JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


May 2012


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

« NO MARKING REQUIRED » Re: [data-protection] ICO website down (2 messages)
"The Power of Information" Department of Health (2 messages)
Babies and FearSquare (are we just creatures of habit?) (2 messages)
Biometrics in Schools (11 messages)
Biometrics in Schools [UNCLASSIFIED] (1 message)
Book Review (1 message)
Can we ever control our digital persona or is the DPA only an illusion? (1 message)
Cash Converters / Cash Shop etc (2 messages)
cloud computing (2 messages)
Cloud Computing and the Law Webcast - 30 May 2012 at 2pm - JISC Legal (1 message)
Comms Data (1 message)
Comms Data Proposals (1 message)
Consent to disclose (2 messages)
Cookie Law (8 messages)
Copy of Members Notification Template (1 message)
CSA and Council Tax (3 messages)
Data loss: from the Islington Gazette (1 message)
Data Protection and Freedom of Expression - Debating the way ahead (1 message)
Data Protection Officer (1 message)
Data Quality policy to share? (1 message)
DCMS Report into Phone hacking (1 message)
Disclosure to the Police (1 message)
Document Retention & Information Audits (1 message)
Draft_Communications_Data_Bill content if interested (1 message)
DWP Staff and Personal Data (5 messages)
DWP Staff and Personal Data [wider question on obtaining information from the police] (4 messages)
ETHICOMP 2013: University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark, 12-14 June 2013 (1 message)
Family CAF Assessment (1 message)
FearSquare (1 message)
Fees to obscure or blur out CCTV images (2 messages)
FW: Hawktalk: Fines for non-registration with the police? Reforms permit enhanced secondary use of electoral rolls (1 message)
FW: Hawktalk:ICO decides that European Commission's criticism of the Data Protection Act should be published (1 message)
Fwd: [data-protection] FearSquare (1 message)
Google is the new Peeping Tom (2 messages)
Hawktalk: Council officials gain access to tax records; powers extend well beyond the justification for data sharing (1 message)
ICO - out of action (1 message)
ICO Consultation (1 message)
ICO Fines List (4 messages)
ICO website down (3 messages)
Internal Use of CCTV Images (2 messages)
Investigative journalism and SAR (phonehacking) (3 messages)
Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation (13 messages)
Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information (6 messages)
Is it Personal Data ? (6 messages)
ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other? (5 messages)
Latest ICO "fine" (1 message)
Members and data (2 messages)
Members Notification Template (4 messages)
MPs and Criminal Offences (1 message)
New FOI Podcast (1 message)
Notification for New Members (6 messages)
Ooops! Draft_Communications_Data_Bill content if interested (1 message)
OSC Inspections (3 messages)
Privacy Statement re Public Consultation Document (2 messages)
Private Setectives (1 message)
Professional Privacy Memberships (1 message)
Protection of Freedoms Act (1 message)
Protection of Freedoms Bill (1 message)
Q: Decision Notices & Late Reliance on Exemptions (4 messages)
Qualifications (1 message)
Recovering costs for a court order to disclose personal information? Is this right? (4 messages)
Relevant Purpose? (4 messages)
retention of emails of ex-staff members (3 messages)
SAR - Copy Preparation and Presentation (3 messages)
Scottish FOI Qualification (5 messages)
Second NHS Fine (1 message)
Sort of Fair Processing Notice (1 message)
storage of records (2 messages)
Subject Access & Info re Parent (2 messages)
Subject Access to Anti-Social Behaviour Records (2 messages)
Third party data (2 messages)
When the dead rise – Do they ever die. (6 messages)
[SPAM?]: [data-protection] Scottish FOI Qualification (1 message)
[Wider question on obtaining information from the police] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

« NO MARKING REQUIRED » Re: [data-protection] ICO website down

« NO MARKING REQUIRED » Re: [data-protection] ICO website down

Mike Gater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 10:57:30 +0100

105 lines

Re: « NO MARKING REQUIRED » Re: [data-protection] ICO website down

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 10:18:29 +0000

171 lines

New Thread

"The Power of Information" Department of Health

"The Power of Information" Department of Health

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 14:12:31 +0100

536 lines

Re: "The Power of Information" Department of Health

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 17:52:23 +0000

451 lines

New Thread

Babies and FearSquare (are we just creatures of habit?)

Babies and FearSquare (are we just creatures of habit?)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 17:17:26 +0000

335 lines

Re: Babies and FearSquare (are we just creatures of habit?)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 12:24:50 +0000

82 lines

New Thread

Biometrics in Schools

Biometrics in Schools

Aston Information Security <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:04:16 +0100

376 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:14:15 +0100

398 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Lemon, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:15:06 +0100

492 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:16:24 +0100

337 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:13:36 +0100

329 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:18:43 +0100

934 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Gibson, Martin (ICT) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:22:54 +0100

673 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 11:08:09 +0100

638 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Aston Information Security <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 15:09:45 +0100

356 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2012 16:18:49 +0100

631 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2012 17:36:21 +0200

789 lines

New Thread

Biometrics in Schools [UNCLASSIFIED]

Re: Biometrics in Schools [UNCLASSIFIED]

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:21:26 +0100

488 lines

New Thread

Book Review

Book Review

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2012 12:21:40 +0100

86 lines

New Thread

Can we ever control our digital persona or is the DPA only an illusion?

Can we ever control our digital persona or is the DPA only an illusion?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 18:08:32 +0000

181 lines

New Thread

Cash Converters / Cash Shop etc

Cash Converters / Cash Shop etc

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 15:50:18 +0100

216 lines

Re: Cash Converters / Cash Shop etc

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 16:58:19 +0200

283 lines

New Thread

cloud computing

cloud computing

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 08:53:11 +0100

84 lines

Re: cloud computing

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 12:10:55 -0400

426 lines

New Thread

Cloud Computing and the Law Webcast - 30 May 2012 at 2pm - JISC Legal

Cloud Computing and the Law Webcast - 30 May 2012 at 2pm - JISC Legal

John X Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 13:43:57 +0100

84 lines

New Thread

Comms Data

Comms Data

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 12:17:00 +0100

143 lines

New Thread

Comms Data Proposals

Comms Data Proposals

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 12:29:32 +0100

110 lines

New Thread

Consent to disclose

Consent to disclose

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 09:43:21 +0100

29 lines

Re: Consent to disclose

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 10:47:30 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

Cookie Law

Cookie Law

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 12:44:24 +0100

27 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Moore, Craig <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 12:58:26 +0100

69 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 13:11:24 +0100

146 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Ian Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 13:57:11 +0100

181 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 11:49:01 +0000

249 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 08:40:29 -0400

316 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Ian Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 14:08:30 +0100

343 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 14:24:01 +0100

377 lines

New Thread

Copy of Members Notification Template

Copy of Members Notification Template

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:58:51 +0100

91 lines

New Thread

CSA and Council Tax

CSA and Council Tax

Lindsay Foody <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 09:41:34 +0100

32 lines

Re: CSA and Council Tax

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 09:48:57 +0100

111 lines

Re: CSA and Council Tax

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 12:00:04 +0200

289 lines

New Thread

Data loss: from the Islington Gazette

Data loss: from the Islington Gazette

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2012 16:03:38 +0100

177 lines

New Thread

Data Protection and Freedom of Expression - Debating the way ahead

Data Protection and Freedom of Expression - Debating the way ahead

David Erdos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 18:22:59 +0000

201 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Officer

Data Protection Officer

Murphy, April DCR <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2012 13:12:33 +0100

420 lines

New Thread

Data Quality policy to share?

Data Quality policy to share?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2012 13:04:33 +0000

217 lines

New Thread

DCMS Report into Phone hacking

DCMS Report into Phone hacking

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 11:40:33 +0100

84 lines

New Thread

Disclosure to the Police

Disclosure to the Police

Powell, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2012 17:10:46 +0100

202 lines

New Thread

Document Retention & Information Audits

Document Retention & Information Audits

Paula Tighe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 10:11:18 +0000

243 lines

New Thread

Draft_Communications_Data_Bill content if interested

Draft_Communications_Data_Bill content if interested

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 13:29:50 +0100

124 lines

New Thread

DWP Staff and Personal Data

DWP Staff and Personal Data

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 08:31:41 +0100

90 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 10:07:03 +0100

417 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 10:11:21 +0100

708 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 10:43:14 +0100

963 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 14:15:27 +0100

956 lines

New Thread

DWP Staff and Personal Data [wider question on obtaining information from the police]

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data [wider question on obtaining information from the police]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 11:32:52 +0000

465 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data [wider question on obtaining information from the police]

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 16:16:27 +0100

623 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data [wider question on obtaining information from the police]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 11:58:00 +0000

380 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data [wider question on obtaining information from the police]

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 13:59:10 +0100

237 lines

New Thread

ETHICOMP 2013: University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark, 12-14 June 2013

ETHICOMP 2013: University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark, 12-14 June 2013

CCSR Web Master <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 16:29:32 +0100

277 lines

New Thread

Family CAF Assessment

Family CAF Assessment

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 16:54:43 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

FearSquare

FearSquare

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 11:08:39 +0100

96 lines

New Thread

Fees to obscure or blur out CCTV images

Fees to obscure or blur out CCTV images

Hodge, Alex DCR <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 09:39:20 +0100

469 lines

Re: Fees to obscure or blur out CCTV images

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 09:43:01 +0100

920 lines

New Thread

FW: Hawktalk: Fines for non-registration with the police? Reforms permit enhanced secondary use of electoral rolls

FW: Hawktalk: Fines for non-registration with the police? Reforms permit enhanced secondary use of electoral rolls

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2012 23:53:59 +0100

205 lines

New Thread

FW: Hawktalk:ICO decides that European Commission's criticism of the Data Protection Act should be published

FW: Hawktalk:ICO decides that European Commission's criticism of the Data Protection Act should be published

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2012 09:05:40 +0100

233 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [data-protection] FearSquare

Fwd: [data-protection] FearSquare

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 May 2012 10:36:03 +0100

227 lines

New Thread

Google is the new Peeping Tom

Google is the new Peeping Tom

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 May 2012 21:40:07 +0100

36 lines

Re: Google is the new Peeping Tom

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 11:01:43 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Council officials gain access to tax records; powers extend well beyond the justification for data sharing

Hawktalk: Council officials gain access to tax records; powers extend well beyond the justification for data sharing

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 13:15:21 +0100

237 lines

New Thread

ICO - out of action

ICO - out of action

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 13:30:37 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

ICO Consultation

ICO Consultation

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2012 11:38:58 +0100

117 lines

New Thread

ICO Fines List

ICO Fines List

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 08:47:30 +0100

118 lines

Re: ICO Fines List

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 09:45:19 +0100

384 lines

Re: ICO Fines List

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 09:58:07 +0100

455 lines

Re: ICO Fines List

Kevin Tarleton (0161 923 6305) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 11:20:25 +0100

834 lines

New Thread

ICO website down

ICO website down

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 10:46:29 +0100

29 lines

Re: ICO website down

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 10:52:59 +0100

97 lines

Re: ICO website down

Richard Hopkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 14:15:14 +0100

70 lines

New Thread

Internal Use of CCTV Images

Internal Use of CCTV Images

Hannah Tessyman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2012 13:09:20 +0100

254 lines

Re: Internal Use of CCTV Images

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 9 May 2012 11:28:19 +0100

280 lines

New Thread

Investigative journalism and SAR (phonehacking)

Investigative journalism and SAR (phonehacking)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 15:13:42 +0000

246 lines

Re: Investigative journalism and SAR (phonehacking)

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 16:31:21 +0100

492 lines

Re: Investigative journalism and SAR (phonehacking)

Robert (Bob) Waixel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 19:46:16 +0100

203 lines

New Thread

Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:19:14 +0100

309 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:19:07 +0100

581 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:31:04 +0100

584 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:38:44 +0100

775 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 11:51:11 +0200

721 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 12:00:24 +0100

218 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 12:57:46 +0100

370 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 14:34:47 +0200

482 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 13:38:18 +0100

571 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 13:39:39 +0100

927 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 13:50:00 +0100

553 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 13:49:26 +0100

824 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 May 2012 09:18:54 +0100

145 lines

New Thread

Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information

Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 May 2012 09:52:13 +0100

113 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:02:19 +0100

634 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:07:44 +0100

812 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:02:35 +0100

512 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information

George Ross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:15:32 +0100

52 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:32:23 +0100

636 lines

New Thread

Is it Personal Data ?

Is it Personal Data ?

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 15:42:07 +0100

32 lines

Re: Is it Personal Data ?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 16:47:55 +0200

139 lines

Re: Is it Personal Data ?

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 15:48:02 +0100

89 lines

Re: Is it Personal Data ?

Bill Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 15:50:16 +0100

33 lines

Re: Is it Personal Data ?

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 15:53:06 +0100

167 lines

Re: Is it Personal Data ?

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 16:02:21 +0100

204 lines

New Thread

ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 11:20:52 +0000

230 lines

ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 12:57:31 +0100

590 lines

Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Lisa Souza - PDP <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 14:27:09 +0100

958 lines

Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Ian Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 09:15:25 +0100

471 lines

Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 14:53:00 +0000

696 lines

New Thread

Latest ICO "fine"

Latest ICO "fine"

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 11:09:44 +0100

232 lines

New Thread

Members and data

Members and data

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 11:22:44 +0100

29 lines

Re: Members and data

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 17:37:17 +0100

78 lines

New Thread

Members Notification Template

Members Notification Template

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 09:47:39 +0100

71 lines

Members Notification Template

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 09:51:27 +0100

34 lines

Re: Members Notification Template

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 16 May 2012 09:56:13 +0100

68 lines

Re: Members Notification Template

Sylvia Reynolds <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:52:51 +0100

279 lines

New Thread

MPs and Criminal Offences

MPs and Criminal Offences

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 08:49:39 +0100

116 lines

New Thread

New FOI Podcast

New FOI Podcast

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 May 2012 13:41:45 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Notification for New Members

Notification for New Members

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:11:54 +0100

242 lines

Re: Notification for New Members

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:43:44 +0100

524 lines

Notification for New Members

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 11:07:45 +0100

358 lines

Re: Notification for New Members

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 12:51:45 +0200

453 lines

Notification for New Members

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 11:59:52 +0100

348 lines

Re: Notification for New Members

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 12:01:33 +0100

600 lines

New Thread

Ooops! Draft_Communications_Data_Bill content if interested

Ooops! Draft_Communications_Data_Bill content if interested

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 13:34:05 +0100

309 lines

New Thread

OSC Inspections

OSC Inspections

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:11:25 +0100

48 lines

Re: OSC Inspections

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:24:58 +0100

98 lines

Re: OSC Inspections

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 11:31:17 +0100

200 lines

New Thread

Privacy Statement re Public Consultation Document

Privacy Statement re Public Consultation Document

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 12:36:59 +0100

214 lines

Re: Privacy Statement re Public Consultation Document

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 15:00:51 +0200

420 lines

New Thread

Private Setectives

Private Setectives

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 08:35:09 +0100

84 lines

New Thread

Professional Privacy Memberships

Professional Privacy Memberships

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 10:53:38 +0100

450 lines

New Thread

Protection of Freedoms Act

Protection of Freedoms Act

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 10:49:09 +0100

121 lines

New Thread

Protection of Freedoms Bill

Protection of Freedoms Bill

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 17:52:00 +0100

134 lines

New Thread

Q: Decision Notices & Late Reliance on Exemptions

Q: Decision Notices & Late Reliance on Exemptions

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2012 14:21:40 +0100

40 lines

Re: Q: Decision Notices & Late Reliance on Exemptions

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2012 20:28:55 +0200

169 lines

Re: Q: Decision Notices & Late Reliance on Exemptions

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2012 09:52:02 +0100

520 lines

Re: Q: Decision Notices & Late Reliance on Exemptions

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2012 19:48:11 +0200

493 lines

New Thread

Qualifications

Qualifications

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 23 May 2012 15:06:44 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Recovering costs for a court order to disclose personal information? Is this right?

Recovering costs for a court order to disclose personal information? Is this right?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 09:35:26 +0000

67 lines

Re: Recovering costs for a court order to disclose personal information? Is this right?

Powell, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 11:13:42 +0100

275 lines

Re: Recovering costs for a court order to disclose personal information? Is this right?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 11:27:03 +0100

604 lines

Re: Recovering costs for a court order to disclose personal information? Is this right?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 10:46:46 +0000

773 lines

New Thread

Relevant Purpose?

Relevant Purpose?

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 12:02:49 +0100

69 lines

Re: Relevant Purpose?

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 13:44:04 +0100

153 lines

Re: Relevant Purpose?

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 13:49:57 +0100

188 lines

Re: Relevant Purpose?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 15:18:19 +0200

399 lines

New Thread

retention of emails of ex-staff members

retention of emails of ex-staff members

Barlow, Jackie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 09:23:23 +0000

294 lines

Re: retention of emails of ex-staff members

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 10:37:58 +0100

650 lines

Re: retention of emails of ex-staff members

Mark D. B. Humphrys <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2012 11:25:13 +0000

790 lines

New Thread

SAR - Copy Preparation and Presentation

SAR - Copy Preparation and Presentation

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 12:01:24 +0100

36 lines

Re: SAR - Copy Preparation and Presentation

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 13:37:11 +0200

155 lines

Re: SAR - Copy Preparation and Presentation

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 13:39:32 +0200

144 lines

New Thread

Scottish FOI Qualification

Scottish FOI Qualification

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 01:04:22 +0100

127 lines

Re: Scottish FOI Qualification

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 08:33:26 +0100

499 lines

Re: Scottish FOI Qualification

Moore, Craig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 08:48:17 +0100

454 lines

Re: Scottish FOI Qualification

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 30 May 2012 09:58:57 +0100

741 lines

Re: Scottish FOI Qualification

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 10:26:39 +0100

783 lines

New Thread

Second NHS Fine

Second NHS Fine

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2012 11:29:05 +0100

113 lines

New Thread

Sort of Fair Processing Notice

Sort of Fair Processing Notice

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2012 11:41:33 +0100

113 lines

New Thread

storage of records

storage of records

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 10:05:57 +0100

86 lines

storage of records

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 13:21:17 +0100

87 lines

New Thread

Subject Access & Info re Parent

Subject Access & Info re Parent

Lindsay Foody <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2012 16:59:48 +0100

34 lines

Re: Subject Access & Info re Parent

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2012 19:37:31 +0200

152 lines

New Thread

Subject Access to Anti-Social Behaviour Records

Subject Access to Anti-Social Behaviour Records

Lindsay Foody <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 08:27:11 +0100

31 lines

Re: Subject Access to Anti-Social Behaviour Records

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 08:46:00 +0100

112 lines

New Thread

Third party data

Third party data

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 13:14:33 +0100

29 lines

Re: Third party data

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 16:50:25 +0200

133 lines

New Thread

When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2012 10:42:27 +0100

76 lines

Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2012 11:27:34 +0100

282 lines

Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2012 12:59:36 +0200

282 lines

Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2012 12:10:37 +0000

250 lines

Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2012 13:57:48 +0100

616 lines

Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2012 20:29:27 +0100

67 lines

New Thread

[SPAM?]: [data-protection] Scottish FOI Qualification

Re: [SPAM?]: [data-protection] Scottish FOI Qualification

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 06:44:10 +0100

291 lines

New Thread

[Wider question on obtaining information from the police]

Re: [Wider question on obtaining information from the police]

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 10:14:05 +0100

203 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager