JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FSL Archives


FSL Archives

FSL Archives


October 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

-bptf sigma formula (4 messages)
-cpval in fslmaths? (1 message)
1st level feat in standard space (2 messages)
<No subject> (1 message)
A question with regards to TBSS (1 message)
about randomise question (3 messages)
About TBSS results (7 messages)
About the CMA labels (2 messages)
ADHD-200 Global Competition Results Now Posted (1 message)
altered design (6 messages)
applywarp --interp default, how to shut off?? (5 messages)
atlas masks (5 messages)
atlases masks parceling (2 messages)
AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat (1 message)
AW: [FSL] Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat (3 messages)
bash or dash? (2 messages)
bedpostx parallel via SGE ? (6 messages)
Brain/background threshold, % question (3 messages)
bvals and bvects for dti (3 messages)
calv VOI length (3 messages)
categorical covariate in vertex analysis (2 messages)
Clarity on a 2x2 repeated measures design (5 messages)
Confusion between DTI and DWI data (6 messages)
convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC (9 messages)
could anyone recommend a rat brain atlas? (3 messages)
Create two masks from one by supplying coordinates of bounding plane (2 messages)
csf /edge in melodic & dual_reg (3 messages)
dicom 2 nifti (3 messages)
Different TRs in DTI acqusitions (3 messages)
Diffusion tensor estimation method (2 messages)
Download failure (4 messages)
download version 4.1.5 (1 message)
DTI (7 messages)
dtifit_question (3 messages)
dual regression (3 messages)
dual regression - 2 level 2 factors, nultiple runs per subject (2 messages)
Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?! (7 messages)
dual regression stage 3 (1 message)
Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects (9 messages)
dual regression: correlate RSN with behavioural data with multiple factors (2 messages)
Dual_regression: failed to find maskall (8 messages)
Eddy current corrections not working (2 messages)
Error Running FSL (2 messages)
Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries (6 messages)
extra tracts with waypoint and termination mask (2 messages)
False positive rate corresponding to uncorrected p-value/minimum cluster size? (3 messages)
FAST bug (6 messages)
FEAT troubleshoot (3 messages)
FEAT under Mac Lion (4 messages)
FEAT: High Pass Filtering (4 messages)
FEAT: High-pass temporal filtering in mirrored design (2 messages)
Featquery crash (1 message)
FEEDS failed (1 message)
Fieldmap (1 message)
fieldmap help (1 message)
film_gls to generate COPE images for longistudinal TBSS (2 messages)
fisher r to z for resting state fmri (4 messages)
Flip an image: fslswapdim problem (3 messages)
FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing (13 messages)
FLIRT outside FEAT (2 messages)
Form clusters by local max or mean? (2 messages)
FSL 4.1.8 using gcc 4.5.1: patch (1 message)
FSL 4.1.9 (3 messages)
FSL 4.1.9 - fslroi (3 messages)
fsl and MAC lion (2 messages)
FSL Digest - 25 Oct 2011 to 26 Oct 2011 (#2011-296) (2 messages)
fslcc input voxels (1 message)
fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images (6 messages)
fslmaths on stats files (6 messages)
FSLVIEW for Ubuntu 11.10 ?... (2 messages)
FSLview Mac OSX problem (2 messages)
FSLView version that does not rely on Qt3? (1 message)
fsl_glm and demean option (3 messages)
fsl_glm and second-level ICA (3 messages)
fsl_randomise_problem? (2 messages)
fsl_regfilt (3 messages)
fsl_regfilt and dof for group analysis (4 messages)
getting MAT, CON, FTS into Glm without FSF (3 messages)
GLM: is mean regressor mandatory for correlation analysis ??? (2 messages)
gradient table correction and avscale output (6 messages)
group analysis on seed-based connectivity data (2 messages)
group-level FEAT on repeated measures (using baseline as voxel-wise covariate) (1 message)
Having some problems with VBM tool (2 messages)
help with Spacial Smoothing (2 messages)
how avscale works? (1 message)
how to correlate a behavioral measures with fmri-data? (4 messages)
How to do cluster-based thresholding after running randomise? (2 messages)
How to register MD to standard space (6 messages)
I 'm lookig for a free spectroscopy program for multi voxel, could you help me? (3 messages)
ICA reproducibility (2 messages)
identify TBSS_results (2 messages)
Identify tracts in cluster command (3 messages)
incorrect TR in header after running flirt (2 messages)
Juelich VOI Extraction (2 messages)
masks of non-cluster-corrected clusters? (2 messages)
MELODIC and different matrix sizes (8 messages)
Melodic and dualreg procedure (8 messages)
melodic and masking (3 messages)
MELODIC and missing fieldmaps (5 messages)
Melodic crashes with memory allocation error (2 messages)
MELODIC failed (2 messages)
MELODIC for resting state data, 2 groups - follow up (3 messages)
MELODIC: automatic dimensionality estimation when identifying artifacts (2 messages)
MELODIC: PCA (2 messages)
Missing contents of Data Folder (3 messages)
Model-related vs unrelated activity (5 messages)
More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA (7 messages)
Multi-session linear trend (7 messages)
Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat (2 messages)
Multiple sessions in featquery (2 messages)
Neuro Bureau: Public release of preprocessed DTI data (1 message)
No component after group ICA (4 messages)
oblique data registration (9 messages)
padding and unpadding images with zeros (1 message)
Paired t-test with additional EV (2 messages)
Paste bug for Glm_gui on Mac OSX (2 messages)
Patients' data and FA values in pons (1 message)
Philips DTI gradient table (8 messages)
Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables (9 messages)
Position available: Postdoc in the cognitive neuroscience of aging (1 message)
Possible SIENAX bug ? (2 messages)
post-hoc t tests (1 message)
Prob Track across subjects (2 messages)
probabilistic ICA (2 messages)
Problem comparing binary tracts between groups using randomise (re-sent) (2 messages)
probtrackx command line help (8 messages)
Projecting scalp positions/data onto the brain (1 message)
question about contrasts and contrast masking (2 messages)
Question about the TBSS regarding to the values extracted (3 messages)
question on randomise and design.fts format (2 messages)
Randomise Correlation Contrasts (3 messages)
Randomise Question (7 messages)
randomise takes forever (3 messages)
randomize permutation number (2 messages)
randomsie error message (2 messages)
Re : Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA (1 message)
Re : [FSL] Having some problems with VBM tool (2 messages)
Re-run Feat after denoising? (1 message)
Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] (1 message)
Repeated-measures, intercept necessary or not? (2 messages)
res4D.nii.gz in higher-level FEAT analysis (2 messages)
resting state fMRI (2 messages)
resting state ICA maps atlas (1 message)
resting state multi-subject melodic (4 messages)
Results tfce filled (3 messages)
rmsdiff (3 messages)
Running MD, AD and RD (1 message)
seed-based correlation average maps (1 message)
sienax issue (2 messages)
Slicer with 4D Images (2 messages)
Specifying number of IC components in Melodic (2 messages)
strange results when using TBSS (2 messages)
Structural Data for VBM (2 messages)
surface tracking (2 messages)
SUSAN noise reduction (2 messages)
SV: [FSL] Philips DTI gradient table (1 message)
switching to the older siena version 2.5 from the last version 2.6 (2 messages)
t-test between 2 groups (1 message)
T1 lesions (1 message)
tbss bvecs and bvals (5 messages)
TBSS DEPROJECT ROI ATLAS (4 messages)
TBSS Group Analysis: tbss_tstats1 or tbss_tstats2 (2 messages)
TBSS output (9 messages)
TBSS randomise F-test (6 messages)
TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA (8 messages)
tbss_3_postreg -S FAILED TO FIND (2 messages)
tbss_3_postreg -S running time? (5 messages)
tbss_3_postreg memory erros and others (1 message)
tbss_non_FA error - different FSL versions? (2 messages)
tbss_skeleton: out of memory (4 messages)
Template from seed classifications (4 messages)
templates MD or FA (2 messages)
temporal derivatives? (4 messages)
temporal mode of ICs generated by TICA (3 messages)
The left/right flip image process (2 messages)
to get the Corresponding Cortical Area name of tracts? (2 messages)
Too strong unwarping by FUGUE for the DTI image (1 message)
Ubuntu 11.10 problem... (8 messages)
Unthresholded effect size maps in FSL (2 messages)
upsampling and downsampling images (5 messages)
Using 1st level FEAT residuals question (3 messages)
Using b-matrix for dtifit (6 messages)
Using FSL to obtain hemodynamic response for brain areas (1 message)
using mask to skull strip? (3 messages)
using mean FA as a confound regressor in TBSS / setting up a paired-design with this confound regressor (3 messages)
VBM with more than one scanner (2 messages)
VBMs (1 message)
Where to download cutoffcalc? (2 messages)
Where to preprocess resting state data for ICA? (2 messages)
Where to preprocess resting state data for ICA? Fsl_glm error? (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FSL Home

FSL Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

-bptf sigma formula

-bptf sigma formula

Richard Bethlehem <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:47:46 +0100

40 lines

Re: -bptf sigma formula

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:22:32 +0100

124 lines

Re: -bptf sigma formula

Michael Lombardo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:29:56 +0100

164 lines

Re: -bptf sigma formula

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:33:06 +0100

236 lines

New Thread

-cpval in fslmaths?

-cpval in fslmaths?

Xiangzhen Kong <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:15:33 +0800

227 lines

New Thread

1st level feat in standard space

1st level feat in standard space

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:27:19 +0100

22 lines

Re: 1st level feat in standard space

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:51:47 +0100

95 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Jane Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:11:28 -0700

14 lines

New Thread

A question with regards to TBSS

Re: A question with regards to TBSS

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2011 15:11:49 -0500

224 lines

New Thread

about randomise question

about randomise question

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:12:18 -0400

48 lines

Re: about randomise question

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:43:27 +0100

49 lines

Re: about randomise question

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:18:35 -0400

87 lines

New Thread

About TBSS results

About TBSS results

SUBSCRIBE FSL Anonymous <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:01:59 +0100

43 lines

Re: About TBSS results

Garin, Alba <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:06:02 +0200

75 lines

Re: About TBSS results

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:47:52 +0200

195 lines

Re: About TBSS results

홍순범 <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Oct 2011 23:15:48 +0900

159 lines

Re: About TBSS results

Garin, Alba <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:06:13 +0200

71 lines

Re: About TBSS results

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:47:27 -0400

305 lines

Re: About TBSS results

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:42:05 +0100

365 lines

New Thread

About the CMA labels

About the CMA labels

Jie Shi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:14:21 -0700

32 lines

Re: About the CMA labels

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:53:48 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

ADHD-200 Global Competition Results Now Posted

ADHD-200 Global Competition Results Now Posted

Michael P. Milham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:27:42 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

altered design

altered design

Amandine Pelletier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:08:25 +0100

45 lines

Re: altered design

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:16:24 +0100

141 lines

Re: altered design

Amandine Pelletier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:15:18 +0200

754 lines

Re: altered design

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:00:12 -0500

863 lines

Re: altered design

Amandine Pelletier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:16:25 +0200

1039 lines

Re: altered design

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:53:28 -0500

1158 lines

New Thread

applywarp --interp default, how to shut off??

applywarp --interp default, how to shut off??

Woodman, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:13:04 -0400

40 lines

Re: applywarp --interp default, how to shut off??

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:19:44 -0400

23 lines

Re: applywarp --interp default, how to shut off??

Woodman, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:42:06 -0400

60 lines

Re: applywarp --interp default, how to shut off??

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:50:39 +0100

87 lines

Re: applywarp --interp default, how to shut off??

Woodman, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:14:00 -0400

124 lines

New Thread

atlas masks

atlas masks

Garin, Alba <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:59:55 +0200

39 lines

Re: atlas masks

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:12:13 +0100

75 lines

Re: atlas masks

Garin, Alba <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:15:57 +0200

110 lines

Re: atlas masks

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:22:56 +0100

129 lines

Re: atlas masks

Garin, Alba <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:08:02 +0200

135 lines

New Thread

atlases masks parceling

atlases masks parceling

Roman M <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:22:35 +0000

55 lines

Re: atlases masks parceling

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:02:12 +0100

74 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat

Kohn, Nils <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:12:49 +0200

113 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat

AW: [FSL] Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat

Kohn, Nils <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:25:20 +0200

313 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat

David Soto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:37:21 +0100

393 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:38:52 +0200

403 lines

New Thread

bash or dash?

bash or dash?

A Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:16:38 +0100

27 lines

Re: bash or dash?

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:21:48 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

bedpostx parallel via SGE ?

bedpostx parallel via SGE ?

Bastian Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:29:24 +0100

31 lines

Re: bedpostx parallel via SGE ?

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:19:45 +0100

113 lines

Re: bedpostx parallel via SGE ?

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:24:19 -0500

419 lines

Re: bedpostx parallel via SGE ?

Bastian Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:00:17 +0100

28 lines

Re: bedpostx parallel via SGE ?

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:51:23 +0100

45 lines

Re: bedpostx parallel via SGE ?

Bastian Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:31:32 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Brain/background threshold, % question

Brain/background threshold, % question

Fernanda Palhano <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:58:47 -0300

34 lines

Re: Brain/background threshold, % question

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:57:18 +0100

78 lines

Re: Brain/background threshold, % question

Fernanda Palhano <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:03:59 -0300

83 lines

New Thread

bvals and bvects for dti

bvals and bvects for dti

antonella torok <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:13:20 +0000

60 lines

Re: bvals and bvects for dti

Elif Alkan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:18:01 +0100

18 lines

Re: bvals and bvects for dti

antonella torok <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:15:02 +0000

126 lines

New Thread

calv VOI length

calv VOI length

Moran Artzi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:29:42 +0100

16 lines

Re: calv VOI length

wolf zinke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:41:58 +0200

27 lines

Re: calv VOI length

Moran Artzi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:05:20 +0200

53 lines

New Thread

categorical covariate in vertex analysis

categorical covariate in vertex analysis

Steven van der Werff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:38:05 +0100

26 lines

Re: categorical covariate in vertex analysis

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 21:24:13 -0300

74 lines

New Thread

Clarity on a 2x2 repeated measures design

Clarity on a 2x2 repeated measures design

Jon Brock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:50:54 +0100

177 lines

Re: Clarity on a 2x2 repeated measures design

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:15:29 +0100

157 lines

Re: Clarity on a 2x2 repeated measures design

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:59:13 -0400

103 lines

Re: Clarity on a 2x2 repeated measures design

Jon Brock <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 07:49:51 +0100

28 lines

Re: Clarity on a 2x2 repeated measures design

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:34:40 -0500

116 lines

New Thread

Confusion between DTI and DWI data

Confusion between DTI and DWI data

Suchada Tantisatirapong <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:52:22 +0100

25 lines

Re: Confusion between DTI and DWI data

Michel Thiebaut de Schotten <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:12:42 +0200

243 lines

Re: Confusion between DTI and DWI data

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:34:50 -0400

86 lines

Re: Confusion between DTI and DWI data

Suchada Tantisatirapong <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:44:58 +0100

60 lines

Re: Confusion between DTI and DWI data

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:17:36 -0400

139 lines

Re: Confusion between DTI and DWI data

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:45:54 +0100

95 lines

New Thread

convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC

Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:58:43 -0400

32 lines

Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:29:41 +0100

153 lines

Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:59:27 -0400

65 lines

Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:16:10 +0200

101 lines

Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:35:50 -0400

83 lines

Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:00:47 +0200

107 lines

Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:40:54 -0400

190 lines

Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:06:23 +0200

172 lines

Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:44:13 -0400

151 lines

New Thread

could anyone recommend a rat brain atlas?

could anyone recommend a rat brain atlas?

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:46:04 +0800

50 lines

Re: could anyone recommend a rat brain atlas?

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:03:12 -0400

51 lines

Re: could anyone recommend a rat brain atlas?

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:34:57 +0800

119 lines

New Thread

Create two masks from one by supplying coordinates of bounding plane

Create two masks from one by supplying coordinates of bounding plane

Joshua L <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:42:37 +0100

32 lines

Re: Create two masks from one by supplying coordinates of bounding plane

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:02:12 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

csf /edge in melodic & dual_reg

csf /edge in melodic & dual_reg

Michael Chen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:23:32 +0100

39 lines

Re: csf /edge in melodic & dual_reg

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:11:42 +0200

74 lines

Re: csf /edge in melodic & dual_reg

Michael Chen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:39:06 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

dicom 2 nifti

dicom 2 nifti

Leslie Engineering <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:00:31 -0400

23 lines

Re: dicom 2 nifti

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:15:10 +0100

27 lines

Re: dicom 2 nifti

Carl Helmick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:12:00 -0300

26 lines

New Thread

Different TRs in DTI acqusitions

Different TRs in DTI acqusitions

Jenifer Juranek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 23:16:00 +0100

19 lines

Re: Different TRs in DTI acqusitions

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:41:08 -0500

39 lines

Re: Different TRs in DTI acqusitions

Lythgoe, David <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:04:06 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Diffusion tensor estimation method

Diffusion tensor estimation method

Ed Gronenschild <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:03:41 +0200

20 lines

Re: Diffusion tensor estimation method

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:07:44 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Download failure

Download failure

Amy Guthormsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:49:52 +0100

17 lines

Re: Download failure

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:31:23 +0100

27 lines

Re: Download failure

Amy Guthormsen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:38:50 +0100

18 lines

Re: Download failure

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:47:26 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

download version 4.1.5

download version 4.1.5

roberto toro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:55:52 +0200

23 lines

New Thread

DTI

DTI

Monica Giraldo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:11:09 +0100

29 lines

Re: DTI

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:45:18 +0100

60 lines

Re: DTI

Monica Giraldo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:52:31 -0400

152 lines

Re: DTI

Monica Giraldo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:40:00 -0400

162 lines

Re: DTI

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:42:16 +0100

290 lines

Re: DTI

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:43:25 +0100

418 lines

Re: DTI

Monica Giraldo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:02:54 -0400

369 lines

New Thread

dtifit_question

dtifit_question

Gabor Perlaki <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:25:53 +0100

23 lines

Re: dtifit_question

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:19:56 +0100

44 lines

Re: dtifit_question

Gabor Perlaki <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:43:32 +0100

11 lines

New Thread

dual regression

dual regression

Stuart Currie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 22:12:32 +0100

20 lines

Re: dual regression

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 23:22:41 +0200

30 lines

Re: dual regression

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 17:24:33 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

dual regression - 2 level 2 factors, nultiple runs per subject

dual regression - 2 level 2 factors, nultiple runs per subject

Monica Wey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:26:10 +0100

32 lines

Re: dual regression - 2 level 2 factors, nultiple runs per subject

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:48:14 +0200

50 lines

New Thread

Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!

Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:03:26 +0200

25 lines

Re: Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!

Christine Zakrzewski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:42:28 +0000

45 lines

Re: Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:39:03 +0100

101 lines

Re: Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:20:57 +0200

70 lines

Re: Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:24:40 +0200

74 lines

Re: Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:28:19 +0100

211 lines

Re: Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:58:50 +0200

145 lines

New Thread

dual regression stage 3

Re: dual regression stage 3

Monica Wey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:23:48 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects

Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Oct 2011 22:16:41 +0200

36 lines

Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:22:23 -0400

35 lines

Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Oct 2011 22:45:44 +0200

58 lines

Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Oct 2011 17:01:47 -0400

56 lines

Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Oct 2011 23:18:27 +0200

71 lines

Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Oct 2011 23:53:29 +0200

55 lines

Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:19:19 +0200

104 lines

Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:50:02 +0200

79 lines

Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:41:05 +0100

246 lines

New Thread

dual regression: correlate RSN with behavioural data with multiple factors

dual regression: correlate RSN with behavioural data with multiple factors

Alberto Inuggi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:06:46 +0100

43 lines

Re: dual regression: correlate RSN with behavioural data with multiple factors

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:38:59 +0200

53 lines

New Thread

Dual_regression: failed to find maskall

Dual_regression: failed to find maskall

Hai Pan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:51:54 -0400

54 lines

Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:56:35 +0100

113 lines

Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall

Hai Pan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:11:11 -0400

125 lines

Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:13:49 +0100

192 lines

Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall

Hai Pan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:57:37 -0400

204 lines

Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall

SUBSCRIBE FSL Dominic Nathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:12:02 +0100

18 lines

Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall

SUBSCRIBE FSL Dominic Nathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:14:06 +0100

11 lines

Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall

Hai Pan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:29:16 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

Eddy current corrections not working

Eddy current corrections not working

Monica Giraldo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:30:46 +0100

15 lines

Re: Eddy current corrections not working

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:07:53 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Error Running FSL

Error Running FSL

SURIL GOHEL <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:44:54 -0400

38 lines

Re: Error Running FSL

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:12:17 +0100

96 lines

New Thread

Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries

Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries

Suchada Tantisatirapong <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:05:26 +0100

27 lines

Re: Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:43:08 +0100

42 lines

Re: Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries

Suchada Tantisatirapong <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:09:41 +0100

62 lines

Re: Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:05:05 +0100

77 lines

Re: Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries

Suchada Tantisatirapong <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:15:54 +0100

97 lines

Re: Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:57:08 +0100

118 lines

New Thread

extra tracts with waypoint and termination mask

extra tracts with waypoint and termination mask

Ellen Guller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:16:19 +0100

21 lines

Re: extra tracts with waypoint and termination mask

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:38:00 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

False positive rate corresponding to uncorrected p-value/minimum cluster size?

False positive rate corresponding to uncorrected p-value/minimum cluster size?

Marieke Jepma <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:00:15 +0100

26 lines

Re: False positive rate corresponding to uncorrected p-value/minimum cluster size?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:15:14 +0100

39 lines

Re: False positive rate corresponding to uncorrected p-value/minimum cluster size?

Donna Dierker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:44:45 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

FAST bug

FAST bug

Rolf A. Heckemann <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:00:32 +0200

41 lines

Re: FAST bug

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2011 04:08:28 -0500

59 lines

Re: FAST bug

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2011 10:17:01 -0400

72 lines

Re: FAST bug

Wolf, Varina Louise <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2011 09:33:02 -0500

61 lines

Re: FAST bug

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 09:51:23 +0100

55 lines

Re: FAST bug

Rolf A. Heckemann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:41:14 +0200

90 lines

New Thread

FEAT troubleshoot

FEAT troubleshoot

David S Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:13:11 +0000

29 lines

Re: FEAT troubleshoot

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:32:57 +0000

118 lines

Re: FEAT troubleshoot

David S Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:49:34 +0000

14 lines

New Thread

FEAT under Mac Lion

FEAT under Mac Lion

Mike Bynevelt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2011 18:37:01 +0800

14 lines

Re: FEAT under Mac Lion

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:30:26 -0500

50 lines

Re: FEAT under Mac Lion

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:40:20 +0100

39 lines

Re: FEAT under Mac Lion

Mike Bynevelt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 20:51:47 +0800

70 lines

New Thread

FEAT: High Pass Filtering

FEAT: High Pass Filtering

Varina Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:00:21 +0100

32 lines

Re: FEAT: High Pass Filtering

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:03:21 +0100

111 lines

Re: FEAT: High Pass Filtering

Wolf, Varina Louise <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:41:39 -0500

244 lines

Re: FEAT: High Pass Filtering

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:57:22 +0100

313 lines

New Thread

FEAT: High-pass temporal filtering in mirrored design

FEAT: High-pass temporal filtering in mirrored design

Peter Fried <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:22:51 -0400

36 lines

Re: FEAT: High-pass temporal filtering in mirrored design

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:25:54 +0100

120 lines

New Thread

Featquery crash

Featquery crash

Benjamin Philip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:49:15 -0700

216 lines

New Thread

FEEDS failed

FEEDS failed

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2011 01:21:49 -0400

182 lines

New Thread

Fieldmap

Re: Fieldmap

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:10:54 -0400

319 lines

New Thread

fieldmap help

Re: fieldmap help

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 00:49:46 -0400

71 lines

New Thread

film_gls to generate COPE images for longistudinal TBSS

film_gls to generate COPE images for longistudinal TBSS

Marcus Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:12:16 +1100

286 lines

Re: film_gls to generate COPE images for longistudinal TBSS

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:05:14 +0100

283 lines

New Thread

fisher r to z for resting state fmri

fisher r to z for resting state fmri

Joyce Chen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:02:13 +0100

22 lines

Re: fisher r to z for resting state fmri

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:28:28 -0500

81 lines

Re: fisher r to z for resting state fmri

Joyce Chen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 18:14:31 -0400

62 lines

Re: fisher r to z for resting state fmri

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:27:05 -0500

155 lines

New Thread

Flip an image: fslswapdim problem

Flip an image: fslswapdim problem

Robert Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:59:19 +0100

21 lines

Re: Flip an image: fslswapdim problem

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:35:15 +0100

56 lines

Re: Flip an image: fslswapdim problem

Robert Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:08:48 +0100

12 lines

New Thread

FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

Daniel Cole <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:24:24 -0400

164 lines

Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:37:46 -0500

725 lines

Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

Daniel Cole <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:46:21 -0400

591 lines

Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

Daniel Cole <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:00:33 -0400

661 lines

Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

Christine Zakrzewski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:59:38 +0000

687 lines

Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:09:55 -0500

1498 lines

Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

Daniel Cole <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:38:36 -0400

1227 lines

Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:14:56 -0400

359 lines

Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

Daniel Cole <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:35:31 -0400

787 lines

Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:50:47 -0400

413 lines

Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

Daniel Cole <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:40:21 -0400

1029 lines

Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:44:58 +0100

1080 lines

Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing

Daniel Cole <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:48:02 -0400

1105 lines

New Thread

FLIRT outside FEAT

FLIRT outside FEAT

Max Beermann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:41:33 +0100

22 lines

Re: FLIRT outside FEAT

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:13:27 +0100

100 lines

New Thread

Form clusters by local max or mean?

Form clusters by local max or mean?

bettyann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:09:20 +0100

35 lines

Re: Form clusters by local max or mean?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:45:33 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

FSL 4.1.8 using gcc 4.5.1: patch

FSL 4.1.8 using gcc 4.5.1: patch

Torsten Rohlfing <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 23:42:08 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

FSL 4.1.9

FSL 4.1.9

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:27:53 +0100

34 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.9

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:50:49 +0200

28 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.9

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:37:01 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

FSL 4.1.9 - fslroi

FSL 4.1.9 - fslroi

wolf zinke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:02:30 +0200

24 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.9 - fslroi

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:29:29 +0100

32 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.9 - fslroi

wolf zinke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:37:31 +0200

31 lines

New Thread

fsl and MAC lion

fsl and MAC lion

Kai Yuan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:09:14 +0800

63 lines

Re: fsl and MAC lion

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:02:58 +0100

65 lines

New Thread

FSL Digest - 25 Oct 2011 to 26 Oct 2011 (#2011-296)

Re: FSL Digest - 25 Oct 2011 to 26 Oct 2011 (#2011-296)

Gonzalo Rojas Costa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:47:46 -0300

39 lines

Re: FSL Digest - 25 Oct 2011 to 26 Oct 2011 (#2011-296)

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:29:56 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

fslcc input voxels

fslcc input voxels

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:49:41 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images

fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:36:20 +0200

50 lines

Re: fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:09:43 +0100

61 lines

Re: fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images

Andreas J. Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:02:31 +0200

154 lines

Re: fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:40:29 +0100

190 lines

Re: fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:11:45 +0200

264 lines

Re: fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:14:02 +0100

273 lines

New Thread

fslmaths on stats files

fslmaths on stats files

Liam Nestor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:14:03 +0100

62 lines

Re: fslmaths on stats files

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:31:44 +0100

106 lines

Re: fslmaths on stats files

Liam Nestor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:23:37 +0100

195 lines

Re: fslmaths on stats files

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:09:33 +0100

138 lines

Re: fslmaths on stats files

Liam Nestor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:33:40 +0100

317 lines

Re: fslmaths on stats files

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:36:16 +0100

354 lines

New Thread

FSLVIEW for Ubuntu 11.10 ?...

FSLVIEW for Ubuntu 11.10 ?...

Gonzalo Rojas Costa <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:15:25 -0300

18 lines

Re: FSLVIEW for Ubuntu 11.10 ?...

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:24:02 +0200

35 lines

New Thread

FSLview Mac OSX problem

FSLview Mac OSX problem

Conrad Rockel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:52:41 +0100

35 lines

Re: FSLview Mac OSX problem

Conrad Rockel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:31:47 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

FSLView version that does not rely on Qt3?

FSLView version that does not rely on Qt3?

Zachary Infantolino <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:47:31 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

fsl_glm and demean option

fsl_glm and demean option

giuseppe pagnoni <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:13:46 +0100

39 lines

Re: fsl_glm and demean option

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:59:01 +0100

127 lines

Re: fsl_glm and demean option

giuseppe pagnoni <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:21:24 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

fsl_glm and second-level ICA

fsl_glm and second-level ICA

Ciara Greene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:50:43 +0100

35 lines

Re: fsl_glm and second-level ICA

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:23:37 +0200

65 lines

Re: fsl_glm and second-level ICA

Ciara Greene <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:50:45 +0100

297 lines

New Thread

fsl_randomise_problem?

Re: fsl_randomise_problem?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:23:59 +0100

42 lines

Re: fsl_randomise_problem?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:30:58 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

fsl_regfilt

fsl_regfilt

Satrajit Ghosh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:23:36 -0400

39 lines

Re: fsl_regfilt

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:30:14 +0200

33 lines

Re: fsl_regfilt

Satrajit Ghosh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:53:10 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

fsl_regfilt and dof for group analysis

fsl_regfilt and dof for group analysis

Marina Shpaner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 18:40:01 +0100

18 lines

Re: fsl_regfilt and dof for group analysis

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:50:34 +0100

102 lines

Re: fsl_regfilt and dof for group analysis

Marina Shpaner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:00:23 +0100

16 lines

Re: fsl_regfilt and dof for group analysis

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:25:00 +0200

35 lines

New Thread

getting MAT, CON, FTS into Glm without FSF

getting MAT, CON, FTS into Glm without FSF

Roderick McColl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:47:49 +0000

76 lines

Re: getting MAT, CON, FTS into Glm without FSF

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 01:14:28 +0100

93 lines

Re: getting MAT, CON, FTS into Glm without FSF

Roderick McColl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:52:58 +0000

133 lines

New Thread

GLM: is mean regressor mandatory for correlation analysis ???

GLM: is mean regressor mandatory for correlation analysis ???

Alberto Inuggi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:21:12 +0100

22 lines

Re: GLM: is mean regressor mandatory for correlation analysis ???

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:44:24 -0400

61 lines

New Thread

gradient table correction and avscale output

gradient table correction and avscale output

Tugan Muftuler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:29:29 +0100

42 lines

Re: gradient table correction and avscale output

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:55:25 +0100

68 lines

Re: gradient table correction and avscale output

Tugan Muftuler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 04:46:52 +0100

26 lines

Re: gradient table correction and avscale output

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:11:08 +0100

73 lines

Re: gradient table correction and avscale output

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:48:52 +0100

90 lines

Re: gradient table correction and avscale output

Tugan Muftuler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:05:20 +0100

105 lines

New Thread

group analysis on seed-based connectivity data

group analysis on seed-based connectivity data

Raj <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:18:11 +0100

30 lines

Re: group analysis on seed-based connectivity data

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:29:43 -0500

104 lines

New Thread

group-level FEAT on repeated measures (using baseline as voxel-wise covariate)

group-level FEAT on repeated measures (using baseline as voxel-wise covariate)

Raj <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:13:52 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Having some problems with VBM tool

Having some problems with VBM tool

Rosalia Dacosta <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:17:24 +0200

57 lines

Re: Having some problems with VBM tool

Christine Zakrzewski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:24:15 +0000

143 lines

New Thread

help with Spacial Smoothing

help with Spacial Smoothing

Woodman, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:32:33 -0400

39 lines

Re: help with Spacial Smoothing

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:42:38 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

how avscale works?

how avscale works?

Keihaninejad, Shiva <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:54:04 +0000

59 lines

New Thread

how to correlate a behavioral measures with fmri-data?

how to correlate a behavioral measures with fmri-data?

Elif Alkan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:30:40 +0100

36 lines

Re: how to correlate a behavioral measures with fmri-data?

David V. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:43:09 -0400

59 lines

Re: how to correlate a behavioral measures with fmri-data?

Daniel Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:07:31 -0400

146 lines

Re: how to correlate a behavioral measures with fmri-data?

Elif Alkan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:28:12 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

How to do cluster-based thresholding after running randomise?

How to do cluster-based thresholding after running randomise?

Xiangzhen Kong <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:24:40 +0800

60 lines

Re: How to do cluster-based thresholding after running randomise?

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:32:50 -0500

100 lines

New Thread

How to register MD to standard space

How to register MD to standard space

Haitao Ge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:25:36 +0800

48 lines

Re: How to register MD to standard space

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:15:15 +0100

58 lines

Re: How to register MD to standard space

Haitao Ge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:33:03 +0800

127 lines

Re: How to register MD to standard space

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:55:22 -0500

590 lines

Re: How to register MD to standard space

Haitao Ge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:58:51 +0800

452 lines

Re: How to register MD to standard space

Bonnie Y K Lam <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:12:37 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

I 'm lookig for a free spectroscopy program for multi voxel, could you help me?

I 'm lookig for a free spectroscopy program for multi voxel, could you help me?

diagnostico imagenes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:02:35 +0200

54 lines

Re: I 'm lookig for a free spectroscopy program for multi voxel, could you help me?

Moran Artzi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:32:39 +0200

73 lines

Re: I 'm lookig for a free spectroscopy program for multi voxel, could you help me?

diagnostico imagenes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:13:16 +0200

106 lines

New Thread

ICA reproducibility

ICA reproducibility

Debby Klooster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:44:43 +0100

38 lines

Re: ICA reproducibility

Gael Varoquaux <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:03:25 +0200

57 lines

New Thread

identify TBSS_results

identify TBSS_results

Gabor Perlaki <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:41:41 +0100

26 lines

Re: identify TBSS_results

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:59:29 +0100

105 lines

New Thread

Identify tracts in cluster command

Identify tracts in cluster command

SUBSCRIBE FSL Patricia Pires <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:33:03 +0100

32 lines

Re: Identify tracts in cluster command

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:00:35 +0100

109 lines

Identify tracts in cluster command

SUBSCRIBE FSL Patricia Pires <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:47:56 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

incorrect TR in header after running flirt

incorrect TR in header after running flirt

Christopher Petty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:07:43 +0100

31 lines

Re: incorrect TR in header after running flirt

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:57:10 +0100

104 lines

New Thread

Juelich VOI Extraction

Juelich VOI Extraction

Anna Zamm <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:38:59 +0100

36 lines

Re: Juelich VOI Extraction

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:26:45 -0400

88 lines

New Thread

masks of non-cluster-corrected clusters?

masks of non-cluster-corrected clusters?

Christine Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:51:29 -0400

32 lines

Re: masks of non-cluster-corrected clusters?

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:12:00 +0100

108 lines

New Thread

MELODIC and different matrix sizes

MELODIC and different matrix sizes

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:51:05 +0100

22 lines

Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:06:11 -0400

36 lines

Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:11:46 +0100

19 lines

Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:22:59 -0400

33 lines

Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:39:40 +0100

20 lines

Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:16:11 +0200

39 lines

Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:55:53 +0100

13 lines

Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:45:26 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Melodic and dualreg procedure

Melodic and dualreg procedure

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:25:27 +0100

27 lines

Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:10:18 +0100

115 lines

Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:12:29 +0100

125 lines

Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:19:36 +0200

61 lines

Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:26:40 -0400

60 lines

Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:11:04 +0100

101 lines

Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:27:12 +0200

32 lines

Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:57:01 +0100

13 lines

New Thread

melodic and masking

melodic and masking

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:38:45 +0100

35 lines

Re: melodic and masking

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:47:12 -0400

47 lines

Re: melodic and masking

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:31:01 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

MELODIC and missing fieldmaps

MELODIC and missing fieldmaps

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:44:02 +0100

20 lines

Re: MELODIC and missing fieldmaps

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:31:39 +0100

100 lines

Re: MELODIC and missing fieldmaps

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:57:41 +0100

28 lines

Re: MELODIC and missing fieldmaps

Andreas J. Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:42:12 +0200

97 lines

Re: MELODIC and missing fieldmaps

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:56:20 +0100

13 lines

New Thread

Melodic crashes with memory allocation error

Melodic crashes with memory allocation error

Antti Korvenoja <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:27:06 +0300

30 lines

Re: Melodic crashes with memory allocation error

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:42:21 +0100

102 lines

New Thread

MELODIC failed

MELODIC failed

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:06:40 -0400

106 lines

Re: MELODIC failed

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:16:07 -0400

138 lines

New Thread

MELODIC for resting state data, 2 groups - follow up

MELODIC for resting state data, 2 groups - follow up

Andrea Greve <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:22:32 +0100

28 lines

Re: MELODIC for resting state data, 2 groups - follow up

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:19:26 +0100

111 lines

Re: MELODIC for resting state data, 2 groups - follow up

Andrea Greve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:44:17 +0100

14 lines

New Thread

MELODIC: automatic dimensionality estimation when identifying artifacts

MELODIC: automatic dimensionality estimation when identifying artifacts

Peter Fried <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:29:51 -0400

31 lines

Re: MELODIC: automatic dimensionality estimation when identifying artifacts

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:41:57 -0400

39 lines

New Thread

MELODIC: PCA

MELODIC: PCA

Danilo Maziero <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:28:20 +0100

22 lines

Re: MELODIC: PCA

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:39:46 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Missing contents of Data Folder

Missing contents of Data Folder

Scott Munro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:05:40 +0100

25 lines

Re: Missing contents of Data Folder

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:36:15 +0200

87 lines

Re: Missing contents of Data Folder

Scott Munro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:43:11 -0400

110 lines

New Thread

Model-related vs unrelated activity

Model-related vs unrelated activity

Sean McWhinney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:38:24 +0100

22 lines

Re: Model-related vs unrelated activity

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:10:39 +0100

104 lines

Re: Model-related vs unrelated activity

McWhinney, Sean <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:39:12 -0400

162 lines

Re: Model-related vs unrelated activity

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:49:02 +0100

194 lines

Re: Model-related vs unrelated activity

McWhinney, Sean <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:26:19 -0400

88 lines

New Thread

More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA

More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA

Nicola Toschi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:39:58 +0200

120 lines

Re: More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 18:29:20 -0400

174 lines

Re: More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA

Nicola Toschi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 00:57:41 +0200

254 lines

Re: More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA

Nicola Toschi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:55:18 +0200

248 lines

Re: More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA

Charlotte Rae <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:54:41 +0100

72 lines

Re: More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA

Nicola Toschi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:38:44 +0200

179 lines

Re: More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:36:18 -0400

285 lines

New Thread

Multi-session linear trend

Multi-session linear trend

Elisabeth Karuza <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:35:16 +0100

42 lines

Re: Multi-session linear trend

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:39:51 +0100

202 lines

Re: Multi-session linear trend

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:13:25 +0200

219 lines

Re: Multi-session linear trend

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:01:30 +0100

302 lines

Re: Multi-session linear trend

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:25:47 +0200

300 lines

Re: Multi-session linear trend

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:29:01 +0100

383 lines

Re: Multi-session linear trend

Elisabeth Karuza <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:51:29 +0100

11 lines

New Thread

Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat

Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat

Kohn, Nils <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:03:19 +0200

22 lines

Re: Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat

David Soto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:09:15 +0100

112 lines

New Thread

Multiple sessions in featquery

Multiple sessions in featquery

Andres Roman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:14:35 +0100

40 lines

Re: Multiple sessions in featquery

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:53:42 +0100

132 lines

New Thread

Neuro Bureau: Public release of preprocessed DTI data

Neuro Bureau: Public release of preprocessed DTI data

Cameron Craddock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:56:10 -0400

109 lines

New Thread

No component after group ICA

No component after group ICA

Arnaud Viarouge <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:57:24 +0100

75 lines

Re: No component after group ICA

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:02:18 +0100

179 lines

Re: No component after group ICA

Arnaud Viarouge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:37:48 -0500

204 lines

Re: No component after group ICA

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:00:51 +0100

282 lines

New Thread

oblique data registration

oblique data registration

Dana <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:57:34 +0100

44 lines

Re: oblique data registration

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:55:44 +0100

149 lines

Re: oblique data registration

Christine Zakrzewski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:41:20 +0000

313 lines

Re: oblique data registration

dana eldreth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:58:16 -0400

369 lines

Re: oblique data registration

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:24:35 -0400

447 lines

Re: oblique data registration

dana eldreth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Oct 2011 14:20:54 -0400

517 lines

Re: oblique data registration

dana eldreth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:59:17 -0400

490 lines

Re: oblique data registration

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:14:15 +0100

522 lines

Re: oblique data registration

dana eldreth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:03:28 -0400

614 lines

New Thread

padding and unpadding images with zeros

Re: padding and unpadding images with zeros

David V. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2011 10:59:25 -0500

170 lines

New Thread

Paired t-test with additional EV

Paired t-test with additional EV

Monica Wey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:37:25 +0100

29 lines

Re: Paired t-test with additional EV

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:02:14 -0500

95 lines

New Thread

Paste bug for Glm_gui on Mac OSX

Paste bug for Glm_gui on Mac OSX

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Oct 2011 19:34:51 +0200

194 lines

Re: Paste bug for Glm_gui on Mac OSX

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:15:39 -0500

237 lines

New Thread

Patients' data and FA values in pons

Patients' data and FA values in pons

Maki Kasahara <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:39:53 +0000

74 lines

New Thread

Philips DTI gradient table

Philips DTI gradient table

Auer, Tibor M.D. Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:24:48 +0200

155 lines

Re: Philips DTI gradient table

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:35:27 +0100

147 lines

Re: Philips DTI gradient table

Auer, Tibor M.D. Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:35:10 +0200

332 lines

Re: Philips DTI gradient table

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:43:51 +0200

309 lines

Re: Philips DTI gradient table

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:17:01 -0400

115 lines

Re: Philips DTI gradient table

Riccardo Navarra <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:20:45 +0100

18 lines

Re: Philips DTI gradient table

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:05:44 +0100

60 lines

Re: Philips DTI gradient table

Auer, Tibor M.D. Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:47:25 +0200

165 lines

New Thread

Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables

Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables

Anna Matejko <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:18:56 +0100

27 lines

Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables

Christine Zakrzewski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:29:24 +0000

46 lines

Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:59:53 -0400

72 lines

Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables

Anna Matejko <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:02:00 +0100

19 lines

Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables

Christine Zakrzewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:05:59 +0000

39 lines

Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables

Anna Matejko <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:56:20 +0100

46 lines

Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables

Christine Zakrzewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:52:19 +0000

70 lines

Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables

Anna Matejko <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:13:33 +0100

71 lines

Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables

Christine Zakrzewski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:28:42 +0000

94 lines

New Thread

Position available: Postdoc in the cognitive neuroscience of aging

Position available: Postdoc in the cognitive neuroscience of aging

James Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Oct 2011 16:13:16 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Possible SIENAX bug ?

Possible SIENAX bug ?

Antonios-Konstantinos Thanellas <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Oct 2011 15:22:55 +0100

288 lines

Re: Possible SIENAX bug ?

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:31:32 +0100

566 lines

New Thread

post-hoc t tests

post-hoc t tests

David Soto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:01:18 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Prob Track across subjects

Prob Track across subjects

Matteo Diano <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:13:29 +0200

31 lines

Re: Prob Track across subjects

Jan Schreiber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:48:43 +0200

26 lines

New Thread

probabilistic ICA

probabilistic ICA

John Fredy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:55:06 -0500

35 lines

Re: probabilistic ICA

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:53:16 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Problem comparing binary tracts between groups using randomise (re-sent)

Problem comparing binary tracts between groups using randomise (re-sent)

Marenco, Stefano (NIH/NIMH) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2011 10:07:04 -0400

360 lines

Re: Problem comparing binary tracts between groups using randomise (re-sent)

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 05:51:43 +0100

376 lines

New Thread

probtrackx command line help

probtrackx command line help

Woodman, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:51:03 -0400

56 lines

Re: probtrackx command line help

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:29:08 +0100

80 lines

Re: probtrackx command line help

Woodman, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:41:41 -0400

105 lines

Re: probtrackx command line help

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:22:20 +0100

123 lines

Re: probtrackx command line help

Woodman, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:13:59 -0400

160 lines

Re: probtrackx command line help

Woodman, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:04:25 -0400

189 lines

Re: probtrackx command line help

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:55:34 +0100

209 lines

Re: probtrackx command line help

Woodman, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:41:56 -0400

232 lines

New Thread

Projecting scalp positions/data onto the brain

Projecting scalp positions/data onto the brain

Manuel Hewitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:01:08 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

question about contrasts and contrast masking

question about contrasts and contrast masking

sere f <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:19:52 +0100

77 lines

Re: question about contrasts and contrast masking

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:31:13 +0000

144 lines

New Thread

Question about the TBSS regarding to the values extracted

Question about the TBSS regarding to the values extracted

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:09:52 -0400

188 lines

Re: Question about the TBSS regarding to the values extracted

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:30:11 +0000

259 lines

Re: Question about the TBSS regarding to the values extracted

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:20:32 -0400

256 lines

New Thread

question on randomise and design.fts format

question on randomise and design.fts format

Roderick McColl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:44:22 +0000

170 lines

Re: question on randomise and design.fts format

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:36:51 +0100

226 lines

New Thread

Randomise Correlation Contrasts

Re: Randomise Correlation Contrasts

Sjoerd Bruijn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:27:52 +0100

17 lines

Re: Randomise Correlation Contrasts

Sjoerd Bruijn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:41:28 +0200

66 lines

Re: Randomise Correlation Contrasts

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:56:02 -0500

155 lines

New Thread

Randomise Question

Randomise Question

Arnold Evia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:35:10 +0100

25 lines

Re: Randomise Question

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:46:12 +0100

100 lines

Re: Randomise Question

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:17:02 -0400

147 lines

Re: Randomise Question

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 08:25:03 +0100

201 lines

Re: Randomise Question

Arnold Evia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:24:42 +0100

25 lines

Re: Randomise Question

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:33:41 -0400

75 lines

Re: Randomise Question

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:26:51 +0100

98 lines

New Thread

randomise takes forever

randomise takes forever

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:24:44 -0400

257 lines

Re: randomise takes forever

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 17:45:13 +0100

327 lines

Re: randomise takes forever

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:51:48 -0400

325 lines

New Thread

randomize permutation number

randomize permutation number

Marenco, Stefano (NIH/NIMH) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:24:54 -0400

167 lines

Re: randomize permutation number

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:34:16 +0100

114 lines

New Thread

randomsie error message

randomsie error message

Shir Hof <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Oct 2011 12:23:20 +0100

32 lines

Re: randomsie error message

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:12:06 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Re : Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA

Re : Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA

Josselin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:49:19 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] Having some problems with VBM tool

Re : [FSL] Having some problems with VBM tool

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:22:51 +0100

76 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] Having some problems with VBM tool

Rosalia Dacosta <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:29:47 +0200

148 lines

New Thread

Re-run Feat after denoising?

Re-run Feat after denoising?

Varina Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:04:50 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Gelareh Ahmadi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:11:58 +1100

801 lines

New Thread

Repeated-measures, intercept necessary or not?

Re: Repeated-measures, intercept necessary or not?

Elisabeth Ploran <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 20:48:29 +0100

49 lines

Re: Repeated-measures, intercept necessary or not?

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 22:19:08 +0100

148 lines

New Thread

res4D.nii.gz in higher-level FEAT analysis

res4D.nii.gz in higher-level FEAT analysis

Goran <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:42:23 +0100

55 lines

Re: res4D.nii.gz in higher-level FEAT analysis

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:09:54 +0100

144 lines

New Thread

resting state fMRI

resting state fMRI

Stuart Currie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:52:11 +0100

32 lines

Re: resting state fMRI

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:15:42 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

resting state ICA maps atlas

Re: resting state ICA maps atlas

michel grothe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2011 12:06:05 +0200

172 lines

New Thread

resting state multi-subject melodic

resting state multi-subject melodic

Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:00:58 +0100

28 lines

Re: resting state multi-subject melodic

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:20:40 -0400

48 lines

Re: resting state multi-subject melodic

Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:01:37 +0100

19 lines

Re: resting state multi-subject melodic

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:16:28 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

Results tfce filled

Results tfce filled

Amandine Pelletier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:20:20 +0100

25 lines

Re: Results tfce filled

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:11:49 +0100

105 lines

Re: Results tfce filled

Xiangzhen Kong <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:43:53 +0800

95 lines

New Thread

rmsdiff

rmsdiff

Martin M Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:25:48 -0700

48 lines

Re: rmsdiff

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:19:10 +0100

72 lines

Re: rmsdiff

Martin M. Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:38:40 -0700

165 lines

New Thread

Running MD, AD and RD

Running MD, AD and RD

Bonnie Y K Lam <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 03:50:48 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

seed-based correlation average maps

seed-based correlation average maps

Angela Favaro <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:29:04 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

sienax issue

Re: sienax issue

Martin M Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:47:09 -0700

167 lines

Re: sienax issue

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:07:36 +0100

513 lines

New Thread

Slicer with 4D Images

Slicer with 4D Images

Michael Waskom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:45:39 -0700

41 lines

Re: Slicer with 4D Images

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:11:22 +0100

103 lines

New Thread

Specifying number of IC components in Melodic

Specifying number of IC components in Melodic

Matthew Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:10:56 +0100

17 lines

Re: Specifying number of IC components in Melodic

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:45:25 +0100

84 lines

New Thread

strange results when using TBSS

strange results when using TBSS

Xiangzhen Kong <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:45:36 +0800

137 lines

Re: strange results when using TBSS

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:35:48 +0100

202 lines

New Thread

Structural Data for VBM

Re: Structural Data for VBM

Aditya Kumar Kasinadhuni <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 23:49:07 +0100

28 lines

Re: Structural Data for VBM

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:31:38 +0100

89 lines

New Thread

surface tracking

surface tracking

Sarina Iwabuchi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:50:10 +1300

40 lines

Re: surface tracking

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:32:49 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

SUSAN noise reduction

SUSAN noise reduction

Supreet kaur <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:23:18 -0400

49 lines

Re: SUSAN noise reduction

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:07:35 +0100

114 lines

New Thread

SV: [FSL] Philips DTI gradient table

SV: [FSL] Philips DTI gradient table

Niklas Lenfeldt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:15:26 +0200

370 lines

New Thread

switching to the older siena version 2.5 from the last version 2.6

switching to the older siena version 2.5 from the last version 2.6

Antonios-Konstantinos Thanellas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:40:53 +0100

29 lines

Re: switching to the older siena version 2.5 from the last version 2.6

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:57:03 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

t-test between 2 groups

t-test between 2 groups

Ramtilak Gattu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 02:39:00 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

T1 lesions

T1 lesions

Adil Javed <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 20:35:13 -0700

15 lines

New Thread

tbss bvecs and bvals

Re: tbss bvecs and bvals

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:02:30 +0100

29 lines

Re: tbss bvecs and bvals

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:00:09 +0200

38 lines

Re: tbss bvecs and bvals

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:20:35 +0100

58 lines

Re: tbss bvecs and bvals

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:27:41 +0200

65 lines

Re: tbss bvecs and bvals

Christine Zakrzewski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:43:44 +0000

85 lines

New Thread

TBSS DEPROJECT ROI ATLAS

Re: TBSS DEPROJECT ROI ATLAS

Amandine Pelletier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 09:33:35 +0200

507 lines

Re: TBSS DEPROJECT ROI ATLAS

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:34:51 +0100

562 lines

Re: TBSS DEPROJECT ROI ATLAS

Amandine Pelletier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:19:58 +0200

602 lines

Re: TBSS DEPROJECT ROI ATLAS

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:51:01 +0100

673 lines

New Thread

TBSS Group Analysis: tbss_tstats1 or tbss_tstats2

TBSS Group Analysis: tbss_tstats1 or tbss_tstats2

antonella torok <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:40:47 +0000

125 lines

Re: TBSS Group Analysis: tbss_tstats1 or tbss_tstats2

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:27:48 +0000

188 lines

New Thread

TBSS output

TBSS output

Moran Artzi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:17:54 +0100

22 lines

tbss output

Garin, Alba <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:50:51 +0200

31 lines

Re: tbss output

Christine Zakrzewski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:45:28 +0000

49 lines

Re: TBSS output

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:37:14 +0100

110 lines

Re: tbss output

Garin, Alba <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 09:31:35 +0200

64 lines

Re: tbss output

Xiangzhen Kong <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 18:53:18 +0800

180 lines

Re: tbss output

Christine Zakrzewski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:13:09 +0000

75 lines

Re: tbss output

Garin, Alba <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 16:21:56 +0200

110 lines

Re: tbss output

Christine Zakrzewski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:59:08 +0000

122 lines

New Thread

TBSS randomise F-test

Re: TBSS randomise F-test

Chou Kun Hsien <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:22:28 +0100

41 lines

Re: TBSS randomise F-test

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:39:28 +0100

127 lines

Re: TBSS randomise F-test

Chou Kun Hsien <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:39:52 +0100

40 lines

Re: TBSS randomise F-test

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 08:25:40 +0200

46 lines

Re: TBSS randomise F-test

Chou Kun Hsien <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 07:52:06 +0100

70 lines

Re: TBSS randomise F-test

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:03:48 +0200

78 lines

New Thread

TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA

TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA

Josselin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:39:30 +0100

32 lines

Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:47:46 -0400

171 lines

Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA

Josselin Houenou <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:51:52 +0100

37 lines

Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:02:35 -0400

136 lines

Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:22:14 -0500

86 lines

Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:08:29 -0400

170 lines

Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA

Josselin Houenou <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:43:33 +0100

17 lines

Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA

Yingying Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:23:01 -0400

107 lines

New Thread

tbss_3_postreg -S FAILED TO FIND

tbss_3_postreg -S FAILED TO FIND

Rodrigo Perea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:18:58 +0100

38 lines

Re: tbss_3_postreg -S FAILED TO FIND

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:45:37 +0100

124 lines

New Thread

tbss_3_postreg -S running time?

Re: tbss_3_postreg -S running time?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:27:16 +0100

25 lines

Re: tbss_3_postreg -S running time?

Rodrigo Perea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:42:24 +0100

15 lines

Re: tbss_3_postreg -S running time?

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:43:40 +0100

84 lines

Re: tbss_3_postreg -S running time?

Rodrigo Perea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 17:08:00 +0100

51 lines

Re: tbss_3_postreg -S running time?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:59:21 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

tbss_3_postreg memory erros and others

Re: tbss_3_postreg memory erros and others

Rodrigo Perea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:53:38 +0100

14 lines

New Thread

tbss_non_FA error - different FSL versions?

tbss_non_FA error - different FSL versions?

Eliana S. Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:32:37 -0700

123 lines

tbss_non_FA error - different FSL versions?

Eliana Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:38:53 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

tbss_skeleton: out of memory

tbss_skeleton: out of memory

Chr. Rossmanith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:33:16 +0200

68 lines

Re: tbss_skeleton: out of memory

Christine Zakrzewski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:47:11 +0000

173 lines

Re: tbss_skeleton: out of memory

Chr. Rossmanith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:51:06 +0200

278 lines

Re: tbss_skeleton: out of memory

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:57:40 +0100

227 lines

New Thread

Template from seed classifications

Template from seed classifications

Martin Kavec <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:20:05 +0200

20 lines

Re: Template from seed classifications

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:47:10 +0100

93 lines

Re: Template from seed classifications

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:48:47 +0100

97 lines

Re: Template from seed classifications

Martin Kavec <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 21:09:19 +0200

55 lines

New Thread

templates MD or FA

templates MD or FA

Alessandra Carla' <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:14:39 +0100

15 lines

Re: templates MD or FA

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:12:33 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

temporal derivatives?

temporal derivatives?

Marco Loggia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:36:50 +0000

23 lines

Re: temporal derivatives?

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:52:25 -0500

30 lines

Re: temporal derivatives?

Marco Loggia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:03:59 +0000

16 lines

Re: temporal derivatives?

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:18:52 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

temporal mode of ICs generated by TICA

temporal mode of ICs generated by TICA

Jie Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:15:33 +0100

24 lines

Re: temporal mode of ICs generated by TICA

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:30:43 +0200

33 lines

Re: temporal mode of ICs generated by TICA

jie yang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:08:32 -0400

104 lines

New Thread

The left/right flip image process

The left/right flip image process

Kai Yuan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:14:46 +0800

55 lines

Re: The left/right flip image process

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:55:47 +0100

117 lines

New Thread

to get the Corresponding Cortical Area name of tracts?

Re: to get the Corresponding Cortical Area name of tracts?

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:35:05 +0100

188 lines

Re: to get the Corresponding Cortical Area name of tracts?

Xiangzhen Kong <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:29:32 +0800

203 lines

New Thread

Too strong unwarping by FUGUE for the DTI image

Too strong unwarping by FUGUE for the DTI image

Kwan-Jin Jung <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:54:18 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Ubuntu 11.10 problem...

Ubuntu 11.10 problem...

Gonzalo Rojas Costa <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:30:15 -0300

19 lines

Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...

diagnostico imagenes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:08:58 +0200

65 lines

Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...

diagnostico imagenes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:17:22 +0200

74 lines

Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...

Rolf A. Heckemann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:57:00 +0200

37 lines

Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...

Stephan Bickel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:27:32 +0100

35 lines

Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:36:12 +0200

89 lines

Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:45:34 +0200

47 lines

Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:03:37 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

Unthresholded effect size maps in FSL

Unthresholded effect size maps in FSL

Reem Jan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:15:57 +0000

137 lines

Re: Unthresholded effect size maps in FSL

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:38:39 +0100

131 lines

New Thread

upsampling and downsampling images

upsampling and downsampling images

Antonios-Konstantinos Thanellas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:27:46 +0100

20 lines

Re: upsampling and downsampling images

wolf zinke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:39:29 +0200

33 lines

Re: upsampling and downsampling images

Benjamin Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:48:05 -0400

24 lines

Re: upsampling and downsampling images

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:17:57 +0100

54 lines

Re: upsampling and downsampling images

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:48:15 +0100

75 lines

New Thread

Using 1st level FEAT residuals question

Using 1st level FEAT residuals question

Roman M <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:40:32 +0000

63 lines

Re: Using 1st level FEAT residuals question

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:16:09 -0500

93 lines

Re: Using 1st level FEAT residuals question

Roman M <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:20:01 +0000

150 lines

New Thread

Using b-matrix for dtifit

Using b-matrix for dtifit

West, John D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 21:23:32 +0000

17 lines

Re: Using b-matrix for dtifit

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:39:02 -0400

46 lines

Re: Using b-matrix for dtifit

West, John D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:38:15 +0000

67 lines

Re: Using b-matrix for dtifit

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:44:38 -0400

117 lines

Re: Using b-matrix for dtifit

West, John D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:00:49 +0000

141 lines

Re: Using b-matrix for dtifit

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:54:39 -0500

193 lines

New Thread

Using FSL to obtain hemodynamic response for brain areas

Using FSL to obtain hemodynamic response for brain areas

Mobin Anandwala <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:19:13 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

using mask to skull strip?

using mask to skull strip?

Varina Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2011 18:39:49 +0100

25 lines

Re: using mask to skull strip?

Rolf A. Heckemann <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2011 20:12:30 +0200

76 lines

Re: using mask to skull strip?

Martin M. Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 07:29:02 -0700

187 lines

New Thread

using mean FA as a confound regressor in TBSS / setting up a paired-design with this confound regressor

using mean FA as a confound regressor in TBSS / setting up a paired-design with this confound regressor

Diederick Stoffers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:15:26 +0200

68 lines

Re: using mean FA as a confound regressor in TBSS / setting up a paired-design with this confound regressor

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:04:33 +0100

118 lines

Re: using mean FA as a confound regressor in TBSS / setting up a paired-design with this confound regressor

Marenco, Stefano (NIH/NIMH) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:36:41 -0400

622 lines

New Thread

VBM with more than one scanner

VBM with more than one scanner

Connolly, Colm <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:49:02 +0000

48 lines

Re: VBM with more than one scanner

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:42:00 +0100

134 lines

New Thread

VBMs

VBMs

Rosalia Dacosta <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:56:47 +0200

51 lines

New Thread

Where to download cutoffcalc?

Where to download cutoffcalc?

Hai Pan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:45:24 -0400

23 lines

Re: Where to download cutoffcalc?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:28:04 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Where to preprocess resting state data for ICA?

Re: Where to preprocess resting state data for ICA?

Debby Klooster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2011 09:53:02 +0100

26 lines

Re: Where to preprocess resting state data for ICA?

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2011 04:06:36 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

Where to preprocess resting state data for ICA? Fsl_glm error?

Re: Where to preprocess resting state data for ICA? Fsl_glm error?

Debby Klooster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:26:56 +0100

32 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager