JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


April 2012


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"resolution" on PDB web page (12 messages)
.CBF raw images in iMOSFLM- error (4 messages)
21-23 May workshop on Integrated Software for Integrative Structural Biology (1 message)
2nd Annual CLS Mx Data Collection School (1 message)
<No subject> (5 messages)
A creative and challenging job in science communication - join PDBe as its Outreach Coordinator! (1 message)
A little perspective (Re: Trends in Data Fabrication) (2 messages)
A topical one...Re: [ccp4bb] Publication ethics Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers (1 message)
aimless and anisotropic scaling (and the docs?) (3 messages)
an ambiguous result of molecular replacement (1 message)
Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling (8 messages)
Anisotropic diffraction (6 messages)
Anybody knows why SSRL is unaccessible ? (3 messages)
anyone scrapping an Raxis-IV? (1 message)
Application deadline approaching: CCP4 summer school at APS, in USA (1 message)
Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex (7 messages)
arp_waters still available? (2 messages)
British Biophysical Society Meeting in Durham July 11-13. (1 message)
bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities (13 messages)
CALL FOR BEAM TIME PROPOSALS: The Protein Crystallography Station @ LANL (1 message)
CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR ESRF BEAM TIME WITH ONLINE MICROSPEC (1 message)
Category 4 Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication (1 message)
CCP-EM positions now available (1 message)
ccp4i project display (3 messages)
Cell dimensions (1 message)
Checking in dry shippers? (9 messages)
commercially available proteins (3 messages)
content calculation in phaser (2 messages)
Coot chain ID (4 messages)
COOT Real Space Refinement keyboard shortcut?? (3 messages)
copy FreeR - maintain resolution (3 messages)
core rmsd in coot (4 messages)
Criteria for Ligand fitting (8 messages)
Crystal behave funny (6 messages)
Crystal handling (2 messages)
Crystal handling (Summary) (1 message)
CSX2012 Spectroscopy & X-ray Workshop, 4.-6. July, ETHZ (1 message)
Deadline april 16th: 24/25 May 2012 IGBMC symposium on “Future Challenges in Integrative Structural Biology” (1 message)
Defining consensus pattern for searching a motif in protein database(s) (1 message)
detergent crystal? (9 messages)
Disorder or poor phases? (13 messages)
Does any software use non-<TRIPOS> sections in mol2 files (1 message)
Error in Scala (3 messages)
Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1 (9 messages)
Final Reminder: BCA/CCP4 Summer School 2012 (1 message)
Finding N-term to C-term Distances (6 messages)
finding NCS in water (3 messages)
FW: error (1 message)
fwd: (4 messages)
Good way to check ion sites on Coot (4 messages)
heavy precipitattion of selenomethionine labelled proteins (1 message)
hello (4 messages)
hey (3 messages)
HI (1 message)
high R factor calculated by sfcheck (2 messages)
high temp factor in coot! (10 messages)
how to install coot on ubuntu 11.10 (4 messages)
Image names (1 message)
iMosflm version 1.0.6 & Mosflm version 7.0.8 (3 messages)
indexing(?) question in P21 (2 messages)
indexing(?) question in P21 - solved (2 messages)
Instruct-NL Workshop on Wednesday April 25, 2012, in Leiden, the Netherlands (1 message)
Inverted Micelles and Crystallization (1 message)
Job opportunity: Postdoctoral researcher (1 message)
job vacancy at Proteros (1 message)
Last call: CCP4 summer school at APS, in USA (1 message)
Ligand fitting into density (6 messages)
Ligand geometry (8 messages)
MAMCM reminder (1 message)
Membrane protein purification with HIC (1 message)
minimum protein concentration for NI-NTA column (3 messages)
modelling a flexible peptide (3 messages)
Molecular Replacement (14 messages)
MOSFLM- Image compatibility (2 messages)
mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients (8 messages)
negative density at some places in the side chain of residues (3 messages)
negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms (13 messages)
new XDS version (1 message)
OASIS new version released (1 message)
off topic: the effects of spontaneous oligomerization on crystallization (2 messages)
Off-pick: suggesiton of puck (2 messages)
Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease (6 messages)
Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files (7 messages)
Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis‏ (Summary) (1 message)
Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis (4 messages)
Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers (42 messages)
one datum many data? (2 messages)
one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication] (29 messages)
PDF position Structural Cell Biology - Michigan (1 message)
PEG MME 2000 in powder form? (2 messages)
phaser: high z score but no sol (7 messages)
PhD position - Institut de Biologie Structurale (Grenoble) (1 message)
Position Available: Technical Key Account Manager at Microlytic (1 message)
Position in Structural Biology of Signaling (1 message)
Positions in Structural Biology of Signaling and HIV-related Immunology (1 message)
Post-Doc position at ICR, London (1 message)
Post-doctoral position at Umeå University, Sweden (1 message)
Postdoc position in structural biology (1 message)
Postdoctoral fellowship for young scientists trained in the UK (1 message)
postdoctoral position at Sanford-Burnham, San Diego, CA (1 message)
postdoctoral position at the NIH focused on understanding the mechanism of cytoskeletal regulators (1 message)
Postdoctoral position at the University of Edinburgh (1 message)
Postdoctoral Position Available in Structural Biophysics and Protein Engineering in Rockville, Maryland, USA (1 message)
Postdoctoral position in DNA replication/repair at the LMB, Cambridge (1 message)
Postdoctoral position in structural and chemical immunology (1 message)
problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data (8 messages)
Problem with indexing in the latest iMosflm release (1 message)
protease inhibitor (1 message)
Publication ethics Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers (2 messages)
Question about PyMol (3 messages)
Real Space Refine Zone for Ligand (3 messages)
refining beta peptides (2 messages)
Refmac and sigma value (7 messages)
Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM (12 messages)
REMINDER *CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR ESRF BEAM TIME WITH ONLINE MICROSPEC* (1 message)
Reminder: BCA Summer School 2012 (1 message)
Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop (10 messages)
RESEARCH DIRECTOR IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY/BIOPHYSICS & TENURE-TRACK GROUP LEADERS, Helsinki (1 message)
Rif: [ccp4bb] indexing(?) question in P21 (1 message)
Rigaku R-axis IIC X-ray diffraction system (2 messages)
scala - handling of anomalous data (2 messages)
SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein.. (6 messages)
simple solution to - Trends in Data Fabrication (2 messages)
sodium vs water near (1 message)
software to generate protein topology diagram like those available at PDBsum webserver (3 messages)
Substitution to glycerol during crystallogenesis (5 messages)
Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit (7 messages)
Summary Re: anyone scrapping an Raxis-IV? (1 message)
SUMMARY [ccp4bb] copy FreeR - maintain resolution (1 message)
symmetry related molecules (2 messages)
three letter codes for buffer components (4 messages)
Trueblood Award Nominations (1 message)
unique reflections vs unique observations (3 messages)
unsubscribe (2 messages)
UPDATED: Position Available: Technical Key Account Manager at Microlytic (1 message)
very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication (94 messages)
very uninformative (2 messages)
Via Annual Reports...Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication (1 message)
water picking (2 messages)
Who is using 64-bit Linux? (21 messages)
wwPDB and CCDC (6 messages)
X-PLOR (2 messages)
Yeast plasmid DNA miniprep problem (2 messages)
zinc finger (1 message)
zinc fingre (7 messages)
[cnsbb] MTZ label (1 message)
[OT] to CCP admin - CCP14 - who's in charge? (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"resolution" on PDB web page

"resolution" on PDB web page

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:23:44 -0500

21 lines

Re: "resolution" on PDB web page

Jan Dohnalek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:41:00 +0200

120 lines

Re: "resolution" on PDB web page

Mark J van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:10:51 +0200

83 lines

Re: "resolution" on PDB web page

Jan Dohnalek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:31:15 +0200

211 lines

Re: "resolution" on PDB web page

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:55:17 -0400

82 lines

Re: "resolution" on PDB web page

Mike Sleutel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:09:09 +0200

86 lines

Re: "resolution" on PDB web page

Miller, Mitchell D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:33:29 -0700

131 lines

Re: "resolution" on PDB web page

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:08:52 -0400

124 lines

Re: "resolution" on PDB web page

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:38:29 -0500

143 lines

Re: "resolution" on PDB web page

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:43:45 +0100

132 lines

Re: "resolution" on PDB web page

H. Raaijmakers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:29:28 +0200

82 lines

Re: "resolution" on PDB web page

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:41:09 -0500

220 lines

New Thread

.CBF raw images in iMOSFLM- error

.CBF raw images in iMOSFLM- error

Yuri Pompeu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:08:19 +0100

24 lines

Re: .CBF raw images in iMOSFLM- error

Harry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:43:37 +0100

42 lines

Re: .CBF raw images in iMOSFLM- error

Harry Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:39:48 +0100

139 lines

Re: .CBF raw images in iMOSFLM- error

Kip Guja <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:19:29 -0400

75 lines

New Thread

21-23 May workshop on Integrated Software for Integrative Structural Biology

21-23 May workshop on Integrated Software for Integrative Structural Biology

Chris Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:55:44 +0000

80 lines

New Thread

2nd Annual CLS Mx Data Collection School

2nd Annual CLS Mx Data Collection School

Shaun Labiuk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:09:43 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

protein chemistry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 00:12:16 +0530

35 lines

<No subject>

Marcus Fislage <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:34:07 +0200

103 lines

<No subject>

Mark J van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:44:44 +0200

55 lines

<No subject>

Abd Ghani Abd Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:24:10 +0100

12 lines

<No subject>

Abd Ghani Abd Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:24:11 +0100

11 lines

New Thread

A creative and challenging job in science communication - join PDBe as its Outreach Coordinator!

A creative and challenging job in science communication - join PDBe as its Outreach Coordinator!

Gerard DVD Kleywegt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:15:49 +0200

59 lines

New Thread

A little perspective (Re: Trends in Data Fabrication)

A little perspective (Re: Trends in Data Fabrication)

Dima Klenchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2012 17:31:04 -0500

27 lines

Re: A little perspective (Re: Trends in Data Fabrication)

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2012 18:53:55 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

A topical one...Re: [ccp4bb] Publication ethics Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

A topical one...Re: [ccp4bb] Publication ethics Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Jrh <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:08:06 +0200

141 lines

New Thread

aimless and anisotropic scaling (and the docs?)

aimless and anisotropic scaling (and the docs?)

Bryan Lepore <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:00:24 -0400

21 lines

Re: aimless and anisotropic scaling (and the docs?)

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:19:24 +0100

40 lines

Re: aimless and anisotropic scaling (and the docs?)

George Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:40:54 +0200

59 lines

New Thread

an ambiguous result of molecular replacement

Re: an ambiguous result of molecular replacement

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:34:58 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling

Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling

David Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:20:42 +0100

111 lines

Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling

Kelly Daughtry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:52:01 -0400

166 lines

Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling

Bryan Lepore <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:52:04 -0400

44 lines

Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling

Nian Huang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:52:43 -0500

192 lines

Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling

Peter Moody <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:57:10 +0100

133 lines

Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling

Patrick Loll <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:09:04 -0400

66 lines

Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling

David Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:23:45 +0100

327 lines

Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling

Steiner, Roberto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:05:29 +0100

182 lines

New Thread

Anisotropic diffraction

Anisotropic diffraction

Theresa Hsu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:18:47 +0100

19 lines

Re: Anisotropic diffraction

David Schuller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:21:05 -0400

33 lines

Re: Anisotropic diffraction

chen c <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:28:04 +0800

67 lines

Re: Anisotropic diffraction

Zhijie Li <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Apr 2012 03:06:21 -0400

56 lines

Re: Anisotropic diffraction

Dale Tronrud <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:12:52 -0700

64 lines

Re: Anisotropic diffraction

Zhijie Li <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:25:29 -0400

225 lines

New Thread

Anybody knows why SSRL is unaccessible ?

Anybody knows why SSRL is unaccessible ?

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:28:23 -0400

65 lines

Re: Anybody knows why SSRL is unaccessible ?

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:35:58 -0400

136 lines

Re: Anybody knows why SSRL is unaccessible ?

Richard Gildea <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:33:19 -0700

88 lines

New Thread

anyone scrapping an Raxis-IV?

anyone scrapping an Raxis-IV?

Peter Moody <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:58:33 +0100

74 lines

New Thread

Application deadline approaching: CCP4 summer school at APS, in USA

Application deadline approaching: CCP4 summer school at APS, in USA

Sanishvili, Ruslan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:14:35 -0500

226 lines

New Thread

Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex

Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex

Zhou, Tongqing (NIH/VRC) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:26:13 -0400

22 lines

Re: Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex

Antony Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:51:53 +0000

39 lines

Re: Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:01:31 +0200

73 lines

Re: Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex

Saul Hazledine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:03:35 +0200

38 lines

Re: Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex

Victor Lamzin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:52:20 +0200

116 lines

Re: Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex

Antony Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:57:16 +0000

121 lines

Re: Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex

Zhou, Tongqing (NIH/VRC) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:20:09 -0400

157 lines

New Thread

arp_waters still available?

arp_waters still available?

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:23:27 -0700

32 lines

Re: arp_waters still available?

Victor Lamzin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:06:52 +0200

49 lines

New Thread

British Biophysical Society Meeting in Durham July 11-13.

British Biophysical Society Meeting in Durham July 11-13.

POHL E. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:28:38 +0100

13424 lines

New Thread

bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

Allister Crow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:37:00 +0100

6901 lines

Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:02:10 +0100

171 lines

Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:27:50 +0100

162 lines

Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

Keitaro Yamashita <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:09:14 +0900

98 lines

Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:26:40 +0100

307 lines

Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:30:11 +0100

309 lines

Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

Tallat Hussain Ghazi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:40:23 -0700

126 lines

Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

Keitaro Yamashita <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:01:00 +0900

198 lines

Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:06:55 +0100

504 lines

Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

Keitaro Yamashita <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:14:26 +0900

326 lines

Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:21:52 +0100

755 lines

Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

Dirk Kostrewa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:08:07 +0200

188 lines

Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:37:28 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

CALL FOR BEAM TIME PROPOSALS: The Protein Crystallography Station @ LANL

CALL FOR BEAM TIME PROPOSALS: The Protein Crystallography Station @ LANL

Suzanne Zoe Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:57:50 -0600

131 lines

New Thread

CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR ESRF BEAM TIME WITH ONLINE MICROSPEC

CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR ESRF BEAM TIME WITH ONLINE MICROSPEC

David Flot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:00:38 +0200

360 lines

New Thread

Category 4 Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Category 4 Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Jrh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:43:05 +0100

207 lines

New Thread

CCP-EM positions now available

CCP-EM positions now available

Gerard DVD Kleywegt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:57:53 +0200

45 lines

New Thread

ccp4i project display

ccp4i project display

wtempel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:52:14 -0400

36 lines

Re: ccp4i project display

Zhijie Li <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:20:54 -0400

92 lines

ccp4i project display

wtempel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 09:21:02 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Cell dimensions

Cell dimensions

Uma Ratu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:38:58 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Checking in dry shippers?

Checking in dry shippers?

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:59:16 +0100

21 lines

Re: Checking in dry shippers?

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:03:49 +0100

60 lines

Re: Checking in dry shippers?

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:32:38 -0400

42 lines

Re: Checking in dry shippers?

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:44:20 +0100

63 lines

Re: Checking in dry shippers?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:46:36 +0200

116 lines

Re: Checking in dry shippers?

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:50:32 +0100

130 lines

Re: Checking in dry shippers?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:06:54 +0200

166 lines

Re: Checking in dry shippers?

Ronnie Berntsson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:53:18 +0200

220 lines

Re: Checking in dry shippers?

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:17:06 -0400

298 lines

New Thread

commercially available proteins

commercially available proteins

Peter Hsu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:29:16 +0100

27 lines

Re: commercially available proteins

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:55:31 -0400

94 lines

Re: commercially available proteins

Stephen Weeks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:13:35 +0200

74 lines

New Thread

content calculation in phaser

content calculation in phaser

Leonard Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:04:47 -0500

42 lines

Re: content calculation in phaser

Leonard Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:18:29 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

Coot chain ID

Coot chain ID

Dipankar Manna <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2012 06:55:10 +0000

105 lines

Re: Coot chain ID

Antony Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:54:00 +0000

138 lines

Re: Coot chain ID

Bernhard Lechtenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:46:39 +0100

70 lines

Re: Coot chain ID

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:22:53 +0100

165 lines

New Thread

COOT Real Space Refinement keyboard shortcut??

Re: COOT Real Space Refinement keyboard shortcut??

Petra Lukacik <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:04:06 +0000

31 lines

Re: COOT Real Space Refinement keyboard shortcut??

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:20:28 +0100

36 lines

Re: COOT Real Space Refinement keyboard shortcut??

Petra Lukacik <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:42:06 +0000

59 lines

New Thread

copy FreeR - maintain resolution

copy FreeR - maintain resolution

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:00:43 +0200

48 lines

Re: copy FreeR - maintain resolution

Andrey Lebedev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:26:16 +0000

63 lines

Re: copy FreeR - maintain resolution

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:29:44 +0100

70 lines

New Thread

core rmsd in coot

core rmsd in coot

Ursula Schulze-Gahmen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 13:51:48 -0700

33 lines

Re: core rmsd in coot

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:53:04 +0100

36 lines

Re: core rmsd in coot

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:31:56 +0100

52 lines

Re: core rmsd in coot

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 12:39:40 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Criteria for Ligand fitting

Criteria for Ligand fitting

Naveed A Nadvi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:02:15 +0100

51 lines

Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:25:58 +0200

91 lines

Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting

Pandit, Jayvardhan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:55:49 +0000

63 lines

Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting

Colin Groom <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:22:28 +0100

113 lines

Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting

Enrico Stura <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:00:36 +0200

97 lines

Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting

Naveed A Nadvi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 04:25:16 +0100

68 lines

Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting

Dale Tronrud <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:37:53 -0700

39 lines

Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:19:51 +0200

102 lines

New Thread

Crystal behave funny

Crystal behave funny

Prem kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:51:58 +0800

38759 lines

Re: Crystal behave funny

Gregory Bowman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:35:29 -0400

160 lines

Re: Crystal behave funny

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:32:57 -0500

42 lines

Re: Crystal behave funny

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:37:29 -0700

62 lines

Re: Crystal behave funny

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:49:42 -0400

199 lines

Re: Crystal behave funny

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:15:18 -0400

254 lines

New Thread

Crystal handling

Crystal handling

Theresa Hsu <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2012 08:24:06 +0100

19 lines

Re: Crystal handling

Ho Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2012 13:15:38 -1000

35 lines

New Thread

Crystal handling (Summary)

Re: Crystal handling (Summary)

Theresa Hsu <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 02:13:35 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

CSX2012 Spectroscopy & X-ray Workshop, 4.-6. July, ETHZ

CSX2012 Spectroscopy & X-ray Workshop, 4.-6. July, ETHZ

Martin Fuchs <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Apr 2012 12:49:10 +0200

69 lines

New Thread

Deadline april 16th: 24/25 May 2012 IGBMC symposium on “Future Challenges in Integrative Structural Biology”

Deadline april 16th: 24/25 May 2012 IGBMC symposium on “Future Challenges in Integrative Structural Biology”

Bruno KLAHOLZ <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:53:37 +0000

525 lines

New Thread

Defining consensus pattern for searching a motif in protein database(s)

Defining consensus pattern for searching a motif in protein database(s)

E rajakumar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:16:43 -0700

57 lines

New Thread

detergent crystal?

detergent crystal?

于洪军 <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:07:21 -0500

6677 lines

Re: detergent crystal?

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:39:53 -0500

84 lines

Re: detergent crystal?

yybbll <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:52:48 +0200

94 lines

Re: detergent crystal?

Van Den Berg, Bert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:32:06 +0000

92 lines

Re: detergent crystal?

Veer Bhatt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:38:22 -0700

87 lines

Re: detergent crystal?

于洪军 <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:05:35 -0500

1559 lines

Re: detergent crystal?

R. M. Garavito <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:40:47 -0400

321 lines

Re: detergent crystal?

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:54:57 -0500

309 lines

Re: detergent crystal?

R. M. Garavito <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:17:29 -0400

515 lines

New Thread

Disorder or poor phases?

Disorder or poor phases?

Francis E Reyes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:22:29 -0600

36 lines

Re: Disorder or poor phases?

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:38:39 +0200

72 lines

Re: Disorder or poor phases?

Dale Tronrud <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:00:28 -0700

95 lines

Re: Disorder or poor phases?

Francis E Reyes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:04:29 -0600

51 lines

Re: Disorder or poor phases?

Gerard Bricogne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:45:06 +0100

114 lines

Re: Disorder or poor phases?

Dale Tronrud <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:19:05 -0700

133 lines

Re: Disorder or poor phases?

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:44:57 +0100

24 lines

Re: Disorder or poor phases?

Dale Tronrud <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:19:12 -0700

31 lines

Re: Disorder or poor phases?

Jens Kaiser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:39:22 -0700

58 lines

Re: Disorder or poor phases?

Bernhard Rupp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:34:09 -0700

187 lines

Re: Disorder or poor phases?

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:31:55 -0700

133 lines

Re: Disorder or poor phases?

Gloria Borgstahl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:50:20 -0500

197 lines

Re: Disorder or poor phases?

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:31:26 +0100

456 lines

New Thread

Does any software use non-<TRIPOS> sections in mol2 files

Does any software use non-<TRIPOS> sections in mol2 files

Thomas Womack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:06:03 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Error in Scala

Error in Scala

Yuri Pompeu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 20:29:53 +0100

25 lines

Re: Error in Scala

Antony Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 19:35:01 +0000

35 lines

Re: Error in Scala

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 21:17:14 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1

Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1

Henning Stahlberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:51:05 +0200

48 lines

Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:48:59 +0100

156 lines

Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:58:50 +0100

103 lines

Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:03:26 +0100

238 lines

Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:11:16 +0100

137 lines

Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:15:41 +0100

148 lines

Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1

Bart Hazes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:51:57 -0600

178 lines

Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:10:11 +0100

151 lines

Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1

Henning Stahlberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:20:29 +0200

215 lines

New Thread

Final Reminder: BCA/CCP4 Summer School 2012

Final Reminder: BCA/CCP4 Summer School 2012

Airlie McCoy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:25:58 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Finding N-term to C-term Distances

Re: Finding N-term to C-term Distances

Sam Jimmeson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:14:27 -0700

35 lines

Re: Finding N-term to C-term Distances

Thomas Holder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:52:38 +0200

58 lines

Re: Finding N-term to C-term Distances

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:07:37 +0200

67 lines

Re: Finding N-term to C-term Distances

Randy Read <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:45:58 +0100

52 lines

Re: Finding N-term to C-term Distances

Robert Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:03:37 -0400

85 lines

Re: Finding N-term to C-term Distances

Thomas Holder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:06:45 +0200

32 lines

New Thread

finding NCS in water

finding NCS in water

Rajesh Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2012 10:33:11 -0500

77 lines

Re: finding NCS in water

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:19:09 +0100

108 lines

Re: finding NCS in water

Rajesh Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:35:50 -0500

139 lines

New Thread

FW: error

FW: error

Oganesyan, Vaheh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:34:19 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

fwd:

fwd:

adam andres <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:52:27 -0700

11 lines

fwd:

adam andres <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:52:27 -0700

11 lines

fwd:

E rajakumar <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:24:17 -0700

13 lines

fwd:

aneesh goyal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:10:50 -0700

15 lines

New Thread

Good way to check ion sites on Coot

Good way to check ion sites on Coot

Andre Godoy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:57:12 -0700

28 lines

Re: Good way to check ion sites on Coot

Zhijie Li <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:37:43 -0400

89 lines

Re: Good way to check ion sites on Coot

Marc Kvansakul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:08:51 +0000

174 lines

Re: Good way to check ion sites on Coot

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:24:22 +0100

184 lines

New Thread

heavy precipitattion of selenomethionine labelled proteins

heavy precipitattion of selenomethionine labelled proteins

supratim dey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:55:08 +0530

40 lines

New Thread

hello

hello

adam andres <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:37:20 -0700

15 lines

hello

adam andres <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:37:24 -0700

14 lines

HELLO

abhishek dey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:26:35 +0800

13 lines

hello

Saumen Datta <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:50:53 -0700

15 lines

New Thread

hey

hey

adam andres <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:32:48 -0700

14 lines

hey

adam andres <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:33:00 -0700

15 lines

hey

E rajakumar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:56:41 -0700

13 lines

New Thread

HI

HI

aneesh goyal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:38:15 -0700

15 lines

New Thread

high R factor calculated by sfcheck

high R factor calculated by sfcheck

Qixu Cai <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:39:59 +0800

20 lines

Re: high R factor calculated by sfcheck

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:04:20 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

high temp factor in coot!

high temp factor in coot!

Arka Chakraborty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:44:29 +0530

50 lines

Re: high temp factor in coot!

Bernhard Rupp <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:28:08 -0700

176 lines

Re: high temp factor in coot!

Arka Chakraborty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2012 12:47:51 +0530

180 lines

Re: high temp factor in coot!

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:24:12 +0200

302 lines

Re: high temp factor in coot!

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:53:13 -0400

24 lines

Re: high temp factor in coot!

Qixu Cai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:13:14 +0800

33 lines

Re: high temp factor in coot!

Qixu Cai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:21:54 +0800

71 lines

Re: high temp factor in coot!

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:01:33 +0200

107 lines

Re: high temp factor in coot!

Qixu Cai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:30:18 +0800

205 lines

Re: high temp factor in coot!

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:14:40 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

how to install coot on ubuntu 11.10

how to install coot on ubuntu 11.10

Michael Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:54:59 -0400

59 lines

Re: how to install coot on ubuntu 11.10

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:59:31 +0200

65 lines

Re: how to install coot on ubuntu 11.10

AFL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:42:35 +0200

46 lines

Re: how to install coot on ubuntu 11.10

Miguel Ortiz Lombardia <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:00:13 +0200

102 lines

New Thread

Image names

Image names

Graeme Winter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:19:58 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

iMosflm version 1.0.6 & Mosflm version 7.0.8

iMosflm version 1.0.6 & Mosflm version 7.0.8

Harry Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:28:14 +0100

129 lines

Re: iMosflm version 1.0.6 & Mosflm version 7.0.8

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:42:38 -0500

291 lines

Re: iMosflm version 1.0.6 & Mosflm version 7.0.8

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:04:00 +0100

192 lines

New Thread

indexing(?) question in P21

indexing(?) question in P21

wtempel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:35:25 -0400

53 lines

Re: indexing(?) question in P21

Phil Jeffrey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:50:27 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

indexing(?) question in P21 - solved

indexing(?) question in P21 - solved

wtempel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:28:26 -0400

44 lines

Re: indexing(?) question in P21 - solved

Bryan Lepore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:34:44 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Instruct-NL Workshop on Wednesday April 25, 2012, in Leiden, the Netherlands

Instruct-NL Workshop on Wednesday April 25, 2012, in Leiden, the Netherlands

Raimond Ravelli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:58:45 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Inverted Micelles and Crystallization

Inverted Micelles and Crystallization

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:45:35 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

Job opportunity: Postdoctoral researcher

Job opportunity: Postdoctoral researcher

Mark Banfield (JIC) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:56:15 +0000

200 lines

New Thread

job vacancy at Proteros

job vacancy at Proteros

Krapp, Stephan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:52:53 +0200

447 lines

New Thread

Last call: CCP4 summer school at APS, in USA

Last call: CCP4 summer school at APS, in USA

Sanishvili, Ruslan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:07:43 -0500

370 lines

New Thread

Ligand fitting into density

Ligand fitting into density

Dipankar Manna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:11:00 +0000

109 lines

Re: Ligand fitting into density

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:38:55 +0200

240 lines

Re: Ligand fitting into density

Fischmann, Thierry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:09:22 -0400

336 lines

Re: Ligand fitting into density

Kendall Nettles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:24:17 -0400

287 lines

Re: Ligand fitting into density

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:40:45 -0400

105 lines

Re: Ligand fitting into density

James Kiefer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:24:35 -0700

184 lines

New Thread

Ligand geometry

Ligand geometry

Uma Ratu <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:47:58 -0400

70 lines

Re: Ligand geometry

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:49:59 +0200

123 lines

Re: Ligand geometry

H. Raaijmakers <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:14:01 +0200

54 lines

Re: Ligand geometry

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:32:58 +0100

155 lines

Re: Ligand geometry

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:56:42 +0200

147 lines

Re: Ligand geometry

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:00:41 +0100

186 lines

Re: Ligand geometry

Uma Ratu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:55:43 -0400

1075 lines

Re: Ligand geometry

Bernhard C. Lohkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:45:03 +0200

120 lines

New Thread

MAMCM reminder

MAMCM reminder

David R. Cooper <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:23:22 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

Membrane protein purification with HIC

Membrane protein purification with HIC

Theresa Hsu <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:39:22 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

minimum protein concentration for NI-NTA column

minimum protein concentration for NI-NTA column

Jerry McCully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:37:52 -0700

66 lines

Re: minimum protein concentration for NI-NTA column

Zhijie Li <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:45:46 -0400

141 lines

Re: minimum protein concentration for NI-NTA column

Thomas Cleveland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:56:36 -0400

67 lines

New Thread

modelling a flexible peptide

modelling a flexible peptide

intekhab alam <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:37:05 +0900

57 lines

Re: modelling a flexible peptide

Zhijie Li <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:59:19 -0400

134 lines

Re: modelling a flexible peptide

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 23:24:15 -0400

124 lines

New Thread

Molecular Replacement

Molecular Replacement

Uma Ratu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:49:43 -0400

60 lines

Re: Molecular Replacement

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:26:59 -0400

39 lines

Re: Molecular Replacement

Uma Ratu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:09:36 +0930

60 lines

Re: Molecular Replacement

Uma Ratu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:04:52 +0930

109 lines

Re: Molecular Replacement

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:59:45 +0100

285 lines

Re: Molecular Replacement

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:44:47 -0400

37 lines

Re: Molecular Replacement

Uma Ratu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:26:02 -0400

87 lines

Molecular replacement

Krithika Sundaram <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 02:26:06 +0100

30 lines

Re: Molecular replacement

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:24:28 -0400

43 lines

Re: Molecular replacement

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:00:28 +0100

134 lines

Re: Molecular replacement

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:11:56 -0500

169 lines

Re: Molecular replacement

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:33:02 -0400

37 lines

Re: Molecular replacement

Bret Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:43:16 +0100

19 lines

Re: Molecular replacement

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:40:21 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

MOSFLM- Image compatibility

MOSFLM- Image compatibility

Yuri Pompeu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 20:38:56 +0100

14 lines

Re: MOSFLM- Image compatibility

Yuri Pompeu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 20:49:00 +0100

14 lines

New Thread

mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients

mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients

Francis E Reyes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:25:05 -0600

25 lines

Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients

Pete Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:54:26 -0500

31 lines

Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:00:29 -0700

26 lines

Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients

Miller, Mitchell D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:13:21 -0700

44 lines

Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients

Phil Jeffrey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:30:25 -0400

37 lines

Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:21:27 -0700

67 lines

Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients

Oliver Smart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 18:48:16 +0100

44 lines

Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:37:47 -0700

73 lines

New Thread

negative density at some places in the side chain of residues

negative density at some places in the side chain of residues

Alaksa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 02:23:09 +0530

15742 lines

Re: negative density at some places in the side chain of residues

Antony Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:03:11 +0000

51 lines

Re: negative density at some places in the side chain of residues

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:32:32 +0100

140 lines

New Thread

negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

Chris Meier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:16:17 +0200

52 lines

Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:27:37 +0100

47 lines

Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:29:35 +0100

33 lines

Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:31:50 -0400

54 lines

Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:41:47 -0500

49 lines

Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

Scott Classen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:42:11 -0700

45 lines

Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:55:02 +0100

33 lines

Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:41:40 +0200

117 lines

Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:13:07 +0100

158 lines

Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

Yuri Pompeu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:25:14 +0100

14 lines

Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

Katherine Sippel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 13:32:08 -0500

143 lines

Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

Sanishvili, Ruslan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:00:00 -0500

354 lines

Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:37:14 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

new XDS version

new XDS version

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:16:26 +0200

135 lines

New Thread

OASIS new version released

OASIS new version released

Fan, Hai-fu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:32:13 +0800

72 lines

New Thread

off topic: the effects of spontaneous oligomerization on crystallization

off topic: the effects of spontaneous oligomerization on crystallization

杨贝 <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:41:12 -0400

77 lines

Re: off topic: the effects of spontaneous oligomerization on crystallization

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:49:50 -0400

91 lines

New Thread

Off-pick: suggesiton of puck

Off-pick: suggesiton of puck

Frank <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:35:32 +0100

23 lines

Re: Off-pick: suggesiton of puck

Jim Pflugrath <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:51:50 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease

Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease

Theresa Hsu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:31:37 +0100

18 lines

Re: Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:10:20 +0200

54 lines

Re: Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease

Dima Klenchin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 04:22:43 -0500

25 lines

Re: Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease

Florian Brückner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:52:54 +0200

167 lines

Re: Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease

Jason Forse <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:32:45 +0100

22 lines

Re: Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease

Tim Fenn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:39:47 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files

Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files

Florian Schmitzberger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:23:13 -0400

201 lines

Re: Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files

Mark J van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:35:42 +0200

69 lines

Re: Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files

Florian Schmitzberger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:42:09 -0400

305 lines

Re: Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:54:20 -0700

56 lines

Re: Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files

Jens Kaiser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:54:24 -0700

65 lines

Re: Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files

Miller, Mitchell D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:23:41 -0700

67 lines

Re: Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files

VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:18:08 +0200

123 lines

New Thread

Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis‏ (Summary)

Re: Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis‏ (Summary)

Theresa Hsu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:56:12 +0100

67 lines

New Thread

Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis

Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis

Theresa Hsu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:53:23 +0100

17 lines

Re: Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis

Xun Lu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:14:37 -0400

36 lines

Re: Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis

Brett Kroncke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:07:26 -0400

83 lines

Re: Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:27:56 -0400

49 lines

New Thread

Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Marc Kvansakul <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:34:09 +0000

92 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:16:27 -0400

58 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:29:33 -0400

141 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Joel Tyndall <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 04:56:24 +0000

284 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 07:31:12 +0200

52 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Remy Loris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:54:44 +0200

162 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Yu Wai Chen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:34:17 +0100

132 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Boaz Shaanan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:24:40 +0000

275 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Francois Berenger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:25:02 +0900

41 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Marc Kvansakul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:09:51 +0000

67 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Jobichen Chacko <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:12:24 +0800

59 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Enrico Stura <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:34:26 +0200

103 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:54:25 +0200

90 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Colin Groom <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:09:50 +0100

122 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:55:46 +0200

161 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Antony Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:09:03 +0000

189 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Randy Read <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:39:27 +0100

256 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:47:33 +0100

23 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Antony Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:10:02 +0000

261 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Antony Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:18:00 +0000

46 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Tom Oldfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:21:06 +0100

188 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Antony Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:26:01 +0000

230 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Maria Sola i Vilarrubias <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:58:49 +0200

376 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Maria Sola i Vilarrubias <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:14:53 +0200

476 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Ravi Nookala <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:34:30 +0100

665 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Patrick Loll <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:42:12 -0400

57 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:48:20 -0700

67 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Miguel Ortiz Lombardia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:10:16 +0200

113 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:34:58 -0400

442 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:08:21 -0700

548 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:18:12 -0400

29 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:47:43 +0200

138 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Patrick Shaw Stewart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:23:02 +0100

184 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Manoj Tiwari <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:07:50 -0400

253 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:01:28 -0400

63 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:08:39 -0400

56 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Sankaranarayanan Rajan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:57:28 +0530

254 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Van Den Berg, Bert <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2012 15:35:17 +0000

85 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:40:01 -0700

229 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:01:01 -0700

28 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Jeremy Tame <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:10:56 +0900

1471 lines

Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Gerard Bricogne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:33:06 +0100

81 lines

New Thread

one datum many data?

Re: one datum many data?

Robert Blessing <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 11:51:51 -0400

82 lines

Re: one datum many data?

VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 18:11:24 +0200

52 lines

New Thread

one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 13:05:10 +0100

29 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Gerard Bricogne <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 15:18:15 +0100

68 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

George T. DeTitta <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:52:13 +0000

54 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Adrian Goldman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 18:01:29 +0300

101 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Patrick Loll <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 11:23:40 -0400

85 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 17:28:52 +0200

52 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Antony Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 15:33:57 +0000

175 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Gerard DVD Kleywegt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 17:48:08 +0200

17 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

David Schuller <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 13:18:15 -0400

29 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Gerard Bricogne <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 18:35:11 +0100

44 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:03:16 -0500

73 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 15:12:36 -0400

72 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Klaus Fütterer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 21:20:02 +0100

128 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Manfred S. Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:47:26 +0200

103 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Antony Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:13:32 +0000

134 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

John R Helliwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:29:31 +0100

160 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Gerard Bricogne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:39:18 +0100

145 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Boaz Shaanan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:33:25 +0000

90 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Gerard DVD Kleywegt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:03:42 +0200

131 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:15:17 -0700

36 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Francis E Reyes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:24:52 -0600

40 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Andreas Förster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:28:41 +0100

39 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Gerard DVD Kleywegt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:25:21 +0200

65 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

George T. DeTitta <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:27:41 +0000

92 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:38:59 -0400

347 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Kendall Nettles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:46:20 -0400

372 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:52:30 -0500

521 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 19:53:08 +0200

95 lines

Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]

Andreas Förster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:16:32 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

PDF position Structural Cell Biology - Michigan

PDF position Structural Cell Biology - Michigan

Amir Khan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 19:24:54 +0100

126 lines

New Thread

PEG MME 2000 in powder form?

PEG MME 2000 in powder form?

VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:01:24 +0200

61 lines

Re: PEG MME 2000 in powder form?

VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:19:00 +0200

126 lines

New Thread

phaser: high z score but no sol

phaser: high z score but no sol

LISA <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:20:19 +0800

45 lines

Re: phaser: high z score but no sol

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:42:27 +0200

50 lines

Re: phaser: high z score but no sol

Randy Read <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:53:41 +0100

53 lines

Re: phaser: high z score but no sol

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:21:05 -0400

39 lines

Re: phaser: high z score but no sol

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:55:17 +0200

148 lines

Re: phaser: high z score but no sol

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:09:19 -0400

125 lines

Re: phaser: high z score but no sol

Francis E Reyes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:14:28 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

PhD position - Institut de Biologie Structurale (Grenoble)

PhD position - Institut de Biologie Structurale (Grenoble)

David Cobessi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:29:28 +0200

87 lines

New Thread

Position Available: Technical Key Account Manager at Microlytic

Position Available: Technical Key Account Manager at Microlytic

Melanie Adams-Cioaba <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:57:05 -0400

404 lines

New Thread

Position in Structural Biology of Signaling

Position in Structural Biology of Signaling

Qiang Chen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:40:11 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Positions in Structural Biology of Signaling and HIV-related Immunology

Positions in Structural Biology of Signaling and HIV-related Immunology

Qiang Chen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:17:06 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

Post-Doc position at ICR, London

Post-Doc position at ICR, London

Alessandro Vannini <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:45:53 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

Post-doctoral position at Umeå University, Sweden

Post-doctoral position at Umeå University, Sweden

Karina Persson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:32:38 +0200

208 lines

New Thread

Postdoc position in structural biology

Postdoc position in structural biology

Charles Ballard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:29:11 +0100

157 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral fellowship for young scientists trained in the UK

Postdoctoral fellowship for young scientists trained in the UK

Daniel Lietha <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:33:13 +0200

69 lines

New Thread

postdoctoral position at Sanford-Burnham, San Diego, CA

postdoctoral position at Sanford-Burnham, San Diego, CA

Rongsheng Jin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:13:37 -0700

129 lines

New Thread

postdoctoral position at the NIH focused on understanding the mechanism of cytoskeletal regulators

postdoctoral position at the NIH focused on understanding the mechanism of cytoskeletal regulators

ANTONINA ROLL-MECAK <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:31:14 -0400

317 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral position at the University of Edinburgh

Postdoctoral position at the University of Edinburgh

Julie Welburn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:45:44 +0100

201 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Position Available in Structural Biophysics and Protein Engineering in Rockville, Maryland, USA

Postdoctoral Position Available in Structural Biophysics and Protein Engineering in Rockville, Maryland, USA

Scott Walsh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:45:52 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral position in DNA replication/repair at the LMB, Cambridge

Postdoctoral position in DNA replication/repair at the LMB, Cambridge

Meindert Lamers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:40:44 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral position in structural and chemical immunology

Postdoctoral position in structural and chemical immunology

Yoonsang Cho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:14:45 -0400

66 lines

New Thread

problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data

problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data

Deepthi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:07:58 -0700

42 lines

Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 05:12:30 +0100

65 lines

Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:48:59 +0200

67 lines

Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:17:27 +0100

54 lines

Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data

Deepthi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:31:00 -0700

147 lines

Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data

Matthew Franklin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:07:16 -0400

250 lines

Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:51:50 +0100

39 lines

Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:25:11 +0100

109 lines

New Thread

Problem with indexing in the latest iMosflm release

Problem with indexing in the latest iMosflm release

A Leslie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:52:09 +0100

706 lines

New Thread

protease inhibitor

protease inhibitor

rashmi panigrahi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:41:28 +0800

29 lines

New Thread

Publication ethics Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Publication ethics Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Jrh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:02:05 +0100

117 lines

Re: Publication ethics Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers

Mark J van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:40:02 +0200

127 lines

New Thread

Question about PyMol

Question about PyMol

Harman, Christine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:17:40 +0000

52 lines

Re: Question about PyMol

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:20:14 -0600

63 lines

Re: Question about PyMol

Harman, Christine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:24:54 +0000

118 lines

New Thread

Real Space Refine Zone for Ligand

Real Space Refine Zone for Ligand

Dipankar Manna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 02:52:17 +0000

103 lines

Re: Real Space Refine Zone for Ligand

jens Preben Morth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:00:28 +0200

167 lines

Re: Real Space Refine Zone for Ligand

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:06:42 +0100

113 lines

New Thread

refining beta peptides

refining beta peptides

Richard Baxter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2012 18:34:51 -0400

28 lines

Re: refining beta peptides

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:44:45 +0100

151 lines

New Thread

Refmac and sigma value

Refmac and sigma value

Uma Ratu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:38:14 -0400

59 lines

Re: Refmac and sigma value

Uma Ratu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:26:21 -0400

102 lines

Re: Refmac and sigma value

Robert Nicholls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:24:42 +0100

146 lines

Re: Refmac and sigma value

[log in to unmask][log in to unmask]

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:04:11 +0200

277 lines

Re: Refmac and sigma value

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:57:29 +0200

301 lines

Re: Refmac and sigma value

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:25:59 +0100

327 lines

Re: Refmac and sigma value

Uma Ratu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:53:42 -0400

362 lines

New Thread

Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM

Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2012 08:42:47 -0700

44 lines

Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2012 12:50:20 -0400

130 lines

Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM

Nat Echols <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2012 10:52:39 -0700

38 lines

Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM

Nicholas M Glykos <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 09:16:48 +0300

29 lines

Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM

Nicholas M Glykos <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 10:34:48 +0300

32 lines

Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 10:53:22 +0100

53 lines

Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM

Harry Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 11:15:04 +0100

204 lines

Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM

Nikolaos Glykos <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:59:22 +0300

31 lines

Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM

Ben Eisenbraun <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 10:09:06 -0400

34 lines

Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:10:40 +0100

28 lines

Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM

Nikolaos Glykos <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 17:50:51 +0300

51 lines

Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM

Marcin Wojdyr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:57:07 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

REMINDER *CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR ESRF BEAM TIME WITH ONLINE MICROSPEC*

REMINDER *CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR ESRF BEAM TIME WITH ONLINE MICROSPEC*

David Flot <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:21:10 +0200

363 lines

New Thread

Reminder: BCA Summer School 2012

Reminder: BCA Summer School 2012

Airlie McCoy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:03:28 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop

Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:15:23 -0500

89 lines

Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop

David Schuller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:20:33 -0400

84 lines

Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop

James Kiefer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:39:41 -0700

98 lines

Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:52:46 -0500

240 lines

Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop

Gerard Bricogne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:25:06 +0100

139 lines

Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:30:26 -0500

320 lines

Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:52:34 -0700

229 lines

Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:09:10 -0700

119 lines

Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop

Lynn F. Ten Eyck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:25:41 -0700

296 lines

Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:35:47 -0700

581 lines

New Thread

RESEARCH DIRECTOR IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY/BIOPHYSICS & TENURE-TRACK GROUP LEADERS, Helsinki

RESEARCH DIRECTOR IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY/BIOPHYSICS & TENURE-TRACK GROUP LEADERS, Helsinki

Mark J van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:00:30 +0200

117 lines

New Thread

Rif: [ccp4bb] indexing(?) question in P21

Rif: [ccp4bb] indexing(?) question in P21

Fulvio Saccoccia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:10:12 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

Rigaku R-axis IIC X-ray diffraction system

Rigaku R-axis IIC X-ray diffraction system

Ng Chyan Leong <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:48:49 +0100

19 lines

Re: Rigaku R-axis IIC X-ray diffraction system

Jim Pflugrath <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:54:29 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

scala - handling of anomalous data

scala - handling of anomalous data

Matthew Chu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:41:18 -0700

49 lines

Re: scala - handling of anomalous data

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 21:55:57 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein..

SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein..

Qian Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:58:57 +0800

61 lines

Re: SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein..

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:15:57 +0200

68 lines

Re: SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein..

Uday Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:03:53 +0100

23 lines

Re: SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein..

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:13:01 -0700

41 lines

Re: SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein..

Mark J van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:16:46 +0200

60 lines

Re: SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein..

Qian Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:05:31 +0800

58 lines

New Thread

simple solution to - Trends in Data Fabrication

Re: simple solution to - Trends in Data Fabrication

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 10:44:50 -0700

363 lines

Re: simple solution to - Trends in Data Fabrication

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:15:16 -0700

377 lines

New Thread

sodium vs water near

sodium vs water near

chandan kishore <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:49:16 +0800

40 lines

New Thread

software to generate protein topology diagram like those available at PDBsum webserver

software to generate protein topology diagram like those available at PDBsum webserver

Parthasarathy Sampathkumar <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:08:30 -0400

152 lines

Re: software to generate protein topology diagram like those available at PDBsum webserver

Parthasarathy Sampathkumar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:12:39 -0400

69 lines

Re: software to generate protein topology diagram like those available at PDBsum webserver

Parthasarathy Sampathkumar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:18:33 -0400

108 lines

New Thread

Substitution to glycerol during crystallogenesis

Substitution to glycerol during crystallogenesis

Toby Longwood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 13:49:50 +0200

74 lines

Re: Substitution to glycerol during crystallogenesis

Florian Schmitzberger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:06:38 -0400

257 lines

Re: Substitution to glycerol during crystallogenesis

Debasish Chattopadhyay <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:58:59 +0000

332 lines

Re: Substitution to glycerol during crystallogenesis

Enrico Stura <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:40:38 +0200

67 lines

Re: Substitution to glycerol during crystallogenesis

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:39:41 -0400

102 lines

New Thread

Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit

Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit

Ke, Jiyuan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:41:54 +0000

143 lines

Re: Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:01:19 -0400

230 lines

Re: Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit

David Schuller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:33:59 -0400

187 lines

Re: Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit

Savvas Savvides <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:21:30 +0200

137 lines

Re: Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:20:55 -0400

227 lines

Re: Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:53:15 -0500

231 lines

Re: Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:09:56 -0400

247 lines

New Thread

Summary Re: anyone scrapping an Raxis-IV?

Summary Re: anyone scrapping an Raxis-IV?

Peter Moody <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:54:59 +0100

129 lines

New Thread

SUMMARY [ccp4bb] copy FreeR - maintain resolution

SUMMARY [ccp4bb] copy FreeR - maintain resolution

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:13:26 +0200

110 lines

New Thread

symmetry related molecules

symmetry related molecules

Maher Alayyoubi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:15:46 -0500

19 lines

Re: symmetry related molecules

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:20:10 -0400

84 lines

New Thread

three letter codes for buffer components

three letter codes for buffer components

Ruth Brenk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:33:03 +0100

35 lines

Re: three letter codes for buffer components

Carlos Frazao <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:20:35 +0100

60 lines

Re: three letter codes for buffer components

Matthew BOWLER <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:05:57 +0200

57 lines

Re: three letter codes for buffer components

Rajintha Bandaranayake <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:11:46 -0400

48 lines

New Thread

Trueblood Award Nominations

Trueblood Award Nominations

Paul Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:01:15 -0700

65 lines

New Thread

unique reflections vs unique observations

unique reflections vs unique observations

Naveed A Nadvi <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2012 09:06:01 +0100

37 lines

Re: unique reflections vs unique observations

Andrew Leslie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:14:12 +0100

103 lines

Re: unique reflections vs unique observations

Jim Pflugrath <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:32:05 +0000

72 lines

New Thread

unsubscribe

unsubscribe

Wolfram Saenger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:21:45 +0200

27 lines

Re: unsubscribe

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:39:43 +0100

79 lines

New Thread

UPDATED: Position Available: Technical Key Account Manager at Microlytic

UPDATED: Position Available: Technical Key Account Manager at Microlytic

Melanie Adams-Cioaba <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:41:50 -0400

412 lines

New Thread

very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Tom Peat <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:56:42 +1000

67 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Kevin Jin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:05:45 -0700

81 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:28:23 -0400

201 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:05:45 -0700

279 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:34:19 -0700

21 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Anastassis Perrakis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:08:42 +0100

28 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 16:21:31 +0200

161 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 16:09:13 +0100

110 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bryan Lepore <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 15:05:04 -0400

53 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Kevin Jin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 12:05:39 -0700

202 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 13:14:48 -0700

98 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Kendall Nettles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 16:27:33 -0400

185 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

David Briggs <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 21:31:22 +0100

163 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 13:40:21 -0700

434 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 13:42:02 -0700

25 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 16:57:33 -0400

95 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Philippe DUMAS <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 00:29:38 +0200

24 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Gerard DVD Kleywegt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 01:57:41 +0200

210 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2012 23:45:47 -0500

69 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

jens Preben Morth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:59:09 +0200

50 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:26:49 +0200

402 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

David Schuller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:56:06 -0400

24 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 15:03:44 +0200

38 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Robert Sweet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:04:52 -0400

52 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:41:02 -0700

360 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:43:42 -0500

114 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:24:55 -0500

181 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Prince, D Bryan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:32:32 -0400

322 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Maria Sola i Vilarrubias <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:00:48 +0200

337 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Nat Echols <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:28:25 -0700

33 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Pete Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:45:44 -0500

79 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:01:39 -0500

131 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Randy Read <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:16:47 +0100

257 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Ravi Nookala <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:30:34 +0100

450 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 10:34:56 +0200

508 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Dyda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:10:31 -0400

47 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

James Whisstock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 00:11:32 +1000

291 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 10:45:25 -0400

109 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Mark J van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:58:51 +0200

79 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Maria Sola i Vilarrubias <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:13:40 +0200

268 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Mark J van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:21:53 +0200

154 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Mark J van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:28:55 +0200

154 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Herbert J. Bernstein <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:33:47 -0400

186 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Tom Peat <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:17:45 +1000

208 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bryan Lepore <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:19:36 -0400

44 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Dale Tronrud <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:16:55 -0700

67 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Kevin Jin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:33:36 -0700

34 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:29:14 -0600

49 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bryan Lepore <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:31:42 -0400

58 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:11:50 -0700

163 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Kevin Jin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:22:33 -0700

143 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:28:04 -0400

173 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Katherine Sippel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:19:57 -0500

207 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Kendall Nettles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:21:44 -0400

131 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Zhijie Li <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:22:38 -0400

92 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:00:51 -0600

66 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Kendall Nettles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:32:28 -0400

81 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:21:40 +0100

152 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Eric Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:45:44 -0400

100 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:24:53 -0700

172 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Zhijie Li <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:59:59 -0400

236 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

John R Helliwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:16:20 +0100

149 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Herbert J. Bernstein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:50:59 -0400

181 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:08:40 -0400

343 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:02:37 -0400

389 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:15:08 -0700

298 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:00:09 -0700

476 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Ronald E Stenkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:03:31 -0700

210 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:11:27 -0700

274 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:30:06 -0700

306 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 19:58:07 -0700

54 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 20:46:43 -0700

63 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 23:57:11 -0400

59 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 21:13:15 -0700

115 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

John R Helliwell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:05:17 +0100

228 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Ronald E Stenkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:23:17 -0700

263 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Patrick Loll <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:16:17 -0400

61 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

James Whisstock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2012 07:02:34 +1000

69 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Jrh <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2012 09:17:31 +0100

292 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Eric Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2012 14:26:36 -0400

64 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 08:48:16 -0700

189 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 13:18:05 -0700

309 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 16:30:45 -0700

21 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:51:02 +0100

47 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:47:15 -0700

60 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Boaz Shaanan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2012 16:32:47 +0000

87 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2012 17:38:05 +0100

101 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

David Schuller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:46:36 -0400

40 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2012 09:55:06 -0700

60 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Richard Gillilan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2012 17:01:45 +0000

38 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:02:33 -0700

56 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:11:30 -0700

57 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:24:43 -0700

109 lines

Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Felix Frolow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2012 21:29:21 +0300

157 lines

New Thread

very uninformative

Re: very uninformative

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:07:20 -0700

307 lines

Re: very uninformative

Kevin Jin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:40:53 -0700

275 lines

New Thread

Via Annual Reports...Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Via Annual Reports...Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication

Jrh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:47:26 +0100

379 lines

New Thread

water picking

water picking

Oganesyan, Vaheh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:11:19 +0000

172 lines

Re: water picking

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:24:01 +0200

73 lines

New Thread

Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:57:40 -0400

38 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Tom Peat <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:07:53 +1000

63 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:19:05 -0400

55 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 13:30:19 -0700

67 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

David Schuller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:01:30 -0400

58 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Harry Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:26:54 +0100

155 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Kip Guja <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:17:26 -0400

77 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Ho Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 13:33:45 -1000

57 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:43:26 +0200

91 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Tom Peat <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:53:52 +1000

109 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:09:26 +0200

116 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Takanori Nakane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:21:17 +0900

24 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:06:46 -0400

287 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:13:19 -0400

319 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

David Aragao <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:30:45 +1000

184 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Harry Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:05:19 +0100

127 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:24:04 -0700

47 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Sabuj Pattanayek <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:27:18 -0500

15 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:08:05 -0600

57 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Sabuj Pattanayek <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:19:41 -0500

39 lines

Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?

Pete Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:45:44 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

wwPDB and CCDC

wwPDB and CCDC

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:14:56 +0100

18 lines

Re: wwPDB and CCDC

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:30:38 +0200

53 lines

Re: wwPDB and CCDC

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:29:39 +0100

31 lines

Re: wwPDB and CCDC

Randy Read <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:38:45 +0100

62 lines

Re: wwPDB and CCDC

Gerard DVD Kleywegt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:40:32 +0200

66 lines

Re: wwPDB and CCDC

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:33:40 +0100

166 lines

New Thread

X-PLOR

X-PLOR

Nadir T. Mrabet <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:34:13 +0200

35 lines

Re: X-PLOR

Francisco Hernandez-Guzman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:59:23 -0700

55 lines

New Thread

Yeast plasmid DNA miniprep problem

Yeast plasmid DNA miniprep problem

Zhang, Zhen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:32:27 +0000

97 lines

Re: Yeast plasmid DNA miniprep problem

Philipp Ellinger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:29:20 +0200

178 lines

New Thread

zinc finger

Re: zinc finger

James Kiefer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:42:28 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

zinc fingre

zinc fingre

Rajesh kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 10:07:01 -0500

67 lines

Re: zinc fingre

Debasish Chattopadhyay <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:17:34 +0000

206 lines

Re: zinc fingre

Rajesh kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 10:20:10 -0500

252 lines

Re: zinc fingre

Pius Padayatti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:51:00 -0400

53 lines

Re: zinc fingre

Debasish Chattopadhyay <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:47:16 +0000

65 lines

Re: zinc fingre

Peter Hsu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 00:43:48 +0100

20 lines

Re: zinc fingre

Rajesh kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:16:14 -0500

87 lines

New Thread

[cnsbb] MTZ label

Re: [cnsbb] MTZ label

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:36:18 -0400

103 lines

New Thread

[OT] to CCP admin - CCP14 - who's in charge?

[OT] to CCP admin - CCP14 - who's in charge?

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:48:21 -0700

29 lines

Re: [OT] to CCP admin - CCP14 - who's in charge?

Harry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2012 22:06:24 +0100

48 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager