JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


November 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post) (13 messages)
Borough Council request (4 messages)
Call Recording in a call centre (10 messages)
Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests? (9 messages)
Data sharing queries 1. Nominated representative/agent on UCAS forms and 2. Students Union (5 messages)
Disclosure Inspection Reports - Housing Act 2004 (2 messages)
Disclosure under DPA s.29(3) [UNCLASSIFIED] (4 messages)
Dog abuser seeks compensation for 'privacy invasion' (4 messages)
DP breach by NatWest (1 message)
DP Officer position in college's (3 messages)
Eire to investigate Facebook over data protection concerns (1 message)
Email virus warning (1 message)
FOI with DP considerations (1 message)
FW: Hawktalk: ICO's view on the Data Protection issues ahead (1 message)
FW: Tracking Shoppers (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Letwin Breached DPA (1 message)
Hawktalk: Does the Health Care Bill permit medical research without patient consent? (1 message)
Hawktalk: Proposals for new Data Protection Directive or Regulation in January 2012 (1 message)
Hawktalk:Email marketing under PECR and the Data Protection Act (1 message)
ICO suffers data loss conundrum (3 messages)
Information Sharing (1 message)
Job opportunity London or Manchester (1 message)
Letwin Breached DPA (7 messages)
Message warning of potential spam (2 messages)
mobile phone data (2 messages)
Nice opportunity... (2 messages)
Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA! (10 messages)
Planning Online (3 messages)
s.29(3) summary of issue (2 messages)
S.54(3) Contempt of court (1 message)
S.55 offence: Online Bingo Player Data Theft Outcome a Joke (1 message)
Santa Databreach (7 messages)
Student Feedback Questionnaires (1 message)
Third Party data (1 message)
Tracking Shoppers (13 messages)
Two new s55A penalties (8 messages)
Universal Opt out (1 message)
Viewing files (3 messages)
Web-site Privacy Policies (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:55:03 +0000

112 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 18:44:42 +0000

225 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Doherty Michael (EAST KENT HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:47:29 +0000

277 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:00:41 +0000

320 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:10:55 -0000

399 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:10:27 +0000

447 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:42:12 -0000

491 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:28:04 +0000

435 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Michael Doherty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:35:38 +0000

56 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 19:17:59 +0000

89 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:42:43 +0000

395 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:58:27 +0000

583 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Peter Lane <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 09:04:13 +0000

65 lines

New Thread

Borough Council request

Borough Council request

Trevor Pearce <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Nov 2011 18:06:59 -0000

238 lines

Re: Borough Council request

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:54:57 +0000

519 lines

Re: Borough Council request

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:59:00 -0000

837 lines

Re: Borough Council request

Jim Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:44:13 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

Call Recording in a call centre

Call Recording in a call centre

Marilyn Barton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:22:36 +0000

43 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:51:29 +0000

234 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:47:02 +0000

115 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:34:36 -0000

127 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:56:30 +0000

200 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:24:28 +0000

548 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:39:44 +0000

666 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:51:15 +0000

246 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:32:50 -0000

666 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Kevin Tarleton (0161 923 6305) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:56:47 -0000

218 lines

New Thread

Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Jaines, Amy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:18:34 -0000

246 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:25:01 +0000

391 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:31:13 -0000

565 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:44:24 +0000

40 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:16:52 +0000

107 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:18:06 -0000

172 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 14:01:11 -0000

176 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 21:02:04 -0000

245 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Nov 2011 09:55:39 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

Data sharing queries 1. Nominated representative/agent on UCAS forms and 2. Students Union

Data sharing queries 1. Nominated representative/agent on UCAS forms and 2. Students Union

Barlow, Jackie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:13:48 +0000

303 lines

Re: Data sharing queries 1. Nominated representative/agent on UCAS forms and 2. Students Union

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:30:27 +0000

456 lines

Re: Data sharing queries 1. Nominated representative/agent on UCAS forms and 2. Students Union

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:46:33 -0000

572 lines

Re: Data sharing queries 1. Nominated representative/agent on UCAS forms and 2. Students Union

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:10:32 +0000

626 lines

Re: Data sharing queries 1. Nominated representative/agent on UCAS forms and 2. Students Union

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:33:19 -0000

335 lines

New Thread

Disclosure Inspection Reports - Housing Act 2004

Disclosure Inspection Reports - Housing Act 2004

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:58:47 -0000

70 lines

Re: Disclosure Inspection Reports - Housing Act 2004

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:07:40 +0000

109 lines

New Thread

Disclosure under DPA s.29(3) [UNCLASSIFIED]

Disclosure under DPA s.29(3) [UNCLASSIFIED]

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:26:18 +0000

62 lines

Re: Disclosure under DPA s.29(3) [UNCLASSIFIED]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:37:02 +0000

117 lines

Re: Disclosure under DPA s.29(3) [UNCLASSIFIED]

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:44:18 -0000

166 lines

Re: Disclosure under DPA s.29(3) [UNCLASSIFIED]

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:47:06 -0000

244 lines

New Thread

Dog abuser seeks compensation for 'privacy invasion'

Dog abuser seeks compensation for 'privacy invasion'

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:32:32 +0000

141 lines

Re: Dog abuser seeks compensation for 'privacy invasion'

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:49:03 -0000

682 lines

Re: Dog abuser seeks compensation for 'privacy invasion'

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:41:47 +0000

842 lines

Re: Dog abuser seeks compensation for 'privacy invasion'

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:37:01 -0000

411 lines

New Thread

DP breach by NatWest

DP breach by NatWest

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:45:12 +0000

68 lines

New Thread

DP Officer position in college's

DP Officer position in college's

Ronnie Perpete <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:59:48 +0000

38 lines

Re: DP Officer position in college's

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:42:51 -0000

74 lines

Re: DP Officer position in college's

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:38:31 +0000

111 lines

New Thread

Eire to investigate Facebook over data protection concerns

Eire to investigate Facebook over data protection concerns

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:40:07 +0000

140 lines

New Thread

Email virus warning

Email virus warning

Dave and Suzy Ensor <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Nov 2011 10:37:01 -0000

520 lines

New Thread

FOI with DP considerations

Re: FOI with DP considerations

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:07:58 -0000

369 lines

New Thread

FW: Hawktalk: ICO's view on the Data Protection issues ahead

FW: Hawktalk: ICO's view on the Data Protection issues ahead

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:34:05 -0000

167 lines

New Thread

FW: Tracking Shoppers

FW: Tracking Shoppers

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:26:30 +0000

199 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Letwin Breached DPA

FW: [data-protection] Letwin Breached DPA

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:57:58 -0000

589 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Does the Health Care Bill permit medical research without patient consent?

Hawktalk: Does the Health Care Bill permit medical research without patient consent?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:19:20 -0000

202 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Proposals for new Data Protection Directive or Regulation in January 2012

Hawktalk: Proposals for new Data Protection Directive or Regulation in January 2012

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 21:08:39 -0000

193 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk:Email marketing under PECR and the Data Protection Act

Hawktalk:Email marketing under PECR and the Data Protection Act

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:20:52 -0000

210 lines

New Thread

ICO suffers data loss conundrum

ICO suffers data loss conundrum

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:11:27 -0000

100 lines

Re: ICO suffers data loss conundrum

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:49:36 +0000

165 lines

Re: ICO suffers data loss conundrum

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:46:20 +0000

790 lines

New Thread

Information Sharing

Information Sharing

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Nov 2011 08:23:58 +0000

157 lines

New Thread

Job opportunity London or Manchester

Job opportunity London or Manchester

Mark Ogden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:29:09 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Letwin Breached DPA

Letwin Breached DPA

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:37:26 +0000

155 lines

Re: Letwin Breached DPA

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:11:17 +0000

409 lines

Re: Letwin Breached DPA

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:16:05 +0000

502 lines

Re: Letwin Breached DPA

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:28:36 +0000

459 lines

Re: Letwin Breached DPA

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:56:49 +0000

795 lines

Re: Letwin Breached DPA

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:26:09 +0000

908 lines

Re: Letwin Breached DPA

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:37:13 +0000

923 lines

New Thread

Message warning of potential spam

Message warning of potential spam

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:28:09 -0000

45 lines

Re: Message warning of potential spam

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:17:07 +0000

63 lines

New Thread

mobile phone data

mobile phone data

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:53:23 +0000

86 lines

Re: mobile phone data

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:45:30 +0000

414 lines

New Thread

Nice opportunity...

Re: Nice opportunity...

SUZY JOHNSON <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:33:10 +0000

35 lines

Re: Nice opportunity...

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:50:07 +0000

213 lines

New Thread

Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:35:55 +0000

68 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:47:06 +0000

246 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:16:57 +0000

239 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:25:58 +0000

457 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:30:00 +0000

579 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

Carolyn Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:35:05 +0000

429 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:47:12 +0000

581 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:58:43 +0000

752 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:02:29 +0000

852 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

Simon Macauley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:34:11 +0000

113 lines

New Thread

Planning Online

Planning Online

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:22:42 +0000

260 lines

Re: Planning Online

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:07:45 -0000

451 lines

Re: Planning Online

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:15:05 +0000

656 lines

New Thread

s.29(3) summary of issue

s.29(3) summary of issue

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:50:36 +0000

311 lines

Re: s.29(3) summary of issue

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:51:55 -0000

815 lines

New Thread

S.54(3) Contempt of court

S.54(3) Contempt of court

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:42:26 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

S.55 offence: Online Bingo Player Data Theft Outcome a Joke

S.55 offence: Online Bingo Player Data Theft Outcome a Joke

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Nov 2011 14:38:36 -0000

515 lines

New Thread

Santa Databreach

Santa Databreach

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:26:54 +0000

140 lines

Re: Santa Databreach

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:32:23 +0000

45 lines

Re: Santa Databreach

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:56:28 +0000

36 lines

Re: Santa Databreach

Bruce Rodger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:00:20 +0000

45 lines

Re: Santa Databreach

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:15:35 +0000

31 lines

Re: Santa Databreach

Robert (Bob) Waixel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:39:22 +0000

80 lines

Re: Santa Databreach

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:12:23 -0000

46 lines

New Thread

Student Feedback Questionnaires

Student Feedback Questionnaires

Mark Lister <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:53:32 +0000

214 lines

New Thread

Third Party data

Third Party data

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:50:36 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Tracking Shoppers

Tracking Shoppers

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:31:07 +0000

161 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:28:17 +0000

45 lines

Tracking Shoppers

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:59:32 +0000

317 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:51:05 -0000

75 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:57:24 -0000

48 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:11:48 +0000

96 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:45:27 +0000

269 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:49:03 +0000

352 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:01:34 +0000

424 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:40:41 +0000

66 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:43:02 +0000

44 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:50:03 +0000

49 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:43:00 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Two new s55A penalties

Two new s55A penalties

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:31:17 +0000

172 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:02:50 +0000

341 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:46:40 +0000

55 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Charles Christacopoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:49:50 +0000

55 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:01:19 +0000

118 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:06:18 +0000

121 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:55:25 -0000

119 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:27:50 +0000

165 lines

New Thread

Universal Opt out

Universal Opt out

Patrice Bendon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:49:54 +0000

66 lines

New Thread

Viewing files

Viewing files

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:59:23 +0000

34 lines

Re: Viewing files

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:06:10 -0000

109 lines

Re: Viewing files

Bell, Neil (Information Officer) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:28:48 +0000

190 lines

New Thread

Web-site Privacy Policies

Web-site Privacy Policies

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:48:29 +0000

44 lines

Re: Web-site Privacy Policies

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:11:23 -0500

95 lines

Re: Web-site Privacy Policies

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:05:01 +0000

41 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager