JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


September 2012


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Articles in LGL (1 message)
CCTV Code (2 messages)
CCTV in toilets (10 messages)
CCTV in toilets (is taking off your coat in the hallway a "changing room"? (1 message)
Child sex offender disclosure scheme (request to disclose)? Have you had one of these? (9 messages)
Cloud (1 message)
cloud computing advice from ICO (1 message)
Council Surveillance Changes (2 messages)
CPS Databreach (2 messages)
Data breach and responsibilities of the recipient (10 messages)
Data Processing Agreements (20 messages)
Debt Management Guidance (2 messages)
Definition of "any imposition of a similar nature" (2 messages)
Deletion of phone recordings (3 messages)
Does anyone have an internal blog on data protection issues to raise awareness? (6 messages)
DP and Schools (1 message)
Environmental Protection Act s71 (2) notice (7 messages)
Friday food for thought - Cookies (15 messages)
Friday question Personal Information Previously supplied makes disclosure reasonable (4 messages)
Friday Question: Duty of Care? (8 messages)
Fw: [data-protection] ID cards showing Date of Birth (2 messages)
FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI r equests from 10 citize ns (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns (8 messages)
Help please: recent article/report on breach notifications to ICO? (5 messages)
Hospitals (4 messages)
ICO guidance on deleting personal data (2 messages)
ICO View on use of Mystery Shoppers (3 messages)
ICO Website (2 messages)
ID cards showing Date of Birth (3 messages)
Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns (5 messages)
Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens (13 messages)
Last chance to register! Data Privacy Salon, 2nd October 2012, Manchester (1 message)
Last post on RE: [data-protection] Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens [longish delete if not interested] (1 message)
Message from Moderators (1 message)
Moderation (1 message)
More cloud stuff (1 message)
New Blog Post (1 message)
New RIPA Rules (1 message)
newspaper clippings are they personal information for DPA or would they be category e data? {stomach, brain, or liver*?} (5 messages)
Outsourcing (6 messages)
Pursuing Debts (2 messages)
Request from Northern Gas (8 messages)
Requests for information of the deceased from a Coroner (2 messages)
RIPA Update course (1 message)
Royals 'secrecy' law criticised (1 message)
Scottish Council Databreach fine (1 message)
Senior Counsel's Opinion on Removal of FoI / DP Statutory Rights (2 messages)
The answer my friend is blowing in the wind! (2 messages)
The application of anonymity in controlled circumstances. (1 message)
The business of personal data (1 message)
The Fresh Prince The public interest vs the public appetite (6 messages)
The Fresh Prince The public interest vs the public appetite [how do we apply the public interest test?] (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Articles in LGL

Articles in LGL

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:46:13 +0100

122 lines

New Thread

CCTV Code

CCTV Code

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:03:33 +0100

94 lines

Re: CCTV Code

Bill Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:26:17 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

CCTV in toilets

CCTV in toilets

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:54:35 +0100

43 lines

Re: CCTV in toilets

Donald Henderson - CHX <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:59:46 +0100

119 lines

Re: CCTV in toilets

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:26:20 +0100

158 lines

Re: CCTV in toilets

Brian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:43:05 +0100

32 lines

Re: CCTV in toilets

Scott Sammons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:48:06 +0100

501 lines

Re: CCTV in toilets

Brian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:38:38 +0100

64 lines

Re: CCTV in toilets

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:25:19 +0200

195 lines

Re: CCTV in toilets

Brian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:50:02 +0100

216 lines

Re: CCTV in toilets

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:38:48 +0200

164 lines

Re: CCTV in toilets

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:12:56 +0200

278 lines

New Thread

CCTV in toilets (is taking off your coat in the hallway a "changing room"?

Re: CCTV in toilets (is taking off your coat in the hallway a "changing room"?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:30:06 +0000

112 lines

New Thread

Child sex offender disclosure scheme (request to disclose)? Have you had one of these?

Child sex offender disclosure scheme (request to disclose)? Have you had one of these?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:08:54 +0000

70 lines

Re: Child sex offender disclosure scheme (request to disclose)? Have you had one of these?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:31:44 +0100

151 lines

Re: Child sex offender disclosure scheme (request to disclose)? Have you had one of these?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:44:06 +0200

243 lines

Re: Child sex offender disclosure scheme (request to disclose)? Have you had one of these?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:05:23 +0000

885 lines

Re: Child sex offender disclosure scheme (request to disclose)? Have you had one of these?

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:22:15 +0100

359 lines

Re: Child sex offender disclosure scheme (request to disclose)? Have you had one of these?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:19:24 +0000

551 lines

Re: Child sex offender disclosure scheme (request to disclose)? Have you had one of these?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:00:13 +0100

237 lines

Re: Child sex offender disclosure scheme (request to disclose)? Have you had one of these?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:05:31 +0200

768 lines

Re: Child sex offender disclosure scheme (request to disclose)? Have you had one of these?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:11:33 +0000

218 lines

New Thread

Cloud

Cloud

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:25:50 +0100

95 lines

New Thread

cloud computing advice from ICO

cloud computing advice from ICO

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:31:11 +0100

212 lines

New Thread

Council Surveillance Changes

Council Surveillance Changes

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:13:57 +0100

163 lines

Re: Council Surveillance Changes

Donald Henderson - CHX <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:37:34 +0100

572 lines

New Thread

CPS Databreach

CPS Databreach

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 27 Sep 2012 21:37:39 +0100

37 lines

Re: CPS Databreach

Charles Christacopoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:08:45 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Data breach and responsibilities of the recipient

Data breach and responsibilities of the recipient

Raymond Scott (ISD) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:45:19 +0000

38 lines

Re: Data breach and responsibilities of the recipient

Powell, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:02:28 +0000

193 lines

Re: Data breach and responsibilities of the recipient

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:05:28 +0100

117 lines

Re: Data breach and responsibilities of the recipient

Powell, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:17:50 +0000

361 lines

Re: Data breach and responsibilities of the recipient

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:48:53 +0200

135 lines

Re: Data breach and responsibilities of the recipient

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:19:28 +0100

822 lines

Re: Data breach and responsibilities of the recipient

Bill Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:51:01 +0100

30 lines

Re: Data breach and responsibilities of the recipient

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:47:54 +0100

96 lines

Re: Data breach and responsibilities of the recipient

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:05:50 +0100

192 lines

Re: Data breach and responsibilities of the recipient

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:27:39 +0200

136 lines

New Thread

Data Processing Agreements

Data Processing Agreements

Murphy, April <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:54:33 +0100

382 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Powell, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:08:25 +0000

465 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:10:40 +0100

412 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Donald Henderson - CHX <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:04:52 +0100

700 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Murphy, April <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:29:22 +0100

757 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Cindy Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:31:17 +0100

31 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:40:43 +0100

157 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Powell, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:45:44 +0000

492 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:58:28 +0100

356 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:06:32 +0100

137 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Rajee Sritharan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:24:19 +0000

180 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Atkinson, Colin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:49:08 +0100

616 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:57:03 +0100

50 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Sep 2012 04:19:21 -0400

236 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:24:49 +0100

43 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:47:08 +0100

724 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:03:11 +0200

775 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:46:50 +0100

224 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:08:24 +0100

866 lines

Re: Data Processing Agreements

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:40:40 +0100

473 lines

New Thread

Debt Management Guidance

Debt Management Guidance

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:49:20 +0100

55 lines

Re: Debt Management Guidance

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:48:44 +0200

173 lines

New Thread

Definition of "any imposition of a similar nature"

Definition of "any imposition of a similar nature"

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:37:45 +0100

60 lines

Re: Definition of "any imposition of a similar nature"

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:04:54 +0100

150 lines

New Thread

Deletion of phone recordings

Deletion of phone recordings

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:36:11 +0100

304 lines

Re: Deletion of phone recordings

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:55:42 +0200

346 lines

Re: Deletion of phone recordings

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:09:33 +0100

740 lines

New Thread

Does anyone have an internal blog on data protection issues to raise awareness?

Does anyone have an internal blog on data protection issues to raise awareness?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:00:09 +0000

73 lines

Re: Does anyone have an internal blog on data protection issues to raise awareness?

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:59:51 +0100

171 lines

Re: Does anyone have an internal blog on data protection issues to raise awareness?

Bill Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:57:14 +0100

39 lines

Re: Does anyone have an internal blog on data protection issues to raise awareness?

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:44:37 +0100

215 lines

Re: Does anyone have an internal blog on data protection issues to raise awareness?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:52:11 +0000

262 lines

Re: Does anyone have an internal blog on data protection issues to raise awareness?

The ITIL Imp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:47:05 +0100

74 lines

New Thread

DP and Schools

DP and Schools

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:13:00 +0100

93 lines

New Thread

Environmental Protection Act s71 (2) notice

Environmental Protection Act s71 (2) notice

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:49:05 +0100

137 lines

Re: Environmental Protection Act s71 (2) notice

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:12:45 +0100

409 lines

Re: Environmental Protection Act s71 (2) notice

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:29:40 +0200

253 lines

Re: Environmental Protection Act s71 (2) notice

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:37:21 +0100

583 lines

Re: Environmental Protection Act s71 (2) notice

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:37:56 +0100

676 lines

Re: Environmental Protection Act s71 (2) notice

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:58:36 +0000

524 lines

Re: Environmental Protection Act s71 (2) notice

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:57:31 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Friday food for thought - Cookies

Friday food for thought - Cookies

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:15:11 +0100

151 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:16:48 -0400

407 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:19:52 +0100

644 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Sandeep Das <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:21:07 +0100

275 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Ian Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:32:30 +0100

844 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:49:19 +0100

102 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:51:23 +0100

518 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Sandeep Das <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:57:17 +0100

336 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Scott Sammons <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:36:30 +0100

470 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:57:14 +0100

516 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:09:57 +0000

448 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Peter Dinsdale <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:36:05 +0000

856 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Ian Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Sep 2012 01:58:15 +0100

65 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Sandeep Das <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Sep 2012 06:04:35 +0200

117 lines

Re: Friday food for thought - Cookies

Ian Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Sep 2012 23:58:43 +0100

92 lines

New Thread

Friday question Personal Information Previously supplied makes disclosure reasonable

Friday question Personal Information Previously supplied makes disclosure reasonable

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:37:28 +0100

60 lines

Re: Friday question Personal Information Previously supplied makes disclosure reasonable

Bill Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:58:48 +0100

40 lines

Re: Friday question Personal Information Previously supplied makes disclosure reasonable

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:36:51 +0200

153 lines

Re: Friday question Personal Information Previously supplied makes disclosure reasonable

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:21:37 +0000

440 lines

New Thread

Friday Question: Duty of Care?

Friday Question: Duty of Care?

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:35:53 +0100

51 lines

Re: Friday Question: Duty of Care?

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:47:18 +0100

146 lines

Re: Friday Question: Duty of Care?

Powell, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:53:00 +0000

247 lines

Re: Friday Question: Duty of Care?

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:54:46 +0100

174 lines

Re: Friday Question: Duty of Care?

Brian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:20:35 +0100

46 lines

Re: Friday Question: Duty of Care?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:39:10 +0000

338 lines

Re: Friday Question: Duty of Care?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:08:08 +0000

502 lines

Re: Friday Question: Duty of Care?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:11:42 +0200

87 lines

New Thread

Fw: [data-protection] ID cards showing Date of Birth

Fw: [data-protection] ID cards showing Date of Birth

Mike Gater <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:54:51 +0100

181 lines

Re: Fw: [data-protection] ID cards showing Date of Birth

Sally Penn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:20:53 +0000

206 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI

Re: FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:17:21 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI r equests from 10 citize ns

Re: FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI r equests from 10 citize ns

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:00:49 +0100

378 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:43:01 +0100

181 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:53:07 +0100

268 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:58:13 +0100

332 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:58:11 +0100

36 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:16:52 +0100

78 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:02:52 +0100

366 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

Brian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:45:04 +0100

42 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:11:34 +0000

487 lines

New Thread

Help please: recent article/report on breach notifications to ICO?

Help please: recent article/report on breach notifications to ICO?

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:39:59 +0000

51 lines

Re: Help please: recent article/report on breach notifications to ICO?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:53:39 +0100

116 lines

Re: Help please: recent article/report on breach notifications to ICO?

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:06:31 +0000

78 lines

Re: Help please: recent article/report on breach notifications to ICO?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:10:18 +0100

134 lines

Re: Help please: recent article/report on breach notifications to ICO?

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:49:53 +0000

149 lines

New Thread

Hospitals

Hospitals

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:12:06 +0100

87 lines

Re: Hospitals

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:01:23 +0100

274 lines

Re: Hospitals

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:35:41 +0100

489 lines

Re: Hospitals

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:32:13 +0200

219 lines

New Thread

ICO guidance on deleting personal data

ICO guidance on deleting personal data

Mark Ogden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:42:08 +0100

225 lines

Re: ICO guidance on deleting personal data

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:38:14 +0200

261 lines

New Thread

ICO View on use of Mystery Shoppers

ICO View on use of Mystery Shoppers

Scott Sammons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:56:30 +0100

40 lines

Re: ICO View on use of Mystery Shoppers

Ian Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:24:40 +0100

92 lines

Re: ICO View on use of Mystery Shoppers

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:10:53 +0100

82 lines

New Thread

ICO Website

ICO Website

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:07:04 +0100

30 lines

Re: ICO Website

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:22:29 +0100

103 lines

New Thread

ID cards showing Date of Birth

ID cards showing Date of Birth

Terry Stevens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:53:43 +0100

33 lines

Re: ID cards showing Date of Birth

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:03:44 +0100

110 lines

Re: ID cards showing Date of Birth

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:57:50 +0200

164 lines

New Thread

Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Sep 2012 08:52:42 +0100

181 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:00:51 +0100

34 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:39:00 +0100

289 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

Paul Cardin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Sep 2012 22:18:53 +0100

52 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citize ns

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:29:49 +0100

124 lines

New Thread

Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Paul Cardin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:31:53 +0100

34 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:40:26 +0100

130 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:33:46 +0100

212 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:44:08 +0100

58 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:34:30 +0000

77 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Paul Cardin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:15:12 +0100

53 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:19:03 +0000

111 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Paul Cardin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:02:45 +0100

47 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:34:10 +0000

288 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:14:39 +0200

350 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Paul Cardin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:46:05 +0100

51 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:38:29 +0100

110 lines

Re: Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens

Paul Cardin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Sep 2012 22:48:47 +0100

98 lines

New Thread

Last chance to register! Data Privacy Salon, 2nd October 2012, Manchester

Last chance to register! Data Privacy Salon, 2nd October 2012, Manchester

JM LITTLEJOHN <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:24:13 +0100

673 lines

New Thread

Last post on RE: [data-protection] Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens [longish delete if not interested]

Last post on RE: [data-protection] Large number of FoI requests from 10 citizens [longish delete if not interested]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:06:07 +0000

144 lines

New Thread

Message from Moderators

Message from Moderators

Paul Simpkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:45:29 +0100

169 lines

New Thread

Moderation

Moderation

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:43:54 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

More cloud stuff

More cloud stuff

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:24:13 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

New Blog Post

New Blog Post

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:18:51 +0100

108 lines

New Thread

New RIPA Rules

New RIPA Rules

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:41:49 +0100

86 lines

New Thread

newspaper clippings are they personal information for DPA or would they be category e data? {stomach, brain, or liver*?}

newspaper clippings are they personal information for DPA or would they be category e data? {stomach, brain, or liver*?}

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:42:49 +0000

217 lines

Re: newspaper clippings are they personal information for DPA or would they be category e data? {stomach, brain, or liver*?}

Bill Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:58:39 +0100

40 lines

Re: newspaper clippings are they personal information for DPA or would they be category e data? {stomach, brain, or liver*?}

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:08:37 +0100

783 lines

Re: newspaper clippings are they personal information for DPA or would they be category e data? {stomach, brain, or liver*?}

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:07:27 +0000

560 lines

Re: newspaper clippings are they personal information for DPA or would they be category e data? {stomach, brain, or liver*?}

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Sep 2012 09:45:29 +0100

135 lines

New Thread

Outsourcing

Outsourcing

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:15:01 +0100

91 lines

Re: Outsourcing

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:47:47 +0100

210 lines

Re: Outsourcing

Bill Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:35:41 +0100

42 lines

Re: Outsourcing

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:46:57 -0400

664 lines

Re: Outsourcing

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:49:19 -0400

82 lines

Re: Outsourcing

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:20:20 +0100

234 lines

New Thread

Pursuing Debts

Pursuing Debts

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Sep 2012 15:52:15 +0100

59 lines

Re: Pursuing Debts

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:39:42 +0100

94 lines

New Thread

Request from Northern Gas

Request from Northern Gas

Lindsay Foody <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:42:48 +0100

49 lines

Re: Request from Northern Gas

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:58:08 +0100

90 lines

Re: Request from Northern Gas

Michael Doherty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:17:55 +0100

134 lines

Re: Request from Northern Gas

Powell, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:13:04 +0000

406 lines

Re: Request from Northern Gas

Trevor Pearce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:14:34 +0100

147 lines

Re: Request from Northern Gas

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:22:02 +0100

212 lines

Re: Request from Northern Gas

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:28:34 +0100

334 lines

Re: Request from Northern Gas

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:36:41 +0100

157 lines

New Thread

Requests for information of the deceased from a Coroner

Requests for information of the deceased from a Coroner

Catherine Hanley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:26:16 +0100

155 lines

Re: Requests for information of the deceased from a Coroner

Catherine Hanley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:40:27 +0100

497 lines

New Thread

RIPA Update course

RIPA Update course

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:53:19 +0100

109 lines

New Thread

Royals 'secrecy' law criticised

Royals 'secrecy' law criticised

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:51:24 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

Scottish Council Databreach fine

Scottish Council Databreach fine

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:48:07 +0100

110 lines

New Thread

Senior Counsel's Opinion on Removal of FoI / DP Statutory Rights

Senior Counsel's Opinion on Removal of FoI / DP Statutory Rights

Paul Cardin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:46:07 +0100

35 lines

Re: Senior Counsel's Opinion on Removal of FoI / DP Statutory Rights

Brian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Sep 2012 11:46:04 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

The answer my friend is blowing in the wind!

The answer my friend is blowing in the wind!

Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:23:10 +0100

304 lines

Re: The answer my friend is blowing in the wind!

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:26:17 +0100

136 lines

New Thread

The application of anonymity in controlled circumstances.

The application of anonymity in controlled circumstances.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:32:13 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

The business of personal data

The business of personal data

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:15:28 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

The Fresh Prince The public interest vs the public appetite

Re: The Fresh Prince The public interest vs the public appetite

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Sep 2012 08:01:20 +0100

970 lines

Re: The Fresh Prince The public interest vs the public appetite

Donald Henderson - CHX <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:18:28 +0100

716 lines

Re: The Fresh Prince The public interest vs the public appetite

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:41:02 +0100

624 lines

Re: The Fresh Prince The public interest vs the public appetite

Donald Henderson - CHX <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:23:32 +0100

709 lines

Re: The Fresh Prince The public interest vs the public appetite

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:30:33 +0100

765 lines

Re: The Fresh Prince The public interest vs the public appetite

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:09:33 +0100

846 lines

New Thread

The Fresh Prince The public interest vs the public appetite [how do we apply the public interest test?]

Re: The Fresh Prince The public interest vs the public appetite [how do we apply the public interest test?]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:56:58 +0000

424 lines

Re: The Fresh Prince The public interest vs the public appetite [how do we apply the public interest test?]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Sep 2012 18:25:07 +0000

394 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager