JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


November 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: Nice opportunity...

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:50:07 +0000

213 lines

Re: Nice opportunity...

SUZY JOHNSON

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:33:10 +0000

35 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Roland Perry

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:43:00 +0000

39 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Roland Perry

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:50:03 +0000

49 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Roland Perry

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:43:02 +0000

44 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Roland Perry

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:40:41 +0000

66 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:01:34 +0000

424 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security)

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:49:03 +0000

352 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:45:27 +0000

269 lines

FW: Tracking Shoppers

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security)

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:26:30 +0000

199 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:11:48 +0000

96 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Simon Howarth

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:57:24 -0000

48 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Simon Howarth

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:51:05 -0000

75 lines

Tracking Shoppers

Bailey, Trish

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:59:32 +0000

317 lines

Re: Tracking Shoppers

Roland Perry

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:28:17 +0000

45 lines

Tracking Shoppers

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:31:07 +0000

161 lines

Re: Santa Databreach

Simon Howarth

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:12:23 -0000

46 lines

Re: Dog abuser seeks compensation for 'privacy invasion'

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:37:01 -0000

411 lines

Re: Santa Databreach

Robert (Bob) Waixel

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:39:22 +0000

80 lines

Re: Santa Databreach

Lynn Wyeth

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:15:35 +0000

31 lines

Re: Santa Databreach

Bruce Rodger

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:00:20 +0000

45 lines

Re: Santa Databreach

Andrew Goodfellow

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:56:28 +0000

36 lines

Universal Opt out

Patrice Bendon

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:49:54 +0000

66 lines

Re: Dog abuser seeks compensation for 'privacy invasion'

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:41:47 +0000

842 lines

Re: Dog abuser seeks compensation for 'privacy invasion'

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:49:03 -0000

682 lines

Re: Santa Databreach

Jethro R Binks

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:32:23 +0000

45 lines

Dog abuser seeks compensation for 'privacy invasion'

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:32:32 +0000

141 lines

Santa Databreach

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:26:54 +0000

140 lines

Hawktalk:Email marketing under PECR and the Data Protection Act

chris pounder

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:20:52 -0000

210 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Baines, Jonathan

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:27:50 +0000

165 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Paul Ticher

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:55:25 -0000

119 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Baines, Jonathan

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:06:18 +0000

121 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Baines, Jonathan

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:01:19 +0000

118 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:49:50 +0000

55 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Roland Perry

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:46:40 +0000

55 lines

Re: Two new s55A penalties

Baines, Jonathan

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:02:50 +0000

341 lines

Re: Borough Council request

Jim Whitaker

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:44:13 +0000

54 lines

Two new s55A penalties

Baines, Jonathan

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:31:17 +0000

172 lines

Re: Borough Council request

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:59:00 -0000

837 lines

Re: Borough Council request

Harrison, Iain

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:54:57 +0000

519 lines

Borough Council request

Trevor Pearce

Fri, 25 Nov 2011 18:06:59 -0000

238 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Kevin Tarleton (0161 923 6305)

Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:56:47 -0000

218 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Simon Howarth

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:32:50 -0000

666 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:51:15 +0000

246 lines

Re: mobile phone data

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:45:30 +0000

414 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:39:44 +0000

666 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Ray Cooke

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:24:28 +0000

548 lines

mobile phone data

Mark van Harmelen

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:53:23 +0000

86 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:56:30 +0000

200 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Paul Ticher

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:34:36 -0000

127 lines

Third Party data

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:50:36 +0000

30 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:47:02 +0000

115 lines

Re: Call Recording in a call centre

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:51:29 +0000

234 lines

Call Recording in a call centre

Marilyn Barton

Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:22:36 +0000

43 lines

Re: Data sharing queries 1. Nominated representative/agent on UCAS forms and 2. Students Union

Simon Howarth

Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:33:19 -0000

335 lines

Re: Data sharing queries 1. Nominated representative/agent on UCAS forms and 2. Students Union

Ray Cooke

Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:10:32 +0000

626 lines

Re: ICO suffers data loss conundrum

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:46:20 +0000

790 lines

Re: Data sharing queries 1. Nominated representative/agent on UCAS forms and 2. Students Union

Simon Howarth

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:46:33 -0000

572 lines

Re: Data sharing queries 1. Nominated representative/agent on UCAS forms and 2. Students Union

Bailey, Trish

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:30:27 +0000

456 lines

Data sharing queries 1. Nominated representative/agent on UCAS forms and 2. Students Union

Barlow, Jackie

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:13:48 +0000

303 lines

Re: Web-site Privacy Policies

Roland Perry

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:05:01 +0000

41 lines

Re: Message warning of potential spam

Roland Perry

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:17:07 +0000

63 lines

Re: ICO suffers data loss conundrum

Baines, Jonathan

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:49:36 +0000

165 lines

Re: Web-site Privacy Policies

Marchini, Renzo

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:11:23 -0500

95 lines

Web-site Privacy Policies

Ian Welton

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:48:29 +0000

44 lines

Message warning of potential spam

Paul Ticher

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:28:09 -0000

45 lines

ICO suffers data loss conundrum

chris pounder

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:11:27 -0000

100 lines

Email virus warning

Dave and Suzy Ensor

Sun, 20 Nov 2011 10:37:01 -0000

520 lines

DP breach by NatWest

CHARLES OPPENHEIM

Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:45:12 +0000

68 lines

Re: Planning Online

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:15:05 +0000

656 lines

Re: Planning Online

Jane Holden

Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:07:45 -0000

451 lines

Planning Online

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:22:42 +0000

260 lines

Hawktalk: Does the Health Care Bill permit medical research without patient consent?

chris pounder

Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:19:20 -0000

202 lines

Re: DP Officer position in college's

Harrison, Iain

Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:38:31 +0000

111 lines

Re: Disclosure Inspection Reports - Housing Act 2004

<>

Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:07:40 +0000

109 lines

Re: DP Officer position in college's

Paul Ticher

Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:42:51 -0000

74 lines

DP Officer position in college's

Ronnie Perpete

Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:59:48 +0000

38 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

Simon Macauley

Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:34:11 +0000

113 lines

Disclosure Inspection Reports - Housing Act 2004

Jane Holden

Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:58:47 -0000

70 lines

FW: [data-protection] Letwin Breached DPA

chris pounder

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:57:58 -0000

589 lines

Re: Letwin Breached DPA

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:37:13 +0000

923 lines

Re: Letwin Breached DPA

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:26:09 +0000

908 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

KPG Professional Services

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:02:29 +0000

852 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:58:43 +0000

752 lines

Re: Letwin Breached DPA

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:56:49 +0000

795 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

KPG Professional Services

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:47:12 +0000

581 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

Carolyn Howard

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:35:05 +0000

429 lines

Re: Letwin Breached DPA

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:28:36 +0000

459 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

KPG Professional Services

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:30:00 +0000

579 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:25:58 +0000

457 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

KPG Professional Services

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:16:57 +0000

239 lines

Re: Letwin Breached DPA

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:16:05 +0000

502 lines

Re: Letwin Breached DPA

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:11:17 +0000

409 lines

Letwin Breached DPA

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:37:26 +0000

155 lines

S.55 offence: Online Bingo Player Data Theft Outcome a Joke

chris pounder

Sun, 13 Nov 2011 14:38:36 -0000

515 lines

Job opportunity London or Manchester

Mark Ogden

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:29:09 +0000

46 lines

Re: Viewing files

Bell, Neil (Information Officer)

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:28:48 +0000

190 lines

Re: Viewing files

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:06:10 -0000

109 lines

Viewing files

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:59:23 +0000

34 lines

S.54(3) Contempt of court

Andrew Goodfellow

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:42:26 +0000

38 lines

Student Feedback Questionnaires

Mark Lister

Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:53:32 +0000

214 lines

Hawktalk: Proposals for new Data Protection Directive or Regulation in January 2012

chris pounder

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 21:08:39 -0000

193 lines

Re: s.29(3) summary of issue

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:51:55 -0000

815 lines

s.29(3) summary of issue

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:50:36 +0000

311 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Peter Lane

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 09:04:13 +0000

65 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

KPG Professional Services

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:58:27 +0000

583 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Ray Cooke

Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:42:43 +0000

395 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 19:17:59 +0000

89 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Michael Doherty

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:35:38 +0000

56 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:28:04 +0000

435 lines

Re: Disclosure under DPA s.29(3) [UNCLASSIFIED]

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:47:06 -0000

244 lines

Re: Disclosure under DPA s.29(3) [UNCLASSIFIED]

Jane Holden

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:44:18 -0000

166 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Jane Holden

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:42:12 -0000

491 lines

Re: Disclosure under DPA s.29(3) [UNCLASSIFIED]

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:37:02 +0000

117 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:10:27 +0000

447 lines

Disclosure under DPA s.29(3) [UNCLASSIFIED]

Healy, Susan

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:26:18 +0000

62 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Jane Holden

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:10:55 -0000

399 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:00:41 +0000

320 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Doherty Michael (EAST KENT HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST)

Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:47:29 +0000

277 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Roland Perry

Sun, 6 Nov 2011 09:55:39 +0000

44 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Simon Howarth

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 21:02:04 -0000

245 lines

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 18:44:42 +0000

225 lines

Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:55:03 +0000

112 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Ben Plouviez

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 14:01:11 -0000

176 lines

Eire to investigate Facebook over data protection concerns

CHARLES OPPENHEIM

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:40:07 +0000

140 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:18:06 -0000

172 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:16:52 +0000

107 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Lynn Wyeth

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:44:24 +0000

40 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Jane Holden

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:31:13 -0000

565 lines

Re: Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Bailey, Trish

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:25:01 +0000

391 lines

Can private companies charge for complying with S.29(3) requests?

Jaines, Amy

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:18:34 -0000

246 lines

Re: Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:47:06 +0000

246 lines

Now Vince Cable might have breached DPA!

CHARLES OPPENHEIM

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:35:55 +0000

68 lines

FW: Hawktalk: ICO's view on the Data Protection issues ahead

chris pounder

Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:34:05 -0000

167 lines

Re: FOI with DP considerations

Simon Howarth

Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:07:58 -0000

369 lines

Information Sharing

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 1 Nov 2011 08:23:58 +0000

157 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager