JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


October 2013


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

3rd Party Systems Access (2 messages)
A 'Friday' question on Wednesday (10 messages)
A footnote on PRISM (1 message)
A footnote on PRISM {a long response please ignore if not interested} (1 message)
Access to Health Records training (2 messages)
Access to who has accessed! (5 messages)
Adv - 2014 Courses (1 message)
ADV - PDP's 2014 Training Courses (1 message)
ADV: PIA, DP Audit and DP Regulation workshop (All November in London) (1 message)
ADV: Update your DP knowledge at our UPDATE conference (Oct 28) (1 message)
Another Data Controller Question - Joint DC (2 messages)
Are a baby's scan pictures personal data? (5 messages)
BCS Exam Tomorrow (1 message)
blog post - use of social media in investigations (1 message)
Breakthrogh on DP Bill (1 message)
BYOD policy (13 messages)
CCTV Conference (2 messages)
CCTV: and FYI Corporate report: Memorandum of understanding: Surveillance Camera Commissioner and Information Commissioner (1 message)
Confidential references (6 messages)
Convicted person's DP rights (7 messages)
Data Breaches (1 message)
Data Processing where Data Controllers are "In Common" (4 messages)
Data Protection & FOI Vacancy (2 messages)
Data Sharing Bill questionnaire (12 messages)
Dead Peoples' Digital Records (1 message)
Digital Lasting power of attorney (1 message)
DP Requests from Overseas Police (3 messages)
Durant (1 message)
EU DP Regulation passes first hurdle - a good thing? (1 message)
Final negotiations on Data Protection Reg look set to be delayed (3 messages)
Fire Service Question. (7 messages)
Fire Service Question. (who owns the home?) (1 message)
Fwd: 3rd Party Systems Access (1 message)
GCHQ and privacy (1 message)
Has there been a MPN for joint data controllers? (2 messages)
Hawktalk: EU Parliament proposes 100 million euro fines for non-compliance with Data Protection Regulation (1 message)
Hawktalk: Select Committee criticises ICO's approach to enforcement of Millepede offences (1 message)
Hi ! (1 message)
ICO prosecutes payday loan company (1 message)
IG re-named IS (5 messages)
Information Governance role - maternity cover fixed term 12 months (1 message)
Information sharing - Are you really sure you've got two ideas? (1 message)
Informed - a new place for information professionals (1 message)
Joint Data Controller Contracts (1 message)
Landlord Schedules - Housing Benefit (1 message)
Meeting the Data Protection Challenge - one day course 14.11.2013 (1 message)
Memorandum of understanding between ICO and MOJ on national security (3 messages)
Message from Moderators (20 messages)
MoJ Fine - Irony Alert (5 messages)
Motor Vehicle Licence Books (7 messages)
MPN Cancelled (2 messages)
New Blog post (1 message)
New DPA Fine (1 message)
Our latest update e mail (1 message)
PIA Code (1 message)
PIA, DP Audit and DP Regulation workshop (All November in London) (1 message)
Police access (6 messages)
Quiz to go with "Data Day Hygiene" ICO Vid? (1 message)
Retention of records (2 messages)
Rogue private eyes: 19 clients to be investigated (3 messages)
s61 and data breaches have they ever been connected? (3 messages)
Safe Harbour (1 message)
Safe Harbour and the DPO's ABC (1 message)
SAR redaction (3 messages)
Security of email (1 message)
smartphone security (1 message)
Staff access to personal data in case management systems (5 messages)
Staff surveys and employer responsibility as a Data controller query (4 messages)
Student surveys and data protection issues (1 message)
Thanks (5 messages)
The artist formerly known as data protection (5 messages)
Watching You Watching Them (1 message)
Who's responsible for investigating breach (4 messages)
Whose data is it (anyway)? (7 messages)
WP29 Opinion on data processors (4 messages)
WP29 Opinion on data processors (who faces the music?) (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

3rd Party Systems Access

3rd Party Systems Access

Catherine Hanley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:50:51 +0100

164 lines

Re: 3rd Party Systems Access

Catherine Hanley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:52:32 +0100

135 lines

New Thread

A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 05:09:58 +0100

43 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:41:48 +0100

52 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:53:41 +0100

96 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:21:16 +0100

81 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:37:22 +0100

108 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:45:38 +0000

166 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:25:09 +0100

44 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:28:12 +0100

51 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:30:53 +0100

38 lines

Re: A 'Friday' question on Wednesday

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:34:34 +0100

130 lines

New Thread

A footnote on PRISM

A footnote on PRISM

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:52:08 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

A footnote on PRISM {a long response please ignore if not interested}

Re: A footnote on PRISM {a long response please ignore if not interested}

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:06:59 +0000

167 lines

New Thread

Access to Health Records training

Access to Health Records training

Jessica Robson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:44:03 +0100

45 lines

Re: Access to Health Records training

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:23:03 +0100

86 lines

New Thread

Access to who has accessed!

Access to who has accessed!

Sarah White <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:22:43 +0000

39 lines

Re: Access to who has accessed!

Jackie Milne (JISC Legal) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:15:30 +0000

51 lines

Re: Access to who has accessed!

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:03:16 +0100

128 lines

Re: Access to who has accessed!

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:04:56 +0000

433 lines

Re: Access to who has accessed!

Sarah White <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:58:40 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

Adv - 2014 Courses

Adv - 2014 Courses

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:41:09 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

ADV - PDP's 2014 Training Courses

ADV - PDP's 2014 Training Courses

Lisa Souza - PDP <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:43:44 +0100

599 lines

New Thread

ADV: PIA, DP Audit and DP Regulation workshop (All November in London)

ADV: PIA, DP Audit and DP Regulation workshop (All November in London)

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:00:41 +0100

285 lines

New Thread

ADV: Update your DP knowledge at our UPDATE conference (Oct 28)

ADV: Update your DP knowledge at our UPDATE conference (Oct 28)

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:13:45 +0100

269 lines

New Thread

Another Data Controller Question - Joint DC

Another Data Controller Question - Joint DC

Catherine Hanley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:38:17 +0100

181 lines

Re: Another Data Controller Question - Joint DC

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:32:38 +0100

162 lines

New Thread

Are a baby's scan pictures personal data?

Are a baby's scan pictures personal data?

stephen Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:08:03 +0100

48 lines

Re: Are a baby's scan pictures personal data?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:35:39 +0100

89 lines

Re: Are a baby's scan pictures personal data?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:01:24 +0100

159 lines

Re: Are a baby's scan pictures personal data?

GM Polato <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:13:17 +0100

84 lines

Re: Are a baby's scan pictures personal data?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:26:45 +0200

158 lines

New Thread

BCS Exam Tomorrow

BCS Exam Tomorrow

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:41:50 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

blog post - use of social media in investigations

blog post - use of social media in investigations

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:56:05 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Breakthrogh on DP Bill

Breakthrogh on DP Bill

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 08:39:49 +0100

259 lines

New Thread

BYOD policy

BYOD policy

Jessica Robson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:58:39 +0100

41 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:24:56 +0100

69 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:38:56 +0100

132 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 06:45:44 +0000

87 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:12:21 +0100

41 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:10:01 +0100

63 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:29:55 +0000

101 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:34:30 +0000

100 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:44:24 +0100

129 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:55:22 +0100

187 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:00:37 +0100

51 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:38:48 +0000

89 lines

Re: BYOD policy

Brunella Longo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:37:28 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

CCTV Conference

CCTV Conference

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:36:29 +0100

44 lines

Re: CCTV Conference

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:57:14 -0000

74 lines

New Thread

CCTV: and FYI Corporate report: Memorandum of understanding: Surveillance Camera Commissioner and Information Commissioner

CCTV: and FYI Corporate report: Memorandum of understanding: Surveillance Camera Commissioner and Information Commissioner

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:00:03 -0000

43 lines

New Thread

Confidential references

Confidential references

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:21:08 +0000

300 lines

Re: Confidential references

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:17:29 +0000

568 lines

Re: Confidential references

Jackie Milne (JISC Legal) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:31:04 +0000

47 lines

Re: Confidential references

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:08:52 +0100

129 lines

Re: Confidential references

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:29:23 +0000

413 lines

Re: Confidential references

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:45:09 -0000

38 lines

New Thread

Convicted person's DP rights

Convicted person's DP rights

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:42:33 +0100

314 lines

Re: Convicted person's DP rights

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:47:53 +0100

557 lines

Re: Convicted person's DP rights

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:58:05 +0100

515 lines

Re: Convicted person's DP rights

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:14:25 +0200

376 lines

Re: Convicted person's DP rights

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:12:08 +0100

380 lines

Re: Convicted person's DP rights

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:20:11 +0100

594 lines

Re: Convicted person's DP rights

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:29:37 +0100

515 lines

New Thread

Data Breaches

Data Breaches

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:00:11 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Data Processing where Data Controllers are "In Common"

Data Processing where Data Controllers are "In Common"

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:27:19 +0100

55 lines

Re: Data Processing where Data Controllers are "In Common"

Jackie Milne (JISC Legal) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:39:30 +0100

53 lines

Re: Data Processing where Data Controllers are "In Common"

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:45:38 +0100

93 lines

Re: Data Processing where Data Controllers are "In Common"

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:39:51 +0000

115 lines

New Thread

Data Protection & FOI Vacancy

Data Protection & FOI Vacancy

Fatima Zohra <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:21:09 +0100

73 lines

Re: Data Protection & FOI Vacancy

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:30:40 +0100

107 lines

New Thread

Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:18:42 +0100

110 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:25:59 +0100

972 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:26:38 +0100

171 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:31:07 +0100

113 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:47:15 +0100

40 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:51:22 +0100

113 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:05:47 +0100

70 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:12:11 +0100

145 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:13:13 +0100

157 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:42:07 +0100

188 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:01:37 +0100

235 lines

Re: Data Sharing Bill questionnaire

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:27:57 +0100

291 lines

New Thread

Dead Peoples' Digital Records

Dead Peoples' Digital Records

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:57:39 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Digital Lasting power of attorney

Digital Lasting power of attorney

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:37:09 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

DP Requests from Overseas Police

DP Requests from Overseas Police

Bev Buckley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:46:54 +0100

63 lines

Re: DP Requests from Overseas Police

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:08:49 +0100

90 lines

Re: DP Requests from Overseas Police

Charles Christacopoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:17:22 +0100

70 lines

New Thread

Durant

Durant

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:49:04 +0100

326 lines

New Thread

EU DP Regulation passes first hurdle - a good thing?

EU DP Regulation passes first hurdle - a good thing?

stephen Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:05:31 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Final negotiations on Data Protection Reg look set to be delayed

Final negotiations on Data Protection Reg look set to be delayed

Dr D.O. Erdos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:58:09 +0100

41 lines

Re: Final negotiations on Data Protection Reg look set to be delayed

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:22:11 +0100

81 lines

Re: Final negotiations on Data Protection Reg look set to be delayed

Dr D.O. Erdos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:28:01 +0100

107 lines

New Thread

Fire Service Question.

Fire Service Question.

Richard Birmingham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:48:16 +0100

37 lines

Re: Fire Service Question.

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:57:24 +0000

79 lines

Re: Fire Service Question.

James Walkom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:16:07 +0100

65 lines

Re: Fire Service Question.

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:21:24 +0100

120 lines

Re: Fire Service Question.

Jones Sandre (NOTTINGHAM CITYCARE PARTNERSHIP) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:01:54 +0100

127 lines

Re: Fire Service Question.

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:05:41 +0100

103 lines

Re: Fire Service Question.

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:19:52 +0100

135 lines

New Thread

Fire Service Question. (who owns the home?)

Re: Fire Service Question. (who owns the home?)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:34:08 +0000

113 lines

New Thread

Fwd: 3rd Party Systems Access

Fwd: 3rd Party Systems Access

Trish-louise Bailey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:10:57 +0100

311 lines

New Thread

GCHQ and privacy

GCHQ and privacy

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:39:10 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Has there been a MPN for joint data controllers?

Has there been a MPN for joint data controllers?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:51:42 +0000

59 lines

Re: Has there been a MPN for joint data controllers?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:59:26 +0100

120 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: EU Parliament proposes 100 million euro fines for non-compliance with Data Protection Regulation

Hawktalk: EU Parliament proposes 100 million euro fines for non-compliance with Data Protection Regulation

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 01:43:04 +0100

193 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Select Committee criticises ICO's approach to enforcement of Millepede offences

Hawktalk: Select Committee criticises ICO's approach to enforcement of Millepede offences

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:59:54 +0100

363 lines

New Thread

Hi !

Hi !

Paul C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:27:34 +0100

590 lines

New Thread

ICO prosecutes payday loan company

ICO prosecutes payday loan company

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:43:46 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

IG re-named IS

IG re-named IS

Sarah White <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:25:04 +0100

35 lines

Re: IG re-named IS

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:44:36 +0100

63 lines

Re: IG re-named IS

Gudge Teresa (AVON AND WILTSHIRE MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:26:16 +0100

81 lines

Re: IG re-named IS

Sarah White <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:33:35 +0100

31 lines

Re: IG re-named IS

Jones Sandre (NOTTINGHAM CITYCARE PARTNERSHIP) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:41:50 +0100

92 lines

New Thread

Information Governance role - maternity cover fixed term 12 months

Information Governance role - maternity cover fixed term 12 months

Andy Morrall <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:01:24 +0100

103 lines

New Thread

Information sharing - Are you really sure you've got two ideas?

Information sharing - Are you really sure you've got two ideas?

Brunella Longo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:59:16 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Informed - a new place for information professionals

Informed - a new place for information professionals

Clark, Ian ([log in to unmask]) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:54:19 +0000

160 lines

New Thread

Joint Data Controller Contracts

Joint Data Controller Contracts

Catherine Hanley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:39:35 +0000

156 lines

New Thread

Landlord Schedules - Housing Benefit

Landlord Schedules - Housing Benefit

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:38:18 +0000

62 lines

New Thread

Meeting the Data Protection Challenge - one day course 14.11.2013

Meeting the Data Protection Challenge - one day course 14.11.2013

cimqgen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:44:38 +0100

240 lines

New Thread

Memorandum of understanding between ICO and MOJ on national security

Memorandum of understanding between ICO and MOJ on national security

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:33:13 +0000

180 lines

Re: Memorandum of understanding between ICO and MOJ on national security

Gleeson, Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:03:34 +0100

449 lines

Re: Memorandum of understanding between ICO and MOJ on national security

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:50:55 +0000

540 lines

New Thread

Message from Moderators

Message from Moderators

Paul Simpkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:00:57 +0100

163 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 22:52:30 +0100

397 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

JiscMail Helpline <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:23:01 +0100

68 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:33:41 +0100

148 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:59:28 +0100

180 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Brian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:13:24 +0100

43 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:21:40 +0100

56 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:22:07 +0100

100 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:59:27 +0000

225 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:05:21 +0100

147 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:13:34 +0100

267 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:20:12 +0100

309 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:05:14 +0100

79 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:42:28 +0100

173 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:47:36 +0100

81 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:16:49 +0100

92 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:50:35 +0100

49 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Craig Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:46:04 +0000

204 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Paul C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:42:01 +0100

108 lines

Re: Message from Moderators

Paul C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:31:24 +0100

305 lines

New Thread

MoJ Fine - Irony Alert

MoJ Fine - Irony Alert

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:57:57 +0100

40 lines

Re: MoJ Fine - Irony Alert

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:32:22 +0100

73 lines

Re: MoJ Fine - Irony Alert

Charles Christacopoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:47:34 +0100

50 lines

Re: MoJ Fine - Irony Alert

Paul C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:52:14 +0100

93 lines

Re: MoJ Fine - Irony Alert

Paul C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:53:24 +0100

99 lines

New Thread

Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:34:57 +0100

37 lines

Re: Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:57:42 +0100

101 lines

Re: Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:04:53 +0100

185 lines

Re: Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Jones Sandre (NOTTINGHAM CITYCARE PARTNERSHIP) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:08:12 +0100

146 lines

Re: Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:12:24 +0100

368 lines

Re: Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Gleeson, Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:32:48 +0100

257 lines

Re: Motor Vehicle Licence Books

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:38:14 +0100

349 lines

New Thread

MPN Cancelled

MPN Cancelled

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:20:05 +0100

140 lines

Re: MPN Cancelled

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:29:13 +0100

228 lines

New Thread

New Blog post

New Blog post

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:27:06 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

New DPA Fine

New DPA Fine

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:53:34 +0000

103 lines

New Thread

Our latest update e mail

Our latest update e mail

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:51:30 +0100

238 lines

New Thread

PIA Code

PIA Code

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:47:59 +0100

432 lines

New Thread

PIA, DP Audit and DP Regulation workshop (All November in London)

Re: PIA, DP Audit and DP Regulation workshop (All November in London)

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:31:16 +0100

538 lines

New Thread

Police access

Police access

Mike Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:28:37 +0000

137 lines

Re: Police access

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:18:40 +0100

178 lines

Re: Police access

Mike Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:13:22 +0000

314 lines

Re: Police access

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:22:35 +0100

719 lines

Re: Police access

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:40:42 +0100

399 lines

Re: Police access

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:57:14 -0000

547 lines

New Thread

Quiz to go with "Data Day Hygiene" ICO Vid?

Quiz to go with "Data Day Hygiene" ICO Vid?

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:17:09 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Retention of records

Retention of records

Christopher Munro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:55:17 +0100

41 lines

Re: Retention of records

Heather Jack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:52:41 +0100

103 lines

New Thread

Rogue private eyes: 19 clients to be investigated

Rogue private eyes: 19 clients to be investigated

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 09:31:40 +0100

83 lines

Re: Rogue private eyes: 19 clients to be investigated

Brunella Longo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 12:27:55 +0100

55 lines

Rogue private eyes: 19 clients to be investigated

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:28:09 +0100

303 lines

New Thread

s61 and data breaches have they ever been connected?

s61 and data breaches have they ever been connected?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 18:16:14 +0100

67 lines

Re: s61 and data breaches have they ever been connected?

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:55:39 +0100

106 lines

Re: s61 and data breaches have they ever been connected?

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:25:13 +0100

132 lines

New Thread

Safe Harbour

Safe Harbour

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:27:02 +0100

290 lines

New Thread

Safe Harbour and the DPO's ABC

Re: Safe Harbour and the DPO's ABC

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:18:51 +0100

525 lines

New Thread

SAR redaction

SAR redaction

Emma Wainman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:46:59 +0000

43 lines

Re: SAR redaction

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:00:23 +0000

83 lines

Re: SAR redaction

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:36:22 +0000

126 lines

New Thread

Security of email

Security of email

Marilyn Barton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:22:17 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

smartphone security

smartphone security

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:05:28 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

Staff access to personal data in case management systems

Staff access to personal data in case management systems

Catherine Hanley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:13:19 +0100

179 lines

Re: Staff access to personal data in case management systems

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:19:45 +0100

782 lines

Re: Staff access to personal data in case management systems

Gudge Teresa (AVON AND WILTSHIRE MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:28:59 +0100

762 lines

Re: Staff access to personal data in case management systems

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:54:03 +0000

171 lines

Re: Staff access to personal data in case management systems

Paul C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:36:03 +0100

804 lines

New Thread

Staff surveys and employer responsibility as a Data controller query

Staff surveys and employer responsibility as a Data controller query

Simon Macauley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:50:26 +0000

64 lines

Re: Staff surveys and employer responsibility as a Data controller query

Jackie Milne (JISC Legal) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:09:38 +0100

53 lines

Re: Staff surveys and employer responsibility as a Data controller query

Simon Macauley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:22:57 +0000

96 lines

Re: Staff surveys and employer responsibility as a Data controller query

Jackie Milne (JISC Legal) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:25:42 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Student surveys and data protection issues

Student surveys and data protection issues

Barlow, Jackie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:42:54 +0000

650 lines

New Thread

Thanks

Thanks

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:55:28 +0100

45 lines

Re: Thanks

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:01:51 +0100

76 lines

Re: Thanks

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:20:55 +0100

87 lines

Re: Thanks

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:37:57 +0100

88 lines

Re: Thanks

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:52:53 +0100

201 lines

New Thread

The artist formerly known as data protection

The artist formerly known as data protection

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:45:16 +0000

71 lines

Re: The artist formerly known as data protection

Owen Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:15:52 +0100

46 lines

Re: The artist formerly known as data protection

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:16:31 +0100

113 lines

Re: The artist formerly known as data protection

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 04:45:01 -0400

200 lines

Re: The artist formerly known as data protection

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:37:05 +0000

264 lines

New Thread

Watching You Watching Them

Watching You Watching Them

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:48:36 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Who's responsible for investigating breach

Who's responsible for investigating breach

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:39:39 +0000

49 lines

Re: Who's responsible for investigating breach

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:53:05 +0100

160 lines

Re: Who's responsible for investigating breach

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2013 12:02:47 +0100

370 lines

Re: Who's responsible for investigating breach

Owen Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2013 12:24:31 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Whose data is it (anyway)?

Whose data is it (anyway)?

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:52:40 +0100

100 lines

Re: Whose data is it (anyway)?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:10:55 +0200

247 lines

Re: Whose data is it (anyway)?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:23:40 +0000

179 lines

Re: Whose data is it (anyway)?

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2013 15:35:30 +0100

212 lines

Re: Whose data is it (anyway)?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:46:52 +0000

77 lines

Re: Whose data is it (anyway)?

Owen Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2013 12:02:08 +0100

28 lines

Re: Whose data is it (anyway)?

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2013 20:10:07 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

WP29 Opinion on data processors

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2013 03:39:41 +0100

731 lines

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2013 07:34:53 +0000

277 lines

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 09:05:09 +0100

317 lines

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 12:49:25 +0000

341 lines

New Thread

WP29 Opinion on data processors (who faces the music?)

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors (who faces the music?)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 10:45:43 +0000

340 lines

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors (who faces the music?)

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2013 16:03:05 +0100

213 lines

Re: WP29 Opinion on data processors (who faces the music?)

Grimbaldus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2013 06:46:33 +0100

81 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager