JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


June 2012


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

£325k CMP for NHS Trust (5 messages)
Another D & G Breach (1 message)
Another Day Another Fine (2 messages)
Belfast Trust Fined (1 message)
Blind people and CCTV (1 message)
Changes to local authority surveillance powers (1 message)
Comms Data (1 message)
Communications Data Bill (2 messages)
Cookies; Subject Access (5 messages)
Council Tax Valuation Band Changes - Claims Companies (3 messages)
Court ruling - Lord(?) v Home Office (3 messages)
data loss from florists (1 message)
data protection directive evidence parliament (1 message)
Disclosure to the Police (2 messages)
Do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR? (8 messages)
DP query re research data on people with amputations (7 messages)
DPA Section 29 (4 messages)
Email Disclaimers (7 messages)
Emails - should they be treated like other personal data? (3 messages)
encrypted cameras? (2 messages)
FOI and DP Job Vacancy (1 message)
Friday question (7 messages)
FW: Blind people and CCTV (3 messages)
FW: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other? (1 message)
FW: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data (2 messages)
fyi: Restriction on Local Authority surveillance (1 message)
Glasgow Council data loss - 38,000 bank details evidently (1 message)
Good news: Dumfries and Galloway Council plans new data policy (2 messages)
Hawktalk: Expect 1,000 objections by Member States to the EU's Data Protection Regulation. (1 message)
Hawktalk: Swiss court concludes that Street View is subject to some data protection rules (4 messages)
Hey (1 message)
Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes( (6 messages)
ICO event on the future of European data protection law - summary report now available (1 message)
Independant Safeguarding Authority (1 message)
Independent Safeguarding Authority (1 message)
Inspection of Old Electoral Registers (2 messages)
Internet Trolls (1 message)
ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other? (6 messages)
ISEB v CIPP (1 message)
Model Data Processing Agreement? (4 messages)
New databreach (1 message)
Notification for Safeguarding Childrens Board (1 message)
Photos (1 message)
Possibly an interesting discussion. (2 messages)
Principle 7 - Data Processing (4 messages)
publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?) (6 messages)
RIPA and councils (1 message)
S29 and the armed forces? (7 messages)
Scotland data breach (1 message)
Scottish FOI Qualification (1 message)
Smart Meters (1 message)
Statistical Data (3 messages)
Subject Access Requests - complaints (10 messages)
Third party data (2 messages)
UK health body fined £325,000 (1 message)
Use of Live (personal) data used within training database (11 messages)
When the dead rise – Do they ever die. (3 messages)
When will the new EC data protection regulation come into force? (5 messages)
Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data (7 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

£325k CMP for NHS Trust

£325k CMP for NHS Trust

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:44:28 +0100

245 lines

Re: £325k CMP for NHS Trust

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:52:14 +0100

432 lines

Re: £325k CMP for NHS Trust

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:16:49 +0100

698 lines

Re: £325k CMP for NHS Trust

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:25:23 +0100

546 lines

Re: £325k CMP for NHS Trust

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:33:32 +0100

975 lines

New Thread

Another D & G Breach

Another D & G Breach

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:47:43 +0100

164 lines

New Thread

Another Day Another Fine

Another Day Another Fine

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:59:47 +0100

121 lines

Re: Another Day Another Fine

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:20:04 +0100

347 lines

New Thread

Belfast Trust Fined

Belfast Trust Fined

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:45:59 +0100

132 lines

New Thread

Blind people and CCTV

Blind people and CCTV

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:57:45 +0100

296 lines

New Thread

Changes to local authority surveillance powers

Changes to local authority surveillance powers

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:58:20 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Comms Data

Comms Data

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:51:44 +0100

155 lines

New Thread

Communications Data Bill

Communications Data Bill

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:50:36 +0100

91 lines

Communications Data Bill

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:31:54 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

Cookies; Subject Access

Cookies; Subject Access

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 05:26:51 -0400

316 lines

Re: Cookies; Subject Access

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:20:08 +0100

599 lines

Re: Cookies; Subject Access

Ian Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:40:12 +0100

93 lines

Re: Cookies; Subject Access

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:42:08 -0400

143 lines

Re: Cookies; Subject Access

Ian Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:55:55 +0100

158 lines

New Thread

Council Tax Valuation Band Changes - Claims Companies

Council Tax Valuation Band Changes - Claims Companies

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:51:59 +0100

232 lines

Re: Council Tax Valuation Band Changes - Claims Companies

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:08:40 +0200

342 lines

Re: Council Tax Valuation Band Changes - Claims Companies

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:09:04 +0100

680 lines

New Thread

Court ruling - Lord(?) v Home Office

Court ruling - Lord(?) v Home Office

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:47:59 +0100

289 lines

Re: Court ruling - Lord(?) v Home Office

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:27:06 +0100

418 lines

Re: Court ruling - Lord(?) v Home Office

Powell, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:28:20 +0000

776 lines

New Thread

data loss from florists

data loss from florists

Richard Birmingham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:37:16 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

data protection directive evidence parliament

data protection directive evidence parliament

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:10:41 +0100

154 lines

New Thread

Disclosure to the Police

Re: Disclosure to the Police

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:43:12 +0100

557 lines

Re: Disclosure to the Police

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:06:15 +0200

668 lines

New Thread

Do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?

Do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?

Jaines, Amy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:10:39 +0100

268 lines

Re: Do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:28:12 +0200

585 lines

Re: Do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:30:58 +0100

611 lines

Re: Do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:42:45 +0100

539 lines

Re: Do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:22:53 +0000

704 lines

Re: do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?

Jaines, Amy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:08:50 +0100

267 lines

Re: do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?

Jaines, Amy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:25:24 +0100

660 lines

Re: do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:00:10 +0100

391 lines

New Thread

DP query re research data on people with amputations

DP query re research data on people with amputations

Stephenson Matthew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:32:24 +0000

350 lines

Re: DP query re research data on people with amputations

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:40:08 +0100

676 lines

Re: DP query re research data on people with amputations

Bill Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:43:04 +0100

46 lines

Re: DP query re research data on people with amputations

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:49:07 +0100

86 lines

Re: DP query re research data on people with amputations

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:58:41 +0100

94 lines

Re: DP query re research data on people with amputations

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:17:25 +0100

48 lines

Re: DP query re research data on people with amputations

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:35:04 +0100

85 lines

New Thread

DPA Section 29

DPA Section 29

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:34:57 +0100

54 lines

Re: DPA Section 29

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:39:18 +0100

143 lines

Re: DPA Section 29

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:01:27 +0100

126 lines

Re: DPA Section 29

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:33:07 +0200

238 lines

New Thread

Email Disclaimers

Email Disclaimers

Mike Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:49:08 +0100

289 lines

Re: Email Disclaimers

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:19:05 +0100

550 lines

Re: Email Disclaimers

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:53:40 +0100

909 lines

Re: Email Disclaimers

Mike Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:30:40 +0100

663 lines

Re: Email Disclaimers

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:06:24 +0100

271 lines

Re: Email Disclaimers

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:32:26 +0200

309 lines

Re: Email Disclaimers

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:29:33 +0100

462 lines

New Thread

Emails - should they be treated like other personal data?

Emails - should they be treated like other personal data?

Brian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jun 2012 16:13:39 +0100

55 lines

Re: Emails - should they be treated like other personal data?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:34:36 +0200

193 lines

Re: Emails - should they be treated like other personal data?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:55:04 +0100

60 lines

New Thread

encrypted cameras?

encrypted cameras?

Richard Birmingham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:43:29 +0100

28 lines

Re: encrypted cameras?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:00:42 +0200

140 lines

New Thread

FOI and DP Job Vacancy

FOI and DP Job Vacancy

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:00:29 +0100

107 lines

New Thread

Friday question

Friday question

Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:07:25 +0100

271 lines

Re: Friday question

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:33:21 +0200

332 lines

Re: Friday question

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:49:35 +0100

473 lines

Re: Friday question

Claire Morrissey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jun 2012 01:42:39 +0100

372 lines

Re: Friday question

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jun 2012 10:28:16 +0200

135 lines

Re: Friday question

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jun 2012 09:54:00 +0100

370 lines

Re: Friday question

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jun 2012 11:34:18 +0200

165 lines

New Thread

FW: Blind people and CCTV

FW: Blind people and CCTV

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:21:05 +0100

476 lines

Re: FW: Blind people and CCTV

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:28:50 +0100

492 lines

Re: FW: Blind people and CCTV

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:29:00 +0200

629 lines

New Thread

FW: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

FW: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:26:38 +0100

461 lines

New Thread

FW: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data

FW: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data

Gudge, Teresa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:13:11 +0100

571 lines

Re: FW: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:18:09 +0100

886 lines

New Thread

fyi: Restriction on Local Authority surveillance

fyi: Restriction on Local Authority surveillance

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:02:13 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Glasgow Council data loss - 38,000 bank details evidently

Glasgow Council data loss - 38,000 bank details evidently

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:46:59 +0100

185 lines

New Thread

Good news: Dumfries and Galloway Council plans new data policy

Good news: Dumfries and Galloway Council plans new data policy

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:08:48 +0100

232 lines

Re: Good news: Dumfries and Galloway Council plans new data policy

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:49:50 +0100

540 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Expect 1,000 objections by Member States to the EU's Data Protection Regulation.

Hawktalk: Expect 1,000 objections by Member States to the EU's Data Protection Regulation.

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jun 2012 01:57:52 +0100

248 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Swiss court concludes that Street View is subject to some data protection rules

Hawktalk: Swiss court concludes that Street View is subject to some data protection rules

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:20:13 +0100

227 lines

Re: Hawktalk: Swiss court concludes that Street View is subject to some data protection rules

Lemon, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:28:13 +0100

392 lines

Re: Hawktalk: Swiss court concludes that Street View is subject to some data protection rules

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:57:07 +0100

528 lines

Re: Hawktalk: Swiss court concludes that Street View is subject to some data protection rules

Jonathan Baines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:27:32 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Hey

Hey

Sarah Henning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:57:09 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes(

Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes(

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:21:33 +0100

173 lines

Re: Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes(

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:41:13 +0100

463 lines

Re: Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes(

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:32:45 +0000

325 lines

Re: Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes(

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:34:31 +0100

691 lines

Re: Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes(

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:36:31 +0100

856 lines

Re: Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes(

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:37:20 +0100

692 lines

New Thread

ICO event on the future of European data protection law - summary report now available

ICO event on the future of European data protection law - summary report now available

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:54:22 +0100

164 lines

New Thread

Independant Safeguarding Authority

Independant Safeguarding Authority

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:23:13 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Independent Safeguarding Authority

Re: Independent Safeguarding Authority

Rob Dawson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:34:53 +0000

79 lines

New Thread

Inspection of Old Electoral Registers

Inspection of Old Electoral Registers

Hannah Tessyman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:18:50 +0100

241 lines

Re: Inspection of Old Electoral Registers

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:57:26 +0100

452 lines

New Thread

Internet Trolls

Internet Trolls

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:54:11 +0100

84 lines

New Thread

ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Trish-louise Bailey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:21:47 +0100

325 lines

Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Moore, Craig <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:42:39 +0100

540 lines

Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:58:27 +0000

233 lines

Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:01:49 +0100

444 lines

Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Trish-louise Bailey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:49:10 +0100

271 lines

Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Trish-louise Bailey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:07:16 +0100

277 lines

New Thread

ISEB v CIPP

ISEB v CIPP

Trish-louise Bailey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:52:32 +0100

77 lines

New Thread

Model Data Processing Agreement?

Model Data Processing Agreement?

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:01:28 +0100

83 lines

Re: Model data processing agreement?

GRAHAM Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:19:12 +0100

130 lines

Re: Model Data Processing Agreement?

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:49:54 +0100

123 lines

Re: Model Data Processing Agreement?

Bill Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:33:11 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

New databreach

New databreach

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:04:30 +0100

127 lines

New Thread

Notification for Safeguarding Childrens Board

Notification for Safeguarding Childrens Board

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:23:48 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

Photos

Photos

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:22:33 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

Possibly an interesting discussion.

Possibly an interesting discussion.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:03:01 +0100

36 lines

Re: Possibly an interesting discussion.

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:39:45 +0100

74 lines

New Thread

Principle 7 - Data Processing

Principle 7 - Data Processing

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Jun 2012 18:55:04 +0100

39 lines

Re: Principle 7 - Data Processing

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:11:51 +0100

92 lines

Re: Principle 7 - Data Processing

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:23:23 +0100

144 lines

Re: Principle 7 - Data Processing

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2012 05:57:37 -0400

100 lines

New Thread

publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?)

publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:03:17 +0000

843 lines

Re: publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?)

Maurice Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:02:04 +0100

316 lines

Re: publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?)

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Jun 2012 20:43:18 +0200

618 lines

Re: publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:08:20 +0000

228 lines

Re: publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?)

Maurice Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:10:40 +0100

374 lines

Re: publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:43:39 +0000

250 lines

New Thread

RIPA and councils

RIPA and councils

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:41:28 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

S29 and the armed forces?

S29 and the armed forces?

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:07:36 +0100

379 lines

Re: S29 and the armed forces?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:12:24 +0100

226 lines

Re: S29 and the armed forces?

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:54:20 +0100

512 lines

Re: S29 and the armed forces?

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:00:19 +0100

871 lines

Re: S29 and the armed forces?

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:52:02 +0000

112 lines

Re: S29 and the armed forces?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:13:49 +0100

41 lines

Re: S29 and the armed forces?

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:37:25 +0000

759 lines

New Thread

Scotland data breach

Scotland data breach

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:08:03 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Scottish FOI Qualification

Re: Scottish FOI Qualification

Simon Macauley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:03:31 +0000

515 lines

New Thread

Smart Meters

Smart Meters

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:55:55 +0100

81 lines

New Thread

Statistical Data

Statistical Data

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:54:24 +0100

44 lines

Re: Statistical Data

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:44:04 +0200

161 lines

Re: Statistical Data

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:53:14 +0200

210 lines

New Thread

Subject Access Requests - complaints

Subject Access Requests - complaints

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:54:36 +0100

296 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:51:09 +0100

777 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:51:12 +0100

494 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:01:36 +0100

96 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:28:47 +0200

375 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:46:44 +0100

914 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:34:27 +0100

690 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:43:49 +0100

105 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:05:42 +0100

118 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:51:06 +0200

280 lines

New Thread

Third party data

Third party data

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:07:01 +0100

30 lines

Re: Third party data

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:37:32 +0200

144 lines

New Thread

UK health body fined £325,000

UK health body fined £325,000

Mike Gater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:47:12 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Use of Live (personal) data used within training database

Use of Live (personal) data used within training database

Mike Gater <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:22:29 +0100

61 lines

Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:32:15 +0100

143 lines

Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:39:12 +0100

134 lines

Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:39:52 +0100

134 lines

Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:42:10 +0100

190 lines

Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database

Peter Dinsdale <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:50:40 +0000

215 lines

Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:55:40 +0100

266 lines

Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:58:56 +0200

280 lines

Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:18:03 +0100

93 lines

Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database

Mike Gater <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:42:56 +0100

47 lines

Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:40:49 +0100

194 lines

New Thread

When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Simon Macauley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:53:55 +0000

846 lines

Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Simon Macauley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:00:27 +0000

451 lines

Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:31:01 +0100

613 lines

New Thread

When will the new EC data protection regulation come into force?

When will the new EC data protection regulation come into force?

Hodge, Alex DCR <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:38:36 +0100

334 lines

Re: When will the new EC data protection regulation come into force?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:43:06 +0100

564 lines

Re: When will the new EC data protection regulation come into force?

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:45:23 -0400

927 lines

Re: When will the new EC data protection regulation come into force?

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:49:33 +0100

38 lines

Re: When will the new EC data protection regulation come into force?

Lowry Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:53:43 +0000

735 lines

New Thread

Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data

Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data

Gudge, Teresa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:25:07 +0100

176 lines

Re: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:49:16 +0100

587 lines

Re: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data

Bill Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:50:37 +0100

40 lines

Re: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:55:36 +0100

674 lines

Re: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:21:37 +0200

346 lines

Re: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data

Chris Tinsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:33:29 +0100

670 lines

Re: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data

Bill Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:34:54 +0100

28 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager