JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


May 2012


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Chronologically

Size

New Truck driver for May

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:01:00 -0500

80 lines

Listening 2

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2012 13:34:44 -0500

67 lines

pat snap .¬_-*.¬_-*.¬_-*Wednesday, 02 May 2012

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 07:50:32 +0100

27 lines

Re: pat snap .¬_-*.¬_-*.¬_-*Wednesday, 02 May 2012

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 17:15:39 +1000

22 lines

Re: pat snap .¬_-*.¬_-*.¬_-*Wednesday, 02 May 2012

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 08:51:19 +0100

55 lines

snap: parade

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 18:18:34 +1000

54 lines

snap: i.m. a friend

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 23:06:03 +0930

36 lines

Re: pat snap .¬_-*.¬_-*.¬_-*Wednesday, 02 May 2012

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 23:06:59 +0930

61 lines

Re: snap: i.m. a friend

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 06:42:40 -0700

43 lines

Re: snap: i.m. a friend

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 23:16:57 +0930

52 lines

Re: pat snap .¬_-*.¬_-*.¬_-*Wednesday, 02 May 2012

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 06:47:25 -0700

32 lines

Re: snap: parade

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 08:51:35 -0600

96 lines

Re: snap: i.m. a friend

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 08:56:53 -0600

77 lines

snap ping

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 09:09:16 -0600

55 lines

Re: snap: parade

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 17:20:58 +0100

101 lines

Re: snap ping

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 17:22:01 +0100

63 lines

Re: snap: i.m. a friend

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 10:05:11 -0700

20 lines

Re: pat snap .¬_-*.¬_-*.¬_-*Wednesday, 02 May 2012

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 08:19:17 +1000

21 lines

Re: Foucault, what is an author

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 08:23:26 +1000

18 lines

Re: pat snap .¬_-*.¬_-*.¬_-*Wednesday, 02 May 2012

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2012 18:29:52 -0400

28 lines

Re: death of the author-online

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 08:31:20 +1000

30 lines

Re: snap: i.m. a friend

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 11:36:05 +0800

64 lines

Re: death of the author-online

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 06:14:23 +0100

53 lines

Re: death of the author-online

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 08:05:07 +0100

62 lines

my poetry book is only £3-99 on Amazon

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 08:30:32 +0100

15 lines

Re: my poetry book is only £3-99 on Amazon

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 08:32:17 +0100

31 lines

Re: my poetry book is only £3-99 on Amazon

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 08:40:05 +0100

46 lines

Re: my poetry book is only £3-99 on Amazon

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 08:51:44 +0100

61 lines

Re: my poetry book is only £3-99 on Amazon

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 17:59:12 +1000

35 lines

Re: my poetry book is only £3-99 on Amazon

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 09:43:52 +0100

91 lines

Re: snap ping

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 19:14:32 +1000

28 lines

19th update

Walter Daniel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 12:19:18 +0100

25 lines

University of Toronto Quaterly 81.2 Spring 2012 now available online

UTP Journals <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 10:34:55 -0400

371 lines

Re: my poetry book is only £3-99 on Amazon

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 17:18:41 +0100

106 lines

Listening 2

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2012 15:30:28 -0500

68 lines

More BBQ long poem

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2012 14:03:59 +1000

50 lines

Re: More BBQ long poem

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2012 14:58:47 +1000

16 lines

enforced silence

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 May 2012 11:26:16 +0200

24 lines

Re: enforced silence

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 May 2012 15:03:57 +0100

35 lines

20th update

Walter Daniel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 May 2012 01:17:33 +0100

25 lines

Re: enforced silence

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 May 2012 13:34:26 +0200

60 lines

Re: death of the author-online

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2012 17:17:08 +1000

27 lines

who do you love?

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2012 17:13:15 +0800

19 lines

Re: death of the author-online

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2012 11:40:26 +0100

60 lines

book launch

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2012 00:16:08 +0800

42 lines

Listening 2

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2012 15:19:58 -0500

70 lines

Re: book launch

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2012 10:45:32 -0600

95 lines

[Fwd: Re: Benedict Taylor's film sonic visuals]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2012 18:54:54 +0200

33 lines

found poem

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2012 18:47:05 +0100

28 lines

Re: found poem

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2012 11:51:16 -0600

70 lines

Notice: Mudlark

William Slaughter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2012 17:27:53 -0400

38 lines

post-budget snap

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 13:34:21 +1000

22 lines

snap: wednesday

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 15:41:35 +1000

38 lines

Re: snap: wednesday

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 07:05:15 +0100

48 lines

pat snap -)))))))))*((((((((-Wednesday, 09 May 2012

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 07:08:59 +0100

25 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 07:33:00 +0100

68 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 16:36:09 +1000

29 lines

Re: pat snap -)))))))))*((((((((-Wednesday, 09 May 2012

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 16:40:36 +1000

18 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Benedict Taylor's film sonic visuals]

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 18:05:40 +1000

43 lines

Re: snap: wednesday

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 16:47:05 +0800

65 lines

In The Long Paddock

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 16:57:02 +0800

24 lines

Re: found poem

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 12:07:48 +0200

45 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Benedict Taylor's film sonic visuals]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 12:14:30 +0200

75 lines

Snap: Music on a train

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 12:27:37 +0200

35 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Benedict Taylor's film sonic visuals]

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 16:49:04 +0100

85 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Benedict Taylor's film sonic visuals]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 18:00:51 +0200

122 lines

Re: Snap: Music on a train

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 09:24:30 -0700

42 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Benedict Taylor's film sonic visuals]

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 17:44:07 +0100

146 lines

Re: Snap: Music on a train

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 18:49:03 +0200

37 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Benedict Taylor's film sonic visuals]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 19:00:53 +0200

189 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 15:47:58 -0600

105 lines

Re: snap: wednesday

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 15:51:23 -0600

91 lines

Re: Snap: Music on a train

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 16:13:28 -0600

62 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Benedict Taylor's film sonic visuals]

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 23:20:18 +0100

203 lines

Re: Snap: Music on a train

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 09:34:29 +0930

69 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 09:37:13 +0930

117 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 17:22:04 -0700

124 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 10:13:18 +0930

137 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2012 17:46:31 -0700

156 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 10:27:49 +0930

66 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Benedict Taylor's film sonic visuals]

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 11:18:53 +1000

89 lines

Re: Snap: Music on a train

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 10:40:43 +0800

90 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Benedict Taylor's film sonic visuals]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 11:51:44 +0200

255 lines

Re: Snap: Music on a train

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 13:09:07 +0200

95 lines

Re: Snap: Music on a train

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 13:12:27 +0200

132 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Benedict Taylor's film sonic visuals]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 13:41:33 +0200

139 lines

Found, a ( faded) snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 13:25:46 +0100

44 lines

[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: Benedict Taylor's film sonic visuals]]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 14:34:20 +0200

41 lines

Re: Found, a ( faded) snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 16:22:47 +0100

61 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 09:40:26 -0600

112 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 17:42:46 +0200

135 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Benedict Taylor's film sonic visuals]

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 18:03:35 +0100

266 lines

Re: Found, a ( faded) snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 21:04:18 +0100

83 lines

Notice: Mudlark

William Slaughter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2012 17:48:49 -0400

29 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 15:25:02 +0800

158 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 20:41:51 +1000

19 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 12:43:31 +0200

36 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 22:29:19 +0930

55 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 15:16:46 +0200

108 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 21:17:17 +0800

84 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 15:57:45 +0200

160 lines

Re: Found, a ( faded) snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 17:15:04 +0100

61 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 17:51:01 +0100

177 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 21:14:28 +0200

219 lines

Re: Found, a ( faded) snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2012 23:40:16 +0100

86 lines

Re: Found, a ( faded) snap

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2012 09:44:46 +1000

71 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2012 13:36:11 +0930

116 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2012 13:48:49 +0930

90 lines

Re: Found, a ( faded) snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2012 06:52:01 +0100

98 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2012 19:39:04 +1000

52 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2012 11:52:18 +0200

78 lines

Re: Found, a ( faded) snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2012 08:57:37 -0600

54 lines

Re: post-budget snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2012 09:06:12 -0600

134 lines

Landscapes: Periglis, from near Burnt Island

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2012 19:34:23 +0200

39 lines

Re: Found, a ( faded) snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2012 18:35:57 +0100

78 lines

who runs the internet?

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2012 11:55:24 +1000

22 lines

21st update

Walter Daniel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2012 06:18:24 +0100

25 lines

on my cockpit

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2012 17:42:52 +1000

29 lines

HEX

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2012 10:22:44 +0100

26 lines

Re: HEX

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2012 12:32:18 +0100

33 lines

Re: HEX

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2012 14:04:18 +0100

57 lines

Re: HEX

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2012 18:37:11 +0100

43 lines

Re: HEX

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2012 18:53:53 +0100

43 lines

Re: HEX

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2012 19:05:30 +0100

85 lines

Re: Found, a ( faded) snap

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 08:34:37 +1000

27 lines

Re: who runs the internet?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 08:30:03 -0600

66 lines

Re: Landscapes: Periglis, from near Burnt Island

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 09:39:12 -0600

87 lines

Re: Landscapes: Periglis, from near Burnt Island

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 17:47:46 +0200

114 lines

Seven Pits: 14/05/2012

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 17:30:45 +0100

20 lines

Re: Seven Pits: 14/05/2012

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 18:35:22 +0200

35 lines

Re: Seven Pits: 14/05/2012

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 11:14:38 -0600

81 lines

Re: Seven Pits: 14/05/2012

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 19:05:49 +0100

32 lines

Re: Seven Pits: 14/05/2012

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 19:28:48 +0100

51 lines

Call for work

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 15:15:52 -0500

71 lines

Re: Seven Pits: 14/05/2012

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2012 22:55:09 +0100

20 lines

Re: Seven Pits: 14/05/2012

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 09:36:42 +0800

35 lines

Re: Seven Pits: 14/05/2012

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 09:45:55 +0100

16 lines

Re: Seven Pits: 14/05/2012

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 19:25:59 +1000

27 lines

to my doctor

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 19:30:54 +1000

15 lines

Re: to my doctor

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 12:02:47 +0100

26 lines

Re: Seven Pits: 14/05/2012

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2012 08:56:22 -0600

59 lines

snap: ruffey and pukekura

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:38:55 +1000

54 lines

Re: snap: ruffey and pukekura

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 06:17:50 +0100

75 lines

pat snap *(*)*-_____________________Wednesday, 16 May 2012

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 07:04:03 +0100

25 lines

Re: snap: ruffey and pukekura

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 07:18:35 +0100

67 lines

Re: snap: ruffey and pukekura

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 14:55:35 +0800

95 lines

Re: pat snap *(*)*-_____________________Wednesday, 16 May 2012

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 08:19:01 +0100

51 lines

Re: pat snap *(*)*-_____________________Wednesday, 16 May 2012

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 08:47:36 +0100

65 lines

Re: pat snap *(*)*-_____________________Wednesday, 16 May 2012

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:32:54 +0100

100 lines

Re: snap: ruffey and pukekura

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:46:59 +0100

86 lines

Landscapes -- Periglis from the farm

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 16:11:18 +0200

40 lines

not really a snap was it

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 16:22:45 +0200

39 lines

snap: snail pace

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 23:13:01 +0800

30 lines

Extra line breaks

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 16:15:36 +0100

19 lines

Re: snap: snail pace

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 16:20:36 +0100

43 lines

Re: snap: snail pace

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 17:25:19 +0200

57 lines

Re: snap: snail pace

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 16:29:02 +0100

65 lines

Re: snap: ruffey and pukekura

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:15:36 -0600

128 lines

should be asleep snap

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2012 01:49:18 +0930

58 lines

Re: not really a snap was it

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:19:51 -0600

88 lines

Re: snap: snail pace

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2012 01:52:08 +0930

40 lines

Re: pat snap *(*)*-_____________________Wednesday, 16 May 2012

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2012 01:54:39 +0930

30 lines

Re: should be asleep snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:35:52 -0600

100 lines

Re: snap: snail pace

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:37:23 -0600

82 lines

snapthought

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:45:25 -0600

56 lines

Re: should be asleep snap

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2012 02:15:41 +0930

111 lines

Re: Lapham quotation

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 11:57:17 -0500

81 lines

Re: pat snap *(*)*-_____________________Wednesday, 16 May 2012

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 18:58:05 +0100

39 lines

snap May Two Six

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 17:20:04 -0700

32 lines

Re: snapthought

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2012 10:47:26 +0800

69 lines

Doug's piece

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 21:02:46 -0700

26 lines

Re: Doug's piece

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2012 22:55:23 -0700

39 lines

Re: snap May Two Six

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2012 08:31:03 -0600

75 lines

Re: Doug's piece

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2012 08:49:03 -0600

83 lines

Re: snap May Two Six

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2012 09:19:32 -0700

81 lines

Reading: final reminder

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2012 10:36:12 -0400

13 lines

Re: Reading: final reminder

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2012 22:50:23 +0800

25 lines

Revised: Final Reminder: Poetry Reading

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2012 10:56:19 -0400

17 lines

Re: Reading: final reminder

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2012 11:03:33 -0600

68 lines

Re: Revised: Final Reminder: Poetry Reading

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2012 11:04:19 -0600

59 lines

Perconger

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2012 20:32:25 +0200

49 lines

RIP Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2012 15:54:23 -0500

66 lines

Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 17 May 2012 to 18 May 2012 (#2012-136)"

Tom Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 00:11:47 +0100

27 lines

Re: Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 17 May 2012 to 18 May 2012 (#2012-136)"

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2012 18:42:04 -0500

97 lines

Re: Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 17 May 2012 to 18 May 2012 (#2012-136)"

James Cervantes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2012 18:49:01 -0500

29 lines

Re: RIP Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau

James Cervantes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2012 18:49:28 -0500

107 lines

Re: to my doctor

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 15:11:10 +1000

24 lines

Re: RIP Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 06:12:47 +0100

135 lines

Paris Review plus SWF FYI

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 15:19:20 +1000

27 lines

Re: Paris Review plus SWF FYI

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 14:56:06 +0930

44 lines

Re: Paris Review plus SWF FYI

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 15:42:45 +1000

19 lines

Re: Perconger

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 15:57:04 +1000

58 lines

Re: Perconger

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2012 23:05:23 -0700

64 lines

Re: to my doctor

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 07:08:13 +0100

64 lines

Re: RIP Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 17:22:01 +1000

155 lines

Swindle revise yet again....

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:49:59 +1000

39 lines

Re: what is a long poem (was to my doctor)

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 17:56:11 +1000

48 lines

Re: what is a long poem (was to my doctor)

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 18:19:35 +1000

28 lines

22nd update

Walter Daniel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 12:09:58 +0100

25 lines

Re: Perconger

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 08:46:20 -0600

114 lines

Re: what is a long poem (was to my doctor)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 09:02:14 -0600

91 lines

a short longish poem?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 09:06:59 -0600

55 lines

Casino snap 05/17/2012

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 09:13:15 -0600

62 lines

Re: Perconger

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 11:45:28 +0200

152 lines

<No subject>

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 15:51:33 +0200

18 lines

Re: Perconger

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 17:00:34 +0200

136 lines

[Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 15:04:16 +0200

169 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 09:34:01 -0600

248 lines

Re: Paris Review plus SWF FYI

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 10:37:28 -0500

97 lines

Re: RIP Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 10:46:54 -0500

217 lines

<No subject>

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 17:01:17 +0100

28 lines

W S Graham as a difficult poet

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 18:01:15 +0200

54 lines

<No subject>

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 11:07:14 -0500

90 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 18:29:21 +0200

279 lines

tonight

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 18:23:36 +0100

15 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 10:37:03 -0700

293 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 19:43:33 +0200

345 lines

Re: tonight

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 19:44:53 +0200

40 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 10:49:15 -0700

354 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 19:56:48 +0200

435 lines

Re: tonight

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 18:58:10 +0100

42 lines

[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: Perconger]]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 19:58:17 +0200

457 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 19:13:27 +0100

243 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 12:04:26 -0700

239 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 23:06:04 +0100

303 lines

Have HEX on my Kindle Fire now - Bravo, Randolph and Louise!

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 15:21:06 -0700

14 lines

Re: Have HEX on my Kindle Fire now - Bravo, Randolph and Louise!

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 23:50:03 +0100

48 lines

Re: Have HEX on my Kindle Fire now - Bravo, Randolph and Louise!

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 15:51:02 -0700

14 lines

Re: a short longish poem?

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2012 10:37:30 +0800

82 lines

Re: Have HEX on my Kindle Fire now - Bravo, Randolph and Louise!

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2012 10:47:59 +0800

25 lines

Re: Have HEX on my Kindle Fire now - Bravo, Randolph and Louise!

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 22:21:56 -0700

69 lines

Fwd: Command confirmation request (F863F8BD)

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2012 15:29:44 +1000

69 lines

Re: Command confirmation request (F863F8BD)

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2012 23:46:30 -0600

93 lines

Kobo

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2012 10:54:09 +0100

52 lines

Re: Have HEX on my Kindle Fire now - Bravo, Randolph and Louise!

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2012 11:00:54 +0100

80 lines

Re: Kobo

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2012 19:56:01 +0930

67 lines

Re: tonight

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2012 15:56:30 +0100

52 lines

Re: tonight

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2012 15:57:17 +0100

56 lines

Re: tonight

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2012 00:31:02 +0930

67 lines

Re: tonight

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2012 23:08:04 +0800

74 lines

Re: tonight

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2012 17:16:26 +0100

72 lines

Listening 2

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2012 14:15:16 -0500

65 lines

Re: Have HEX on my Kindle Fire now - Bravo, Randolph and Louise!

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2012 12:20:28 -0700

98 lines

Re: Have HEX on my Kindle Fire now - Bravo, Randolph and Louise!

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2012 13:21:08 -0700

120 lines

Re: Perconger

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2012 17:24:25 +1000

28 lines

Re: what is a long poem (was to my doctor)

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2012 17:32:26 +1000

24 lines

Re: W S Graham as a difficult poet

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2012 17:44:15 +1000

25 lines

Aust poetry publishing

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2012 19:39:27 +1000

14 lines

Re: tonight

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2012 08:50:12 -0600

91 lines

Re: W S Graham as a difficult poet

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2012 09:04:19 -0600

103 lines

Re: Have HEX on my Kindle Fire now - Bravo, Randolph and Louise!

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2012 20:14:20 +0100

138 lines

and some more bbq

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2012 13:21:57 +1000

43 lines

First post

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2012 22:17:27 +1000

117 lines

Re: First post

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2012 13:34:48 +0100

140 lines

Listening 2

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2012 13:51:48 -0500

66 lines

Re: First post

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2012 14:16:41 -0600

182 lines

Re: First post

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2012 21:20:09 +0100

197 lines

Re: FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 14:50:35 +1000

23 lines

pat snapping .-{{{{{{{{{{{"""}}}}}}}}}-.

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 07:49:53 +0100

24 lines

Re: FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 09:29:35 +0200

64 lines

Re: FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 08:36:39 +0100

17 lines

Re: FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 09:51:59 +0200

36 lines

Re: FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 10:22:10 +0200

43 lines

snap: eek

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 18:22:50 +1000

64 lines

Re: FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 10:58:20 +0100

75 lines

snap - air, played

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 19:37:21 +0930

31 lines

Re: snap: eek

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 11:08:47 +0100

74 lines

FW: pat snapping .-{{{{{{{{{{{"""}}}}}}}}}-. reviso

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 11:10:42 +0100

33 lines

Re: snap - air, played

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 11:14:21 +0100

41 lines

Re: snap - air, played

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 18:15:49 +0800

52 lines

Re: snap: eek: scat

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 20:52:29 +1000

75 lines

Re: FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 13:31:30 +0200

105 lines

SNAP: Prime Minister preceded by an ex newspaper editor

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 13:55:56 +0200

38 lines

Re: Welcome noted

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 22:13:10 +1000

206 lines

Re: snap - air, played

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 21:47:04 +0930

61 lines

Re: First post - Notepadding it

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 22:48:37 +1000

149 lines

Re: First post - Notepadding it

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 14:12:31 +0100

166 lines

Re: pat snapping .-{{{{{{{{{{{"""}}}}}}}}}-.

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 09:18:17 -0600

64 lines

Re: pat snapping .-{{{{{{{{{{{"""}}}}}}}}}-.

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 00:54:25 +0930

73 lines

Re: FW: pat snapping .-{{{{{{{{{{{"""}}}}}}}}}-. reviso

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 16:25:00 +0100

62 lines

Re: SNAP: Prime Minister preceded by an ex newspaper editor

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 00:55:24 +0930

44 lines

Re: SNAP: Prime Minister preceded by an ex newspaper editor

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 17:29:27 +0200

55 lines

Re: snap - air, played

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 09:34:34 -0600

70 lines

Re: snap - air, played

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 01:07:46 +0930

78 lines

Re: First post - Notepadding it

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 09:38:33 -0600

194 lines

Re: SNAP: Prime Minister preceded by an ex newspaper editor

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 09:53:11 -0600

100 lines

Re: SNAP: Prime Minister preceded by an ex newspaper editor

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 17:57:14 +0200

23 lines

Re: First post

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 19:06:14 +0200

166 lines

Re: FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 12:53:51 -0700

12 lines

poetry in film festival!

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 07:33:26 +1000

11 lines

Re: poetryetc

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 09:46:59 +1000

23 lines

Re: poetryetc

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 09:52:12 +1000

35 lines

snap

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 18:15:13 -0600

28 lines

Re: Plain Texting it

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 10:42:53 +1000

209 lines

Re: grief snap

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 10:46:55 +1000

38 lines

Snap: Contemplating Motion

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 20:56:00 -0400

20 lines

Re: Snap: Contemplating Motion

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2012 20:58:34 -0400

30 lines

Re: FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 17:16:42 +1000

34 lines

Re: Plain Texting it

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 17:25:46 +1000

17 lines

Re: Casino snap 05/17/2012

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 18:45:41 +1000

26 lines

Re: snap - air, played

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 17:20:52 +0800

92 lines

Re: poetryetc

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 11:21:51 +0200

53 lines

Re: snap - air, played

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 19:21:29 +0930

71 lines

Re: FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 12:26:21 +0200

78 lines

Re: snap - air, played

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 18:30:40 +0800

86 lines

Re: poetryetc tagging device fitting

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 21:19:42 +1000

64 lines

Re: snap

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 20:01:42 +0800

40 lines

Re: Snap: Contemplating Motion

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 08:46:53 -0600

62 lines

Re: FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 08:59:18 -0600

61 lines

Re: snap - air, played

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 09:07:02 -0600

114 lines

Re: snap - air, played

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 00:39:53 +0930

120 lines

Re: FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 17:19:17 +0200

103 lines

Re: snap - air, played

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 17:21:22 +0200

161 lines

Re: snap - air, played

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 00:58:26 +0930

114 lines

pickies

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 17:52:18 +0200

34 lines

[Fwd: pickies]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 17:57:18 +0200

62 lines

Re: pickies

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 10:02:21 -0600

80 lines

Re: pickies

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 18:05:53 +0200

105 lines

Elidius on a rock

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 18:44:21 +0200

33 lines

Re: Elidius on a rock

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 09:47:28 -0700

38 lines

Re: Elidius on a rock

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 17:50:22 +0100

63 lines

Re: Elidius on a rock

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 19:10:21 +0200

84 lines

Re: Elidius on a rock

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 19:11:56 +0200

63 lines

Re: Elidius on a rock

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 11:29:09 -0600

112 lines

Re: Elidius on a rock

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 19:34:46 +0200

145 lines

Re: poetryetc

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2012 19:36:38 +0100

64 lines

Re: photography and FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 10:52:44 +1000

36 lines

Re: Snap: Contemplating Motion

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 11:17:42 +0800

80 lines

Re: Snap: Contemplating Motion

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 00:55:34 -0400

97 lines

Re: Snap: Contemplating Motion

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 13:17:37 +0800

111 lines

Re: snap - air, played

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 13:19:11 +0800

124 lines

Re: Snap: Contemplating Motion

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 01:22:24 -0400

122 lines

VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 19:32:43 +1000

57 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 13:37:02 +0200

85 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 12:46:02 +0100

114 lines

Re: photography and FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 09:01:00 -0600

93 lines

Re: photography and FYI [Fwd: Re: Perconger]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 17:28:50 +0200

140 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 17:07:38 +0100

100 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 11:45:59 -0600

149 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 20:12:13 +0100

156 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 12:18:33 -0700

185 lines

draft at the end of a bad day

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2012 23:07:41 +0100

63 lines

Re: draft at the end of a bad day

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 May 2012 09:23:01 -0600

108 lines

Re: Snap: Contemplating Motion

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 May 2012 17:08:58 +0100

39 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 May 2012 17:15:32 +0100

141 lines

Re: Snap: Contemplating Motion

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 May 2012 13:04:02 -0400

131 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 May 2012 18:24:58 +0100

56 lines

Re: draft at the end of a bad day

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 May 2012 18:26:53 +0100

44 lines

Re: Snap: Contemplating Motion

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 08:30:20 +1000

49 lines

Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 25 May 2012 to 26 May 2012 (#2012-144)"

Tom Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 00:03:39 +0100

27 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 00:04:37 +0100

110 lines

For Talha Ahsan

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 00:38:36 +0100

39 lines

Re: For Talha Ahsan

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 01:07:02 +0100

13 lines

Re: For Talha Ahsan

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 07:26:51 +0100

73 lines

Re: For Talha Ahsan

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 08:53:09 +0100

108 lines

School snap

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 19:37:47 +1000

39 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 10:47:46 +0100

159 lines

Whoops, that's mor n ing

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 20:21:47 +1000

43 lines

Re: Whoops, that's mor n ing

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 11:47:44 +0100

71 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 13:18:02 +0100

125 lines

23rd update

Walter Daniel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 13:22:45 +0100

25 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 18:55:31 +0100

186 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 19:05:55 +0100

172 lines

Re: For Talha Ahsan

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 23:02:15 +0100

19 lines

Re: VERY HEAVY: I must admit... for over the past six months

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 00:02:52 +0100

168 lines

Re: Whoops, that's mor n ing

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 00:05:05 +0100

84 lines

Re: pat snapping .-{{{{{{{{{{{"""}}}}}}}}}-.

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 00:19:00 +0100

72 lines

Re: School snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 00:23:33 +0100

50 lines

Monday meander

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 10:02:27 +1000

107 lines

from recent, unpublished American Ghazals

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 22:44:12 -0700

27 lines

Re: from recent, unpublished American Ghazals

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 13:55:54 +0800

40 lines

Re: from recent, unpublished American Ghazals

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2012 23:10:47 -0700

46 lines

Re: For Talha Ahsan

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 08:40:01 +0100

47 lines

Re: from recent, unpublished American Ghazals

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 08:50:46 +0100

74 lines

Re: School snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 10:13:26 +0200

69 lines

Elidius and the governor

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 11:00:25 +0200

77 lines

Re: Elidius and the governor

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 10:28:34 +0100

111 lines

Re: from recent, unpublished American Ghazals

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 17:49:08 +0800

33 lines

Re: from recent, unpublished American Ghazals

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 11:22:40 +0100

55 lines

Re: Elidius and the governor

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 12:58:45 +0200

127 lines

Re: from recent, unpublished American Ghazals

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 19:22:08 +0800

75 lines

Re: Elidius and the governor

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 13:25:20 +0100

25 lines

Re: Elidius and the governor

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 14:29:26 +0200

43 lines

pocket litter may 12

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 14:38:28 +0200

26 lines

Re: For Talha Ahsan

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 09:00:19 -0600

83 lines

Re: from recent, unpublished American Ghazals

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 09:08:04 -0600

120 lines

Re: from recent, unpublished American Ghazals

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2012 11:33:01 -0700

94 lines

pat snap no 425? ¬-_*::¬-_*::¬-_*:: Tuesday, 29 May 2012

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 08:21:58 +0100

26 lines

Stravinsky snap: Le Sacre ... it was 99 years ago today

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 17:46:57 +1000

18 lines

Re: pat snap no 425? ¬-_*::¬-_*::¬-_*:: Tuesday, 29 May 2012

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 08:56:08 +0100

56 lines

Re: Stravinsky snap: Le Sacre ... it was 99 years ago today

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 10:10:28 +0100

55 lines

Re: pat snap no 425? ¬-_*::¬-_*::¬-_*:: Tuesday, 29 May 2012

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 20:33:03 +1000

32 lines

Re: pat snap no 425? ¬-_*::¬-_*::¬-_*:: Tuesday, 29 May 2012

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 20:36:27 +1000

36 lines

Re: pat snap no 425? ¬-_*::¬-_*::¬-_*:: Tuesday, 29 May 2012

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 11:54:54 +0100

48 lines

Re: Stravinsky snap: Le Sacre ... it was 99 years ago today

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 11:53:02 -0600

87 lines

Re: Stravinsky snap: Le Sacre ... it was 99 years ago today

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2012 12:20:04 -0700

95 lines

verdictive

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 08:46:36 +1000

22 lines

Re: verdictive

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 00:03:09 +0100

13 lines

snap: julius katchen

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 09:41:55 +1000

74 lines

Not very snappy wednesdsy snap

Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 10:27:15 +1000

104 lines

Re: Not very snappy wednesdsy snap

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 10:56:51 +1000

133 lines

unusual in australia - uts in Sydney

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 15:42:12 +1000

64 lines

Re: verdictive

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 06:52:09 +0100

50 lines

Re: verdictive

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 07:05:59 +0100

87 lines

Re: Not very snappy wednesdsy snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 08:02:30 +0100

119 lines

Re: Not very snappy wednesdsy snap

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 17:19:38 +1000

57 lines

Snap: Call and response

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 10:30:15 +0200

60 lines

[Fwd: Snap: Call and response]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 11:20:49 +0200

89 lines

Re: publication contest!

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 11:23:08 +0200

28 lines

Re: unusual in australia - uts in Sydney

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 10:38:13 +0100

73 lines

Re: Not very snappy wednesdsy snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 10:39:15 +0100

140 lines

Re: Snap: Call and response

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 10:57:52 +0100

71 lines

Re: pat snap no 425? ¬-_*::¬-_*::¬-_*:: Tuesday, 29 May 2012

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 10:59:42 +0100

74 lines

Re: Snap: Call and response

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 12:07:58 +0200

110 lines

The new ebook from Argotist Ebooks is Memory Fictions by Lawrence Upton

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 12:53:19 +0200

38 lines

Re: verdictive

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 12:30:23 +0100

54 lines

Re: verdictive

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 13:05:23 +0100

92 lines

Re: verdictive

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 13:31:50 +0100

13 lines

Re: verdictive

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 14:06:12 +0100

37 lines

Re: snap: julius katchen

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 18:17:02 +0100

87 lines

Re: The new ebook from Argotist Ebooks is Memory Fictions by Lawrence Upton

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2012 20:31:52 +0100

49 lines

Re: snap: julius katchen

Andrew Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2012 12:16:59 +0800

97 lines

Re: unusual in australia - uts in Sydney

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2012 08:12:43 -0600

104 lines

Re: unusual in australia - uts in Sydney

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2012 10:19:03 -0400

110 lines

Re: unusual in australia - uts in Sydney / Francis Webb

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2012 06:23:23 +1000

60 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager