JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


October 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

£293 per FOIA how much for a DPA request? Why is no one counting? (2 messages)
24 year old student versus Facebook (1200 pages on Subject Access) (1 message)
Access to 'Personal' Emails on Work System (9 messages)
Access to Information held in Complaint Files (1 message)
Actress Sues Amazon (1 message)
Audio Newsletter (1 message)
cctv (6 messages)
Charities and JustTextGiving (1 message)
Community Budgets information sharing (1 message)
Data Privacy Daily (1 message)
Data Protection statement (8 messages)
Data sharing between Universities and SUs (1 message)
Dates of Signed Form of Authority (4 messages)
Deceased persons (6 messages)
Deceased persons [UNCLASSIFIED] (1 message)
Disclosure of personal data in relation to possible credit card fraud (4 messages)
Disclosure of personal data isn't data sharing (4 messages)
DP with FOI Considerations (1 message)
DPA 84 Prosecution (1 message)
DustbinGate (3 messages)
duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario] (13 messages)
Exemption to disclose (3 messages)
FOI Man Blog (1 message)
FOI Request with DP implications - tenanted dwellings (1 message)
FOI with DP considerations (13 messages)
FW: Hawktalk:CCTV images are accessible on subject access (or is it Durant misses the Dublin Bus?) (1 message)
FW: New Directive...or not? (1 message)
FW: Subject Access/Health & Safety Query (2 messages)
FW: [data-protection] DustbinGate (1 message)
Hawktalk: "Let's get rid of the Human Rights Act" (2 messages)
Hawktalk: What is wrong with the Data Protection Act? FOI Infraction saga hits the buffers (1 message)
Hawlktalk: If IP addresses ARE "personal data" for a copyright purpose, aren't they personal data for ALL purposes? (4 messages)
iCloud ... (13 messages)
ICO - Guidance Access to personal data in complaints form (3 messages)
ICO calls for complusory audit powers (5 messages)
Individual who got a small fine (4 messages)
Is a name personal data ? (5 messages)
ISEB (1 message)
ISEB Exam Tips (1 message)
ISEB exams (1 message)
latest newsletter (2 messages)
Letwin/Dustbin-gate (3 messages)
letwingate (3 messages)
List of adequate countries (3 messages)
New Directive...or not? (5 messages)
New Directive...or not? - possibly both (2 messages)
News about cloud and data protection (6 messages)
Noise Complaint Recordings/Findings (7 messages)
Parental access to student data (FE) (1 message)
Personal data - CCTV recordings (1 message)
Protection fo Freedoms Bill (1 message)
Pseudonymisation (1 message)
Quiz: Letwin is innocent OK? A Friday Test (7 messages)
Section 29 Guidance (5 messages)
Sport England - Anyone Else Using this serv ice? (1 message)
Sport England - Anyone Else Using this service - THANK YOU (1 message)
Sport England - Anyone Else Using this service? (2 messages)
Subject Access Request (5 messages)
Subject Access/Health & Safety Query (10 messages)
The Global Flow of Information (1 message)
Top Companies Commend Francis Maude for Open Data implications for O Hara? (3 messages)
UPDATE RE: [data-protection] duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario] (1 message)
Voice recording (1 message)
[POSSIBLE SPAM] Monitoring methods (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

£293 per FOIA how much for a DPA request? Why is no one counting?

£293 per FOIA how much for a DPA request? Why is no one counting?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:29:00 +0100

348 lines

Re: £293 per FOIA how much for a DPA request? Why is no one counting?

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:37:15 +0000

62 lines

New Thread

24 year old student versus Facebook (1200 pages on Subject Access)

24 year old student versus Facebook (1200 pages on Subject Access)

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:29:56 +0100

179 lines

New Thread

Access to 'Personal' Emails on Work System

Access to 'Personal' Emails on Work System

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:40:09 +0100

163 lines

Re: Access to 'Personal' Emails on Work System

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:51:42 +0100

400 lines

Re: Access to 'Personal' Emails on Work System

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:53:20 +0100

43 lines

Re: Access to 'Personal' Emails on Work System

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:05:06 +0100

51 lines

Re: Access to 'Personal' Emails on Work System

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:30:10 +0000

93 lines

Re: Access to 'Personal' Emails on Work System

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:41:23 +0100

89 lines

Re: Access to 'Personal' Emails on Work System

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:36:10 +0100

559 lines

Re: Access to 'Personal' Emails on Work System

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:01:20 +0100

847 lines

Re: Access to 'Personal' Emails on Work System

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:08:41 +0100

932 lines

New Thread

Access to Information held in Complaint Files

Access to Information held in Complaint Files

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:17:03 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Actress Sues Amazon

Actress Sues Amazon

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:02:13 +0100

129 lines

New Thread

Audio Newsletter

Audio Newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:08:18 +0100

174 lines

New Thread

cctv

cctv

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:27:38 +0100

30 lines

Re: cctv

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:38:02 +0100

74 lines

Re: cctv

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:39:49 +0100

154 lines

Re: cctv

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:43:50 +0100

99 lines

Re: cctv

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:44:33 +0100

143 lines

Re: cctv

Communications for CameraWatch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:46:35 +0100

97 lines

New Thread

Charities and JustTextGiving

Charities and JustTextGiving

Data Protection <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:05:02 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

Community Budgets information sharing

Community Budgets information sharing

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:17:04 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

Data Privacy Daily

Data Privacy Daily

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:30:58 +0100

136 lines

New Thread

Data Protection statement

Data Protection statement

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:00:53 +0100

323 lines

Re: Data Protection statement

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:12:30 +0100

431 lines

Re: Data Protection statement

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:14:19 +0100

456 lines

Re: Data Protection statement

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:17:46 +0000

525 lines

Re: Data Protection statement

Peter Dinsdale <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:23:05 +0100

379 lines

Data Protection statement

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:42:27 +0100

801 lines

Re: Data Protection statement

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:27:57 +0100

707 lines

Re: Data Protection statement

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:38:24 +0100

852 lines

New Thread

Data sharing between Universities and SUs

Data sharing between Universities and SUs

Claire Morrissey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:31:02 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

Dates of Signed Form of Authority

Dates of Signed Form of Authority

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:58:58 +0100

58 lines

Re: Dates of Signed Form of Authority

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:01:56 +0100

139 lines

Re: Dates of Signed Form of Authority

Heness Nigel (CENTRAL AND NORTH WEST LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 11:20:06 +0100

217 lines

Re: Dates of Signed Form of Authority

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:39:51 +0100

103 lines

New Thread

Deceased persons

Deceased persons

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:50:12 +0100

36 lines

Re: Deceased persons

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:56:45 +0100

103 lines

Re: Deceased persons

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:57:06 +0100

98 lines

Re: Deceased persons

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:00:04 +0100

216 lines

Re: Deceased persons

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:31:59 +0100

87 lines

Re: Deceased persons

Andrew Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:54:44 +0100

444 lines

New Thread

Deceased persons [UNCLASSIFIED]

Re: Deceased persons [UNCLASSIFIED]

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:57:39 +0100

94 lines

New Thread

Disclosure of personal data in relation to possible credit card fraud

Disclosure of personal data in relation to possible credit card fraud

Barlow, Jackie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:54:21 +0000

281 lines

Re: Disclosure of personal data in relation to possible credit card fraud

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:23:10 +0100

471 lines

Re: Disclosure of personal data in relation to possible credit card fraud

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:28:23 +0100

553 lines

Re: Disclosure of personal data in relation to possible credit card fraud

Lynn Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:03:27 +0100

615 lines

New Thread

Disclosure of personal data isn't data sharing

Disclosure of personal data isn't data sharing

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:29:48 +0100

82 lines

Re: Disclosure of personal data isn't data sharing

Gibson, Martin (ICT) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:35:19 +0100

155 lines

Re: Disclosure of personal data isn't data sharing

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:49:18 +0100

208 lines

Re: Disclosure of personal data isn't data sharing

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:01:07 +0100

177 lines

New Thread

DP with FOI Considerations

DP with FOI Considerations

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:52:49 +0100

217 lines

New Thread

DPA 84 Prosecution

DPA 84 Prosecution

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:11:39 +0100

193 lines

New Thread

DustbinGate

DustbinGate

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:06:06 +0100

140 lines

Re: DustbinGate

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:14:39 +0100

171 lines

Re: DustbinGate

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:21:47 +0100

546 lines

New Thread

duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 18:27:46 +0100

96 lines

Re: duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:50:55 +0100

318 lines

Re: duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:01:03 +0100

587 lines

Re: duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:01:34 +0100

810 lines

Re: duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:08:48 +0100

44 lines

Re: duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

Robert Wyllie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:01:28 +0100

360 lines

Re: duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

Andrew Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:12:16 +0100

155 lines

Re: duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

Rob Dawson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:21:41 +0000

846 lines

Re: duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:16:45 +0100

637 lines

Re: duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:30:05 +0100

321 lines

Re: duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:37:24 +0100

857 lines

Re: duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

Andrew Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:54:59 +0100

597 lines

Re: duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

Piers Margetts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:55:57 +0000

893 lines

New Thread

Exemption to disclose

Exemption to disclose

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:37:05 +0100

32 lines

Re: Exemption to disclose

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:38:30 +0100

88 lines

Re: Exemption to disclose

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:48:50 +0100

112 lines

New Thread

FOI Man Blog

FOI Man Blog

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:13:19 +0100

134 lines

New Thread

FOI Request with DP implications - tenanted dwellings

FOI Request with DP implications - tenanted dwellings

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:38:46 +0100

70 lines

New Thread

FOI with DP considerations

FOI with DP considerations

Peel, Michelle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:46:44 +0000

236 lines

Re: FOI with DP considerations

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:50:25 +0100

412 lines

Re: FOI with DP considerations

Peel, Michelle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:51:51 +0000

494 lines

Re: FOI with DP considerations

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:05:59 +0100

727 lines

Re: FOI with DP considerations

Peel, Michelle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:08:48 +0000

854 lines

Re: FOI with DP considerations

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:39:34 +0100

475 lines

Re: FOI with DP considerations

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:10:31 +0100

449 lines

Re: FOI with DP considerations

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:42:22 +0100

648 lines

Re: FOI with DP considerations

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:41:38 +0100

465 lines

Re: FOI with DP considerations

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:50:39 +0100

578 lines

Re: FOI with DP considerations

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:51:34 +0100

668 lines

Re: FOI with DP considerations

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:36:06 +0100

754 lines

Re: FOI with DP considerations

Peter Dinsdale <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:55:42 +0100

494 lines

New Thread

FW: Hawktalk:CCTV images are accessible on subject access (or is it Durant misses the Dublin Bus?)

FW: Hawktalk:CCTV images are accessible on subject access (or is it Durant misses the Dublin Bus?)

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:33:31 +0100

175 lines

New Thread

FW: New Directive...or not?

FW: New Directive...or not?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:13:31 +0100

812 lines

New Thread

FW: Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

FW: Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:43:36 +0100

890 lines

FW: Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:07:09 +0100

371 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] DustbinGate

FW: [data-protection] DustbinGate

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:48:39 +0100

504 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: "Let's get rid of the Human Rights Act"

Hawktalk: "Let's get rid of the Human Rights Act"

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:08:11 +0100

168 lines

Re: Hawktalk: "Let's get rid of the Human Rights Act"

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:20:08 +0100

60 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: What is wrong with the Data Protection Act? FOI Infraction saga hits the buffers

Hawktalk: What is wrong with the Data Protection Act? FOI Infraction saga hits the buffers

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:25:41 +0100

176 lines

New Thread

Hawlktalk: If IP addresses ARE "personal data" for a copyright purpose, aren't they personal data for ALL purposes?

Hawlktalk: If IP addresses ARE "personal data" for a copyright purpose, aren't they personal data for ALL purposes?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:31:50 +0100

186 lines

Re: Hawlktalk: If IP addresses ARE "personal data" for a copyright purpose, aren't they personal data for ALL purposes?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:19:24 +0100

368 lines

Re: Hawlktalk: If IP addresses ARE "personal data" for a copyright purpose, aren't they personal data for ALL purposes?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:55:51 +0100

559 lines

Re: Hawlktalk: If IP addresses ARE "personal data" for a copyright purpose, aren't they personal data for ALL purposes?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:41:59 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

iCloud ...

iCloud ...

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:29:29 +0100

282 lines

Re: iCloud ...

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:53:01 +0100

358 lines

Re: iCloud ...

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:54:32 +0100

463 lines

Re: iCloud ...

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:57:03 +0100

786 lines

Re: iCloud ...

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:08:16 -0400

482 lines

Re: iCloud ...

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:21:38 +0100

600 lines

Re: iCloud ...

Joe Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:59:23 +0100

509 lines

Re: iCloud ...

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:46:37 -0400

828 lines

Re: iCloud ...

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:07:13 +0100

961 lines

Re: iCloud ...

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:33:00 +0100

807 lines

Re: iCloud ...

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:23:34 +0100

840 lines

Re: iCloud ...

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:32:19 +0100

520 lines

Re: iCloud ...

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:53:48 +0100

813 lines

New Thread

ICO - Guidance Access to personal data in complaints form

ICO - Guidance Access to personal data in complaints form

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:12:08 +0100

213 lines

Re: ICO - Guidance Access to personal data in complaints form

Maurice Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:26:49 +0100

239 lines

Re: ICO - Guidance Access to personal data in complaints form

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:44:37 +0100

122 lines

New Thread

ICO calls for complusory audit powers

ICO calls for complusory audit powers

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:16:43 +0100

207 lines

Re: ICO calls for complusory audit powers

Lemon, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:55:13 +0100

277 lines

Re: ICO calls for complusory audit powers

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:09:52 +0100

408 lines

Re: ICO calls for complusory audit powers

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:23:26 +0100

542 lines

Re: ICO calls for complusory audit powers

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:27:57 +0100

632 lines

New Thread

Individual who got a small fine

Individual who got a small fine

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:04:12 +0100

41 lines

Re: Individual who got a small fine

Kevin Tarleton (0161 923 6305) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:06:56 +0100

104 lines

Re: Individual who got a small fine

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:07:03 +0100

107 lines

Re: Individual who got a small fine

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:21:40 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Is a name personal data ?

Is a name personal data ?

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:07:42 +0100

28 lines

Re: Is a name personal data ?

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:12:13 +0100

97 lines

Re: Is a name personal data ?

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:14:09 +0100

84 lines

Re: Is a name personal data ?

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:46:15 -0400

156 lines

Re: Is a name personal data ?

Piers Margetts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:58:21 +0000

59 lines

New Thread

ISEB

ISEB

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:48:41 +0100

138 lines

New Thread

ISEB Exam Tips

ISEB Exam Tips

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:46:50 +0100

149 lines

New Thread

ISEB exams

ISEB exams

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:23:39 +0100

149 lines

New Thread

latest newsletter

latest newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:14:39 +0100

214 lines

Re: latest newsletter

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:40:31 +0100

494 lines

New Thread

Letwin/Dustbin-gate

Letwin/Dustbin-gate

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:05:40 +0100

41 lines

Re: Letwin/Dustbin-gate

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:17:22 +0100

79 lines

Re: Letwin/Dustbin-gate

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:30:03 +0100

118 lines

New Thread

letwingate

letwingate

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:02:06 +0100

70 lines

Re: letwingate

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:04:31 +0100

249 lines

Re: letwingate

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:27:02 +0100

218 lines

New Thread

List of adequate countries

List of adequate countries

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:58:43 +0100

166 lines

Re: List of adequate countries

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:01:45 +0100

381 lines

Re: List of adequate countries

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:04:31 +0100

614 lines

New Thread

New Directive...or not?

New Directive...or not?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:09:15 +0100

184 lines

Re: New Directive...or not?

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:13:51 -0400

577 lines

Re: New Directive...or not?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:20:23 +0100

692 lines

Re: New Directive...or not?

Andrew Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:13:19 +0100

544 lines

Re: New Directive...or not?

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:17:17 -0400

755 lines

New Thread

New Directive...or not? - possibly both

Re: New Directive...or not? - possibly both

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:46:23 +0100

498 lines

Re: New Directive...or not? - possibly both

Lemon, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:37:16 +0100

560 lines

New Thread

News about cloud and data protection

Re: News about cloud and data protection

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2011 20:35:41 +0000

83 lines

Re: News about cloud and data protection

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2011 22:01:52 +0100

45 lines

Re: News about cloud and data protection

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:03:22 +0100

127 lines

Re: News about cloud and data protection

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:49:57 +0100

53 lines

Re: News about cloud and data protection

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:51:39 -0400

202 lines

News about cloud and data protection

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:00:32 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Noise Complaint Recordings/Findings

Noise Complaint Recordings/Findings

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:41:38 +0100

63 lines

Re: Noise Complaint Recordings/Findings

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:53:44 +0100

120 lines

Re: Noise Complaint Recordings/Findings

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:06:30 +0100

175 lines

Re: Noise Complaint Recordings/Findings

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:26:03 +0100

229 lines

Re: Noise Complaint Recordings/Findings

Piers Margetts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:42:14 +0000

101 lines

Re: Noise Complaint Recordings/Findings

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 08:43:25 +0100

257 lines

Re: Noise Complaint Recordings/Findings

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 08:52:05 +0100

149 lines

New Thread

Parental access to student data (FE)

Re: Parental access to student data (FE)

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:52:00 +0100

87 lines

New Thread

Personal data - CCTV recordings

Personal data - CCTV recordings

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:09:23 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Protection fo Freedoms Bill

Protection fo Freedoms Bill

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:04:12 +0100

149 lines

New Thread

Pseudonymisation

Pseudonymisation

Fiona <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:07:38 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Quiz: Letwin is innocent OK? A Friday Test

Quiz: Letwin is innocent OK? A Friday Test

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:54:44 +0100

349 lines

Re: Quiz: Letwin is innocent OK? A Friday Test

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:33:20 +0100

620 lines

Re: Quiz: Letwin is innocent OK? A Friday Test

Peter Dinsdale <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:59:45 +0100

613 lines

Re: Quiz: Letwin is innocent OK? A Friday Test

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:32:39 +0100

957 lines

Re: Quiz: Letwin is innocent OK? A Friday Test

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:50:08 +0100

235 lines

Re: Quiz: Letwin is innocent OK? A Friday Test

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:06:32 +0100

709 lines

Re: Quiz: Letwin is innocent OK? A Friday Test

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:19:58 +0100

498 lines

New Thread

Section 29 Guidance

Section 29 Guidance

Trevor Pearce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:44:25 +0100

219 lines

Re: Section 29 Guidance

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:46:50 +0100

631 lines

Re: Section 29 Guidance

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 18:00:21 +0100

39 lines

Re: Section 29 Guidance

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 18:35:22 +0100

99 lines

Re: Section 29 Guidance

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:11:36 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Sport England - Anyone Else Using this serv ice?

Re: Sport England - Anyone Else Using this serv ice?

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:59:09 +0100

587 lines

New Thread

Sport England - Anyone Else Using this service - THANK YOU

Sport England - Anyone Else Using this service - THANK YOU

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:24:41 +0100

204 lines

New Thread

Sport England - Anyone Else Using this service?

Sport England - Anyone Else Using this service?

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:46:26 +0100

303 lines

Re: Sport England - Anyone Else Using this service?

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:37:32 +0100

557 lines

New Thread

Subject Access Request

Subject Access Request

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:34:15 +0100

222 lines

Re: Subject Access Request

Dominey, Caroline <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:42:50 +0100

369 lines

Re: Subject Access Request

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:44:05 +0100

376 lines

Re: Subject Access Request

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:40:43 +0100

411 lines

Re: Subject Access Request

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:43:24 +0100

667 lines

New Thread

Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

Steve Hunter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:40:51 +0100

126 lines

Re: Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:02:21 +0100

353 lines

Re: Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:27:52 +0100

377 lines

Re: Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

Piers Margetts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:32:17 +0000

457 lines

Re: Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

Maurice Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:14:13 +0100

497 lines

Re: Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:42:08 +0100

167 lines

Re: Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:19:23 +0100

276 lines

Re: Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

Simon Macauley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:28:29 +0100

320 lines

Re: Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:12:21 +0100

366 lines

Re: Subject Access/Health & Safety Query

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:48:00 +0100

286 lines

New Thread

The Global Flow of Information

The Global Flow of Information

Rachel Shand <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:35:00 +0100

455 lines

New Thread

Top Companies Commend Francis Maude for Open Data implications for O Hara?

Top Companies Commend Francis Maude for Open Data implications for O Hara?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:00:55 +0100

255 lines

Re: Top Companies Commend Francis Maude for Open Data implications for O Hara?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:54:33 +0100

471 lines

Re: Top Companies Commend Francis Maude for Open Data implications for O Hara?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:10:09 +0100

551 lines

New Thread

UPDATE RE: [data-protection] duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

UPDATE RE: [data-protection] duty of care vs. data protection [interesting scenario]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:53:48 +0100

493 lines

New Thread

Voice recording

Voice recording

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:38:26 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

[POSSIBLE SPAM] Monitoring methods

[POSSIBLE SPAM] Monitoring methods

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:26:50 +0100

147 lines

Re: [POSSIBLE SPAM] Monitoring methods

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:53:03 +0100

43 lines

Re: [POSSIBLE SPAM] Monitoring methods

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:37:56 +0100

94 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager