0100

39 lines

Re: Who's responsible for investigating breach

Baines, Jonathan

Mon, 7 Oct 2013 12:02:47 +0100

370 lines

Re: Whose data is it (anyway)?

Owen Thomas

Mon, 7 Oct 2013 12:02:08 +0100

28 lines

Re: Who's responsible for investigating breach

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:53:05 +0100

160 lines

Who's responsible for investigating breach

Jane Holden

Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:39:39 +0000

49 lines

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors (who faces the music?)

Grimbaldus

Sat, 5 Oct 2013 06:46:33 +0100

81 lines

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors (who faces the music?)

Paul Ticher

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 16:03:05 +0100

213 lines

Rogue private eyes: 19 clients to be investigated

Chris Pounder

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:28:09 +0100

303 lines

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors

Andrew Cormack

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 12:49:25 +0000

341 lines

Re: Rogue private eyes: 19 clients to be investigated

Brunella Longo

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 12:27:55 +0100

55 lines

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors (who faces the music?)

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 10:45:43 +0000

340 lines

Rogue private eyes: 19 clients to be investigated

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 09:31:40 +0100

83 lines

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 09:05:09 +0100

317 lines

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors

Andrew Cormack

Wed, 2 Oct 2013 07:34:53 +0000

277 lines

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors

Grimbaldus

Wed, 2 Oct 2013 03:39:41 +0100

731 lines

Re: Whose data is it (anyway)?

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:46:52 +0000

77 lines

Re: Whose data is it (anyway)?

Chris Pounder

Tue, 1 Oct 2013 15:35:30 +0100

212 lines

Re: Whose data is it (anyway)?

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:23:40 +0000

179 lines

Re: Whose data is it (anyway)?

Phil Bradshaw

Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:10:55 +0200

247 lines

Whose data is it (anyway)?

Grimbaldus

Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:52:40 +0100

100 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager