JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives


DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives

DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives


January 2012


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report (7 messages)
AW: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience? (1 message)
DCAM - detail re: grouping constructs for the technical editors (3 messages)
DCAM editors' - Wed Jan 4, 9:00 EST - Agenda (1 message)
DCAM entities for DescribedResourceId and ValueId (local non-URI identifiers) (3 messages)
DCAM Proposal - summary (1 message)
DCAM Statement versus RDF Statement (3 messages)
DCAM Statement versus RDF Statement -> "Slots" and "Boxes" ? (1 message)
DCAM telecon - 2012-01-30 Monday, 1100 EST (1 message)
DCAM: the analogy to SKOS (1 message)
DCAP:DCAM (4 messages)
Drafts Published by the W3C HTML Data Task Force (1 message)
Heads up: DCAM telecon on Monday, 30 January, 11:00 EST (1 message)
Issues tracker needed! What is your experience? (11 messages)
Issues trackers - summary of discussion (2 messages)
Literals in DCAM: labels, notations, ...others? (2 messages)
Microdata to RDF (dvcs.w3.org) (1 message)
Monday's informal Schema.org Alignment call - report (1 message)
RCAM Revision Tech (1 message)
Revising (and simplifying) DCAM terminology - a proposal (4 messages)
Schema.org Alignment Task Group *informal* telecon - TODAY (1 message)
Schema.org Alignment Task Group telecon next Monday, 2012-01-09 ? (1 message)
thesis...RE: DCAM entities for DescribedResourceId and ValueId (local non-URI identifiers) (1 message)
Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model (12 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DC-ARCHITECTURE Home

DC-ARCHITECTURE Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report

2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:20:17 -0500

147 lines

Re: 2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2012 09:58:10 +0000

228 lines

Re: 2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2012 03:46:18 -0800

256 lines

Re: 2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report

Kai Eckert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:40:59 +0100

42 lines

Re: 2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report

Kai Eckert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:02:49 +0100

69 lines

Re: 2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2012 17:11:08 +0000

110 lines

Re: 2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report

Kai Eckert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:14:22 +0100

119 lines

New Thread

AW: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

AW: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

Fischer, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:24:09 +0100

118 lines

New Thread

DCAM - detail re: grouping constructs for the technical editors

DCAM - detail re: grouping constructs for the technical editors

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:56:36 -0500

86 lines

Re: DCAM - detail re: grouping constructs for the technical editors

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:17:31 +0000

145 lines

Re: DCAM - detail re: grouping constructs for the technical editors

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:55:27 -0500

68 lines

New Thread

DCAM editors' - Wed Jan 4, 9:00 EST - Agenda

DCAM editors' - Wed Jan 4, 9:00 EST - Agenda

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2012 13:53:06 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

DCAM entities for DescribedResourceId and ValueId (local non-URI identifiers)

DCAM entities for DescribedResourceId and ValueId (local non-URI identifiers)

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:11:15 -0500

48 lines

Re: DCAM entities for DescribedResourceId and ValueId (local non-URI identifiers)

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 09:14:01 +0100

57 lines

Re: DCAM entities for DescribedResourceId and ValueId (local non-URI identifiers)

Mark Diggory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:17:55 -0800

195 lines

New Thread

DCAM Proposal - summary

DCAM Proposal - summary

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2012 16:59:21 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

DCAM Statement versus RDF Statement

DCAM Statement versus RDF Statement

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2012 14:40:11 -0500

46 lines

Re: DCAM Statement versus RDF Statement

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:38:37 +0100

60 lines

Re: DCAM Statement versus RDF Statement

Kai Eckert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:10:05 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

DCAM Statement versus RDF Statement -> "Slots" and "Boxes" ?

Re: DCAM Statement versus RDF Statement -> "Slots" and "Boxes" ?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:54:01 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

DCAM telecon - 2012-01-30 Monday, 1100 EST

DCAM telecon - 2012-01-30 Monday, 1100 EST

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:53:02 -0500

68 lines

New Thread

DCAM: the analogy to SKOS

DCAM: the analogy to SKOS

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:30:48 -0500

103 lines

New Thread

DCAP:DCAM

DCAP:DCAM

Jon Phipps <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:25:11 -0500

119 lines

Re: DCAP:DCAM

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:22:20 -0500

94 lines

Re: DCAP:DCAM

Jon Phipps <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:27:39 -0500

301 lines

Re: DCAP:DCAM

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:53:22 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Drafts Published by the W3C HTML Data Task Force

Drafts Published by the W3C HTML Data Task Force

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:54:39 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

Heads up: DCAM telecon on Monday, 30 January, 11:00 EST

Heads up: DCAM telecon on Monday, 30 January, 11:00 EST

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:44:15 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Jan 2012 13:11:39 -0500

48 lines

Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

Baden Hughes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:27:24 +1100

74 lines

Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

Bernard Vatant <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2012 07:43:10 +0100

221 lines

Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2012 07:15:09 -0500

240 lines

Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

Arquette,Mark K <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:03:17 -0600

75 lines

Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

Jon Phipps <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:49:10 -0500

160 lines

Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

Corey A Harper <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:02:14 -0500

100 lines

Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

Mark A. Matienzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:51:25 -0500

114 lines

Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

Corey A Harper <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:13:08 -0500

142 lines

Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

Peter Ring <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:34:27 +0100

334 lines

Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:15:05 -0500

358 lines

New Thread

Issues trackers - summary of discussion

Issues trackers - summary of discussion

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:39:33 -0500

69 lines

Re: Issues trackers - summary of discussion

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:01:19 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Literals in DCAM: labels, notations, ...others?

Literals in DCAM: labels, notations, ...others?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:41:48 -0500

108 lines

Re: Literals in DCAM: labels, notations, ...others?

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:13:31 +0100

120 lines

New Thread

Microdata to RDF (dvcs.w3.org)

Microdata to RDF (dvcs.w3.org)

Jon Phipps <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:09:31 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Monday's informal Schema.org Alignment call - report

Monday's informal Schema.org Alignment call - report

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:13:26 -0500

105 lines

New Thread

RCAM Revision Tech

RCAM Revision Tech

Kai Eckert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:55:50 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Revising (and simplifying) DCAM terminology - a proposal

Revising (and simplifying) DCAM terminology - a proposal

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2012 14:19:21 -0500

117 lines

Re: Revising (and simplifying) DCAM terminology - a proposal

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:15:44 -0800

155 lines

Re: Revising (and simplifying) DCAM terminology - a proposal

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:39:08 +0100

130 lines

Re: Revising (and simplifying) DCAM terminology - a proposal

Kai Eckert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:27:43 +0100

183 lines

New Thread

Schema.org Alignment Task Group *informal* telecon - TODAY

Schema.org Alignment Task Group *informal* telecon - TODAY

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:06:51 -0500

374 lines

New Thread

Schema.org Alignment Task Group telecon next Monday, 2012-01-09 ?

Schema.org Alignment Task Group telecon next Monday, 2012-01-09 ?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:16:49 -0500

338 lines

New Thread

thesis...RE: DCAM entities for DescribedResourceId and ValueId (local non-URI identifiers)

thesis...RE: DCAM entities for DescribedResourceId and ValueId (local non-URI identifiers)

Greenberg, Jane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:41:49 +0000

291 lines

New Thread

Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model

Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:01:29 -0500

64 lines

Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:09:49 +0100

74 lines

Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:35:27 +0000

93 lines

Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:49:43 +0100

92 lines

Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:29:50 +0000

83 lines

Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 07:20:42 -0800

120 lines

Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:40:53 +0100

102 lines

Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:50:17 +0000

122 lines

Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:46:30 -0500

22 lines

Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:47:50 +0100

106 lines

Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2012 18:58:59 +0000

77 lines

Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model

Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:28:09 +0100

62 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager