JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


May 2012


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Ian Welton

Thu, 31 May 2012 20:29:27 +0100

67 lines

Disclosure to the Police

Powell, Andrew

Thu, 31 May 2012 17:10:46 +0100

202 lines

Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 31 May 2012 13:57:48 +0100

616 lines

Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 31 May 2012 12:10:37 +0000

250 lines

Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Phil Bradshaw

Thu, 31 May 2012 12:59:36 +0200

282 lines

Sort of Fair Processing Notice

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 31 May 2012 11:41:33 +0100

113 lines

ICO Consultation

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 31 May 2012 11:38:58 +0100

117 lines

Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 31 May 2012 11:27:34 +0100

282 lines

When the dead rise – Do they ever die.

Ian Welton

Thu, 31 May 2012 10:42:27 +0100

76 lines

Re: Privacy Statement re Public Consultation Document

Phil Bradshaw

Wed, 30 May 2012 15:00:51 +0200

420 lines

Privacy Statement re Public Consultation Document

Ward, Ciaran

Wed, 30 May 2012 12:36:59 +0100

214 lines

Re: Scottish FOI Qualification

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 30 May 2012 10:26:39 +0100

783 lines

Re: Scottish FOI Qualification

<>

Wed, 30 May 2012 09:58:57 +0100

741 lines

Re: Scottish FOI Qualification

Moore, Craig

Wed, 30 May 2012 08:48:17 +0100

454 lines

Re: Scottish FOI Qualification

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 30 May 2012 08:33:26 +0100

499 lines

Re: [SPAM?]: [data-protection] Scottish FOI Qualification

KPG Professional Services

Wed, 30 May 2012 06:44:10 +0100

291 lines

Scottish FOI Qualification

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 30 May 2012 01:04:22 +0100

127 lines

Re: Recovering costs for a court order to disclose personal information? Is this right?

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 29 May 2012 10:46:46 +0000

773 lines

Re: Recovering costs for a court order to disclose personal information? Is this right?

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 29 May 2012 11:27:03 +0100

604 lines

Re: Recovering costs for a court order to disclose personal information? Is this right?

Powell, Andrew

Tue, 29 May 2012 11:13:42 +0100

275 lines

Re: Consent to disclose

Paul Ticher

Tue, 29 May 2012 10:47:30 +0100

71 lines

Recovering costs for a court order to disclose personal information? Is this right?

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 29 May 2012 09:35:26 +0000

67 lines

Consent to disclose

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 29 May 2012 09:43:21 +0100

29 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Baines, Jonathan

Mon, 28 May 2012 14:24:01 +0100

377 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Ian Clark

Mon, 28 May 2012 14:08:30 +0100

343 lines

New FOI Podcast

<>

Mon, 28 May 2012 13:41:45 +0100

40 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Marchini, Renzo

Mon, 28 May 2012 08:40:29 -0400

316 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 28 May 2012 11:49:01 +0000

249 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Ian Griffiths

Sun, 27 May 2012 13:57:11 +0100

181 lines

Can we ever control our digital persona or is the DPA only an illusion?

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 25 May 2012 18:08:32 +0000

181 lines

Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 25 May 2012 14:53:00 +0000

696 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data [wider question on obtaining information from the police]

Ian Welton

Fri, 25 May 2012 13:59:10 +0100

237 lines

Hawktalk: Council officials gain access to tax records; powers extend well beyond the justification for data sharing

chris pounder

Fri, 25 May 2012 13:15:21 +0100

237 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 25 May 2012 13:11:24 +0100

146 lines

Re: Cookie Law

Moore, Craig

Fri, 25 May 2012 12:58:26 +0100

69 lines

Cookie Law

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 25 May 2012 12:44:24 +0100

27 lines

Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Ian Barker

Fri, 25 May 2012 09:15:25 +0100

471 lines

Data Protection and Freedom of Expression - Debating the way ahead

David Erdos

Thu, 24 May 2012 18:22:59 +0000

201 lines

Re: "The Power of Information" Department of Health

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 24 May 2012 17:52:23 +0000

451 lines

Re: cloud computing

Marchini, Renzo

Thu, 24 May 2012 12:10:55 -0400

426 lines

Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Lisa Souza - PDP

Thu, 24 May 2012 14:27:09 +0100

958 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data [wider question on obtaining information from the police]

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 24 May 2012 11:58:00 +0000

380 lines

ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

chris pounder

Thu, 24 May 2012 12:57:31 +0100

590 lines

ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 24 May 2012 11:20:52 +0000

230 lines

Re: [Wider question on obtaining information from the police]

Ian Welton

Thu, 24 May 2012 10:14:05 +0100

203 lines

cloud computing

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 24 May 2012 08:53:11 +0100

84 lines

Family CAF Assessment

Michelle Peel

Wed, 23 May 2012 16:54:43 +0100

55 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data [wider question on obtaining information from the police]

Chris Brogan

Wed, 23 May 2012 16:16:27 +0100

623 lines

Qualifications

<>

Wed, 23 May 2012 15:06:44 +0100

37 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data

Simon Howarth

Wed, 23 May 2012 14:15:27 +0100

956 lines

"The Power of Information" Department of Health

Simon Howarth

Wed, 23 May 2012 14:12:31 +0100

536 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data [wider question on obtaining information from the police]

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 23 May 2012 11:32:52 +0000

465 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data

Chris Brogan

Wed, 23 May 2012 10:43:14 +0100

963 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data

Jane Holden

Wed, 23 May 2012 10:11:21 +0100

708 lines

Re: DWP Staff and Personal Data

Ward, Ciaran

Wed, 23 May 2012 10:07:03 +0100

417 lines

DWP Staff and Personal Data

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 23 May 2012 08:31:41 +0100

90 lines

Re: Subject Access & Info re Parent

Phil Bradshaw

Tue, 22 May 2012 19:37:31 +0200

152 lines

Subject Access & Info re Parent

Lindsay Foody

Tue, 22 May 2012 16:59:48 +0100

34 lines

Second NHS Fine

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 21 May 2012 11:29:05 +0100

113 lines

Re: retention of emails of ex-staff members

Mark D. B. Humphrys

Fri, 18 May 2012 11:25:13 +0000

790 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Phil Bradshaw

Thu, 17 May 2012 17:36:21 +0200

789 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Dunster, Jon

Thu, 17 May 2012 16:18:49 +0100

631 lines

Data Protection Officer

Murphy, April DCR

Thu, 17 May 2012 13:12:33 +0100

420 lines

FW: Hawktalk:ICO decides that European Commission's criticism of the Data Protection Act should be published

chris pounder

Thu, 17 May 2012 09:05:40 +0100

233 lines

ETHICOMP 2013: University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark, 12-14 June 2013

CCSR Web Master

Wed, 16 May 2012 16:29:32 +0100

277 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Aston Information Security

Wed, 16 May 2012 15:09:45 +0100

356 lines

storage of records

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 16 May 2012 13:21:17 +0100

87 lines

Re: Notification for New Members

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 16 May 2012 12:01:33 +0100

600 lines

Notification for New Members

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 16 May 2012 11:59:52 +0100

348 lines

Re: Notification for New Members

Phil Bradshaw

Wed, 16 May 2012 12:51:45 +0200

453 lines

Latest ICO "fine"

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 16 May 2012 11:09:44 +0100

232 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 16 May 2012 11:08:09 +0100

638 lines

Notification for New Members

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 16 May 2012 11:07:45 +0100

358 lines

Copy of Members Notification Template

<>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:58:51 +0100

91 lines

Re: Members Notification Template

Sylvia Reynolds

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:52:51 +0100

279 lines

Re: Notification for New Members

Cotterill, Steve

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:43:44 +0100

524 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Gibson, Martin (ICT)

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:22:54 +0100

673 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools [UNCLASSIFIED]

Healy, Susan

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:21:26 +0100

488 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:18:43 +0100

934 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

CHARLES OPPENHEIM

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:16:24 +0100

337 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Lemon, Stephen

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:15:06 +0100

492 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

Mark van Harmelen

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:14:15 +0100

398 lines

Re: Biometrics in Schools

<>

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:13:36 +0100

329 lines

Notification for New Members

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:11:54 +0100

242 lines

Biometrics in Schools

Aston Information Security

Wed, 16 May 2012 10:04:16 +0100

376 lines

Re: Members Notification Template

<>

Wed, 16 May 2012 09:56:13 +0100

68 lines

Members Notification Template

Brenda Scourfield

Wed, 16 May 2012 09:51:27 +0100

34 lines

Members Notification Template

Brenda Scourfield

Wed, 16 May 2012 09:47:39 +0100

71 lines

Re: Members and data

Simon Howarth

Tue, 15 May 2012 17:37:17 +0100

78 lines

Re: ICO website down

Richard Hopkins

Tue, 15 May 2012 14:15:14 +0100

70 lines

Members and data

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 15 May 2012 11:22:44 +0100

29 lines

Re: « NO MARKING REQUIRED » Re: [data-protection] ICO website down

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 15 May 2012 10:18:29 +0000

171 lines

« NO MARKING REQUIRED » Re: [data-protection] ICO website down

Mike Gater

Tue, 15 May 2012 10:57:30 +0100

105 lines

Re: ICO website down

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 15 May 2012 10:52:59 +0100

97 lines

ICO website down

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 15 May 2012 10:46:29 +0100

29 lines

storage of records

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 15 May 2012 10:05:57 +0100

86 lines

Re: Babies and FearSquare (are we just creatures of habit?)

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 14 May 2012 12:24:50 +0000

82 lines

Protection of Freedoms Act

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 14 May 2012 10:49:09 +0100

121 lines

MPs and Criminal Offences

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 14 May 2012 08:49:39 +0100

116 lines

Private Setectives

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 14 May 2012 08:35:09 +0100

84 lines

FW: Hawktalk: Fines for non-registration with the police? Reforms permit enhanced secondary use of electoral rolls

chris pounder

Sun, 13 May 2012 23:53:59 +0100

205 lines

Data loss: from the Islington Gazette

chris pounder

Sat, 12 May 2012 16:03:38 +0100

177 lines

Babies and FearSquare (are we just creatures of habit?)

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 11 May 2012 17:17:26 +0000

335 lines

Re: Is it Personal Data ?

Jane Holden

Fri, 11 May 2012 16:02:21 +0100

204 lines

Re: Is it Personal Data ?

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 11 May 2012 15:53:06 +0100

167 lines

Re: Third party data

Phil Bradshaw

Fri, 11 May 2012 16:50:25 +0200

133 lines

Re: Is it Personal Data ?

Bill Dunn

Fri, 11 May 2012 15:50:16 +0100

33 lines

Re: Is it Personal Data ?

Jane Holden

Fri, 11 May 2012 15:48:02 +0100

89 lines

Re: Is it Personal Data ?

Phil Bradshaw

Fri, 11 May 2012 16:47:55 +0200

139 lines

Is it Personal Data ?

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 11 May 2012 15:42:07 +0100

32 lines

Re: Relevant Purpose?

Phil Bradshaw

Fri, 11 May 2012 15:18:19 +0200

399 lines

Re: Relevant Purpose?

Jane Holden

Fri, 11 May 2012 13:49:57 +0100

188 lines

Re: Relevant Purpose?

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 11 May 2012 13:44:04 +0100

153 lines

Ooops! Draft_Communications_Data_Bill content if interested

chris pounder

Fri, 11 May 2012 13:34:05 +0100

309 lines

Draft_Communications_Data_Bill content if interested

chris pounder

Fri, 11 May 2012 13:29:50 +0100

124 lines

Third party data

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 11 May 2012 13:14:33 +0100

29 lines

Relevant Purpose?

Jane Holden

Fri, 11 May 2012 12:02:49 +0100

69 lines

Fwd: [data-protection] FearSquare

<>

Fri, 11 May 2012 10:36:03 +0100

227 lines

ICO - out of action

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 10 May 2012 13:30:37 +0100

35 lines

Re: ICO Fines List

Kevin Tarleton (0161 923 6305)

Thu, 10 May 2012 11:20:25 +0100

834 lines

FearSquare

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 10 May 2012 11:08:39 +0100

96 lines

Re: ICO Fines List

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 10 May 2012 09:58:07 +0100

455 lines

Re: ICO Fines List

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 10 May 2012 09:45:19 +0100

384 lines

ICO Fines List

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 10 May 2012 08:47:30 +0100

118 lines

Cloud Computing and the Law Webcast - 30 May 2012 at 2pm - JISC Legal

John X Kelly

Wed, 9 May 2012 13:43:57 +0100

84 lines

Comms Data

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 9 May 2012 12:17:00 +0100

143 lines

Re: Internal Use of CCTV Images

<>

Wed, 9 May 2012 11:28:19 +0100

280 lines

Document Retention & Information Audits

Paula Tighe

Wed, 9 May 2012 10:11:18 +0000

243 lines

Re: retention of emails of ex-staff members

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 9 May 2012 10:37:58 +0100

650 lines

retention of emails of ex-staff members

Barlow, Jackie

Wed, 9 May 2012 09:23:23 +0000

294 lines

Re: Q: Decision Notices & Late Reliance on Exemptions

Phil Bradshaw

Tue, 8 May 2012 19:48:11 +0200

493 lines

Internal Use of CCTV Images

Hannah Tessyman

Tue, 8 May 2012 13:09:20 +0100

254 lines

Re: Q: Decision Notices & Late Reliance on Exemptions

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 8 May 2012 09:52:02 +0100

520 lines

Re: Q: Decision Notices & Late Reliance on Exemptions

Phil Bradshaw

Fri, 4 May 2012 20:28:55 +0200

169 lines

Q: Decision Notices & Late Reliance on Exemptions

Andrew Goodfellow

Fri, 4 May 2012 14:21:40 +0100

40 lines

Data Quality policy to share?

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 4 May 2012 13:04:33 +0000

217 lines

Book Review

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 4 May 2012 12:21:40 +0100

86 lines

Re: SAR - Copy Preparation and Presentation

Phil Bradshaw

Thu, 3 May 2012 13:39:32 +0200

144 lines

Re: SAR - Copy Preparation and Presentation

Phil Bradshaw

Thu, 3 May 2012 13:37:11 +0200

155 lines

SAR - Copy Preparation and Presentation

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 3 May 2012 12:01:24 +0100

36 lines

Re: Google is the new Peeping Tom

Simon Howarth

Thu, 3 May 2012 11:01:43 +0100

71 lines

Professional Privacy Memberships

Simon Howarth

Thu, 3 May 2012 10:53:38 +0100

450 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

<>

Thu, 3 May 2012 09:18:54 +0100

145 lines

Re: Investigative journalism and SAR (phonehacking)

Robert (Bob) Waixel

Wed, 2 May 2012 19:46:16 +0100

203 lines

Re: Investigative journalism and SAR (phonehacking)

chris pounder

Wed, 2 May 2012 16:31:21 +0100

492 lines

Investigative journalism and SAR (phonehacking)

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 2 May 2012 15:13:42 +0000

246 lines

Re: Cash Converters / Cash Shop etc

Phil Bradshaw

Wed, 2 May 2012 16:58:19 +0200

283 lines

Cash Converters / Cash Shop etc

Cotterill, Steve

Wed, 2 May 2012 15:50:18 +0100

216 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Wed, 2 May 2012 13:50:00 +0100

553 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Jane Holden

Wed, 2 May 2012 13:49:26 +0100

824 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Jane Holden

Wed, 2 May 2012 13:39:39 +0100

927 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Jane Holden

Wed, 2 May 2012 13:38:18 +0100

571 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Phil Bradshaw

Wed, 2 May 2012 14:34:47 +0200

482 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Wed, 2 May 2012 12:57:46 +0100

370 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Jane Holden

Wed, 2 May 2012 12:00:24 +0100

218 lines

Re: CSA and Council Tax

Phil Bradshaw

Wed, 2 May 2012 12:00:04 +0200

289 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Phil Bradshaw

Wed, 2 May 2012 11:51:11 +0200

721 lines

Re: CSA and Council Tax

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 2 May 2012 09:48:57 +0100

111 lines

CSA and Council Tax

Lindsay Foody

Wed, 2 May 2012 09:41:34 +0100

32 lines

Google is the new Peeping Tom

<>

Tue, 1 May 2012 21:40:07 +0100

36 lines

Protection of Freedoms Bill

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 1 May 2012 17:52:00 +0100

134 lines

Comms Data Proposals

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 1 May 2012 12:29:32 +0100

110 lines

DCMS Report into Phone hacking

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 1 May 2012 11:40:33 +0100

84 lines

Re: OSC Inspections

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 1 May 2012 11:31:17 +0100

200 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Jane Holden

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:38:44 +0100

775 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:32:23 +0100

636 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:31:04 +0100

584 lines

Re: OSC Inspections

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:24:58 +0100

98 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:19:14 +0100

309 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal in formation

Jane Holden

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:19:07 +0100

581 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information

George Ross

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:15:32 +0100

52 lines

OSC Inspections

Jane Holden

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:11:25 +0100

48 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information

Jane Holden

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:07:44 +0100

812 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:02:35 +0100

512 lines

Re: Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 1 May 2012 10:02:19 +0100

634 lines

Is a standard tenancy agreement personal information

<>

Tue, 1 May 2012 09:52:13 +0100

113 lines

Re: Fees to obscure or blur out CCTV images

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 1 May 2012 09:43:01 +0100

920 lines

Fees to obscure or blur out CCTV images

Hodge, Alex DCR

Tue, 1 May 2012 09:39:20 +0100

469 lines

Re: Subject Access to Anti-Social Behaviour Records

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 1 May 2012 08:46:00 +0100

112 lines

Subject Access to Anti-Social Behaviour Records

Lindsay Foody

Tue, 1 May 2012 08:27:11 +0100

31 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager